Topic: Why isn't the media covering the killing of an unarmed white | |
---|---|
its not that hard to understand at all most whites will not jump on the racist bandwagon and riot and loot some blacks automatically go straight to the racist mantra some blacks riot and loot to profit from the misfortune of the situation if a rife is formed between two groups of people they are distracted from what those in power are really doing to the unfortunate in both groups it is as simple as divide and rule if whites would riot and loot then that story would have got the same coverage this explains it better than i http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbp6umQT58A |
|
|
|
all true
its not hard to understand most whites don't jump on a 'racist bandwagon', they are more likely to jump on the 'government conspiracy bandwagon' instead some blacks automatically go straight to racist mantra (and some whites automatically go straight to trivializing and minimizing it) if a rife is formed between two groups of people they are distracted from what those in power are really doing to the unfortunate,, historically, we can look at how all the European servants became 'white' and above the 'blacks' to see evidence of how that method works to put people against each other instead of working with each other it is as simple and complex as divide and rule if whites would riot and loot that story would have gotten coverage, as it did with the tea party and occupy riots,,,, or over the bundy ranch, where dozens of white actually had WEAPONS and behaved threateningly,,,,,refusing to just 'do what they were told' and take 'personal responsibility' to avoid any potentially fatal clashes with authorities,,, |
|
|
|
Cuz it would be racist. We all know how them liberal bigots hate racism. I'll drink to that! |
|
|