100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Hanoi Jane At It Again! | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
sigh I wish I could be around to see how many of her complainers are going to be making charitable donations in when they are 75 let alone PAYING taxes,,,,anymore miley syndrome alive and well You've gotta be kidding me, were not going to be running a charity raking in hundreds of million dollars like her either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
there was never any intention of forming a neo colony whatever the heck that is. we were fighting to halt the red chinese and the spread of totalitarianism....whether misguided or not. There is a free Vietnam today. In the process the horrors and actions of Pol pot were uncovered and stopped in Cambodia also. So our presence in the region brought the concept and actuality of freedom from tyranny. It was not a total loss. Why anyone would have supported those totalitarian regimes is beyond me. We made a very firm statement that SEAN nations were to be free & independent - a commitment I hope the US will always stand by. and also - thank you for your service. Actually we went in to fight the spread of Communism and a very brutal regime trying to take over the region. At least that is what I would like to believe. It was more of a concoction that the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations got into under false circumstances (that whole navy incident that was fabricated) in part to help major companies like Bell Helicopter and other military contractors who financed their political campaigns. I really wish I could believe their intentions were honorable and really to fight the spread of Communism, but I cant. Kennedy and Johnson were as crooked as they come, but not nearly as bad as the dictating a$$hole we have in office now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sigh I wish I could be around to see how many of her complainers are going to be making charitable donations in when they are 75 let alone PAYING taxes,,,,anymore miley syndrome alive and well You've gotta be kidding me, were not going to be running a charity raking in hundreds of million dollars like her either. exactly,, all the more reason not to quantify whether her contributions are enough,,,,,at least she is making them,,,, at least she helps others,,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sigh I wish I could be around to see how many of her complainers are going to be making charitable donations in when they are 75 let alone PAYING taxes,,,,anymore miley syndrome alive and well I do both on a regular basis thank you. She hasn't made a donation in years, but she has taken in a LOT of money. That is called a scam since by law your required to give a certain percentage of the total amount you have annually. She hasn't done that in years. She has spent the money on other things though for herself etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sigh I wish I could be around to see how many of her complainers are going to be making charitable donations in when they are 75 let alone PAYING taxes,,,,anymore miley syndrome alive and well You've gotta be kidding me, were not going to be running a charity raking in hundreds of million dollars like her either. exactly,, all the more reason not to quantify whether her contributions are enough,,,,,at least she is making them,,,, at least she helps others,,,,, She's NOT making them, that's the problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sigh I wish I could be around to see how many of her complainers are going to be making charitable donations in when they are 75 let alone PAYING taxes,,,,anymore miley syndrome alive and well I do both on a regular basis thank you. She hasn't made a donation in years, but she has taken in a LOT of money. That is called a scam since by law your required to give a certain percentage of the total amount you have annually. She hasn't done that in years. She has spent the money on other things though for herself etc. she has donated in OTHER places, and she has obviously broken no tax law,, so perhaps, like was stated in the public explanation, she had already OVERPAID in a previous year and her COLLECTION Was largely from herself,,, |
|
|
|
|
