Topic: 9/11 truthers...
Bestinshow's photo
Sun 06/09/13 10:42 AM


Enough evidence exists to raise questions without the shameless charge of "conspiracy theorists"


Bologna is not evidence.
Its so hard to break into a mind so conditioned by a decade of propaganda and lies. Maybe one should go watch american Idol or a sporting game and leave politics to the adults.

Conrad_73's photo
Sun 06/09/13 12:05 PM



Enough evidence exists to raise questions without the shameless charge of "conspiracy theorists"


Bologna is not evidence.
Its so hard to break into a mind so conditioned by a decade of propaganda and lies. Maybe one should go watch american Idol or a sporting game and leave politics to the adults.
More BALONEY!
Are CTs Adults?laugh

no photo
Sun 06/09/13 01:23 PM
There is another explanation of why the picture (allegedly live) behind the woman reporter still showed building 7 standing while she was reporting that it had fallen.

Maybe that video was taken earlier and was not really live and she was standing in front of a video screen of the chaos taken earlier.

News people fake stuff like that all the time while competing to be the best and fastest reporters on the scene.

I did not see this alleged live broadcast personally and I did not look at my watch to see what time it was. Of course the time zones would have had to be considered in timing the event.

Does anyone know if the BBC has ever responded to this anomaly?


no photo
Sun 06/09/13 01:26 PM
Here is a breakdown. I have not read it yet:

BBC's Premature Announcement of WTC 7's Collapse

http://www.wtc7.net/bbc.html

no photo
Sun 06/09/13 03:04 PM




Enough evidence exists to raise questions without the shameless charge of "conspiracy theorists"


Bologna is not evidence.
Its so hard to break into a mind so conditioned by a decade of propaganda and lies. Maybe one should go watch american Idol or a sporting game and leave politics to the adults.
More BALONEY!
Are CTs Adults?laugh

laugh

no photo
Sun 06/09/13 03:32 PM
I guess you people are not adults if all you can do is post laughing heads.


HappyBun's photo
Sun 06/09/13 03:46 PM

Enough evidence exists to raise questions without the shameless charge of "conspiracy theorists"


Some people just love using BUZZ WORDS . And others consider laughing heads to be a contribution. They are harmless really. They would be better suited to the games section.

mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/10/13 08:15 AM

There is another explanation of why the picture (allegedly live) behind the woman reporter still showed building 7 standing while she was reporting that it had fallen.

Maybe that video was taken earlier and was not really live and she was standing in front of a video screen of the chaos taken earlier.

News people fake stuff like that all the time while competing to be the best and fastest reporters on the scene.

I did not see this alleged live broadcast personally and I did not look at my watch to see what time it was. Of course the time zones would have had to be considered in timing the event.

Does anyone know if the BBC has ever responded to this anomaly?




i think it is just CT'er nonsense, as per par with the 9-11 CT'er rants... people keep talking about this, but i have yet to see anything to show it really happened...

mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/10/13 08:17 AM


Enough evidence exists to raise questions without the shameless charge of "conspiracy theorists"


Some people just love using BUZZ WORDS . And others consider laughing heads to be a contribution. They are harmless really. They would be better suited to the games section.


yea, along with this whole topic...better waste of time to count blades of grass in my front yard then to beleive these CT'er fantasies...

Conrad_73's photo
Mon 06/10/13 08:19 AM
Edited by Conrad_73 on Mon 06/10/13 08:52 AM


Enough evidence exists to raise questions without the shameless charge of "conspiracy theorists"


Some people just love using BUZZ WORDS . And others consider laughing heads to be a contribution. They are harmless really. They would be better suited to the games section.
I usually laugh at the absurd!
I also laugh at TDS!

JustDukkyMkII's photo
Mon 06/10/13 08:49 AM

I usually laugh at the absurd!


It beats hell out of believing it!

"Those who believe absurdities can be made to commit atrocities." -- Voltaire

no photo
Mon 06/10/13 01:22 PM


There is another explanation of why the picture (allegedly live) behind the woman reporter still showed building 7 standing while she was reporting that it had fallen.

Maybe that video was taken earlier and was not really live and she was standing in front of a video screen of the chaos taken earlier.

News people fake stuff like that all the time while competing to be the best and fastest reporters on the scene.

I did not see this alleged live broadcast personally and I did not look at my watch to see what time it was. Of course the time zones would have had to be considered in timing the event.

Does anyone know if the BBC has ever responded to this anomaly?




i think it is just CT'er nonsense, as per par with the 9-11 CT'er rants... people keep talking about this, but i have yet to see anything to show it really happened...


I guess you didn't follow the link I Posted then.


mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/10/13 01:25 PM



There is another explanation of why the picture (allegedly live) behind the woman reporter still showed building 7 standing while she was reporting that it had fallen.

Maybe that video was taken earlier and was not really live and she was standing in front of a video screen of the chaos taken earlier.

News people fake stuff like that all the time while competing to be the best and fastest reporters on the scene.

I did not see this alleged live broadcast personally and I did not look at my watch to see what time it was. Of course the time zones would have had to be considered in timing the event.

Does anyone know if the BBC has ever responded to this anomaly?




i think it is just CT'er nonsense, as per par with the 9-11 CT'er rants... people keep talking about this, but i have yet to see anything to show it really happened...


I guess you didn't follow the link I Posted then.




i just saw it...

mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/10/13 01:28 PM

Here is a breakdown. I have not read it yet:

BBC's Premature Announcement of WTC 7's Collapse

http://www.wtc7.net/bbc.html



i can't really determine what, if anything, is actually factual in that piece... the worst thing is it came from a ct'er website, so there may not be any truth in it...

no photo
Mon 06/10/13 01:32 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Mon 06/10/13 01:34 PM


Here is a breakdown. I have not read it yet:

BBC's Premature Announcement of WTC 7's Collapse

http://www.wtc7.net/bbc.html



i can't really determine what, if anything, is actually factual in that piece... the worst thing is it came from a ct'er website, so there may not be any truth in it...


That is the only place you can find the truth. You have to know how to recognize it though.

The information came from the BBC. I suppose you could double check with them if you are so untrusting of non-authority websites.

And since when are you so pro-media whores and government propaganda websites? Don't you realize that truth is where you find it. It is not with some "authority" that we are told we should trust.

But it looks like you have placed your faith in your government and in the corporations who control the media. good luck with that.




mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/10/13 01:40 PM



Here is a breakdown. I have not read it yet:

BBC's Premature Announcement of WTC 7's Collapse

http://www.wtc7.net/bbc.html



i can't really determine what, if anything, is actually factual in that piece... the worst thing is it came from a ct'er website, so there may not be any truth in it...


That is the only place you can find the truth. You have to know how to recognize it though.

The information came from the BBC. I suppose you could double check with them if you are so untrusting of non-authority websites.

And since when are you so pro-media whores and government propaganda websites? Don't you realize that truth is where you find it. It is not with some "authority" that we are told we should trust.

But it looks like you have placed your faith in your government and in the corporations who control the media. good luck with that.






so, according to you, i'm just supposed to believe anything that you post on here?

if everyone is lying, which i know for a fact that some CT'ers do, then what do you recommend? maybe i should devote my following to you and be happy with that...

no photo
Mon 06/10/13 01:42 PM




Here is a breakdown. I have not read it yet:

BBC's Premature Announcement of WTC 7's Collapse

http://www.wtc7.net/bbc.html



i can't really determine what, if anything, is actually factual in that piece... the worst thing is it came from a ct'er website, so there may not be any truth in it...


That is the only place you can find the truth. You have to know how to recognize it though.

The information came from the BBC. I suppose you could double check with them if you are so untrusting of non-authority websites.

And since when are you so pro-media whores and government propaganda websites? Don't you realize that truth is where you find it. It is not with some "authority" that we are told we should trust.

But it looks like you have placed your faith in your government and in the corporations who control the media. good luck with that.






so, according to you, i'm just supposed to believe anything that you post on here?

if everyone is lying, which i know for a fact that some CT'ers do, then what do you recommend? maybe i should devote my following to you and be happy with that...



If you would read my post I suggested that you check with the BBC them self to verify what is on that website if you really want to check it out.


mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/10/13 05:48 PM





Here is a breakdown. I have not read it yet:

BBC's Premature Announcement of WTC 7's Collapse

http://www.wtc7.net/bbc.html



i can't really determine what, if anything, is actually factual in that piece... the worst thing is it came from a ct'er website, so there may not be any truth in it...


That is the only place you can find the truth. You have to know how to recognize it though.

The information came from the BBC. I suppose you could double check with them if you are so untrusting of non-authority websites.

And since when are you so pro-media whores and government propaganda websites? Don't you realize that truth is where you find it. It is not with some "authority" that we are told we should trust.

But it looks like you have placed your faith in your government and in the corporations who control the media. good luck with that.






so, according to you, i'm just supposed to believe anything that you post on here?

if everyone is lying, which i know for a fact that some CT'ers do, then what do you recommend? maybe i should devote my following to you and be happy with that...



If you would read my post I suggested that you check with the BBC them self to verify what is on that website if you really want to check it out.




doesn't really matter if everyone is lying, does it? if it was real, it seems like it would have been edited by your buddy bush, since he was in league with Murdoch. but since there were no investigations on this, and it is still floating around, i have to see it as fake...

no photo
Mon 06/10/13 06:00 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Mon 06/10/13 06:01 PM






Here is a breakdown. I have not read it yet:

BBC's Premature Announcement of WTC 7's Collapse

http://www.wtc7.net/bbc.html



i can't really determine what, if anything, is actually factual in that piece... the worst thing is it came from a ct'er website, so there may not be any truth in it...


That is the only place you can find the truth. You have to know how to recognize it though.

The information came from the BBC. I suppose you could double check with them if you are so untrusting of non-authority websites.

And since when are you so pro-media whores and government propaganda websites? Don't you realize that truth is where you find it. It is not with some "authority" that we are told we should trust.

But it looks like you have placed your faith in your government and in the corporations who control the media. good luck with that.






so, according to you, i'm just supposed to believe anything that you post on here?

if everyone is lying, which i know for a fact that some CT'ers do, then what do you recommend? maybe i should devote my following to you and be happy with that...



If you would read my post I suggested that you check with the BBC them self to verify what is on that website if you really want to check it out.




doesn't really matter if everyone is lying, does it? if it was real, it seems like it would have been edited by your buddy bush, since he was in league with Murdoch. but since there were no investigations on this, and it is still floating around, i have to see it as fake...



You sure have your panties in a twist about George Bush don't you?

But if you don't spend any time to verify it with the BBC I don't care what your opinion is. You can believe what ever you want.

What is with all the defending of George Bush anyway? I never even mentioned George Bush.


mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/10/13 06:12 PM







Here is a breakdown. I have not read it yet:

BBC's Premature Announcement of WTC 7's Collapse

http://www.wtc7.net/bbc.html



i can't really determine what, if anything, is actually factual in that piece... the worst thing is it came from a ct'er website, so there may not be any truth in it...


That is the only place you can find the truth. You have to know how to recognize it though.

The information came from the BBC. I suppose you could double check with them if you are so untrusting of non-authority websites.

And since when are you so pro-media whores and government propaganda websites? Don't you realize that truth is where you find it. It is not with some "authority" that we are told we should trust.

But it looks like you have placed your faith in your government and in the corporations who control the media. good luck with that.






so, according to you, i'm just supposed to believe anything that you post on here?

if everyone is lying, which i know for a fact that some CT'ers do, then what do you recommend? maybe i should devote my following to you and be happy with that...



If you would read my post I suggested that you check with the BBC them self to verify what is on that website if you really want to check it out.




doesn't really matter if everyone is lying, does it? if it was real, it seems like it would have been edited by your buddy bush, since he was in league with Murdoch. but since there were no investigations on this, and it is still floating around, i have to see it as fake...



You sure have your panties in a twist about George Bush don't you?

But if you don't spend any time to verify it with the BBC I don't care what your opinion is. You can believe what ever you want.

What is with all the defending of George Bush anyway? I never even mentioned George Bush.



can you point out where i defended anyone?
and anyway, besides that, when don't you CT'ers blame Bush, Cheney, or the Jews?
so now you trust the mainstream media?
BBC tells the "truth"?
when did this start happening?