Topic: Mingle� statistics | |
---|---|
this statistics were based upon a random sample of 55 active members ( whose posts are over 150 ) and from different sections to assure accuracy and justice .....
and i don't have a clue why i made it ... |
|
|
|
Edited by
Ɔʎɹɐx
on
Wed 11/27/13 09:03 AM
|
|
so if you were a male , non U.S. citizen , under 35 years old and less than 5.5 feet tall Mingle� member , then you belong to a minority which should be protected by UN rules and conventions !
|
|
|
|
Wtf. Protected from what?
|
|
|
|
Wtf. Protected from what? |
|
|
|
I'm guessing there is diplomatic ammunity that I'm unaware of
|
|
|
|
Wtf. Protected from what? from special treatment by the mods... |
|
|
|
Well I am none of those so doesn't apply to me.
|
|
|
|
Wtf. Protected from what? from special treatment by the mods... Do I look like I give special treatment? I'd pop my own son just as fast as anyone else |
|
|
|
Nope, can't agree with others here. He's just someone who is a free spirit and not limited by being inside the box as opposed to thinking outside the box. To understand that you would need to understand a creative and scientific mind. Might be an interesting study, I think. JMHO
|
|
|
|
Well I am none of those so doesn't apply to me. neither do i ,as i am 6.2 feet tall , but i can be a mingle� rights watch chairman |
|
|
|
this statistics were based upon a random sample of 55 active members ( whose posts are over 150 ) and from different sections to assure accuracy and justice ..... and i don't have a clue why i made it ... Man, you must be bored out of your mind Admit it, you only wanted to find out how big the chances are of you finding small women here, in your preferred age range. Had there been fewer, you would've moved on to another site. |
|
|
|
Man, you must be bored out of your mind Admit it, you only wanted to find out how big the chances are of you finding small women here, in your preferred age range. Had there been fewer, you would've moved on to another site. i was bored more than a statue in the museum and about the small woman thing , well , i am a realistic man who knows how to read numbers , 53% is something to be taken into consideration |
|
|
|
Wtf. Protected from what? from threads removing |
|
|
|
Man, you must be bored out of your mind Admit it, you only wanted to find out how big the chances are of you finding small women here, in your preferred age range. Had there been fewer, you would've moved on to another site. i was bored more than a statue in the museum See, I knew it!!! and about the small woman thing , well , i am a realistic man who knows how to read numbers , 53% is something to be taken into consideration See, I knew it!!! I should blacklist you for being so narrow-minded! I feel utterly rejected. First you admire my legs and now I've been made redundant because I have longer legs than a shortcake. Stick that in your pc and make a graph out of it. I'm telling you, it will NOT compute |
|
|
|
Nope, can't agree with others here. He's just someone who is a free spirit and not limited by being inside the box as opposed to thinking outside the box. To understand that you would need to understand a creative and scientific mind. Might be an interesting study, I think. JMHO oh honey , that was so sweet |
|
|
|
Wtf. Protected from what? from special treatment by the mods... Do I look like I give special treatment? I'd pop my own son just as fast as anyone else ok,ok, the other mods... |
|
|
|
Wtf. Protected from what? from threads removing |
|
|
|
Wtf. Protected from what? from threads removing Or getting warnings? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
dcastelmissy
on
Wed 11/27/13 10:25 AM
|
|
Man, you must be bored out of your mind Admit it, you only wanted to find out how big the chances are of you finding small women here, in your preferred age range. Had there been fewer, you would've moved on to another site. i was bored more than a statue in the museum See, I knew it!!! and about the small woman thing , well , i am a realistic man who knows how to read numbers , 53% is something to be taken into consideration See, I knew it!!! I should blacklist you for being so narrow-minded! I feel utterly rejected. First you admire my legs and now I've been made redundant because I have longer legs than a shortcake. Stick that in your pc and make a graph out of it. I'm telling you, it will NOT compute "Feeling utterly rejected"? I thought we were responsible for our OWN feelings or attitudes? Isn't that what you've previously said? How can a simple graph affect you in this way? You have your preferences in physical attributes, other people have others. What's wrong if he prefers, as you put it, a "shortcake"? Isn't name calling, however innocent sounding, considered just that--name calling and intended to insult? Just asking... |
|
|