http://www.thefinaledition.com/article/nobel-committee-asks-obama-nicely-to-return-peace-prize.html

how about the Money he so generously gave to the Needy?

When did he do that?

need to ask him,I don't know!

You mean to tell me that he spent all those Kroner on himself?

Just shows how stupid the Nobel Prize Committee is that the prize is worthless.

Only reason he got it,because he isn't Bush!
And,Boy,didn't they shot themselves in the Foot,while putting the other one in their Mouths!

or how ignorant one man on the committee is,,,,withdrawing troops isnt 'peace prize' behavior? lol, what is,, sending in more?

and bombing Libya WAS a UN Decision,,,,,,

I could go on, but why bother,,,

let's say,the Committee gravely miscalculated!

Ought to have waited a bit longer until giving him that Prize.

its for works in progress, which they were, and still are

he is a president who needs cooperation from government .....he has been doing what HE has authority for but he doesnt have sole authority to complete it from beginning to end

Rotating troops is business as usual.
Droning kids is Peace Prize worthy, yes?

if bombing children on christmas in hanois is (kissinger),,,yes

but,, perhaps the black tax will apply here instead,,,,

I've never heard of 'the final edition' before, and I actually thought the headline was real.

The article makes it more clear that its a joke.

Visiting thefinaledition.com reveals that this site is like theonion.com.


They didn't actually ask war-monger Obama for the medal back.

Sigh.

thats a relief, not just for the npp controversy, but the part about them all being drunk,,,,

Whoa,the UN doesn't make Military decision for the USA,Congress is the only one with that capacity!
UN permission isn't enough!

wasnt my point exactly

earlier in the piece , the same person was stating something about how Obama was supposed to be working more with the UN

then he complained about him participating in a UN mission,,,

http://www.capitalisminstitute.org/white-house-killing-americans/

Obama: “In part because our capacity to capture a terrorist inside the United States are very different than in the foothills or mountains of Afghanistan or Pakistan.”

Because infeasibility of capture is one of the three criteria for ordering a drone strike, in theory the DOJ could declare that a terrorist located inside the U.S. is always, by definition, within reach of law enforcement and therefore the infeasibility requirement can never be satisfied here.

I'm not to worried about drone strikes on U.S. soil.

we have a saying here.

"If you give the Devil your little Finger,he'll take the whole Hand."

...and that photo of one of them grabbing a woman's breasts...