2 Next
Topic: Syria Weaponizing Chemical Weapons
JustDukkyMkII's photo
Tue 12/11/12 10:04 AM
Edited by JustDukkyMkII on Tue 12/11/12 10:21 AM



I think this is just a bluff by Assad to scare his people into check.


I think it's a setup for a military intervention into Syria to be based possibly on a false flag chemical attack or another "Iraqi WMD" schtick that will "justify" the intervention under the RPT doctrine.

Basically the same old crap in a different pile.


False flag? Saddam admitted during interviews with the FBI that he was developing and would NEVER stop developing nuclear weapons.


I'm calling you on that assertion and demanding that you post proof of it. I can find NOTHING of the sort in the FBI interviews. In fact, Saddam admitted in the interviews that he DIDN'T have WMDs...They were just a bluff to keep Iran from exacting revenge for the war he started with them.

WMDs exist, but even if they were possessed by a dictatorial regime, the regime would be sane enough to know that using them as anything more than self-defence against an external threat would be nothing less than national suicide. Even Hitler abided by the Geneva conventions.

As far as Saddam having them before the Iraq war, he admitted to destroying the ones the UN didn't find. Interestingly, I note that it was the US that sold them to Saddam in the first place (and I'm sure talked him into attacking & using them on Iran). I'm pretty sure in Assad's case he either doesn't have them or if he does, won't use them on his own people. It's far more likely that he'll be "framed" for such an incident by a very cooperative press that repeats verbatim the carefully worded propaganda we foolishly take as "news."

Conrad_73's photo
Tue 12/11/12 10:45 AM




I think this is just a bluff by Assad to scare his people into check.


I think it's a setup for a military intervention into Syria to be based possibly on a false flag chemical attack or another "Iraqi WMD" schtick that will "justify" the intervention under the RPT doctrine.

Basically the same old crap in a different pile.


False flag? Saddam admitted during interviews with the FBI that he was developing and would NEVER stop developing nuclear weapons.


I'm calling you on that assertion and demanding that you post proof of it. I can find NOTHING of the sort in the FBI interviews. In fact, Saddam admitted in the interviews that he DIDN'T have WMDs...They were just a bluff to keep Iran from exacting revenge for the war he started with them.

WMDs exist, but even if they were possessed by a dictatorial regime, the regime would be sane enough to know that using them as anything more than self-defence against an external threat would be nothing less than national suicide. Even Hitler abided by the Geneva conventions.

As far as Saddam having them before the Iraq war, he admitted to destroying the ones the UN didn't find. Interestingly, I note that it was the US that sold them to Saddam in the first place (and I'm sure talked him into attacking & using them on Iran). I'm pretty sure in Assad's case he either doesn't have them or if he does, won't use them on his own people. It's far more likely that he'll be "framed" for such an incident by a very cooperative press that repeats verbatim the carefully worded propaganda we foolishly take as "news."
OMG!laugh
Saddam actually did try buy Uranium in Niger in the nineties!
Look it up
laugh

JustDukkyMkII's photo
Tue 12/11/12 10:50 AM
Edited by JustDukkyMkII on Tue 12/11/12 10:50 AM





I think this is just a bluff by Assad to scare his people into check.


I think it's a setup for a military intervention into Syria to be based possibly on a false flag chemical attack or another "Iraqi WMD" schtick that will "justify" the intervention under the RPT doctrine.

Basically the same old crap in a different pile.


False flag? Saddam admitted during interviews with the FBI that he was developing and would NEVER stop developing nuclear weapons.


I'm calling you on that assertion and demanding that you post proof of it. I can find NOTHING of the sort in the FBI interviews. In fact, Saddam admitted in the interviews that he DIDN'T have WMDs...They were just a bluff to keep Iran from exacting revenge for the war he started with them.

WMDs exist, but even if they were possessed by a dictatorial regime, the regime would be sane enough to know that using them as anything more than self-defence against an external threat would be nothing less than national suicide. Even Hitler abided by the Geneva conventions.

As far as Saddam having them before the Iraq war, he admitted to destroying the ones the UN didn't find. Interestingly, I note that it was the US that sold them to Saddam in the first place (and I'm sure talked him into attacking & using them on Iran). I'm pretty sure in Assad's case he either doesn't have them or if he does, won't use them on his own people. It's far more likely that he'll be "framed" for such an incident by a very cooperative press that repeats verbatim the carefully worded propaganda we foolishly take as "news."
OMG!laugh
Saddam actually did try buy Uranium in Niger in the nineties!
Look it up
laugh


It wasn't hard to find:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niger_uranium_forgeries

Conrad_73's photo
Tue 12/11/12 10:52 AM






I think this is just a bluff by Assad to scare his people into check.


I think it's a setup for a military intervention into Syria to be based possibly on a false flag chemical attack or another "Iraqi WMD" schtick that will "justify" the intervention under the RPT doctrine.

Basically the same old crap in a different pile.


False flag? Saddam admitted during interviews with the FBI that he was developing and would NEVER stop developing nuclear weapons.


I'm calling you on that assertion and demanding that you post proof of it. I can find NOTHING of the sort in the FBI interviews. In fact, Saddam admitted in the interviews that he DIDN'T have WMDs...They were just a bluff to keep Iran from exacting revenge for the war he started with them.

WMDs exist, but even if they were possessed by a dictatorial regime, the regime would be sane enough to know that using them as anything more than self-defence against an external threat would be nothing less than national suicide. Even Hitler abided by the Geneva conventions.

As far as Saddam having them before the Iraq war, he admitted to destroying the ones the UN didn't find. Interestingly, I note that it was the US that sold them to Saddam in the first place (and I'm sure talked him into attacking & using them on Iran). I'm pretty sure in Assad's case he either doesn't have them or if he does, won't use them on his own people. It's far more likely that he'll be "framed" for such an incident by a very cooperative press that repeats verbatim the carefully worded propaganda we foolishly take as "news."
OMG!laugh
Saddam actually did try buy Uranium in Niger in the nineties!
Look it up
laugh


It wasn't hard to find:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niger_uranium_forgeries
laugh
That was easy,and totally untrue!laugh
Told you to LOOK it up,not Wikipedia it!:laughing:

JustDukkyMkII's photo
Tue 12/11/12 11:11 AM







I think this is just a bluff by Assad to scare his people into check.


I think it's a setup for a military intervention into Syria to be based possibly on a false flag chemical attack or another "Iraqi WMD" schtick that will "justify" the intervention under the RPT doctrine.

Basically the same old crap in a different pile.


False flag? Saddam admitted during interviews with the FBI that he was developing and would NEVER stop developing nuclear weapons.


I'm calling you on that assertion and demanding that you post proof of it. I can find NOTHING of the sort in the FBI interviews. In fact, Saddam admitted in the interviews that he DIDN'T have WMDs...They were just a bluff to keep Iran from exacting revenge for the war he started with them.

WMDs exist, but even if they were possessed by a dictatorial regime, the regime would be sane enough to know that using them as anything more than self-defence against an external threat would be nothing less than national suicide. Even Hitler abided by the Geneva conventions.

As far as Saddam having them before the Iraq war, he admitted to destroying the ones the UN didn't find. Interestingly, I note that it was the US that sold them to Saddam in the first place (and I'm sure talked him into attacking & using them on Iran). I'm pretty sure in Assad's case he either doesn't have them or if he does, won't use them on his own people. It's far more likely that he'll be "framed" for such an incident by a very cooperative press that repeats verbatim the carefully worded propaganda we foolishly take as "news."
OMG!laugh
Saddam actually did try buy Uranium in Niger in the nineties!
Look it up
laugh


It wasn't hard to find:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niger_uranium_forgeries
laugh
That was easy,and totally untrue!laugh
Told you to LOOK it up,not Wikipedia it!:laughing:


I will accept your claim that the Wiki link is totally untrue if you can prove it. Can you post any links to support your claim?

Conrad_73's photo
Tue 12/11/12 11:53 AM








I think this is just a bluff by Assad to scare his people into check.


I think it's a setup for a military intervention into Syria to be based possibly on a false flag chemical attack or another "Iraqi WMD" schtick that will "justify" the intervention under the RPT doctrine.

Basically the same old crap in a different pile.


False flag? Saddam admitted during interviews with the FBI that he was developing and would NEVER stop developing nuclear weapons.


I'm calling you on that assertion and demanding that you post proof of it. I can find NOTHING of the sort in the FBI interviews. In fact, Saddam admitted in the interviews that he DIDN'T have WMDs...They were just a bluff to keep Iran from exacting revenge for the war he started with them.

WMDs exist, but even if they were possessed by a dictatorial regime, the regime would be sane enough to know that using them as anything more than self-defence against an external threat would be nothing less than national suicide. Even Hitler abided by the Geneva conventions.

As far as Saddam having them before the Iraq war, he admitted to destroying the ones the UN didn't find. Interestingly, I note that it was the US that sold them to Saddam in the first place (and I'm sure talked him into attacking & using them on Iran). I'm pretty sure in Assad's case he either doesn't have them or if he does, won't use them on his own people. It's far more likely that he'll be "framed" for such an incident by a very cooperative press that repeats verbatim the carefully worded propaganda we foolishly take as "news."
OMG!laugh
Saddam actually did try buy Uranium in Niger in the nineties!
Look it up
laugh


It wasn't hard to find:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niger_uranium_forgeries
laugh
That was easy,and totally untrue!laugh
Told you to LOOK it up,not Wikipedia it!:laughing:


I will accept your claim that the Wiki link is totally untrue if you can prove it. Can you post any links to support your claim?
Maybe look up what Saddam's Ambassador was doing in Niger,a Country whose Exports are mainly Yellow Cake!laugh

JustDukkyMkII's photo
Tue 12/11/12 12:11 PM
Edited by JustDukkyMkII on Tue 12/11/12 12:11 PM


I will accept your claim that the Wiki link is totally untrue if you can prove it. Can you post any links to support your claim?

Maybe look up what Saddam's Ambassador was doing in Niger,a Country whose Exports are mainly Yellow Cake!

Sorry; no cigar…that hardly supports your claim.

IF he was ever there, it may not even have pertained to yellowcake and might only be (for instance) that he liked Nigerian hookers.laugh

Conrad_73's photo
Tue 12/11/12 12:27 PM



I will accept your claim that the Wiki link is totally untrue if you can prove it. Can you post any links to support your claim?

Maybe look up what Saddam's Ambassador was doing in Niger,a Country whose Exports are mainly Yellow Cake!

Sorry; no cigar…that hardly supports your claim.

IF he was ever there, it may not even have pertained to yellowcake and might only be (for instance) that he liked Nigerian hookers.laugh
yep,he was there!
So,what was he doing there besides sampling the Women?
Looking for Nigerian Shamanism Exports for Saddam's Iraq!
Keep on digging!

JustDukkyMkII's photo
Tue 12/11/12 12:35 PM




I will accept your claim that the Wiki link is totally untrue if you can prove it. Can you post any links to support your claim?

Maybe look up what Saddam's Ambassador was doing in Niger,a Country whose Exports are mainly Yellow Cake!

Sorry; no cigar…that hardly supports your claim.

IF he was ever there, it may not even have pertained to yellowcake and might only be (for instance) that he liked Nigerian hookers.laugh
yep,he was there!
So,what was he doing there besides sampling the Women?
Looking for Nigerian Shamanism Exports for Saddam's Iraq!
Keep on digging!



There is no need for me to "keep digging" to refute phoney claims that have already been well-documented as false. It would be a waste of my time.

You, on the other hand, should do some digging to support your laughable claim that Saddam was buying yellowcake from Niger. Either that or eat your claim...Bon appetit.

JustDukkyMkII's photo
Tue 12/18/12 01:12 PM
It looks like there may soon be a chemical weapon false flag attack in Syria to blame on Assad and justify a NATO invasion of Syria:

We have heard repeatedly from politicians and pundits alike that Assad may very well be using his chemical weapons against the rebels. A number of days ago John Baird, Canada’s foreign minister, expressed his fear that Assad will be using chemical weapons on his own people.

Well, we have warned numerous times, it’s the Syrian rebels who we need to worry about — not Assad. The rebels have seized chemical weapons, and they are willing to use them on innocent people. According to Russia Today, Syrian rebels have obtained chemical weapons from Libya and are planning on using them on civilians, and then blaming it on Assad. This is an effort between the Syrian rebels and their allies in Turkey, alongside cooperation with Libyan rebels under Abdel Hakim bel Haj.

The Al-Rih al-Sarsar Chemical Brigade in Syria, according to The Campaign to Return to Emergency Law:

carries out science experiments on animals by poisoning them, using toxic gases, and says the allies of the Syrian government will be poisoned just like the animals.

Here is a video released by the brigade showing the chemical powders they are planning on using to kill civilians who support Assad:

Video of chemicals. (in link)

Notice, the company name for these materials is Tekkim, a chemical factory in Turkey. The Syrian media reports that the Turks are involved in giving these materials to Syria.

How are the rebels testing these chemicals? On rabbits:

Video of Syrian rebels testing chemicals on rabbits. (in link)

Where is the outcry of PETA on this animal cruelty?

This is the answer that these terrorists give in regards to how they will use these chemicals:

By Allah it did not take 1 minute of breathing, and you will see Allah willing, what will the chemical and biological weapons do to you.

Watch rebel speech (in link)

They are planning on using the weapons on civilians after the Assad regime falls.

There is also another video which we have found of long range missiles in the hands of the rebels which they stole after taking over the Al-Hajar al-Aswad Air Force base. (in link)

So we can talk about our fears of Assad using chemical weapons, but what we can be sure of, and what we cannot ignore, is that if Assad goes down (and we believe he will) the rebels will use chemical weaponry on civilians.

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/theodore-and-walid-shoebat/syrian-rebels-now-have-chemical-weapons/


JustDukkyMkII's photo
Tue 12/18/12 05:44 PM
A Syrian Girl pleads for understanding of the Syrian situation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP3mXVRd89Y

Ras427's photo
Tue 12/18/12 05:50 PM




I think this is just a bluff by Assad to scare his people into check.


I think it's a setup for a military intervention into Syria to be based possibly on a false flag chemical attack or another "Iraqi WMD" schtick that will "justify" the intervention under the RPT doctrine.

Basically the same old crap in a different pile.


False flag? Saddam admitted during interviews with the FBI that he was developing and would NEVER stop developing nuclear weapons.


I'm calling you on that assertion and demanding that you post proof of it. I can find NOTHING of the sort in the FBI interviews. In fact, Saddam admitted in the interviews that he DIDN'T have WMDs...They were just a bluff to keep Iran from exacting revenge for the war he started with them.

WMDs exist, but even if they were possessed by a dictatoria l regime, the regime would be sane enough to know that using them as anything more than self-defence against an external threat would be nothing less than national suicide. Even Hitler abided by the Geneva conventions.

As far as Saddam having them before the Iraq war, he admitted to destroying the ones the UN didn't find. Interestingly, I note that it was the US that sold them to Saddam in the first place (and I'm sure talked him into attacking & using them on Iran). I'm pretty sure in Assad's case he either doesn't have them or if he does, won't use them on his own people. It's far more likely that he'll be "framed" for such an incident by a very cooperative press th at repeats verbatim the carefully worded propaganda we foolishly take as "news."
It does not matter how many times we repackage the same primise for war, a conditioned mind will always select that which is condusive to a line of thinking long formulated at self preservation, a false sence of rightiouseness along with maintaining false perception. No matter what you present, the American people are prone to deception. No matter whats presented to the contrary, we bought Manhattan for $24 in trinkets. Chemicals in Syria is just another WMD ploy that we will gladly eccept as it will be easy to to swallow while affording us the ability to face denial without knowing it. In other words, we are suckers comfortable in our proneness to ignorence.

Lpdon's photo
Tue 12/18/12 10:53 PM




I think this is just a bluff by Assad to scare his people into check.


I think it's a setup for a military intervention into Syria to be based possibly on a false flag chemical attack or another "Iraqi WMD" schtick that will "justify" the intervention under the RPT doctrine.

Basically the same old crap in a different pile.


False flag? Saddam admitted during interviews with the FBI that he was developing and would NEVER stop developing nuclear weapons.


I'm calling you on that assertion and demanding that you post proof of it. I can find NOTHING of the sort in the FBI interviews. In fact, Saddam admitted in the interviews that he DIDN'T have WMDs...They were just a bluff to keep Iran from exacting revenge for the war he started with them.

WMDs exist, but even if they were possessed by a dictatorial regime, the regime would be sane enough to know that using them as anything more than self-defence against an external threat would be nothing less than national suicide. Even Hitler abided by the Geneva conventions.

As far as Saddam having them before the Iraq war, he admitted to destroying the ones the UN didn't find. Interestingly, I note that it was the US that sold them to Saddam in the first place (and I'm sure talked him into attacking & using them on Iran). I'm pretty sure in Assad's case he either doesn't have them or if he does, won't use them on his own people. It's far more likely that he'll be "framed" for such an incident by a very cooperative press that repeats verbatim the carefully worded propaganda we foolishly take as "news."


http://www.youtube.com/channel/SW3smEHgCFe3s

Watch this right here. It's the National Geographic Channel interviewing the FBI Agent that spent months befriending and interviewing Saddam. He talks about towards the end how Saddam admitted to him that he would never stop.

JustDukkyMkII's photo
Wed 12/19/12 03:37 PM
Things seems to be right on schedule for the much anticipated war with Syria (Though today's news looks a little like a bit of a setback for the foreign Al Qaida "rebels"). My reguest to NATO is to take special care to see that the Syrian Girl isn't killed or harmed in the upcoming false flag chemical attack or the bombing & invasion due to follow it…She's much much too cute!

http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/why-the-nwo-hates-syria/28622/

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/2012-12/18/c_124108768.htm

Lpdon's photo
Sun 12/23/12 11:19 PM

Things seems to be right on schedule for the much anticipated war with Syria (Though today's news looks a little like a bit of a setback for the foreign Al Qaida "rebels"). My reguest to NATO is to take special care to see that the Syrian Girl isn't killed or harmed in the upcoming false flag chemical attack or the bombing & invasion due to follow it…She's much much too cute!

http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/why-the-nwo-hates-syria/28622/

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/2012-12/18/c_124108768.htm


Tired of getting PWNED?

Where's this so called invasion? Did I miss it?

2 Next