1 2 4 Next
Topic: Here 'they come!
no photo
Mon 12/31/12 06:05 PM



"Not too many people have pointed this out"

What does that tell you?



It tells me that you have too much time on your hands. laugh laugh


Ad Hominem noted, keep it up. slaphead


Keep it up? Really? Ya miss me I can tell. laugh

andrewzooms's photo
Mon 12/31/12 06:17 PM
I have not come to the conclusion of what happened yet. The dad of the Colorado shooter and Peter Lanza where both going testify against a banking scandal. I have not confirmed if this is a fact or not.



HotRodDeluxe's photo
Mon 12/31/12 11:37 PM

I have not come to the conclusion of what happened yet. The dad of the Colorado shooter and Peter Lanza where both going testify against a banking scandal. I have not confirmed if this is a fact or not.





No, it is actually false.

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Tue 01/01/13 03:42 AM
Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Tue 01/01/13 03:57 AM
The nutters over at David Icke's Forums are having a field day with this:

Can it be SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY was a MASS BLOOD RITUAL SACRIFICE whose STRUCTURAL DESIGN MIRRORS the MAYAN SACRIFICIAL BURIAL PYRAMID OF TEOTIHUACAN!?!


http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=232011

Despite this, there is no shortage of dupes handing over cash to this guy.

http://www.worthofweb.com/website-value/davidicke.com

The gene pool really has a shallow end. slaphead

no photo
Tue 01/01/13 01:27 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Tue 01/01/13 01:29 PM


I have not come to the conclusion of what happened yet. The dad of the Colorado shooter and Peter Lanza where both going testify against a banking scandal. I have not confirmed if this is a fact or not.





No, it is actually false.


Says WHO??

I guess it depends on who you believe.

Here is some more laughable disinformation to add to the confusion:
(Note the bolded paragraph)

No body really has any real credible sources.



***************************
According to Lanza’s Linkedin page, Lanza has worked “closely with many of the preeminent partnership tax advisors in the United States on a daily basis.” Currently Lanza is employed as the tax director and vice president of taxes at GE Energy Financial Services (GE-EFS).

Lanza’s responsibilities at GE-EFS include:

• Tax strategies, planning and tax operations
• Reporting directly to GE-EFS Chief Financial Officer
• Consultations on “structuring, negotiating asset acquisition, dispositions”
• Responsible for risk management on transactions
• Assist other employees in achieving business tax objectives
• Partner with GE Corporate tax group to “leverage technical resources . . . provide support on projects and initiatives”

Cited in mainstream media, GE has been successfully evading paying taxes for some time now. Although the corporation reported global profits of $14.2 billion with $5.1 billion of that total being attributed to American operations, GE claimed a tax benefit of $3.2 billion. Lanza, would have contributed to the success of GE evading corporate taxes in the US.

With the use of lobbyists on Capitol Hill, the abuse of tax breaks and creative accounting, GE has been able to pay low tax rates in the US; as well as move their monetary assets into offshore bank accounts.

While President Obama claims to want to reign in the corporate tax system and stop multi-national companies from cheating the system, he appointed Jeffrey Immelt, GE chief executive, as his chairman on the President’s Council on Jobs and Competiveness, as well as liaison to the corporate community and expert on corporate taxes.

The originator of the unqualified information about Lanza and LIBOR appears to be a member of the CIA-controlled and NSA-sponsored nameless, faceless hacker group Anonymous. Again, there are no citations provided that back-up these allegations, but that is not the point when disinformation is being spread across the alternative media circuit.

http://occupycorporatism.com/no-viable-connection-between-peter-lanza-us-senate-libor-hearings/

\\***********************************


rofl rofl rofl

I can believe that the CIA and NSA is engaged in rumors and disinformation, but to use the name "a hacker group called anonymous" seems a bit strange.





HotRodDeluxe's photo
Sun 01/06/13 05:10 PM
Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Sun 01/06/13 05:10 PM
That was just dumb. slaphead I suggest you look into it further, as I can't be bothered with this crap.

no photo
Sun 01/06/13 05:14 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Sun 01/06/13 05:14 PM

That was just dumb. slaphead I suggest you look into it further, as I can't be bothered with this crap.



No thanks, I can't be bothered with the crap either. But if you are going to make a claim that something is not true, we would appreciate knowing what reliable source you got your information from.


HotRodDeluxe's photo
Sun 01/06/13 05:17 PM
Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Sun 01/06/13 05:18 PM


That was just dumb. slaphead I suggest you look into it further, as I can't be bothered with this crap.



No thanks, I can't be bothered with the crap either. But if you are going to make a claim that something is not true, we would appreciate knowing what reliable source you got your information from.





I don't particularly care what you want. Prove that it is otherwise. I'm not running around trying to find the documents I read on this just for some CTer's to completely dismiss in an off hand way. I'm over dealing with such individuals. I think I posted something about this a few pages back anyway.

no photo
Sun 01/06/13 05:27 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Sun 01/06/13 05:28 PM



That was just dumb. slaphead I suggest you look into it further, as I can't be bothered with this crap.



No thanks, I can't be bothered with the crap either. But if you are going to make a claim that something is not true, we would appreciate knowing what reliable source you got your information from.





I don't particularly care what you want. Prove that it is otherwise. I'm not running around trying to find the documents I read on this just for some CTer's to completely dismiss in an off hand way. I'm over dealing with such individuals. I think I posted something about this a few pages back anyway.


That's just fine. Now, how would you like it if I followed your every post or statement saying

"No it is Actually false."

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Sun 01/06/13 08:39 PM
Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Sun 01/06/13 09:22 PM




That was just dumb. slaphead I suggest you look into it further, as I can't be bothered with this crap.



No thanks, I can't be bothered with the crap either. But if you are going to make a claim that something is not true, we would appreciate knowing what reliable source you got your information from.





I don't particularly care what you want. Prove that it is otherwise. I'm not running around trying to find the documents I read on this just for some CTer's to completely dismiss in an off hand way. I'm over dealing with such individuals. I think I posted something about this a few pages back anyway.


That's just fine. Now, how would you like it if I followed your every post or statement saying

"No it is Actually false."



You do that anyway and I wasn't even responding to you, so just mind your own business for a change. I take it you didn't bother checking the earlier posts on the subject as I suggested?

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Sun 01/06/13 08:47 PM
Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Sun 01/06/13 09:24 PM
Reposted from JREF:

"I see the claims have been transformed into the assertion that both men were "scheduled to testify in the ongoing global LIBOR scandal" and "to testify before the US Sentate in the ongoing LIBOR scandal".

The evidence for such testimony, naturally, is less than convincing: from the Fabian4Liberty site mentioned:"


We got on the phone and leveraged our contacts in the world of finance, government, and law. It was repeatedly confirmed from our contacts in the financial industry that both Holmes and Lanza are men that would be called in to report information under their purview for investigations concerning credit rate manipulation such as the LIBOR scandal. And again, contacts in the field of law confirmed that Holmes and Lanza are men that multiple government agencies would have questions for.

"In short, the only "evidence" that these two men were going to testify in front of anything is this blogger's completely-anonymous "contacts" saying that various government agencies investigating LIBOR could call them in to ask them some questions as part of their ongoing investigations, but apparently this hasn't actually happened yet. Note how testimony before the Senate isn't actually part of the claims on Fabian4Liberty's website.

He also contradicts himself, because in another article he blames "Big Pharma" and antidepressants for the shooting, rather than some sort of conspiracy to get the fathers of the Aurora shooter and the Connecticut shooter to do...well, he never actually says what the point of the supposed LIBOR connection of the shooter's fathers' actually is."

"And as a sign of the blogger's credibility or lack thereof, he apparently also thinks the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi last September was carried out by al Qaeda ("a tool of the banker run CIA that is working overtime to create World War 3") as part of their globalist/banker/NATO plot "to create maximum chaos to implement regime change and draconian legislation both abroad and here at home", along with fomenting general world chaos "which is always good for the military industrial complex and their financiers at the Federal Reserve"."

"Plus, there's this odd alarmist screed about how Obama is even now drafting an Executive Order in response to the Connecticut shooting, "extending the Executive Order from July of this year." I have no idea what Executive Order from July he's talking about, though, since none of them seem to have anything whatsoever to do with guns or gun control in the US.

In short, this entire "LIBOR connection" appears to exist solely and entirely inside the head of some random conspiraloon with a website and a YouTube channel."


One blogger makes crap up, it goes viral and the dupes lap it up. Unsubstantiated CIA leak? Oh, please! Some people watch too much TV.






1 2 4 Next