You already had one?

No. If I had one before, maybe I wouldn't have to listen to the voices or other personalities that are still with me!

Sorry Scoob....

Gee, the way it seems. Maybe I should've gotten the lobotomy done.

And No, I don't know how to spell it for sure either.

Did anyone message her and find out what the results of her experiment was? I think you should, she told me.

I think she is getting a government grant.

If you can believe it, the U.S. government has spent $175,587 “to determine if cocaine makes Japanese quail engage in sexually risky behavior”.

The U.S. government once spent 2.6 million dollars to train Chinese prostitutes to drink responsibly.

How much is this one worth?

yes they're drinking more responsibly now... but they're turning down more more clients..lol.. short thinking government.. spend $5 to make $1...lol.......hi ginger...

I don't get this "so and so blew you a kiss" or "so and so sent you a hug". What's that about? Is it just a digital way to flirt?

nudging..??. its a way to get your attention... kind of the way you do it.. when you give someone that look with those big beautiful eyes of yours...

During childhood I was very much interested in reading ghost stories.
in those stories,usually ghosts were shown hanging on the trees,with their heads down & legs up...
.....whenever I come to mingle...I always feel like being on such trees...with plenty of ghosts hanging around me......all are invisible....still their thoughts,laughs,smiles,crying are audible to me....

Treading lightly huh?

Maybe the elephant that "tiptoed" into the room is one that had (past tense) a boyfriend who made a choice, that he had every right to do, leave you and to move toward a woman who he found more desirable both physically, and/or by character, or maturity and shock or self pride has fogged the brain.

Maybe the proverbial elephant thinks it was a Mingler; or maybe not that wooed away her hearts desire but that is not proved. Maybe he met this new interest in the real world. The facts are irrelevant if he left you.

Justifying coming in as an "experiment", not as a member, but as a judgmental observer trying to fortify an opinion is not endearing and actually supports the ex-boyfriend's decision to withdraw from a relationship with you. Pretty is as pretty does.

Nor does that you were in fact superior because in your opinion not as "ugly" as you perceive her. Beauty; is of course subjective, but you have not posted her photo and she could quite likely be equal or better in appearance. We don't know for a fact the photo posted is even you.

That was quite mean of you calling someone else ugly. Still, just look at all of the men wanting you because of your looks. Beauty fades, though. I'd rather keep the soul.

^5 on the Soul retention.

I am not sure that many have said they "wanted" her: they have said she is attractive in appearance. BIG difference.

I like that, very nice.

If my memory serves me Emo IS consistently nice. And I personally think she is lovely to look at from her lead shot. Very feminine and and tasteful portrait.

Now, ladies, I have not come here to either judge you or anyone else. I have as much right to be here as you do. I have not in any way attacked or demeaned you in any way shape or form. Why would you feel the need to do the same to me? Is it possible that the pot is calling the kettle black and passing judgement without any good basis for that judgement? I have made no self revelation that I am beautiful. I have not indicated the physical prowess of my ex's girlfriend. In fact, I did not say physcially ugly at all. What made you feel as though you should be in defense mode?

"Experimental Post", calling another woman "UGLY" are direct quotes so YES YOU HAVE called the Ex's girlfriend ugly and you are judging Mingler's: seeing how we would play your thread. You want to put some kind of symantic spin on it now then you are not only attacking her appearance but something else and deluding yourself but few others.

Anytime someone comes in making negative remarks about someone not present to defend them-self a wise person moves to "defense" mode and questions motive. Yours about the exboyfriend's relationship were clearly based in jealousy.

Want to say you have not attacked or demeaned a Mingle poster may be be accurate. But you have attacked the "girlfriend" who is not here to defend herself and you can like that attack did not go unnoticed, and was reflecting badly on you, or not. It is relevant to the comment you made about "treading lightly".

Someone else, I think Argo, said you were beautiful very early in the thread possibly before your subsequent comments. But that is not everyone's opinion; and I stand by my post that you may or may not be. Which is an observation not an attack. As were the following posts about presenting yourself in a less than flattering light.