On the night Martin Walsh was elected mayor of Boston, Vice President Joe Biden made sure to call the incoming Democrat to offer his congratulations.




Trouble is, he phoned the wrong Martin Walsh, according to the Boston Globe.

“You son of a gun, Marty!” Biden reportedly said. “You did it!”

The Marty Walsh at the focus of the vice president’s glee was a former aide to U.S. Senator Edward M. Kennedy who is now the president of Gateway Public Solutions, a Boston-based government relations firm.

Walsh thanked Biden for his kind words after telling him that he had reached the wrong Marty, the paper said. He offered his help to track down the incoming mayor.

Also on Tuesday night, the wrong Walsh received phone calls from several Democratic luminaries, including Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee.

Walsh told the newspaper he expects in the coming weeks he may field more calls from people congratulating him under false pretenses.

“We’re a dime a dozen in Boston,” he said. “I probably know eight Marty Walshes.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/11/07/biden-congratulates-wrong-martin-walsh-on-boston-mayoral-victory/

And people wonder why Biden is kept on such a short leash!

Dumb and Dumberer!

DC is dumb, the voters are dumberer..... They keep voting the same mistakes expecting something to change.....

Biden fur presadent 2018!

You spelled "fer" wrong oops!

He just can't help it!

Hard to swill his beer with his foot always in his mouth....when it's not up his or Obozos' a$$

orrrrrrr ... it could be an act to keep Obama from being assassinated.

Sadly, it is no act.

Bumbling Joe Biden couldn't find is own a$$ with his hands in his back pockets!

I think you guys are all missing out on the advantages of impeaching Obumma & replacing him with Biden. He could inadvertantly blow the whole operation!

If Biden was in charge:

He could hit all the wrong drone targets and take out the terrorist Democrats.

He could keep the world safe for democracy by bombing Switzerland (hopefully, he'd inadvertantly hit the BIS with a cruise missile)

He could confiscate all the gun owners and put the guns into camps where they could be safe.

He could accidentally apply the wrong thirteenth amendment and have all the lawyers deported to England. (Hooray!)

He could accidentally end the global depression by misinterpreting the order to "Nuke Iran for the BIS."

Think of the endless possibilities!

BTW,how come you don't just arrest the Canadian Delegates/Members of the BIS!
Got IBS?

Much as I'd love to arrest them now, the principals of the BIS have insulated themselves well from any prosecution. They operate in universal jurisdiction and since they don't constitute a "nation", cannot be prosecuted in the only natural law court on earth (the ICJ), which deals only with disputes among nations. They could theoretically be arrested and prosecuted for fraud in a court of equity, but since nobody knows who they are, they constitute what is called "hidden principals", who cannot be held liable. Only their agents can be held liable (the board consisting of the heads of the central banks) and sued, but again, the countries in which they operate have long ago legalized bank fraud in their statutes, and the central banks themselves are not in the jurisdiction of those countries anyway, but sovereign entities in their own right.

The only way I see a prosecution going forward is arrest under ecclesiastical, equity, common law, or universal jurisdiction and being as how virtually all relevent countries (corporations) have superseded their basic law with statutory law (that legalized fraud), no country would be willing or able to prosecute anyway.

Key to the upcoming arrests (if the Principals of the BIS don't bargain their way out of arrest for trial) is the July 15th Apostolic Letter by the Pope (also a Jesuit, and probably one of the few on earth who knows for a fact who they are), in which he said NO ONE is above the law. (This was backed up by the Jesuit General, who, in an almost unheard of move, made a public statement backing up the Pope.)

If there are to be arrests, they will probably be made by agents of the Vatican operating in universal jurisdiction, but indications are that it may not be necessary, because I heard a rumour that the Boys in the BIS are now eager to cooperate. (For their sake I hope so!)

The long and the short of it is that I won't be making the arrests (if they happen at all), and that suits me fine, I didn't wanna have to leave my little pond to play "cop" anyway.

BTW...There is already a presidential precedent for Biden in Gerry Ford, whose presidency is most notable for doing nothing except having a very entertaining president who usually banged his head in low doorways. Based on the premise that less government is better government, I guess that makes him just about the best president in American history.

Another example of someone not knowing what an impeachment is.

Bill Clinton was impeached, but he was not removed from office.
Why? Because an impeachment is an accusation, not a conviction.

Incorrect assumption on your part. I know exactly what impeachment means, and you are partially correct in the definition you used. I suppose i could have said "remove him from office" instead of "impeach him", but that might imply a possibly unlawful procedure (lynching?). In light of the fact that an accused is entitled to a trial, proper procedure would dictate a proper impeachment. Asssuming Obumma couldn't show lawful cause for things like his murder-by-drone-without-due-process-of-law program, I have absolutely no doubt he would be evicted from his office and charged with crimes, but I'm getting ahead of myself here...First he has to be impeached; the rest is pretty well a foregone conclusion.

I don't think that fooling around at the office merits being evicted from the office of president, but murder does, so I don't think that he'd get the same treatment Clinton did.

A more proper definition for "impeachment" than the one you gave would be: "To proceed against a public officer for crime or misfeasance, before a proper court, by the presentation of a written accusation called Articles of Impeachment."

I find it odd that someone who isn't a citizen of the USA would tell U.S. citizens who they should impeach.

Don't have to nuke Iran they are playing with the stuff and Chernobyl came as a surprise their mess will probably be less than that and more than the Japanese Mess with Nuclear. A question I am here to observe learn contribute what is BIS

Why should that surprise you?...I'm not a citizen of Canada either, but I tell Canadian citizens they should impeach the PM of Canada.