100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Anti-gun Missouri Dem. arrested with 9mm pistol | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Anti-gun Missouri Dem. arrested with 9mm pistol, refuses breathalyzer test  Earlier this week, Missouri state Senator Jamilah Nasheed, a Democrat who has sponsored several anti-gun bills, was arrested while protesting in front of the Ferguson Police Department, The Blaze reported Tuesday. What made the arrest interesting is that Nasheed was carrying a 9mm handgun with extra ammunition. The arrest was conducted without incident, CBS St. Louis said. Nasheed, however, chanted as she was taken away. On Tuesday, Nasheed said hers was a “symbolic arrest” to send a “message to the protesters that we can protest peacefully and that we must protest peacefully and that we want justice for Michael Brown.” But her arrest and news that she was in possession of a firearm brought charges of hypocrisy. According to attorney Eric Vickers, Nasheed needs the gun for her own protection and Nasheed says she holds a concealed carry permit. But if Nasheed had her way, other Missourians would not have the same right. One bill she pushed, for example, would have required the “parent or guardian of a child who attends a public, private, or charter school shall notify, in writing, the superintendent of the school district, or the governing body of a private school or charter school, that such parent or guardian owns a firearm within thirty calendar days” of enrollment. The NRA has also dubbed several of her bills as "anti-gun," and a post at Guns Save Lives said Nasheed has voted against several pro-gun bills over the last two years. USA Today said Nasheed refused to pay her $600 bond and sent the night in jail, but was released after an unidentified individual paid it for her. Nasheed, USA Today added, said her gun has not been returned. what should be news is how many americans have reading comprehension skills,,,,, to push for REGULATION of GUNS is no more 'anti gun', than supporting Drivers licenses for drivers is 'ANTI DRIVING' besides,she is a damn Hypocrite,like all the rest of the anti-Gunners! Besides it's not within your Rights to proscribe what someone can possess as a means of Selfdefense,regardless of the Woo you hear from the Politicians! In other words,it's none of your Beeswax! "Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of private firearms is the goal." -- Janet Reno you think she was kidding? I think you made statements that were irrelevant to what I posted....lol Why because they prove you you once again not correct? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
they don't 'prove' anything
their subjective opinions,, based in flawed logic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
She looks happy and smiling after being arrested... it was symbolic,, so exposure is kind of the point she had a gun, legally, and did not use it,,, kind of what many people wish had been the case with Michael Browns shooter,,, The problem is with the word "legally". I bring this up only because of the possibility of intoxication. Were she actually intoxicated, the carry permit becomes void, making the possession of the firearm illegal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-gun Missouri Dem. arrested with 9mm pistol, refuses breathalyzer test Earlier this week, Missouri state Senator Jamilah Nasheed, a Democrat who has sponsored several anti-gun bills, was arrested while protesting in front of the Ferguson Police Department, The Blaze reported Tuesday. What made the arrest interesting is that Nasheed was carrying a 9mm handgun with extra ammunition. The arrest was conducted without incident, CBS St. Louis said. Nasheed, however, chanted as she was taken away. On Tuesday, Nasheed said hers was a “symbolic arrest” to send a “message to the protesters that we can protest peacefully and that we must protest peacefully and that we want justice for Michael Brown.” But her arrest and news that she was in possession of a firearm brought charges of hypocrisy. According to attorney Eric Vickers, Nasheed needs the gun for her own protection and Nasheed says she holds a concealed carry permit. But if Nasheed had her way, other Missourians would not have the same right. One bill she pushed, for example, would have required the “parent or guardian of a child who attends a public, private, or charter school shall notify, in writing, the superintendent of the school district, or the governing body of a private school or charter school, that such parent or guardian owns a firearm within thirty calendar days” of enrollment. The NRA has also dubbed several of her bills as "anti-gun," and a post at Guns Save Lives said Nasheed has voted against several pro-gun bills over the last two years. USA Today said Nasheed refused to pay her $600 bond and sent the night in jail, but was released after an unidentified individual paid it for her. Nasheed, USA Today added, said her gun has not been returned. what should be news is how many americans have reading comprehension skills,,,,, to push for REGULATION of GUNS is no more 'anti gun', than supporting Drivers licenses for drivers is 'ANTI DRIVING' Yes, but it can become hypocritical depending on the types of regulation she supports. As a matter of fact, breaking gun control laws in general contradicts what she supposedly stands for. If she were intoxicated, she was breaking laws that regulate firearms. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
She refused a breathalyzer. Wonder why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
She looks happy and smiling after being arrested... it was symbolic,, so exposure is kind of the point she had a gun, legally, and did not use it,,, kind of what many people wish had been the case with Michael Browns shooter,,, My heart bleeds for the savage, bully, bum, burden. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
She looks happy and smiling after being arrested... it was symbolic,, so exposure is kind of the point she had a gun, legally, and did not use it,,, kind of what many people wish had been the case with Michael Browns shooter,,, Total BS. She has a concealed carry permit. Her attorney said "she needed the gun for her protection". She is the purest form of hypocrite! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
She looks happy and smiling after being arrested... it was symbolic,, so exposure is kind of the point she had a gun, legally, and did not use it,,, kind of what many people wish had been the case with Michael Browns shooter,,, The problem is with the word "legally". I bring this up only because of the possibility of intoxication. Were she actually intoxicated, the carry permit becomes void, making the possession of the firearm illegal. IF she were intoxicated, that would be true I don't believe there is information stating she was though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
She refused a breathalyzer. Wonder why? because she can,,,its one of them there, 'rights' like owning a gun,,,lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
She looks happy and smiling after being arrested... it was symbolic,, so exposure is kind of the point she had a gun, legally, and did not use it,,, kind of what many people wish had been the case with Michael Browns shooter,,, The problem is with the word "legally". I bring this up only because of the possibility of intoxication. Were she actually intoxicated, the carry permit becomes void, making the possession of the firearm illegal. IF she were intoxicated, that would be true I don't believe there is information stating she was though. Then you didn't read the news reports and your "beliefs" are based on what you want to be true, not the actual truth. "Sources also told News 4 Ferguson police requested St. Ann to administer a breathalyzer test at the time of her arrest because she "smelled strongly of intoxicants," but, despite originally agreeing to the test, later refused to do so. Nasheed said Tuesday she was not intoxicated at the time. An arrest report, obtained by News 4 Wednesday, states "observation of Nasheed noted that she appeared to be intoxicated while parts of her speech was incoherent and slurred." The arresting officer went on to say "several officers...smelled the odor of alcohol emitting from her breath and person of Nasheed." Read more: http://www.kmov.com/special-coverage-001/State-Senator-arrested-outside-Ferguson-Police-Department-279860142.html#ixzz3HR4JMoew |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
She looks happy and smiling after being arrested... it was symbolic,, so exposure is kind of the point she had a gun, legally, and did not use it,,, kind of what many people wish had been the case with Michael Browns shooter,,, The problem is with the word "legally". I bring this up only because of the possibility of intoxication. Were she actually intoxicated, the carry permit becomes void, making the possession of the firearm illegal. IF she were intoxicated, that would be true I don't believe there is information stating she was though. Then you didn't read the news reports and your "beliefs" are based on what you want to be true, not the actual truth. "Sources also told News 4 Ferguson police requested St. Ann to administer a breathalyzer test at the time of her arrest because she "smelled strongly of intoxicants," but, despite originally agreeing to the test, later refused to do so. Nasheed said Tuesday she was not intoxicated at the time. An arrest report, obtained by News 4 Wednesday, states "observation of Nasheed noted that she appeared to be intoxicated while parts of her speech was incoherent and slurred." The arresting officer went on to say "several officers...smelled the odor of alcohol emitting from her breath and person of Nasheed." Read more: http://www.kmov.com/special-coverage-001/State-Senator-arrested-outside-Ferguson-Police-Department-279860142.html#ixzz3HR4JMoew I guess that she sobered up enough to know not to take the Breathalyzer.  http://www.kmov.com/special-coverage-001/State-Senator-arrested-outside-Ferguson-Police-Department-279860142.html#ixzz3HR4JMoew |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
She looks happy and smiling after being arrested... it was symbolic,, so exposure is kind of the point she had a gun, legally, and did not use it,,, kind of what many people wish had been the case with Michael Browns shooter,,, The problem is with the word "legally". I bring this up only because of the possibility of intoxication. Were she actually intoxicated, the carry permit becomes void, making the possession of the firearm illegal. IF she were intoxicated, that would be true I don't believe there is information stating she was though. Then you didn't read the news reports and your "beliefs" are based on what you want to be true, not the actual truth. "Sources also told News 4 Ferguson police requested St. Ann to administer a breathalyzer test at the time of her arrest because she "smelled strongly of intoxicants," but, despite originally agreeing to the test, later refused to do so. Nasheed said Tuesday she was not intoxicated at the time. An arrest report, obtained by News 4 Wednesday, states "observation of Nasheed noted that she appeared to be intoxicated while parts of her speech was incoherent and slurred." The arresting officer went on to say "several officers...smelled the odor of alcohol emitting from her breath and person of Nasheed." Read more: http://www.kmov.com/special-coverage-001/State-Senator-arrested-outside-Ferguson-Police-Department-279860142.html#ixzz3HR4JMoew I guess that she sobered up enough to know not to take the Breathalyzer. http://www.kmov.com/special-coverage-001/State-Senator-arrested-outside-Ferguson-Police-Department-279860142.html#ixzz3HR4JMoew Or called her attorney!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
She was probably there lookin for what Michael Brown was high on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
She looks happy and smiling after being arrested... it was symbolic,, so exposure is kind of the point she had a gun, legally, and did not use it,,, kind of what many people wish had been the case with Michael Browns shooter,,, The problem is with the word "legally". I bring this up only because of the possibility of intoxication. Were she actually intoxicated, the carry permit becomes void, making the possession of the firearm illegal. IF she were intoxicated, that would be true I don't believe there is information stating she was though. Then you didn't read the news reports and your "beliefs" are based on what you want to be true, not the actual truth. "Sources also told News 4 Ferguson police requested St. Ann to administer a breathalyzer test at the time of her arrest because she "smelled strongly of intoxicants," but, despite originally agreeing to the test, later refused to do so. Nasheed said Tuesday she was not intoxicated at the time. An arrest report, obtained by News 4 Wednesday, states "observation of Nasheed noted that she appeared to be intoxicated while parts of her speech was incoherent and slurred." The arresting officer went on to say "several officers...smelled the odor of alcohol emitting from her breath and person of Nasheed." Read more: http://www.kmov.com/special-coverage-001/State-Senator-arrested-outside-Ferguson-Police-Department-279860142.html#ixzz3HR4JMoew and yet no PROOF of being drunk,, drinking and being drunk are two different things,,,,btw or else they could just round up everyone who ever exits a bar,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
She looks happy and smiling after being arrested... it was symbolic,, so exposure is kind of the point she had a gun, legally, and did not use it,,, kind of what many people wish had been the case with Michael Browns shooter,,, The problem is with the word "legally". I bring this up only because of the possibility of intoxication. Were she actually intoxicated, the carry permit becomes void, making the possession of the firearm illegal. IF she were intoxicated, that would be true I don't believe there is information stating she was though. Then you didn't read the news reports and your "beliefs" are based on what you want to be true, not the actual truth. "Sources also told News 4 Ferguson police requested St. Ann to administer a breathalyzer test at the time of her arrest because she "smelled strongly of intoxicants," but, despite originally agreeing to the test, later refused to do so. Nasheed said Tuesday she was not intoxicated at the time. An arrest report, obtained by News 4 Wednesday, states "observation of Nasheed noted that she appeared to be intoxicated while parts of her speech was incoherent and slurred." The arresting officer went on to say "several officers...smelled the odor of alcohol emitting from her breath and person of Nasheed." Read more: http://www.kmov.com/special-coverage-001/State-Senator-arrested-outside-Ferguson-Police-Department-279860142.html#ixzz3HR4JMoew and yet no PROOF of being drunk,, drinking and being drunk are two different things,,,,btw or else they could just round up everyone who ever exits a bar,,, Drinking while carrying = illegal (Whether you are drunk or not) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
just like operating a car, I imagine the reason for a breathalyzer is because there is a MAX that you can blow for it to be illegal,,,,,, I will research it,,
It is a misdemeanor to possess an unloaded fire arm under the influence of drugs or alcohol (it is a felony if the weapon is loaded). - See more at: http://gun.laws.com/state-gun-laws/missouri-gun-laws#sthash.MLNXDtBI.dpuf there would have to be some legal definition of under the influence that doesn't just mean having ANY amount of drink, but I don't feel like researching that,,, |
|
|
|
|
