It doesn't prove anything, it relates my disgust at the Sandy Hook Cter's in a somewhat colloquial fashion, but effective. As for your last 'comment'...I can't be bothered gracing that with a response.

This thread has been edited of comments
targeting members rather than the Topic.

soufie
Site Moderator

So you have dodged my points of conflict with the "official" story very nicely.

Over 2000 posts in only 6 months.

Either you have far too much time on your hands, or the pay is good at the new job.

I didn't realise you made any cogent points worth addressing. As for your puerile accusations...well, is that all you've got? Really? Let me put it this way, it's easy to rack up a large post count when it takes 3 pages to explain a simple concept to someone who lacks basic comprehension. Do you and your friend who made the same dumbass accusation a few days ago, really think some small time dating site is really worth the installation of shills, so some agency you have no idea of can monitor the rambling of a tiny and insignificant section of society?


Really? I mean it's quite a dumb insult when you think about it. But I suppose 'think' is the key word, and I'm beginning to suspect it's a malapropism in this case.


As for the earlier comment on my post about the computer date being 'feasible, but unlikely' do you think some theory about 'da gubbmint wanting to take yer gunz so dey stayged Sandy Hook' is more likely? Really?

Hey! This might interest you. Gene Rosen must be a part of this False Flag operation. Reading between the lines, no-one would believe he was just trying to help the kids, he's obviously a CIA actor. Even though I have no experience in drama, I can tell he's an actor. Look at his name...Jewish, it's all there. (Note: For those who lack an iron-e-meter, this is meant to be satirical)

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/gene-rosen-sandy-hook-conspiracy-155033813.html

Maybe, the CTer's will harass this poor guy until he has to move, or worse. And you wonder why I'm disgusted by this moronic drivel?

Hey, try this one I just made up:

Da gubbmint stayjed Sandy Hook so y'all would by more gunz and he'p there friends in da arms trayde. Dey juz' say dey'll take yer gunz so y'all buy 'em. Y'all....

I got me pwoof!!!Itz on da internetz! Dayz all actors, y'all!

What do you think? I think it'll fly on some sites I visit. Stay tuned, this one might pop-up on a CT site near you!

doubt there was a Hoax needed!
Enough Crazies out there to try make a name for themselves,and enough Politicians willing to take advantage of any Crisis coming up!

We all know the Rahmism about exploiting Crises!
Like;"Never Let A Good Crisis Go To Waste"!

Be that as it may, it's the CTer's I find particularly repellent regarding Sandy Hook. Anyway, I've a satire to construct.

why am I scared?

Satire cont. (I know, but some need it pointed out)



So, every time there is a mass shooting gun sales skyrocket owing to the public's fear of impending weapon confiscations. Recently, since the Sandy Hook Psy-Op, gun sales have gone through the roof (No Kurt Cobain pun intended). The government isn't worried about you and your guns. They've got bigger ones and more of them, so they don't need to take yours. They want you to buy them. People who spread the propaganda that the government wants to take your guns are just shills trying to whip up hysteria to increase sales. Don't be one of the sheeple!

http://www.cnbc.com/id/100325110/The_Sandy_Hook_Effect_Gun_Sales_Rise_as_Stocks_Fall

I believe this is evidence of a form of economic stimulus, and is it just a coincidence that these sales figures are concomitant with the Fiscal Cliff crisis?

I don't think so.

Gun merchants within the NWO recognised this sales trend after each mass shooting years ago, and the arms manufacturers within the Cabal (I have information confirming this, but I cannot reveal my sources) instructed President Obysmal to conduct a Psy-Op to boost sales after less than satisfactory retail figures leading up to Christmas.

You may ask, "why would they do this as their share prices have fallen?" Good question. Well, if the proposed legislation fails to be ratified (and I believe it will fail), the arms manufacturers share price shall rise, especially after the announcement of the annual profits, which will be huge when this quarter's sales figures are included.

Who would also be happy with this? The banksters who control the government. It's possible that the media are in on the scam as well, by providing conflicting reports on the day, they produced the kind of suspicion and paranoia in the population required to initiate the sales hikes. Simple, just follow the money.

It's all starting to make sense now. I'm not saying it's true, I'm Just Asking Questions, but throughout this JAQing off, the same old faces come to mind. Sadly, I can hear the bleating of the sheeple reciting the same old herd (flock?) mentality. Anyway, I must change address before the CIA catch up with me and I get neutered with a butter knife (it happens!).

So by your standards.... every black man is a druggie banger, every lawyer is a shyster, anyone without a higher education is a loser without merit, and anyone who questions the lack of or unproven info that doesn't match your view is a CTer.

Life as a drone must be very lonely. That would account for your high post rate over such a short period.

While I may not enjoy a higher education, have to work hard for anything I might wish to enjoy, struggling at my own business in a failed economy rather than accepting welfare, you wish to belittle my character or credibility, and that of others, with your abusive humor because we might question anything that doesn't fit your opinion of it?

We here in America have over 500 of those kind of people that have created the problems we face today. They too refuse to admit they might be wrong, so the problems continue getting worse as they ignore the voices of others, and reason.

Sandy Hook youtube video gets 10,000,000 views, but will be taken down soon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wx9GxXYKx_8&bpctr=1358454456

How, pray tell, did you arrive at such a stupendously ridiculous conclusion?



So, you've got no valid argument then? Just petty insults and innuendo?



How about you take a look at the way you belittle others and stop being such a hypocrite. Btw, you're not the only one who works hard for a living and doesn't accept any form of welfare. So, apparently, because you work hard and lack tertiary education, it exonerates you from thinking critically about the disgusting and absurd nature of the Sandy Hook Ct's? Stop spending time on trying to insult me and think about the stupidity behind these theories.



Yes, because they don't follow your skewed world view, they're all evil, unpatriotic types who exist merely to ruin your life, I see.

I don't recall having a theory, but I do recall having questions. I may even post videos to support the reasons for my questions.

Only a fool doesn't question the obvious errors whether they are mistakes or falacies, and only a fool has all the answers.

Me, I have questions

As for the views I hold of the leaders of the country I love and fought to protect, I value your opinion less than I do Piers Morgans.... at least he lives here..... for now.

Like I said, no theories, just questions, and I post what I find in my research.....pro or con.... for others like myself who still have questions to consider....

From Jesse Ventura's Facebook Page:

"I dont see enough evidence to think Sandy Hook was a false flag operation. This is more of a tragic event turned into political opportunity than it is a staged event. Was there investigative bungling and the sensationalist media reporting unverified stories? Yes. Was there confusion and were facts lost and gained in that confusion? Yes. Are there people, even witnesses, looking for their 30 seconds in the spotlight? Yes. Are there individuals and institutions using and shaping this event for their own political agendas? Yes, and we must keep a very watchful eye on those institutions to keep them from twisting the facts of this event. Sadly, everything I mentioned above can, when taken out of context, make one think manipulation is afoot.

Most chaotic events can come across that way. In examining the event, I don't see government hands at work mainly because they would have covered their tracks better. We can't expect them to pull off ...elaborately planned hoaxes while at the same time leaving behind so many easy "smoking guns" for us to find. It took years for independent investigators to uncover JFK. It took years for us to begin scratching out the truth about 9/11. Those of us who study real history, not state sanctioned history, can very easily become just as close minded and biased for conspiracy as those who stand in our way and refuse to accept the truth about our government and the people running it.

It's very easy to fall into that trap, especially when knowing how much of our history and world events are not what they appear to be. So please, do not immediately jump up and yell "Fire!" just because someone makes a YouTube video. Research, research, research. You only hurt our cause by promoting false conspiracies and crackpot agendas. Much like the Birther conspiracy, I am starting to think that a lot of the so called "evidence" of conspiracy coming out about Sandy Hook is designed and fabricated to make us "conspiracy theorists," us truth seekers, look foolish. Why? So that when good people argue against the destruction of our Second Amendment they can easily be painted with the "crackpot" brush."

With the Sandy Hook massacre.
Sure, it's more than likely kids and teachers were killed.
What know you all of mercs? Our Gov. pays them to create scenarios that resemble lone wolf assignments.
They will kill whatever or whoever they are paid to kill. they have no allegiance.
If caught, they just disappear. As if, they were ghosts. Under the protection of our own people that have an agenda. What ever happened to the ghost that was apprehended in the woods?
Why do the casings have no rifles matching them?
Why did Feinstein say they had been preparing the gun control paperwork for over a year before the incident?
More and more questions the MSMBS will not touch.



PS
Do ya'll really believe water-boading has stopped?
Doubt it.
Just sub-contracted.

A POTUS kills women and children with brown skin in foreign lands, has ordered the deaths of 3 American citizens without due process or trial...one a 16 year old boy at a BBQ in his own back yard.

It is not so hard to believe such a person is capable of almost any atrocity to promote an agenda that delivers desired results.

Sad but true, the more we allow, the more they desire!

The bigger the risk, the greater the prize!

Let's put this silliness to bed. The Undergrads at the University of Youtube have been busily promulgating misinformation under the guise of 'Just Asking Questions' (JAQing off). The following piece addresses the many 'questions' that have been raised by those who don't understand what real research actually is. Some 'questions' are just too inane to answer, but thankfully someone took the time.

Enjoy (the water pressure is too great for me down here ):

http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/newtown.asp

Addendum: A CT must be dumb if Jesse Ventura doesn't believe it.

actually,good old MSM goofed again on purpose!

http://www.ijreview.com/2013/01/30208-nbc-admits-no-assault-rifle-used-in-newtown-shooting/


NBC Admitted: No ‘Assault Rifle’ Used in Newtown Shooting

When the president surrounds himself with children while giving his announcement that reasonable gun control measures are necessary, bear in mind that those ‘assault rifles‘ the government is sure to be going after were not even used in the Newton, Connecticut elementary shooting. As NBC admits in the video above, four handguns were used to carry out that despicable atrocity. This directly contradicts other reports.

Pete Williams, who is NBC’s chief Justice correspondent, reported the following in the video posted above:

This continues to be a very complex investigation and there is a lot of contradictory information out there, but we have some new information this morning (one month ago) from a couple of federal officials and state officials.

They say now that there were actually four handguns inside the school, not just two as we were initially told. Four handguns and apparently only handguns that were taken into the school.

We knew that Adam Lanza, the man said to be the gunman here, also had an ‘assault-style’ AR-15 -style rifle that he had had taken to the school, it was in the car he drove there, his mother’s car, but we have been told by several officials that he had left that in the car.

The correspondent makes it clear over and over again that he confirmed this information with federal and state officials. Now, a lot of media reports contradict this one, but somebody’s lying. The report that an ‘AR-15-style’ assault rifle was in the trunk of murderer Adam Lanza’s car is up for dispute as well. If one examines footage from police breaking into Lanza’s car, one sees police clearing a round from a “long gun of some type” that does not appear to be ‘AR-15 style’ or ‘assault-style.’

Whether or not the mainstream media are intentionally spreading disinformation about the Sandy Hook elementary tragedy, there is one thing for certain: not only are violent crime rates at a modern low and going down, but only 323 homicides were committed by rifles in 2011. That includes hunting rifles, assault rifles, military style rifles, semi-automatic rifles and whatever label one comes up with, regardless of magazine or clip capacity.

In a nation of 311 million people, the odds of being killed by a rifle is about one homicide per million people, which is far less than the odds of being murdered by a blunt object. But we don’t hear the media arguing about regulating hammers and clubs. Again, when 99.7% of registered gun owners are law-abiding, gun control is not about guns, it’s about control.

So, the CNN report of the 19th that quotes Lt. Paul Vance who identifies Lanza's primary weapon as the Bushmaster AR-15 is false?

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/12/18/us/connecticut-lanza-guns/index.html

quite possible!

When MSM hears "Assault-Weapon" all bets are off!

Snopes is run by two ant-gun liberals.

They claim, they are self funding. I'd like to see copies of their tax returns.

There was no auto-fire weapon or, rifle found inside the school. Just pistols.

Why, were there .223 cal. casings found?