Topic: Dear Haters...
msharmony's photo
Tue 03/18/14 02:29 PM


I agree with haters vilifying people

being opposed or in disagreement to the ACTIONS and WORDS of people is quite different from HATING on people,,,and usually doesn't require or include the use of insulting and juvenile NAME CALLING and LABELS,,,

I am guilty with fighting juvenile behavior with juvenile behavior,,,

but rarely INTRODUCING it or INITIATING it,,,

Im definitely a work in progress with the 'turn the other cheek' philosophy DoDo

but life is good and getting better by the minute,, when I do become more of what I am meant to become, I will probably be somewhere else around the crowds who are uplifting, compassionate, intelligent, and Inspiring,,,

away from the juvenile rhetoric of 'haters'


flowerforyou


msharmony, there you go again ... saying something that makes me desire you even more. flowers bigsmile



aww shucks,,,,flowerforyou

msharmony's photo
Tue 03/18/14 02:29 PM
as wonderous as the 'race card' card,,,laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Tue 03/18/14 03:03 PM

Meanwhile as America struggles .....

White House Refuses To Disclose Cost Of Michelle Obama’s Taxpayer-Funded China Trip

From the ghetto to flamboyance....at taxpayer expense.... what message is she delivering to China exactly? That we will need another loan to cover all her "vacations"?

Big daddy sending her to beg yet again?

http://benswann.com/white-house-refuses-to-disclose-cost-of-michelle-obamas-taxpayer-funded-china-trip/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=nl

msharmony's photo
Tue 03/18/14 03:05 PM
Edited by msharmony on Tue 03/18/14 03:06 PM
oh wow, a lawyer can afford to go to China and taxpayers have to cover the expense of keeping her safe because she is the presidents WIFE,,,

oh,, the SCANDAL,,,,shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Tue 03/18/14 03:15 PM

oh wow, a lawyer can afford to go to China and taxpayers have to cover the expense of keeping her safe because she is the presidents WIFE,,,

oh,, the SCANDAL,,,,shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked


Yeah, a great message to send the taxpayers who are struggling because of her baby daddys' failed universal healthcare system, which they will have to also pay to bail out in the tune of $5.5 BILLION in 2015, as he racks the national debt up to over $20 TRILLION, and cuts the military because there is no money to continue funding it.

There is no shock anymore! We expect nothing but extravagance from this WH on the taxpayers dime!


no photo
Tue 03/18/14 03:54 PM



I included the race because the BIASED anti Obama post from Mychal Massies arsenal included a title that alluded to his race,,,


Doubt that very seriously.


you don't have to doubt sweety, its easy to research,,

it was called 'Black Male Journalist on Obamas'

and it was similar to this OP except it was anti OBAMAS instead of anti HATERS,,,,


But why are you going off topic, the post concerning Mychal was not this thread. So you have gone off topic just to insinuate race into the topic.

So that would make my original conclusion correct, I doubt it very seriously. Very typical of the entitlement crowd to not be able to refute what is offered and to switch topics and especially to play the race card as has been done here.

no photo
Tue 03/18/14 03:57 PM


Really and where would that be. And exactly what logic is being used to address what?



exactly!! what logic,,,,lol
and here I thought it was pretty straightforward that the alluded to logic was INCLUDED in the post that questioned it



odumbite is 'finite'

but hater is a generalization,,,


an opinion is not really an opinion because it is based on some fact


So as usual if one cannot refute, deflect and play the race card.

willing2's photo
Tue 03/18/14 03:58 PM
Who's saying Meeshel can practice law?

Last I read, she was forced to turn it in.

The reason why should be public knowledge.

FYI, Meeschel doesn't pay for ****. Taxpayers carry the load for her and welfare sluts.

no photo
Tue 03/18/14 04:00 PM

ain't that Racecard a wondrous Tool?:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:


Amazing, actually. Why pursue knowledge when the race card is such a shield.

msharmony's photo
Tue 03/18/14 04:05 PM



Really and where would that be. And exactly what logic is being used to address what?



exactly!! what logic,,,,lol
and here I thought it was pretty straightforward that the alluded to logic was INCLUDED in the post that questioned it



odumbite is 'finite'

but hater is a generalization,,,


an opinion is not really an opinion because it is based on some fact


So as usual if one cannot refute, deflect and play the race card.



lol, nothing in that post mentions race

but the 'race card' card is just as clever as its predecessor,,,

msharmony's photo
Tue 03/18/14 04:06 PM




I included the race because the BIASED anti Obama post from Mychal Massies arsenal included a title that alluded to his race,,,


Doubt that very seriously.


you don't have to doubt sweety, its easy to research,,

it was called 'Black Male Journalist on Obamas'

and it was similar to this OP except it was anti OBAMAS instead of anti HATERS,,,,


But why are you going off topic, the post concerning Mychal was not this thread. So you have gone off topic just to insinuate race into the topic.

So that would make my original conclusion correct, I doubt it very seriously. Very typical of the entitlement crowd to not be able to refute what is offered and to switch topics and especially to play the race card as has been done here.


its called 'precedent'

one was set to specify the RACE of the op, so I followed suit

its also known as a CONTRAST

one person posted an ANTI-Topic about the OBamas and included the race of the author

I , likewise, posted an ANTI-Topic about haters and included the race of the author

if there is really an issue, perhaps someone should have set the previous poster straight, so I would have been forewarned

but alas, no such condemnation was found in THAT thread,, just plenty of kudos and agreement

the poor persecuted privileged crowd looking to complain about their own set standards yet again,,,


no photo
Tue 03/18/14 04:11 PM


Meanwhile as America struggles .....

White House Refuses To Disclose Cost Of Michelle Obama’s Taxpayer-Funded China Trip

From the ghetto to flamboyance....at taxpayer expense.... what message is she delivering to China exactly? That we will need another loan to cover all her "vacations"?

Big daddy sending her to beg yet again?

http://benswann.com/white-house-refuses-to-disclose-cost-of-michelle-obamas-taxpayer-funded-china-trip/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=nl


But OMG, just imagine...


The Chinese trip will undeniably be expensive. But Ben Rhodes, the White House’s deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, insisted that the price tag is well worth it. He said, "The most powerful message we can deliver [to Chinese people] is one of the examples of not just the First Lady’s life story but of America and our values. That alone I think speaks to things like respect for human rights that are interwoven into the DNA of the United States of America… The First Lady’s story itself sends a powerful message about the ability of someone of a disadvantaged economic background from a minority group to ascend to the position that she did in private life and now as First Lady."


The Chinese being introduced to "her blackness" in all it's grandeur, the life of the first female dog of the United States. Wonder if she will let them know that there are no blacks in the Chinese Communist Party like she did at Princeton.


Michelle herself stated, "My experiences at Princeton have made me far more aware of my 'Blackness' than ever before."

no photo
Tue 03/18/14 04:13 PM

oh wow, a lawyer can afford to go to China and taxpayers have to cover the expense of keeping her safe because she is the presidents WIFE,,,

oh,, the SCANDAL,,,,shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked


Duhhhhh, does this mean something that a non-entitlement person could reasonably be expected to discern?

msharmony's photo
Tue 03/18/14 04:13 PM

Who's saying Meeshel can practice law?

Last I read, she was forced to turn it in.

The reason why should be public knowledge.

FYI, Meeschel doesn't pay for ****. Taxpayers carry the load for her and welfare sluts.


when did you get a job as her accountant? lol

her license is voluntarily inactive, a difference from 'forced to turn in'


but keep reading whatever you are reading for the 'facts' you choose to believe,,

no photo
Tue 03/18/14 04:15 PM


oh wow, a lawyer can afford to go to China and taxpayers have to cover the expense of keeping her safe because she is the presidents WIFE,,,

oh,, the SCANDAL,,,,shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked


Yeah, a great message to send the taxpayers who are struggling because of her baby daddys' failed universal healthcare system, which they will have to also pay to bail out in the tune of $5.5 BILLION in 2015, as he racks the national debt up to over $20 TRILLION, and cuts the military because there is no money to continue funding it.

There is no shock anymore! We expect nothing but extravagance from this WH on the taxpayers dime!




I think cutting the military would actually be a good thing, but a great thing would be a dollar for dollar cut of the military and entitlements, a double play for the ole taxpayer.

msharmony's photo
Tue 03/18/14 04:18 PM



Meanwhile as America struggles .....

White House Refuses To Disclose Cost Of Michelle Obama’s Taxpayer-Funded China Trip

From the ghetto to flamboyance....at taxpayer expense.... what message is she delivering to China exactly? That we will need another loan to cover all her "vacations"?

Big daddy sending her to beg yet again?

http://benswann.com/white-house-refuses-to-disclose-cost-of-michelle-obamas-taxpayer-funded-china-trip/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=nl


But OMG, just imagine...


The Chinese trip will undeniably be expensive. But Ben Rhodes, the White House’s deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, insisted that the price tag is well worth it. He said, "The most powerful message we can deliver [to Chinese people] is one of the examples of not just the First Lady’s life story but of America and our values. That alone I think speaks to things like respect for human rights that are interwoven into the DNA of the United States of America… The First Lady’s story itself sends a powerful message about the ability of someone of a disadvantaged economic background from a minority group to ascend to the position that she did in private life and now as First Lady."


The Chinese being introduced to "her blackness" in all it's grandeur, the life of the first female dog of the United States. Wonder if she will let them know that there are no blacks in the Chinese Communist Party like she did at Princeton.


Michelle herself stated, "My experiences at Princeton have made me far more aware of my 'Blackness' than ever before."




awww, poor persecuted privileged folks believing that 'disadvantaged' can only refer to 'blackness'

no photo
Tue 03/18/14 04:25 PM

Who's saying Meeshel can practice law?

Last I read, she was forced to turn it in.

The reason why should be public knowledge.

FYI, Meeschel doesn't pay for ****. Taxpayers carry the load for her and welfare sluts.


But the biggest welfare slut of them all, the presidents...

From Anit-Federalist 71...


The great object of each president then will be to render his government a glorious period in the annals of his country. When a man constitutionally retires from office, he retires without pain; he is sensible he retires because the laws direct it, and not from the success of his rivals, nor with that public disapprobation which being left out, when eligible, implies. It is said that a man knowing that at a given period he must quit his office, will unjustly attempt to take from the public, and lay in store the means of support and splendor in his retirement. There can, I think, be but very little in this observation. The same constitution that makes a man eligible for a given period only, ought to make no man eligible till he arrive to the age of forty or forty-five years. If he be a man of fortune, be will retire with dignity to his estate; if not, he may, like the Roman consuls, and other eminent characters in republics, find an honorable support and employment in some respectable office. A man who must, at all events, thus leave his office, will have but few or no temptations to fill its dependent offices with his tools, or any particular set of men; whereas the man constantly looking forward to his future elections, and perhaps, to the aggrandizement of his family, will have every inducement before him to fill all places with his own props and dependents. As to public monies, the president need handle none of them, and he may always rigidly be made to account for every shilling he shall receive.

InvictusV's photo
Wed 03/19/14 07:08 AM
I think the jerkoff that typed this drivel could find a beautiful new home in lovely North Korea..

One party.. Communist.. Everyone is equal.. LMAO..

They are very eco friendly..



as you can see they don't use much power..

I am sure they love all the groups he mentioned.. Dennis Rodman is the dictators best friend..

It sounds like heaven on earth for the progressive crowd..


willing2's photo
Wed 03/19/14 07:52 AM

I think the jerkoff that typed this drivel could find a beautiful new home in lovely North Korea..

One party.. Communist.. Everyone is equal.. LMAO..

They are very eco friendly..



as you can see they don't use much power..

I am sure they love all the groups he mentioned.. Dennis Rodman is the dictators best friend..

It sounds like heaven on earth for the progressive crowd..



I almost wanted to go to NK. That is until I realized the name wasn't Poontang, NK.:angel:

msharmony's photo
Wed 03/19/14 08:09 AM
seems like op nailed it

if you don't like anything about America (Except the people and things I don't like) you should leave 'my' country


interesting,,,how that proved itself,,