2 Next
Topic: obama at it again... dictator for life?
no photo
Sun 01/06/13 11:26 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Sun 01/06/13 11:27 AM
I'm not so sure a semi-permanent leader is such a bad idea for some governments. The way it is right now, billions and billions of dollars are spent on elections, and politicians are so busy trying to stay in office they are not doing their jobs and the elections are rigged anyway. Nothing really gets done.






AndyBgood's photo
Sun 01/06/13 11:47 AM

I'm not so sure a semi-permanent leader is such a bad idea for some governments. The way it is right now, billions and billions of dollars are spent on elections, and politicians are so busy trying to stay in office they are not doing their jobs and the elections are rigged anyway. Nothing really gets done.








But tax dollars are not supposed to be used for elections!

no photo
Sun 01/06/13 12:15 PM


I'm not so sure a semi-permanent leader is such a bad idea for some governments. The way it is right now, billions and billions of dollars are spent on elections, and politicians are so busy trying to stay in office they are not doing their jobs and the elections are rigged anyway. Nothing really gets done.








But tax dollars are not supposed to be used for elections!



They come from banksters and citizens who donate. A big waste of money that could be used for more constructive things.


JustDukkyMkII's photo
Mon 01/07/13 09:29 PM
If they want to pass a truly democratic constitutional amendment, Give the people the right to impeach the entire government (or ANY portion thereof) by plebiscite. At least that way, when government starts getting out of hand, the voice of the majority could kick them out on their ***, kill the bills passed by that government and put in new people; hopefully ones that will do their bloody job!

2 Next