Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Topic: NSA recruitment drive goes horribly wrong
Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Mon 07/08/13 06:52 AM
If you only posted what the NSA guys said, it would mean little. I'm no fan of the NSA or big government, but this piece is just some college kid doing some bashing. It would appear that (this collage kid) has more backbone and common sense than 90% of the folks who post here. Feel free to follow the link and then make an informed comment. a Link to some contrived Article,in,of all Papers,The Guardian? The Guardian is the same paper that broke Glen Greenwalds NSA story and that is the Guardian that is restricted on the Department of Defence's computers. It seems the Guardian much to your disdain is fulfilling its role as a independent news source not part of the propaganda matrix that is on your preferred reading list. Your comments are so predictable Mr Conrad. keep on llaughing Sonny,while you can! You really want to tell me that the NSA is going around having public Hiring-Drives like GE! Your Credulity is absolutely astounding! Hook,Line and Sinker! It's not my credulity at issue in this thread. I find it odd that on other threads you would claim we need to get "government off our backs" yet here you take a stand defending government spying. First you claim it did not happen then start back tracking. It would be nice and more interesting if you were not so agenda driven. Yep,you believe the Story,Hook Line and Sinker,so that has to do with your Credulity! Credulity is a state of willingness to believe in one or many people or things in the absence of reasonable proof or knowledge. Credulity is not simply belief in something that may be false. The subject of the belief may even be correct, but a credulous person will believe it without good evidence.WIKI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credulity

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Mon 07/08/13 07:04 AM
was almost tempted to sign up! SOBs told me I was too Old!

Bestinshow Joined Mon 06/01/09 Posts: 5540	Mon 07/08/13 08:06 AM Edited by Bestinshow on Mon 07/08/13 08:09 AM
If you only posted what the NSA guys said, it would mean little. I'm no fan of the NSA or big government, but this piece is just some college kid doing some bashing. It would appear that (this collage kid) has more backbone and common sense than 90% of the folks who post here. Feel free to follow the link and then make an informed comment. a Link to some contrived Article,in,of all Papers,The Guardian? The Guardian is the same paper that broke Glen Greenwalds NSA story and that is the Guardian that is restricted on the Department of Defence's computers. It seems the Guardian much to your disdain is fulfilling its role as a independent news source not part of the propaganda matrix that is on your preferred reading list. Your comments are so predictable Mr Conrad. keep on llaughing Sonny,while you can! You really want to tell me that the NSA is going around having public Hiring-Drives like GE! Your Credulity is absolutely astounding! Hook,Line and Sinker! It's not my credulity at issue in this thread. I find it odd that on other threads you would claim we need to get "government off our backs" yet here you take a stand defending government spying. First you claim it did not happen then start back tracking. It would be nice and more interesting if you were not so agenda driven. Yep,you believe the Story,Hook Line and Sinker,so that has to do with your Credulity! Credulity is a state of willingness to believe in one or many people or things in the absence of reasonable proof or knowledge. Credulity is not simply belief in something that may be false. The subject of the belief may even be correct, but a credulous person will believe it without good evidence.WIKI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credulity So your saying this event did not take place at all and is just a far fetched tale? (please say yes)

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Mon 07/08/13 08:10 AM
If you only posted what the NSA guys said, it would mean little. I'm no fan of the NSA or big government, but this piece is just some college kid doing some bashing. It would appear that (this collage kid) has more backbone and common sense than 90% of the folks who post here. Feel free to follow the link and then make an informed comment. a Link to some contrived Article,in,of all Papers,The Guardian? The Guardian is the same paper that broke Glen Greenwalds NSA story and that is the Guardian that is restricted on the Department of Defence's computers. It seems the Guardian much to your disdain is fulfilling its role as a independent news source not part of the propaganda matrix that is on your preferred reading list. Your comments are so predictable Mr Conrad. keep on llaughing Sonny,while you can! You really want to tell me that the NSA is going around having public Hiring-Drives like GE! Your Credulity is absolutely astounding! Hook,Line and Sinker! It's not my credulity at issue in this thread. I find it odd that on other threads you would claim we need to get "government off our backs" yet here you take a stand defending government spying. First you claim it did not happen then start back tracking. It would be nice and more interesting if you were not so agenda driven. Yep,you believe the Story,Hook Line and Sinker,so that has to do with your Credulity! Credulity is a state of willingness to believe in one or many people or things in the absence of reasonable proof or knowledge. Credulity is not simply belief in something that may be false. The subject of the belief may even be correct, but a credulous person will believe it without good evidence.WIKI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credulity So your saying this event did not take place at all and is just a far fetched tail? (please say yes) I am saying that Greenwald gave you another Phony Bill Of Sale! An absolutely onesided Account of whatever took place,and you fell for it! Greenwald is known for those Stunts! He ain't no better than the rest of the MSM-Crowd!

Bestinshow Joined Mon 06/01/09 Posts: 5540	Mon 07/08/13 08:23 AM Edited by Bestinshow on Mon 07/08/13 08:26 AM
If you only posted what the NSA guys said, it would mean little. I'm no fan of the NSA or big government, but this piece is just some college kid doing some bashing. It would appear that (this collage kid) has more backbone and common sense than 90% of the folks who post here. Feel free to follow the link and then make an informed comment. a Link to some contrived Article,in,of all Papers,The Guardian? The Guardian is the same paper that broke Glen Greenwalds NSA story and that is the Guardian that is restricted on the Department of Defence's computers. It seems the Guardian much to your disdain is fulfilling its role as a independent news source not part of the propaganda matrix that is on your preferred reading list. Your comments are so predictable Mr Conrad. keep on llaughing Sonny,while you can! You really want to tell me that the NSA is going around having public Hiring-Drives like GE! Your Credulity is absolutely astounding! Hook,Line and Sinker! It's not my credulity at issue in this thread. I find it odd that on other threads you would claim we need to get "government off our backs" yet here you take a stand defending government spying. First you claim it did not happen then start back tracking. It would be nice and more interesting if you were not so agenda driven. Yep,you believe the Story,Hook Line and Sinker,so that has to do with your Credulity! Credulity is a state of willingness to believe in one or many people or things in the absence of reasonable proof or knowledge. Credulity is not simply belief in something that may be false. The subject of the belief may even be correct, but a credulous person will believe it without good evidence.WIKI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credulity So your saying this event did not take place at all and is just a far fetched tail? (please say yes) I am saying that Greenwald gave you another Phony Bill Of Sale! An absolutely onesided Account of whatever took place,and you fell for it! Greenwald is known for those Stunts! He ain't no better than the rest of the MSM-Crowd! Please inform yourself before making your negative comments. It was not Greenwald who wrote the story. I think you often shoot off your keyboard without having a clue into what a topic is. Again you seem to be agenda driven and only wish to drag things off topic without reasonable conversation. Back to weeding the garden see you next rest break

JustDukkyMkII Joined Fri 11/12/10 Posts: 1462	Mon 07/08/13 03:34 PM
What a crock! How so?...You don't believe the conversation took place? No, I didn't say that. I've heard the recording. So what's the "crock"? They do not even know.......... good luck No luck needed. The comments one makes can be very revealing. I get peoples' agreement by asking questions. If they don't respond in a reasonable period of time, that is called "going silent", which places the questioned party into dishonour. If their response doesn't directly address the question, that is still "going silent". In either event, when they go silent, I have their agreement that they have a hidden agenda behind their comments, aspersive innuendo or otherwise.

Bestinshow Joined Mon 06/01/09 Posts: 5540	Tue 07/09/13 01:03 PM
What a crock! How so?...You don't believe the conversation took place? No, I didn't say that. I've heard the recording. So what's the "crock"? They do not even know.......... good luck No luck needed. The comments one makes can be very revealing. I get peoples' agreement by asking questions. If they don't respond in a reasonable period of time, that is called "going silent", which places the questioned party into dishonour. If their response doesn't directly address the question, that is still "going silent". In either event, when they go silent, I have their agreement that they have a hidden agenda behind their comments, aspersive innuendo or otherwise.

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Tue 07/09/13 01:09 PM
If you only posted what the NSA guys said, it would mean little. I'm no fan of the NSA or big government, but this piece is just some college kid doing some bashing. It would appear that (this collage kid) has more backbone and common sense than 90% of the folks who post here. Feel free to follow the link and then make an informed comment. a Link to some contrived Article,in,of all Papers,The Guardian? The Guardian is the same paper that broke Glen Greenwalds NSA story and that is the Guardian that is restricted on the Department of Defence's computers. It seems the Guardian much to your disdain is fulfilling its role as a independent news source not part of the propaganda matrix that is on your preferred reading list. Your comments are so predictable Mr Conrad. keep on llaughing Sonny,while you can! You really want to tell me that the NSA is going around having public Hiring-Drives like GE! Your Credulity is absolutely astounding! Hook,Line and Sinker! It's not my credulity at issue in this thread. I find it odd that on other threads you would claim we need to get "government off our backs" yet here you take a stand defending government spying. First you claim it did not happen then start back tracking. It would be nice and more interesting if you were not so agenda driven. Yep,you believe the Story,Hook Line and Sinker,so that has to do with your Credulity! Credulity is a state of willingness to believe in one or many people or things in the absence of reasonable proof or knowledge. Credulity is not simply belief in something that may be false. The subject of the belief may even be correct, but a credulous person will believe it without good evidence.WIKI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credulity So your saying this event did not take place at all and is just a far fetched tail? (please say yes) I am saying that Greenwald gave you another Phony Bill Of Sale! An absolutely onesided Account of whatever took place,and you fell for it! Greenwald is known for those Stunts! He ain't no better than the rest of the MSM-Crowd! Please inform yourself before making your negative comments. It was not Greenwald who wrote the story. I think you often shoot off your keyboard without having a clue into what a topic is. Again you seem to be agenda driven and only wish to drag things off topic without reasonable conversation. Back to weeding the garden see you next rest break i think everyone agrees that the NSA is not very well liked right now, regardless of some college kids acting dumb...

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Tue 07/09/13 01:13 PM Edited by Conrad_73 on Tue 07/09/13 01:17 PM
If you only posted what the NSA guys said, it would mean little. I'm no fan of the NSA or big government, but this piece is just some college kid doing some bashing. It would appear that (this collage kid) has more backbone and common sense than 90% of the folks who post here. Feel free to follow the link and then make an informed comment. a Link to some contrived Article,in,of all Papers,The Guardian? The Guardian is the same paper that broke Glen Greenwalds NSA story and that is the Guardian that is restricted on the Department of Defence's computers. It seems the Guardian much to your disdain is fulfilling its role as a independent news source not part of the propaganda matrix that is on your preferred reading list. Your comments are so predictable Mr Conrad. keep on llaughing Sonny,while you can! You really want to tell me that the NSA is going around having public Hiring-Drives like GE! Your Credulity is absolutely astounding! Hook,Line and Sinker! It's not my credulity at issue in this thread. I find it odd that on other threads you would claim we need to get "government off our backs" yet here you take a stand defending government spying. First you claim it did not happen then start back tracking. It would be nice and more interesting if you were not so agenda driven. Yep,you believe the Story,Hook Line and Sinker,so that has to do with your Credulity! Credulity is a state of willingness to believe in one or many people or things in the absence of reasonable proof or knowledge. Credulity is not simply belief in something that may be false. The subject of the belief may even be correct, but a credulous person will believe it without good evidence.WIKI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credulity So your saying this event did not take place at all and is just a far fetched tail? (please say yes) I am saying that Greenwald gave you another Phony Bill Of Sale! An absolutely onesided Account of whatever took place,and you fell for it! Greenwald is known for those Stunts! He ain't no better than the rest of the MSM-Crowd! Please inform yourself before making your negative comments. It was not Greenwald who wrote the story. I think you often shoot off your keyboard without having a clue into what a topic is. Again you seem to be agenda driven and only wish to drag things off topic without reasonable conversation. Back to weeding the garden see you next rest break was you who introduced Greenie into the Game,not me! and as usual,made a Big Story out of a non-Story! But what can you expect from a Rag like the Guardian!

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Tue 07/09/13 01:16 PM
If you only posted what the NSA guys said, it would mean little. I'm no fan of the NSA or big government, but this piece is just some college kid doing some bashing. It would appear that (this collage kid) has more backbone and common sense than 90% of the folks who post here. Feel free to follow the link and then make an informed comment. a Link to some contrived Article,in,of all Papers,The Guardian? The Guardian is the same paper that broke Glen Greenwalds NSA story and that is the Guardian that is restricted on the Department of Defence's computers. It seems the Guardian much to your disdain is fulfilling its role as a independent news source not part of the propaganda matrix that is on your preferred reading list. Your comments are so predictable Mr Conrad. keep on llaughing Sonny,while you can! You really want to tell me that the NSA is going around having public Hiring-Drives like GE! Your Credulity is absolutely astounding! Hook,Line and Sinker! It's not my credulity at issue in this thread. I find it odd that on other threads you would claim we need to get "government off our backs" yet here you take a stand defending government spying. First you claim it did not happen then start back tracking. It would be nice and more interesting if you were not so agenda driven. Yep,you believe the Story,Hook Line and Sinker,so that has to do with your Credulity! Credulity is a state of willingness to believe in one or many people or things in the absence of reasonable proof or knowledge. Credulity is not simply belief in something that may be false. The subject of the belief may even be correct, but a credulous person will believe it without good evidence.WIKI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credulity So your saying this event did not take place at all and is just a far fetched tail? (please say yes) I am saying that Greenwald gave you another Phony Bill Of Sale! An absolutely onesided Account of whatever took place,and you fell for it! Greenwald is known for those Stunts! He ain't no better than the rest of the MSM-Crowd! Please inform yourself before making your negative comments. It was not Greenwald who wrote the story. I think you often shoot off your keyboard without having a clue into what a topic is. Again you seem to be agenda driven and only wish to drag things off topic without reasonable conversation. Back to weeding the garden see you next rest break i think everyone agrees that the NSA is not very well liked right now, regardless of some college kids acting dumb... That sums it up pretty well.

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Tue 07/09/13 01:25 PM
If you only posted what the NSA guys said, it would mean little. I'm no fan of the NSA or big government, but this piece is just some college kid doing some bashing. It would appear that (this collage kid) has more backbone and common sense than 90% of the folks who post here. Feel free to follow the link and then make an informed comment. a Link to some contrived Article,in,of all Papers,The Guardian? The Guardian is the same paper that broke Glen Greenwalds NSA story and that is the Guardian that is restricted on the Department of Defence's computers. It seems the Guardian much to your disdain is fulfilling its role as a independent news source not part of the propaganda matrix that is on your preferred reading list. Your comments are so predictable Mr Conrad. keep on llaughing Sonny,while you can! You really want to tell me that the NSA is going around having public Hiring-Drives like GE! Your Credulity is absolutely astounding! Hook,Line and Sinker! It's not my credulity at issue in this thread. I find it odd that on other threads you would claim we need to get "government off our backs" yet here you take a stand defending government spying. First you claim it did not happen then start back tracking. It would be nice and more interesting if you were not so agenda driven. Yep,you believe the Story,Hook Line and Sinker,so that has to do with your Credulity! Credulity is a state of willingness to believe in one or many people or things in the absence of reasonable proof or knowledge. Credulity is not simply belief in something that may be false. The subject of the belief may even be correct, but a credulous person will believe it without good evidence.WIKI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credulity So your saying this event did not take place at all and is just a far fetched tail? (please say yes) I am saying that Greenwald gave you another Phony Bill Of Sale! An absolutely onesided Account of whatever took place,and you fell for it! Greenwald is known for those Stunts! He ain't no better than the rest of the MSM-Crowd! Please inform yourself before making your negative comments. It was not Greenwald who wrote the story. I think you often shoot off your keyboard without having a clue into what a topic is. Again you seem to be agenda driven and only wish to drag things off topic without reasonable conversation. Back to weeding the garden see you next rest break i think everyone agrees that the NSA is not very well liked right now, regardless of some college kids acting dumb... it's interesting what makes Worldnews today,and meanwhile SCOTUS is giving away the Store,while People are transfixed by Stories of a Couple smartmouth Kids!

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Tue 07/09/13 01:45 PM
What a crock! How so?...You don't believe the conversation took place? No, I didn't say that. I've heard the recording. So what's the "crock"? They do not even know.......... good luck No luck needed. The comments one makes can be very revealing. I get peoples' agreement by asking questions. If they don't respond in a reasonable period of time, that is called "going silent", which places the questioned party into dishonour. If their response doesn't directly address the question, that is still "going silent". In either event, when they go silent, I have their agreement that they have a hidden agenda behind their comments, aspersive innuendo or otherwise. another dang Conspiracy by the Scaly Ones I bet!

JustDukkyMkII Joined Fri 11/12/10 Posts: 1462	Tue 07/09/13 01:55 PM Edited by JustDukkyMkII on Tue 07/09/13 01:56 PM
What a crock! How so?...You don't believe the conversation took place? No, I didn't say that. I've heard the recording. So what's the "crock"? They do not even know.......... good luck No luck needed. The comments one makes can be very revealing. I get peoples' agreement by asking questions. If they don't respond in a reasonable period of time, that is called "going silent", which places the questioned party into dishonour. If their response doesn't directly address the question, that is still "going silent". In either event, when they go silent, I have their agreement that they have a hidden agenda behind their comments, aspersive innuendo or otherwise. another dang Conspiracy by the Scaly Ones I bet! I've already got Hot Rod's agreement that he was trying to cast aspersions with nonsensical innuendo...Do I have to get yours to, or would you care to explain how your remark isn't the same thing Rod was trying to do?

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Tue 07/09/13 02:00 PM Edited by Conrad_73 on Tue 07/09/13 02:06 PM
What a crock! How so?...You don't believe the conversation took place? No, I didn't say that. I've heard the recording. So what's the "crock"? They do not even know.......... good luck No luck needed. The comments one makes can be very revealing. I get peoples' agreement by asking questions. If they don't respond in a reasonable period of time, that is called "going silent", which places the questioned party into dishonour. If their response doesn't directly address the question, that is still "going silent". In either event, when they go silent, I have their agreement that they have a hidden agenda behind their comments, aspersive innuendo or otherwise. another dang Conspiracy by the Scaly Ones I bet! I've already got Hot Rod's agreement that he was trying to cast aspersions with nonsensical innuendo...Do I have to get yours to, or would you care to explain how your remark isn't the same thing Rod was trying to do? what is your problem? actually you were the one ascribing Motives to others! So,me thinks the Innuendo came from the Duck,not from me! Wasn't me making Major News about a Wisearse Kid!

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Tue 07/09/13 02:01 PM
What a crock! How so?...You don't believe the conversation took place? No, I didn't say that. I've heard the recording. So what's the "crock"? They do not even know.......... good luck No luck needed. The comments one makes can be very revealing. I get peoples' agreement by asking questions. If they don't respond in a reasonable period of time, that is called "going silent", which places the questioned party into dishonour. If their response doesn't directly address the question, that is still "going silent". In either event, when they go silent, I have their agreement that they have a hidden agenda behind their comments, aspersive innuendo or otherwise. Tsk,tsk,tsk! Seeing Sperrids?

JustDukkyMkII Joined Fri 11/12/10 Posts: 1462	Tue 07/09/13 02:07 PM
What a crock! How so?...You don't believe the conversation took place? No, I didn't say that. I've heard the recording. So what's the "crock"? They do not even know.......... good luck No luck needed. The comments one makes can be very revealing. I get peoples' agreement by asking questions. If they don't respond in a reasonable period of time, that is called "going silent", which places the questioned party into dishonour. If their response doesn't directly address the question, that is still "going silent". In either event, when they go silent, I have their agreement that they have a hidden agenda behind their comments, aspersive innuendo or otherwise. another dang Conspiracy by the Scaly Ones I bet! I've already got Hot Rod's agreement that he was trying to cast aspersions with nonsensical innuendo...Do I have to get yours to, or would you care to explain how your remark isn't the same thing Rod was trying to do? what is your problem? Since you didn't explain your remark, you have gone silent and agreed that you were trying to pull the same crap Rod did. You also tried to deflect your dishonouring yourself by trying to cast the onus back on me by implying I had a "problem" of some sort (kinda clumsy & fallacious, wouldn't you say?) when the problem was clearly yours in that you couldn't find a way to escape your dishonour. Thank you for your agreement that you were trying to pull the same kinda crap that rod did. I'll give him some credit though; at least he was smart enough to cut his losses and stay silent. Sorry to sound cruel, but sometimes one has to be cruel to be kind.

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Tue 07/09/13 02:15 PM Edited by Conrad_73 on Tue 07/09/13 02:25 PM
What a crock! How so?...You don't believe the conversation took place? No, I didn't say that. I've heard the recording. So what's the "crock"? They do not even know.......... good luck No luck needed. The comments one makes can be very revealing. I get peoples' agreement by asking questions. If they don't respond in a reasonable period of time, that is called "going silent", which places the questioned party into dishonour. If their response doesn't directly address the question, that is still "going silent". In either event, when they go silent, I have their agreement that they have a hidden agenda behind their comments, aspersive innuendo or otherwise. another dang Conspiracy by the Scaly Ones I bet! I've already got Hot Rod's agreement that he was trying to cast aspersions with nonsensical innuendo...Do I have to get yours to, or would you care to explain how your remark isn't the same thing Rod was trying to do? what is your problem? Since you didn't explain your remark, you have gone silent and agreed that you were trying to pull the same crap Rod did. You also tried to deflect your dishonouring yourself by trying to cast the onus back on me by implying I had a "problem" of some sort (kinda clumsy & fallacious, wouldn't you say?) when the problem was clearly yours in that you couldn't find a way to escape your dishonour. Thank you for your agreement that you were trying to pull the same kinda crap that rod did. I'll give him some credit though; at least he was smart enough to cut his losses and stay silent. Sorry to sound cruel, but sometimes one has to be cruel to be kind. you really are off it,Mister! Good luck with your Paranoia! You need it! BTW,love the way you're trying to call people out over remarks that don't mean a thing! Yep,you are revealing a lot too! Like it is extremely interesting,the way you are consistently taking the side of oppressive Heads of State and Groups! Now,this Thread is all your Playground!Enjoy!

JustDukkyMkII Joined Fri 11/12/10 Posts: 1462	Tue 07/09/13 03:46 PM
What a crock! How so?...You don't believe the conversation took place? No, I didn't say that. I've heard the recording. So what's the "crock"? They do not even know.......... good luck No luck needed. The comments one makes can be very revealing. I get peoples' agreement by asking questions. If they don't respond in a reasonable period of time, that is called "going silent", which places the questioned party into dishonour. If their response doesn't directly address the question, that is still "going silent". In either event, when they go silent, I have their agreement that they have a hidden agenda behind their comments, aspersive innuendo or otherwise. another dang Conspiracy by the Scaly Ones I bet! I've already got Hot Rod's agreement that he was trying to cast aspersions with nonsensical innuendo...Do I have to get yours to, or would you care to explain how your remark isn't the same thing Rod was trying to do? what is your problem? Since you didn't explain your remark, you have gone silent and agreed that you were trying to pull the same crap Rod did. You also tried to deflect your dishonouring yourself by trying to cast the onus back on me by implying I had a "problem" of some sort (kinda clumsy & fallacious, wouldn't you say?) when the problem was clearly yours in that you couldn't find a way to escape your dishonour. Thank you for your agreement that you were trying to pull the same kinda crap that rod did. I'll give him some credit though; at least he was smart enough to cut his losses and stay silent. Sorry to sound cruel, but sometimes one has to be cruel to be kind. you really are off it,Mister! Good luck with your Paranoia! You need it! BTW,love the way you're trying to call people out over remarks that don't mean a thing! Yep,you are revealing a lot too! Like it is extremely interesting,the way you are consistently taking the side of oppressive Heads of State and Groups! Now,this Thread is all your Playground!Enjoy! I'm not taking anyone's "side" as should be blatantly obvious to any reasonable man. methinks thou dost protest too much. LMAO

Bestinshow Joined Mon 06/01/09 Posts: 5540	Wed 07/10/13 08:18 AM
If you only posted what the NSA guys said, it would mean little. I'm no fan of the NSA or big government, but this piece is just some college kid doing some bashing. It would appear that (this collage kid) has more backbone and common sense than 90% of the folks who post here. Feel free to follow the link and then make an informed comment. a Link to some contrived Article,in,of all Papers,The Guardian? The Guardian is the same paper that broke Glen Greenwalds NSA story and that is the Guardian that is restricted on the Department of Defence's computers. It seems the Guardian much to your disdain is fulfilling its role as a independent news source not part of the propaganda matrix that is on your preferred reading list. Your comments are so predictable Mr Conrad. keep on llaughing Sonny,while you can! You really want to tell me that the NSA is going around having public Hiring-Drives like GE! Your Credulity is absolutely astounding! Hook,Line and Sinker! It's not my credulity at issue in this thread. I find it odd that on other threads you would claim we need to get "government off our backs" yet here you take a stand defending government spying. First you claim it did not happen then start back tracking. It would be nice and more interesting if you were not so agenda driven. Yep,you believe the Story,Hook Line and Sinker,so that has to do with your Credulity! Credulity is a state of willingness to believe in one or many people or things in the absence of reasonable proof or knowledge. Credulity is not simply belief in something that may be false. The subject of the belief may even be correct, but a credulous person will believe it without good evidence.WIKI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credulity Why wouldnt I believe it Mr Conrad? I listened to the recording double checked with other sources and confirmed the event. What has shaped your conclusions? Nothing?