Nasty Dis-Grace actually shocked me and said something I agree with!

Nancy Grace Rips Piers Morgan: It's Not Right for a Brit To Lecture Us About Gun Control!

To Morgan the pirate:

"��Oh are you back on gun control again!" Grace interjected. "If it weren'��t for the British, we wouldn't even have to have protections to carry guns, it was the British way back when we founded America who were running through all of our homes, trying to take our stuff! So we're protected under the constitution! So it's not really right for a Brit to jump up and start talking to us about gun control."

http://tv.yahoo.com/news/nancy-grace-rips-piers-morgan-not-brit-lecture-150835400.html

Americans are myopic in accepting opinions for which they disagree and demonstrate ignorance to contrary opinions lest they examine their self righteous beliefs with more scrutiny...

doesn't make it any less true...

Whatever,but it doesn't make Piers less of a Jacka$$!

Wow you're generous to think or state Morgan deserves credit for even that capability!

It's his stupidity and ignorance that gives him even the appearance of that distinction. It has nothing to do with capability for this mindless heap of whale dung (even lower than a spineless, brainless, jelly fish rating).

Perhaps the idiot Morgan needs to be on the receiving end of his stupidity instead of a mother and her children as in this video.....who was prepared!

Perhaps to our benefit Morgan would "call the police"..... who would of course, arrive too late to save him........ if he was able to get to a phone at all

Mom opens fire on home invaders in Detroit to defend children

The mother tells Action News she "didn't have time to get scared." When she heard the door to her home on Woodrow Wilson being kicked in, she immediately warned the three teenage intruders and then opened fire.

One of the teens dropped a handgun on his way out the door. He then tried to get back inside the house a second time, but was again met with gunfire. Once again, he took off and all three were arrested shortly after the incident by Detroit Police.

http://www.wxyz.com/news/mom-opens-fire-on-home-invaders-in-detroit-to-defend-children

it also doesn;t make any sense

good grief that was over 200 years ago. Can't she come up with anything better than that?

Tho' I do agree that nationals from other countries need to myob

Yet again. Another gun owner who needs to be sentenced to time on the range. Three thugs still loose to hit some other house.

Perhaps, they'll get lucky and pick the house of a gun SNATCHing Liberal.

Liberals would tell you to just let the intruders kill her and her kids.

So our Constitution or history is irrelevant?

It may have been written long ago, but it IS the law of the land no matter how hard this admin seeks to change it by bypassing Congress, thinking an imperial presidents pen holds power over the will of the people they serve, and who are protected, NOT ruled, under it!

Streets and Homes weren't so safe from his Thugs though!

Good one Con!

NG is an idiot, anything to get ratings... but still true, nonetheless...

lol

not to mention, I kind of think it was some 'brits' who founded the states and some 'brits' who wrote the protections and the constitution,,lol

but , the us vs them usually works well as a distraction,,,


he has as much right to speak what he feels about American laws when he is residing in America,, as the holocaust survivor who lives in America has to speak about how similar our conditions allegedly are to those during the holocaust,,

aren't freedom of speech and right to bear arms part of the same constitution?


smh

Has little to do with freedom of speech or his right to it. For pete's sake, he has a national TV show to spout his vile on...... for profit.

Get it screwed on straight!

so what? she has a show too....

and they both have 'rights' , that Im told are not given but inherent

one of which is FREEDOM OF SPEECH,, so who is SHE to base her disagreement with someone about one right by insinuating they shouldn't have another,,,?

he is a pundit, that's who he is,, just like she is,,

She is a citizen defending her Constitutional rights, he is a Brit hoping to dismantle them!

Big difference!

so wait,,

they are only 'rights' because they are 'given' in the constitution, and not inherent for all people under US laws?

visitors to the US aren't protected by US laws or permitted US rights?

I wasn't aware,,

in that case,, british bsshing makes much more sense,,


tying in all of another countries citizens to the disagreeable things some of them did centuries ago while disregarding the things some of those same people did that afforded said rights

makes much more sense too

But what about this little jewel...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPb5nJSHCQ8[/ulr]

"Alex Jones: Piers Morgan Uses Armed Guards Hypocrite On The Second Amendment"

Savy about Immigration Law, I see.

Foreigners with a VISITORS VISA cannot legally work here. Neither can they vote, can't own property in the US. There are many other RIGHTS, we citizens have that foreign visitors don't have.

Many, many other levels of Immigration statuses.

What else you major in?

it wasn't a major

married an immigrant, went through the immigration process for and with them

there are many visas, there is also a visa that allows a specified number of days one can spend in the us, or work in the us

if one is not planning to make someplace their permanent home, they are VISITING that place,, in my opinion,,,

but sadly, you missed the point again, in the haste to be mocking

the point was, I was previously told that rights are not 'given', thay are just innate,, if they are not 'given' they are not restricted to citizenship status

if that is not true, than americans have every 'right' to bash anyone from anyplace else when they use their speech to share an opinion about someone else, and even to imply they shouldn't have as equal a right to do so as we do when we interject our opinions about things happening in the middle east, or Israel, or AFrica,,,,to name but a few,,,

but, I was just previously misguided by the idea thst such rights were just INNATE and not given,,