100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Creation vs. Evolution. - part 2 | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Hope not,though,even though looking at this World one could swear that Devolution is taking place!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
uche9aa
on
Thu 09/25/14 01:38 AM
|
|
Evolution theory was contrived to calm the ache and guilty conscience of depraved men who rejected the glaring and conspicous evidences of God the creator and great designer of the planets and all that are therein.Chance couldnt have wired the array of arteries in Darwin's body
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Thu 09/25/14 02:01 AM
|
|
Evolution theory was contrived to calm the ache and guilty conscience of depraved men who rejected the glaring and conspicous evidences of God the creator and great designer of the planets and all that are therein.Chance couldnt have wired the array of arteries in Darwin's body    I really start to wonder about you! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Creationists are little more than failures in natural selection and will, thankfully, disappear from the gene-pool, over time!
Question: How do creationist's brain cells die? Answer: Alone! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What if the creationist you meet is a beautiful single girl? Then the real dilemma begins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the best horses breed and the worst horses don't, won't the breed get better?
If the smartest humans average one baby and the dumbest average six, won't the race get dumber? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evolution theory was contrived to calm the ache and guilty conscience of depraved men who rejected the glaring and conspicous evidences of God the creator and great designer of the planets and all that are therein. Ah, that must be a comforting lie! Chance couldnt have wired the array of arteries in Darwin's body And traffic lights in the US are not blue. Your statement has almost nothing to do with the topic at hand, though it does show that once again: Most people who criticize the theory of evolution do not understand it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evolution has science to support its ideas, creation would be an important instrument in the process of evolution but nothing more. If we were created then the form that did the creating would have to exist as a form of evolution...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps we are just the toys of ancient aliens who got bored.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps we are just the toys of ancient aliens who got bored.  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone's going to have their own opinion,I personally believe in creation,but F***it,for now lets just say we came from @ female chimp and a male ivory Ape!
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
unknown_romeo
on
Tue 10/28/14 07:09 PM
|
|
Hope not,though,even though looking at this World one could swear that Devolution is taking place! Thats the only thing i could also agree with you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm , a Universe from nothing , life from no life , that is what evolution tries to force upon us .
Go's against common sense and rational thought , the mere theory go's against everything science tells us to accept , observable , testable , repeatable science ... The universe is rationaly inteligable , we know that if the percentages were one hairs width off in any equation of natural laws , we wouldnt be here . Then you gota get past that hurdle onto the next , the cell comming from a chemicle pond ...the probability of a simple, basic cell forming is 10^57800 to 1. let thank sink in, that is 1 with 57,800 zeros after it and the number of atoms in the observable universe is 10^80, and any probability past 10^50 to 1 is deemed universally impossible ... Then we continue on with complexity , impossible complexity that is , we shouldnt be here according to naturalisms own theories . We live on a simbiotic planet which reeks design , everything has a purpose or co-purpose ... Now rewind back to the big bang - Before hubble scientsits assumed the universe had allways been here , although the bible has all along said it had a 'beginning' when it was found to have a beginning Scientists were at odds to release the information as it would lend to much weight to religion ... That brings up further problems , time and space according to science didnt exist before the big bang , hence no laws of physics , interesting ? We are moral beings , that want to live forever , we want justice and equality , we are created in Gods image ... Atheism is not only incoherent in its theories it degrades the magnificance of the human being to mere animal , and the beuty of the planet to mere accident ? Again going by naturalistic viewpoint we shouldnt be here , it is the odds of winning the jackpot lottery first division everyday for a thousand years , that is the odds of life from non-life ... Impossible ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm , a Universe from nothing , life from no life , that is what evolution tries to force upon us . Go's against common sense and rational thought , the mere theory go's against everything science tells us to accept , observable , testable , repeatable science ... The universe is rationaly inteligable , we know that if the percentages were one hairs width off in any equation of natural laws , we wouldnt be here . Then you gota get past that hurdle onto the next , the cell comming from a chemicle pond ...the probability of a simple, basic cell forming is 10^57800 to 1. let thank sink in, that is 1 with 57,800 zeros after it and the number of atoms in the observable universe is 10^80, and any probability past 10^50 to 1 is deemed universally impossible ... Then we continue on with complexity , impossible complexity that is , we shouldnt be here according to naturalisms own theories . We live on a simbiotic planet which reeks design , everything has a purpose or co-purpose ... Now rewind back to the big bang - Before hubble scientsits assumed the universe had allways been here , although the bible has all along said it had a 'beginning' when it was found to have a beginning Scientists were at odds to release the information as it would lend to much weight to religion ... That brings up further problems , time and space according to science didnt exist before the big bang , hence no laws of physics , interesting ? We are moral beings , that want to live forever , we want justice and equality , we are created in Gods image ... Atheism is not only incoherent in its theories it degrades the magnificance of the human being to mere animal , and the beuty of the planet to mere accident ? Again going by naturalistic viewpoint we shouldnt be here , it is the odds of winning the jackpot lottery first division everyday for a thousand years , that is the odds of life from non-life ... Impossible ... I recommend you have another look at the Theory Of Evolution,and the Subjectmatter it contains! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What theory do you recommend ?
40% scientists are christian 15% are agnostic ? Survival of the fittest ? Well thats a given . Origin of species? Thats a lie it should of been called adaption of species . The fossile record ? Cambrian explosion ? which seems to back the creation account not evolutionary theory . Scientists cannot even agree on a theory , what is their is inconclusive ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What theory do you recommend ? 40% scientists are christian 15% are agnostic ? Survival of the fittest ? Well thats a given . Origin of species? Thats a lie it should of been called adaption of species . The fossile record ? Cambrian explosion ? which seems to back the creation account not evolutionary theory . Scientists cannot even agree on a theory , what is their is inconclusive ... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What theory do you recommend ? 40% scientists are christian 15% are agnostic ? not sure where 40% came from ??? 93 percent of the members of the National Academy of Sciences, one of the most elite scientific organizations in the United States, do not believe in God. A broader description comes from the Pew Research Center, which reported in 2009 that 51 percent of scientists believe that God or some higher power exists, while 41 percent of scientists reject both of those concepts. Neither of these two statistics mentions Christianity... The 51% believe in a higher power or God. As an atheist-agnostic I understand this, much easier to believe in a higher power than in a god-man who's god-father immaculately inseminated a woman because he was so upset over a couple who ate a piece of fruit when a talking snake said not to !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone has their own belief about this and this is one of those topics people just need to agree to disagree on. Some people have faith and others the truth...I mean science.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone has their own belief about this and this is one of those topics people just need to agree to disagree on. Some people have faith and others the truth...I mean science.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evolution theory was contrived to calm the ache and guilty conscience of depraved men who rejected the glaring and conspicous evidences of God the creator and great designer of the planets and all that are therein.Chance couldnt have wired the array of arteries in Darwin's body depraved men? can you have any discussion that you don't put others down to try to make your point stronger? face it, lots of people just don't believe in god, why does that bother you? |
|
|
|
|
