Are you a conspiracy theorist? If not, perhaps you should be. Yes, there have certainly been a lot of “conspiracy theories” over the years that have turned out not to be accurate.

However, the truth is that a large number of very prominent conspiracy theories have turned out to actually be true. So the next time that you run into some ��tin foil hat wearing lunatics, you might want to actually listen to what they have to say. They may actually know some things that you do not.


They may actually know some things that you do not. In fact, one recent study found that ��conspiracy theorists are actually more sane than the general population.

So the next time you are tempted to dismiss someone as a ��conspiracy theorist, just remember that the one that is crazy might actually be you.

The following are 16 popular conspiracy theories that turned out to be true.

http://www.whydontyoutrythis.com/2013/07/16-conspiracy-theories-that-turned-out-to-be-true.html

Regarding the items listed in the URL, I'd like to make a few comments about possible remedy for the situations:

1. re SV40 and the cover-up:

No doubt the contaminated vaccines were produced by pharmaceutical companies that presumably failed in their due diligence tonsure the safety of those being vaccinated. Moreover, they failed to make a sincere and diligent effort to inform the people vaccinated. or their legal guardians and possibly makes them guilty of "unlawful concealment with intent" (the intent is to prevent reduction of profit, which makes this a crime of fraud).

If "laws" have been passed to prevent a lawsuit against the Big Pharma companies, it only means that the Corporation passing those laws for its "persons" has agreed to accept the liability, so if the CDC didn't make a similar diligent effort at disclosure to inform the damaged parties, and make an offer of remedy, then the United States Corporation is conspiring to commit fraud with intent. So this makes it a genuine conspiracy, and one for which the victims are entitled to remedy at law.

One fly in the ointment is that none of the victims can make a valid claim for damages, unless they can prove their cancer was a direct result of receiving the vaccine... practically impossible and the suit can only be filed by provably injured parties. This is grossly unfair, as there may be other detrimental effects from the vaccine than cancer, which again can't be directly attributed to the vaccine.

All you have is a statistical probability of harm (and you don't know the statistics). This all sounds pretty negative and much like the injured parties have no remedy at law for the harm they have or will suffer, since the claim is not provable in court. However the injured parties (everyone who received what may have been contaminated vaccines) DO have remedy OUTSIDE of a courtroom, by getting the agreement with the offending parties that they have (one or more of) abandoned the precautionary principal, abandoned the duty to care, committed fraud, committed breach of the public trust.

The government has an OBLIGATION to provide you with the best statistical research regarding the probability of harm (and types of harm) done to the possibly injured parties. If they fail to provide it, no biggie; you can guess the odds. You don't need to get cancer to claim injury, because you can also claim compensatory damages for pain & suffering (including psychological - for worry & fear). What can also be claimed is any physical ailment you suffered from after receiving the vaccine, as you don't know if it can be attributed to the vaccine or not and the uncertainty itself can cause you pain because you fear but can't prove harm from the vaccine (you have the right to live in freedom from fear...That's the justification they use to blow trillions on "homeland security"...so if you're living in fear, you have suffered damages and are again entitled to remedy).

All you really need to do to get remedy outside of a courtroom is to get the Pharmaceutical companies and government agencies involved to show cause as to how what they did wasn't a crime of harm entitling you to equitable compensation (and possibly punitive damages). If they fail to show cause, it can only be because they can't provide a lawful excuse for committing the crimes they did, and since they have no excuse, they have NO CHOICE but to agree with the injured parties that they have been injured and are due whatever compensatory and/or punitive damages they are claiming as due from the "perps" (Corporations trying to screw the people). A few nicely crafted letters to the offending parties should do the trick...You'll have them in an iron-clad contract to pay out without ever going to court!! (note: This will work with ALL similarly offending corporations, like Monsanto, who now think they are untouchable because they bribed congress into passing "laws" that prevent them from being sued [the Protect Monsanto Act]...IMO, people should make up "price list/fee schedules" monetizing things like "Fear" or "suspected damages", which monetize in uncertain terms ("Price varies...call for quote") the things they intend to bill for and send those price-lists to the government and relevant Corporations. Once that is done, it is a simple matter of making "them" prove they DIDN'T commit the offences listed that you will be billing for.)

2. is an unauthorized use of your private information (your visage), which must be stored in a database for reference, unless of course you previously authorized it (hopefully for a fee)...after all your visage is YOUR private property and you can lease out its use for a royalty [if you want to]).

3. See #1

4. This one might be like GMOs, an abandonment of the precautionary principle (if it ain't broke don't fix it, especially if you don't know the consequences of fooling around with that stuff)

5. Ditto of #4 with the addition (in the event that chimera's are sentient beings) of unlawful denial of the right to self determination. (This one could also be used for barbaric practices like human sacrifice (volcanoes, Baal, etc.) & unnecessary infant circumcision, which even now is being banned in Germany and Norway)

6. Conspiracy to put private information in a database without authorization?...This should definitely be an item on people's fee schedules. There's no reason people shouldn't be compensated for unauthorized storage/disclosure of their private info, or denied the right to authorize it for a compensatory royalty.

7. Well, yeah, but so is your government. The only difference is that you have to pay to buy a ticket to watch pro wrestling, while in the government's case, they have free delivery and will come right into your home & body slam you free of charge.

8. You think it's just Texas? The largest underground aquifer in North America has essentially been "privatized" and "sold" for a pittance to a private multibillionaire, who is even now draining it and dropping the water table to everyone's detriment for his own personal profit. I'm sure the draining he's done to date contributes significantly to Texas's drought problem. IMO, it isn't nice of the guy to rob the common like that, but I guess that's just me...It's a commercial world. (Just the same, he'd better keep his grubby paws off my marsh...That's where I draw the (red) line!

9. That's just paranoia; the IRS targets everyone...Good thing for them that most people don't know the IRS's gun isn't loaded and they can only unlawfully bluff, bully and imprison money out of people.

10. It's about bloody time on this one!…They've been poisoning you since the 1940s.

11. Well DUH!... You're just finding out now? I guess you people are just gonna have to read the studies...The ones not affiliated with the cell companies that is.

12. This one is just good ol' american know-how and enterprise at work...Better dying thru chemistry.

13. Doesn't everyone? I'm glad they didn't decide there are too many ducks! I have an idea; since everyone agrees that there are too many people, why don't they all get together and pick a number of people to kill, make that many "short straws" and have a lottery where everyone can participate fairly?...I have a sneaking hunch the idea wouldn't sound so great to anyone who drew a short straw...especially the people who thought of culling the population in the first place.

Thanks! I'll have to go over this stuff again.

RE: Wrestling is fake... (most people know this)




Funny!

Also: Presidential debates are fake. (I believe)