100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: AIDS | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
thats like saying you cant catch measles without being exposed to measles to argue the point that being in a room full of children with measles will excel your odds anal sex has a higher risk for STD's, just like having multiple partners does of course ,if everyone used protection there would be NO risks yet, thats not the case, so being that so many dont use protection amongst those not using protection, those engaging in sodomy are at higher risk No, it is nothing like saying you can't catch measles without being exposed to it...You literally cannot catch HIV unless a partner has it, that is, fundamentally, the only way you catch HIV. no crap but the risk is higher with anal sex IF THE RISK IS HIGHER THAT MEANS IT CAN BE THE CAUSE!!!! the risk is higher in african american males as well, that wouldnt mean they were the 'cause' though the cause will never be pinpointed,, that ship has sailed,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In other news - there's probably a cure, but it's less lucrative than medications to treat people for the rest of their lives.
See? That's my 'conspiracy theory'. But a put a probably in there, so I'm not saying that I know. Anyway... I guess the issue to be addressed, or rather, the debatable point, is whether or not the act of anal sex leads to a greater risk of contraction... or whether what is being insinuated is really that the homosexual community has had a history of more commonly having unprotected sex (no risk of pregnancy [seems legit]), and that would lead to a higher overall infection rate within that community that would spread exponentially. It's really... the same exponential component in any demographic, but without the fear of pregnancy there is roughly half the initiative to wear protection. This is simply my observation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thats like saying you cant catch measles without being exposed to measles to argue the point that being in a room full of children with measles will excel your odds anal sex has a higher risk for STD's, just like having multiple partners does of course ,if everyone used protection there would be NO risks yet, thats not the case, so being that so many dont use protection amongst those not using protection, those engaging in sodomy are at higher risk No, it is nothing like saying you can't catch measles without being exposed to it...You literally cannot catch HIV unless a partner has it, that is, fundamentally, the only way you catch HIV. no crap but the risk is higher with anal sex IF THE RISK IS HIGHER THAT MEANS IT CAN BE THE CAUSE!!!! the risk is higher in african american males as well, that wouldnt mean they were the 'cause' though the cause will never be pinpointed,, that ship has sailed,,, YES U ARE RIGHT BUT THE STATISTICAL DATA SAYS THAT THERE WERE 34 MILLION HIV AFFECTED PPL AS PER 2010 CENSUS WHEN THE WORLD POPULATION WAS 7 BILLION .... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where are you getting your statistical information?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where are you getting your statistical information? http://www.avert.org/worldstats.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
s1owhand
on
Thu 12/13/12 10:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i blame wild monkey sex! 
may be but it says the chimpanzee was eaten by ppl at that time and got mutated in humans ..it was called HIV 1 in particular.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thats like saying you cant catch measles without being exposed to measles to argue the point that being in a room full of children with measles will excel your odds anal sex has a higher risk for STD's, just like having multiple partners does of course ,if everyone used protection there would be NO risks yet, thats not the case, so being that so many dont use protection amongst those not using protection, those engaging in sodomy are at higher risk No, it is nothing like saying you can't catch measles without being exposed to it...You literally cannot catch HIV unless a partner has it, that is, fundamentally, the only way you catch HIV. no crap but the risk is higher with anal sex IF THE RISK IS HIGHER THAT MEANS IT CAN BE THE CAUSE!!!! the risk is higher in african american males as well, that wouldnt mean they were the 'cause' though the cause will never be pinpointed,, that ship has sailed,,, YES U ARE RIGHT BUT THE STATISTICAL DATA SAYS THAT THERE WERE 34 MILLION HIV AFFECTED PPL AS PER 2010 CENSUS WHEN THE WORLD POPULATION WAS 7 BILLION .... ok, so there were 34 million infected,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well then, don't bend over in front of another guy and you should be OK then, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well then, don't bend over in front of another guy and you should be OK then, right?  it applies to u too because it is more common in gay community
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thats like saying you cant catch measles without being exposed to measles to argue the point that being in a room full of children with measles will excel your odds anal sex has a higher risk for STD's, just like having multiple partners does of course ,if everyone used protection there would be NO risks yet, thats not the case, so being that so many dont use protection amongst those not using protection, those engaging in sodomy are at higher risk No, it is nothing like saying you can't catch measles without being exposed to it...You literally cannot catch HIV unless a partner has it, that is, fundamentally, the only way you catch HIV. no crap but the risk is higher with anal sex IF THE RISK IS HIGHER THAT MEANS IT CAN BE THE CAUSE!!!! the risk is higher in african american males as well, that wouldnt mean they were the 'cause' though the cause will never be pinpointed,, that ship has sailed,,, YES U ARE RIGHT BUT THE STATISTICAL DATA SAYS THAT THERE WERE 34 MILLION HIV AFFECTED PPL AS PER 2010 CENSUS WHEN THE WORLD POPULATION WAS 7 BILLION .... ok, so there were 34 million infected,,, this 34 million is reached just through spreading in-spite of many protective measures, medical excellence and awareness? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thats like saying you cant catch measles without being exposed to measles to argue the point that being in a room full of children with measles will excel your odds anal sex has a higher risk for STD's, just like having multiple partners does of course ,if everyone used protection there would be NO risks yet, thats not the case, so being that so many dont use protection amongst those not using protection, those engaging in sodomy are at higher risk No, it is nothing like saying you can't catch measles without being exposed to it...You literally cannot catch HIV unless a partner has it, that is, fundamentally, the only way you catch HIV. no crap but the risk is higher with anal sex IF THE RISK IS HIGHER THAT MEANS IT CAN BE THE CAUSE!!!! the risk is higher in african american males as well, that wouldnt mean they were the 'cause' though the cause will never be pinpointed,, that ship has sailed,,, YES U ARE RIGHT BUT THE STATISTICAL DATA SAYS THAT THERE WERE 34 MILLION HIV AFFECTED PPL AS PER 2010 CENSUS WHEN THE WORLD POPULATION WAS 7 BILLION .... ok, so there were 34 million infected,,, this 34 million is reached just through spreading in-spite of many protective measures, medical excellence and awareness? people want what they want when they want it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thats like saying you cant catch measles without being exposed to measles to argue the point that being in a room full of children with measles will excel your odds anal sex has a higher risk for STD's, just like having multiple partners does of course ,if everyone used protection there would be NO risks yet, thats not the case, so being that so many dont use protection amongst those not using protection, those engaging in sodomy are at higher risk No, it is nothing like saying you can't catch measles without being exposed to it...You literally cannot catch HIV unless a partner has it, that is, fundamentally, the only way you catch HIV. no crap but the risk is higher with anal sex IF THE RISK IS HIGHER THAT MEANS IT CAN BE THE CAUSE!!!! the risk is higher in african american males as well, that wouldnt mean they were the 'cause' though the cause will never be pinpointed,, that ship has sailed,,, YES U ARE RIGHT BUT THE STATISTICAL DATA SAYS THAT THERE WERE 34 MILLION HIV AFFECTED PPL AS PER 2010 CENSUS WHEN THE WORLD POPULATION WAS 7 BILLION .... ok, so there were 34 million infected,,, this 34 million is reached just through spreading in-spite of many protective measures, medical excellence and awareness? people want what they want when they want it U ARE INDIRECTLY BLAMING THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thats like saying you cant catch measles without being exposed to measles to argue the point that being in a room full of children with measles will excel your odds anal sex has a higher risk for STD's, just like having multiple partners does of course ,if everyone used protection there would be NO risks yet, thats not the case, so being that so many dont use protection amongst those not using protection, those engaging in sodomy are at higher risk No, it is nothing like saying you can't catch measles without being exposed to it...You literally cannot catch HIV unless a partner has it, that is, fundamentally, the only way you catch HIV. no crap but the risk is higher with anal sex IF THE RISK IS HIGHER THAT MEANS IT CAN BE THE CAUSE!!!! the risk is higher in african american males as well, that wouldnt mean they were the 'cause' though the cause will never be pinpointed,, that ship has sailed,,, YES U ARE RIGHT BUT THE STATISTICAL DATA SAYS THAT THERE WERE 34 MILLION HIV AFFECTED PPL AS PER 2010 CENSUS WHEN THE WORLD POPULATION WAS 7 BILLION .... ok, so there were 34 million infected,,, this 34 million is reached just through spreading in-spite of many protective measures, medical excellence and awareness? people want what they want when they want it U ARE INDIRECTLY BLAMING THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES!! nope IM directly placing the responsibility on the people themself very directly,,,lol our body is our responsibility as well as what we do and allow to be done to it,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thats like saying you cant catch measles without being exposed to measles to argue the point that being in a room full of children with measles will excel your odds anal sex has a higher risk for STD's, just like having multiple partners does of course ,if everyone used protection there would be NO risks yet, thats not the case, so being that so many dont use protection amongst those not using protection, those engaging in sodomy are at higher risk No, it is nothing like saying you can't catch measles without being exposed to it...You literally cannot catch HIV unless a partner has it, that is, fundamentally, the only way you catch HIV. no crap but the risk is higher with anal sex IF THE RISK IS HIGHER THAT MEANS IT CAN BE THE CAUSE!!!! the risk is higher in african american males as well, that wouldnt mean they were the 'cause' though the cause will never be pinpointed,, that ship has sailed,,, YES U ARE RIGHT BUT THE STATISTICAL DATA SAYS THAT THERE WERE 34 MILLION HIV AFFECTED PPL AS PER 2010 CENSUS WHEN THE WORLD POPULATION WAS 7 BILLION .... ok, so there were 34 million infected,,, this 34 million is reached just through spreading in-spite of many protective measures, medical excellence and awareness? people want what they want when they want it U ARE INDIRECTLY BLAMING THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES!! nope IM directly placing the responsibility on the people themself very directly,,,lol our body is our responsibility as well as what we do and allow to be done to it,,, YES U ARE RIGHT ... how much safe is it with using condoms and all ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thats like saying you cant catch measles without being exposed to measles to argue the point that being in a room full of children with measles will excel your odds anal sex has a higher risk for STD's, just like having multiple partners does of course ,if everyone used protection there would be NO risks yet, thats not the case, so being that so many dont use protection amongst those not using protection, those engaging in sodomy are at higher risk No, it is nothing like saying you can't catch measles without being exposed to it...You literally cannot catch HIV unless a partner has it, that is, fundamentally, the only way you catch HIV. no crap but the risk is higher with anal sex IF THE RISK IS HIGHER THAT MEANS IT CAN BE THE CAUSE!!!! the risk is higher in african american males as well, that wouldnt mean they were the 'cause' though the cause will never be pinpointed,, that ship has sailed,,, YES U ARE RIGHT BUT THE STATISTICAL DATA SAYS THAT THERE WERE 34 MILLION HIV AFFECTED PPL AS PER 2010 CENSUS WHEN THE WORLD POPULATION WAS 7 BILLION .... ok, so there were 34 million infected,,, this 34 million is reached just through spreading in-spite of many protective measures, medical excellence and awareness? people want what they want when they want it U ARE INDIRECTLY BLAMING THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES!! nope IM directly placing the responsibility on the people themself very directly,,,lol our body is our responsibility as well as what we do and allow to be done to it,,, YES U ARE RIGHT ... how much safe is it with using condoms and all ? proper use of condoms is most likely the safest , barring the use of more than one form of birth control they are really the only way to try to prevent std besides abstaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i find it amazing how in this day and age how uninformed people are. first off conspiracy there is a cure but it is very exspencive and painful. it is done with a bone merrow transplant. Also there are for worse things to be infected with in the u.s. because of the medicine. I also must agree it is our own responsabilty to engage in safer sex practice. this is a good topic because knowlege is power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well then, don't bend over in front of another guy and you should be OK then, right? it applies to u too because it is more common in gay community
DUDE... If I had a tattoo it would be a one way only sign on my a$$ pointing out. I am SO not into other guys. Now hot women on the other hand and Elvis takes the stage! THANK YOU VERY MUCH! I don't worry what the other guy does to get his rocks off. We all got something we like that is immoral, illegal, or impractical. Its just human nature. What I want is impractical... That is my issue... But I am not out rubbing people's noses in that. You think Anal intercourse is bad... DUDE! I could fill you in on stuff that would make you probably want to barf! I know how sick people can get and homosexuality isn't the worst thing in life. if two guys find satisfaction with each other look at it this way, less competition for the girls for YOU! Its a win win for you! I think you got some learning to do about life. I know some homosexuals I would be VERY hesitant to talk trash about in their presence. Something about making a body builder mad seems a bad idea! Besides there are people who make monkey bumps with monkeys too. We call them bestial and there are diseases associated with that one like the classic Syphilis! The Greeks knew about treating this one. And I can think of a modern day culture that likewise encourages bestial behavior... Hint it is South American! Likewise I can back this claim if it doesn't get me in trouble. You see something most people miss is how messed up people are about sex in general. What the hell is it when people talk about it and suddenly the repression and fear set in? And we wonder why our kids end up so messed up... |
|
|
|
|
