100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: How about a Real Negro American for President? Yes! | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
alnewman
on
Wed 05/21/14 11:13 AM
|
|
Where has it been confirmed? If it is so obvious, why are the records still sealed? All there has ever been is a document of dubious authenticity. The brain dead accept that without having to have it proved. If there is no problem, then why are the records not available? But that is really immaterial anyway, with his mother American, he has the right to claim citizenship but that does not bestow "natural" born citizen as his father was a British subject and so was Odumbo until his eighteenth birthday when he could accept being a US citizen after denouncing any loyalty to England, period. shouldn't that be "Renouncing"? Normally, but where England, specifically City of London, is concerned denounce is much more accurate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
there is no duty for anyone to prove who their parents were beyond what is on their birth certificate I cant recall a president in my lifetime who has been required to do so. That's because there was no question of their parentage. Not clear about Obama's past. Not so sure about that, perhaps Jimmy Carter and George, Jr. should have proven theirs. One could of been related to a fruitcake and the other could have come from divine inception. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yes, children the 'truth' is whatever I Say if you ignore it, you agree with me and if you 'fight it',, you are in fear,,,,,,, and if you laugh, well, either you have no clue (f you are Asian/american pacific) or you just think the logic being applied is beyond hilarious and irrelevant to what is being discussed,,,, That would be that stance of those that ignore truth waiting to be told. And there is no "fighting" truth, just ignorance of it made even more so by refusing to find and accept. It is only those in fear that don't want to know the truth, not as you imply, far from it. Others can only point to the path, it is up to the individual to verify to find enlightenment. The idiots are those that reject off hand, that determine that truth can only be that which within their preconceived notion of the truth ignoring all facts otherwise, solipsism. Solipsism if from the Latin adjective solus: alone, and the Latin pronoun ipse: self. It is the ideology that only one's own mind is sure to exist, solipsists contend that knowledge of anything outside one's own mind is unsure, hence there is no such thing as objective truth, and nothing about the external world and it's workings can actually be known. It is within this concept of Solipsism that the masses are led around by the nose. There can be no truth but for that told to them by their masters. And you can pretend all you want, doesn't change reality one iota. And Asia and the Pacific Rim are areas and their native population, has nothing to do with racial false labeling. But then everything has to be reduced to racial to instill some kind of false logic. And this has everything to do with the OP. It was the introduction of false logic designed to denigrate Allen West that has driven the topic and needs to be thoroughly exposed. And to insinuate that some racist bigot with the same last name would somehow do other than further denigrate Allen West. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When I get some time, I will post his voting record on important issues and his political experience. I'll wager, he's much more experiencd in management than Hoosein and more level headed than Hitlary. But will the truth and facts stand against prejudice and ignorance? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rectangle of light in the acres of a farm was the window of the library of Judge Narragansett. He sat at a table, and the light of his lamp fell on the copy of an ancient document. He had marked and crossed out the contradictions in its statements that had once been the cause of its destruction. He was now adding a new clause to its pages: "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of production and trade . . ." at the end of the last chapter of Atlas Shrugged But that would suppose their are contradictions in it's statements. There are no contradictions in the statements. The document is pure, it is only the inherent trait of men that betrays that purity. From the very beginning, there were forces at work that tried to subjugate the very concept of free man and we were warned numerous times to always beware to protect our freedoms from the evils of psychopathic man. It is the people's fault that we are where we are. Every since even before that glorious document was signed much less ratified, forces have been at work to circumvent it's meaning and restrictions. As the founders stated during the ratification period, a bill of rights wasn't needed as it was understood by the very restrictions placed within the document rights were inherent, but look where we are, without those devout amendments called the "Bill of Rights", we would be in much worse shape. Bless Ayn Rand for her insight, but she is but one that has bought the obvious to the forefront in her time, but still so many read the message and went back to their lives ignoring all around them. And that passage is already in the Constitution: To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another; nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another. It is an assigned power with an additional restriction on that power that has caused so many problems. But this was only possible be the passing and ratification of the 17th Amendment, the accelerated downfall of a republic into the debauchery of a democracy, that know by the founders to guarantee failure, and here we are, on the brink, descending into fascism and oligarchy, the implementation of Agenda 21. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yes, children the 'truth' is whatever I Say if you ignore it, you agree with me and if you 'fight it',, you are in fear,,,,,,, and if you laugh, well, either you have no clue (f you are Asian/american pacific) or you just think the logic being applied is beyond hilarious and irrelevant to what is being discussed,,,, That would be that stance of those that ignore truth waiting to be told. And there is no "fighting" truth, just ignorance of it made even more so by refusing to find and accept. It is only those in fear that don't want to know the truth, not as you imply, far from it. Others can only point to the path, it is up to the individual to verify to find enlightenment. The idiots are those that reject off hand, that determine that truth can only be that which within their preconceived notion of the truth ignoring all facts otherwise, solipsism. Solipsism if from the Latin adjective solus: alone, and the Latin pronoun ipse: self. It is the ideology that only one's own mind is sure to exist, solipsists contend that knowledge of anything outside one's own mind is unsure, hence there is no such thing as objective truth, and nothing about the external world and it's workings can actually be known. It is within this concept of Solipsism that the masses are led around by the nose. There can be no truth but for that told to them by their masters. And you can pretend all you want, doesn't change reality one iota. And Asia and the Pacific Rim are areas and their native population, has nothing to do with racial false labeling. But then everything has to be reduced to racial to instill some kind of false logic. And this has everything to do with the OP. It was the introduction of false logic designed to denigrate Allen West that has driven the topic and needs to be thoroughly exposed. And to insinuate that some racist bigot with the same last name would somehow do other than further denigrate Allen West. all that because I think Cornel West would be an interesting candidate? denigrated Allen? He must be a pretty shallow figure then..... |
|
|
|
|
