100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Steam coming from Fukushima Unit 3 | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Tue 12/31/13 03:46 PM
|
|
Steam coming from Fukushima Unit 3 reactor building — Observed multiple times this week Tepco (translation), Dec. 24, 2013: At around 7:00 am on December 19, and confirmed by the camera that from Unit 3 reactor building, 5th floor near the center, steam is generated. Have not been identified abnormal plant conditions of 55 minutes at 7:00 am the same day, the indicated value of the monitoring post (meteorological data of 40 minutes at 7:00 am, 5.6 ℃ temperature, 93.7% humidity). Then, in 58 minutes around 7:00 am December 24, steam is no longer observed. It should be noted, have not been identified abnormal plant conditions in a 3-minute time at 8:00 am the same day, the indicated value monitoring posts, etc. (meteorological data of 50 minutes at 7:00 am, 4.1 ℃ temperature, 74.9% humidity). ........................ They say (according to what little I can find in searches......?) the cloud generated (possibly radioactive) is due to hit the west coast tomorrow, and spread to the midwest and east coast in the following few days. You'd think if it was a serious matter (as some are predicting) we would be told......right? 
On one of my other forums a couple of posters are noting "spikes" in their testing units from the normal 50CPM to 62CPM already..... and it hasn't arrived yet... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"...You'd think if it was a serious matter (as some are predicting) we would be told......right? ..."
Ya think...really...no seriously REALLY? If ya believe they'd be straight up about it now after all this time...I mean, why would any of em change..."If ya like your health care plan you can keep it...I didn't have sex with that lady...what diff. Does it make...we have it under control." REALLY? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No problem, don't panic, were all gonna die.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think I heard that or paraphrased as, "nobody leaves alive". I for one don't relish the thought of glowing in the dark with a 1/2 life of 1,000 plus years.
Like FTS, just ain't right. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One more earthquake or after shock should do it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One more earthquake or after shock should do it.
I don't believe that gift is thru giving quite yet as it is..... We have an ocean full of frankenfish you can eat in the dark now... no need for a candlelight dinner 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One more earthquake or after shock should do it.
I don't believe that gift is thru giving quite yet as it is..... We have an ocean full of frankenfish you can eat in the dark now... no need for a candlelight dinner
 I laugh but I cry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hopefully our collective energy future will drift away, more and more, from nuclear power. Certainly all countries have an obligation to let their global neighbors know about "incidents" but my thinking is that small incidents probably go unreported. They probably only report incidents too large to hide.
I am not a nuclear scientist, but let's hope that if the steam cloud was radioactive, that it will dissipate as it moves. Don't you think that there would be reports of sicknesses in the news related to the cloud if it had an immediate detrimental effect? I do. But what I also think is that, over time, these collective "little pollutions" add up....to no good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 01/01/14 09:48 AM
|
|
hopefully our collective energy future will drift away, more and more, from nuclear power. Certainly all countries have an obligation to let their global neighbors know about "incidents" but my thinking is that small incidents probably go unreported. They probably only report incidents too large to hide. I am not a nuclear scientist, but let's hope that if the steam cloud was radioactive, that it will dissipate as it moves. Don't you think that there would be reports of sicknesses in the news related to the cloud if it had an immediate detrimental effect? I do. But what I also think is that, over time, these collective "little pollutions" add up....to no good. With a half-life of 10,000 years, the "cloud" may disappear, but not so much any radiation The media will sell us on the need for vaccines to support big pharma, but there is no real cure for radiation poisoning, so no profit in warning us of their screw up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hopefully our collective energy future will drift away, more and more, from nuclear power. Certainly all countries have an obligation to let their global neighbors know about "incidents" but my thinking is that small incidents probably go unreported. They probably only report incidents too large to hide. I am not a nuclear scientist, but let's hope that if the steam cloud was radioactive, that it will dissipate as it moves. Don't you think that there would be reports of sicknesses in the news related to the cloud if it had an immediate detrimental effect? I do. But what I also think is that, over time, these collective "little pollutions" add up....to no good. With a half-life of 10,000 years, the "cloud" may disappear, but not so much any radiation The media will sell us on the need for vaccines to support big pharma, but there is no real cure for radiation poisoning, so no profit in warning us of their screw up You mean Obamacare won't treat radiation poisoning? OMG! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quick! I know what to do, being an old NBR soldier.
Bend over, put your head between your legs, and kiss your butt goodbye! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
alnewman
on
Thu 01/02/14 05:18 PM
|
|
Does radiation affect intelligence? Maybe that would explain Feinstein, Pelosi, and Boxer. But what the heck happen with Reid, eating the toothpaste and taking his flu shots? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Mon 01/06/14 03:33 PM
|
|
Dec 2013 video with CPM's over 150 at beach on west coast That's 3 times or more the normal reading http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcQLxT49ZP0&feature=youtu.be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another earthquake and this one will be worse than Chernobyl? Sweetestgirl, if the steam is coming from the reactor IT IS radioactive! No ifs or buts about it! Don't be surprised if you go to the toilet one day and you've got a tail and a head growing on your big toe?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Mon 01/06/14 05:29 PM
|
|
Another earthquake and this one will be worse than Chernobyl? Sweetestgirl, if the steam is coming from the reactor IT IS radioactive! No ifs or buts about it! Don't be surprised if you go to the toilet one day and you've got a tail and a head growing on your big toe?
Hmmmmmm.... a little tail is always a nice thing to acquire A little head ain't so bad either
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hopefully our collective energy future will drift away, more and more, from nuclear power. Certainly all countries have an obligation to let their global neighbors know about "incidents" but my thinking is that small incidents probably go unreported. They probably only report incidents too large to hide. I am not a nuclear scientist, but let's hope that if the steam cloud was radioactive, that it will dissipate as it moves. Don't you think that there would be reports of sicknesses in the news related to the cloud if it had an immediate detrimental effect? I do. But what I also think is that, over time, these collective "little pollutions" add up....to no good. The collective energy future is actually moving towards more nuclear power production. The goal for 2050 is for nuclear to provide 25% of the worlds power production. At some point between now and 2050 fission will be part of the equation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hopefully our collective energy future will drift away, more and more, from nuclear power. Certainly all countries have an obligation to let their global neighbors know about "incidents" but my thinking is that small incidents probably go unreported. They probably only report incidents too large to hide. I am not a nuclear scientist, but let's hope that if the steam cloud was radioactive, that it will dissipate as it moves. Don't you think that there would be reports of sicknesses in the news related to the cloud if it had an immediate detrimental effect? I do. But what I also think is that, over time, these collective "little pollutions" add up....to no good. The collective energy future is actually moving towards more nuclear power production. The goal for 2050 is for nuclear to provide 25% of the worlds power production. At some point between now and 2050 fission will be part of the equation. Strange as it sounds, nukes are the safest form of energy production. Check the data! Coal and oil are extremely dangerous not to mention Global Warming. The trend is towards plugin electric cars with the juice coming from nukes. The arabs will still find others to buy their oil. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hopefully our collective energy future will drift away, more and more, from nuclear power. Certainly all countries have an obligation to let their global neighbors know about "incidents" but my thinking is that small incidents probably go unreported. They probably only report incidents too large to hide. I am not a nuclear scientist, but let's hope that if the steam cloud was radioactive, that it will dissipate as it moves. Don't you think that there would be reports of sicknesses in the news related to the cloud if it had an immediate detrimental effect? I do. But what I also think is that, over time, these collective "little pollutions" add up....to no good. The collective energy future is actually moving towards more nuclear power production. The goal for 2050 is for nuclear to provide 25% of the worlds power production. At some point between now and 2050 fission will be part of the equation. Strange as it sounds, nukes are the safest form of energy production. Check the data! Coal and oil are extremely dangerous not to mention Global Warming. The trend is towards plugin electric cars with the juice coming from nukes. The arabs will still find others to buy their oil. No not strange, totally inaccurate. Nuclear power is the most dangerous source of power on earth. What has happened is only the tip of the iceberg. Coal and oil are not dangerous, just a myth to make Al Gore a billionaire. And electric cars are not the solution with current technology causes by far more pollution than diesel or gasoline power. Just eating up that ole propaganda, aren't we? Good little sheeple. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hopefully our collective energy future will drift away, more and more, from nuclear power. Certainly all countries have an obligation to let their global neighbors know about "incidents" but my thinking is that small incidents probably go unreported. They probably only report incidents too large to hide. I am not a nuclear scientist, but let's hope that if the steam cloud was radioactive, that it will dissipate as it moves. Don't you think that there would be reports of sicknesses in the news related to the cloud if it had an immediate detrimental effect? I do. But what I also think is that, over time, these collective "little pollutions" add up....to no good. The collective energy future is actually moving towards more nuclear power production. The goal for 2050 is for nuclear to provide 25% of the worlds power production. At some point between now and 2050 fission will be part of the equation. Strange as it sounds, nukes are the safest form of energy production. Check the data! Coal and oil are extremely dangerous not to mention Global Warming. The trend is towards plugin electric cars with the juice coming from nukes. The arabs will still find others to buy their oil. No not strange, totally inaccurate. Nuclear power is the most dangerous source of power on earth. What has happened is only the tip of the iceberg. Coal and oil are not dangerous, just a myth to make Al Gore a billionaire. And electric cars are not the solution with current technology causes by far more pollution than diesel or gasoline power. Just eating up that ole propaganda, aren't we? Good little sheeple. This really isn't about algore or his theories. It is about producing power to a world population that is growing rapidly. I would argue that refining and transporting oil is very dangerous. I guarantee that more coal miners have been killed over the years than all nuclear accidents have killed combined. The Texas City refinery explosion in 1947 killed more than have died from all nuclear accidents combined. We just saw the train derailment in North Dakota that would have been a major catastrophe had it happened in the middle of the town. There was just another one in Canada this week.. I don't believe in Man Made Global Warming. The earth has always gone through warming and cooling cycles. Anyone that thinks man has more of an influence than nature are fools. I do believe in nuclear power and its ability to provide reliable power. |
|
|
|
|
