100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Who's Afraid of 9/11 Conspiracy Theories? | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sun 12/02/12 02:06 PM
|
|
Insane fabrications like controlled demolition or a pulse weapon.. Those are call "theories" or "hypothesis." The government calls their B.S. " the truth."  And THAT is an insane fabrication... to call something truth when it is not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InvictusV,
So are you a true believer in the official story told by the Media whores and the political machine? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insane fabrications like controlled demolition or a pulse weapon.. Those are call "theories" or "hypothesis." The government calls their b.S. "truth." And THAT is an insane fabrication... to call something truth when it is not. so then why is the major 9-11 conspiracy group called the 9-11 truth movement? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InvictusV, So are you a true believer in the official story told by the Media whores and the political machine? I believe that the 9-11 truth movement was begun as a political organization with the sole purpose of trying to fabricate a narrative in which implicated Bush. It has little or nothing to do with what actually happened. It has morphed into a major money making enterprise in which all the kooks and whackos from the conspiracy circuit have converged to enrich themselves.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sun 12/02/12 02:20 PM
|
|
Insane fabrications like controlled demolition or a pulse weapon.. Those are call "theories" or "hypothesis." The government calls their b.S. "truth." And THAT is an insane fabrication... to call something truth when it is not. so then why is the major 9-11 conspiracy group called the 9-11 truth movement? I am not up on all of the different 9-11 truth movements out there or who runs them or why they named it that. I am not involved with any of them. I suppose they named it the truth movement because they are looking for the truth. That's just my idea. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InvictusV, So are you a true believer in the official story told by the Media whores and the political machine? I believe that the 9-11 truth movement was begun as a political organization with the sole purpose of trying to fabricate a narrative in which implicated Bush. It has little or nothing to do with what actually happened. It has morphed into a major money making enterprise in which all the kooks and whackos from the conspiracy circuit have converged to enrich themselves.. Actually I was not asking you about what you believe about a certain 9-11 truth movement or any of those organizations. I was asking you if you believe the official government account of 9-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On a side note, for a group of people who are trying to expose or find the truth as apposed to the government's official account of something, when they claim that they believe that something is "true" because of the reasons they give, they are attempting to convince someone.
But when the government (or the global Elite) put out the official findings that such and such a thing is true or not true, that is a different thing altogether. They are supposed to be the authority and they are not supposed to lie or cover up the truth. Right? So do they Lie? We have learned that YES THEY DO. Is the dumbed down sheeple public going to continue to believe their official authorities after they have been lied to over and over again? Apparently a lot of them will. The question on my mind is... how many people actual trust and believe the official politicians who have lied to us? Did you watch any of the campaign ads? They constantly called each other LIAR. Do you actually believe your government representatives? Do you believe they mostly don't lie? Do you actually believe what you see on the Media? What are they not telling us? Is what they are telling us true? How gullible is the Public when it comes to the over all Political information that we are given? How can we trust them, and how can people know what to believe? This includes the wild fear mongering conspiracy screaming people like Alex Jones and the like. Truth mixed with crap. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Sun 12/02/12 02:34 PM
|
|
Some people just squirm under the thumb of the truth.  And some people just assume and make ch*t up. Well, let's face it, dumbass accusations are all they have as a response. Well developed arguments with supporting evidence appear to be beyond their capabilities. The 'sheeple' or 'shill' attacks only demonstrate the accusor's lack of intelligence. But hey, there has always been, and always will be those who massage their ego with the thought that they have special knowledge. That's the psychology behind the cult mentality. If you believed the official account of 9-11 you would have no problem admitting it. But you will not commit. You are a "truther." Please, save your sophist nonsense. Instead, you claim that this "official" account has "documented evidence" Really? I don't think so. I've never made such a claim, all I've done is post logical and verifiable evidence to counter your wild unsubstantiated rants. Evidence which you rarely bother to read and if you do, you rarely comprehend. Your assumptions and unsubstantiated extrapolations become quite tedious. Well developed arguments with supporting evidence appear to be beyond their capabilities. Why do you spend your efforts insulting anyone who does not share your views? It doesn't take much of an effort and it's only a response to an insult in kind. The 'sheeple' or 'shill' attacks only demonstrate the accusor's lack of intelligence. But hey, there has always been, and always will be those who massage their ego with the thought that they have special knowledge. That's the psychology behind the cult mentality. The above is true. What's your problem? And then never miss an opportunity to brag about how educated you are and how ignorant everyone else is. See, this is the sort of brain dead insult I respond to in kind.  Apparently there is no "well developed arguments" or "supporting evidence" that is convincing enough for 80% of most people. If the arguments were so "well developed" they would be more convincing. A logical fallacy. Next! It really does not take education or even intelligence to see and recognize a big fat lie. No, it doesn't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InvictusV, So are you a true believer in the official story told by the Media whores and the political machine? I believe that the 9-11 truth movement was begun as a political organization with the sole purpose of trying to fabricate a narrative in which implicated Bush. It has little or nothing to do with what actually happened. It has morphed into a major money making enterprise in which all the kooks and whackos from the conspiracy circuit have converged to enrich themselves.. Actually I was not asking you about what you believe about a certain 9-11 truth movement or any of those organizations. I was asking you if you believe the official government account of 9-11. I simply don't care what the official government account is. What I believe is based on my own conclusions and that involved spending an inordinate amount of time reading "theories" and "hypotheses" from 9-11 truther sites and independent scientific investigations of the collapses of WTC 1 WTC 2 WTC 7 and the damage to the Pentagon. I concluded based on researching the funding and supporting cast of 9-11 truth that they were nothing more than left wing antagonists with axes to grind over the 2000 election. Nothing more. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is what you posted:
Well developed arguments with supporting evidence appear to be beyond their capabilities. Are you saying that because you continue to post vague remarks like this, you are off the hook? Being uncommitted and vague is not going to save you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is what you posted: Well developed arguments with supporting evidence appear to be beyond their capabilities. Are you saying that because you continue to post vague remarks like this, you are off the hook? Being uncommitted and vague is not going to save you. It's not vague, it's succinct and to the point. Why don't you employ a well developed argument for a change? I wish this site had an 'ignore' feature. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InvictusV, So are you a true believer in the official story told by the Media whores and the political machine? I believe that the 9-11 truth movement was begun as a political organization with the sole purpose of trying to fabricate a narrative in which implicated Bush. It has little or nothing to do with what actually happened. It has morphed into a major money making enterprise in which all the kooks and whackos from the conspiracy circuit have converged to enrich themselves.. Actually I was not asking you about what you believe about a certain 9-11 truth movement or any of those organizations. I was asking you if you believe the official government account of 9-11. I simply don't care what the official government account is. What I believe is based on my own conclusions and that involved spending an inordinate amount of time reading "theories" and "hypotheses" from 9-11 truther sites and independent scientific investigations of the collapses of WTC 1 WTC 2 WTC 7 and the damage to the Pentagon. I concluded based on researching the funding and supporting cast of 9-11 truth that they were nothing more than left wing antagonists with axes to grind over the 2000 election. Nothing more. But you don't know or don't care what really happened, or if the government account is a lie? I would think that would be the most important thing to consider. The only reason I even bother to look at alternative accounts of 9-11 is because I can't believe the official account for lack of evidence. I know a lie when I see it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is what you posted: Well developed arguments with supporting evidence appear to be beyond their capabilities. Are you saying that because you continue to post vague remarks like this, you are off the hook? Being uncommitted and vague is not going to save you. It's not vague, it's succinct and to the point. Why don't you employ a well developed argument for a change? I wish this site had an 'ignore' feature. Try using your own "free will." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is what you posted: Well developed arguments with supporting evidence appear to be beyond their capabilities. Are you saying that because you continue to post vague remarks like this, you are off the hook? Being uncommitted and vague is not going to save you. It's not vague, it's succinct and to the point. Why don't you employ a well developed argument for a change? I wish this site had an 'ignore' feature. Try using your own "free will." I do, but you keep badgering me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InvictusV, So are you a true believer in the official story told by the Media whores and the political machine? I believe that the 9-11 truth movement was begun as a political organization with the sole purpose of trying to fabricate a narrative in which implicated Bush. It has little or nothing to do with what actually happened. It has morphed into a major money making enterprise in which all the kooks and whackos from the conspiracy circuit have converged to enrich themselves.. Actually I was not asking you about what you believe about a certain 9-11 truth movement or any of those organizations. I was asking you if you believe the official government account of 9-11. I simply don't care what the official government account is. What I believe is based on my own conclusions and that involved spending an inordinate amount of time reading "theories" and "hypotheses" from 9-11 truther sites and independent scientific investigations of the collapses of WTC 1 WTC 2 WTC 7 and the damage to the Pentagon. I concluded based on researching the funding and supporting cast of 9-11 truth that they were nothing more than left wing antagonists with axes to grind over the 2000 election. Nothing more. But you don't know or don't care what really happened, or if the government account is a lie? I would think that would be the most important thing to consider. The only reason I even bother to look at alternative accounts of 9-11 is because I can't believe the official account for lack of evidence. I know a lie when I see it. What happened is crystal clear. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sun 12/02/12 02:51 PM
|
|
Jeanniebean's remark was: Some people just squirm under the thumb of the truth. Hotrod's reply: And some people just assume and make ch*t up. Well, let's face it, dumbass accusations are all they have as a response. Well developed arguments with supporting evidence appear to be beyond their capabilities. The 'sheeple' or 'shill' attacks only demonstrate the accusor's lack of intelligence. But hey, there has always been, and always will be those who massage their ego with the thought that they have special knowledge. That's the psychology behind the cult mentality. I was not "badgering" you when I posted: "Some people just squirm under the thumb of the truth." It was not directed at anyone in particular. And yet you took it to heart and you proceeded to "badger me." and accuse me of badgering you when I was simply responding to your post. So I think you need more practice using your free will to ignore me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InvictusV, So are you a true believer in the official story told by the Media whores and the political machine? I believe that the 9-11 truth movement was begun as a political organization with the sole purpose of trying to fabricate a narrative in which implicated Bush. It has little or nothing to do with what actually happened. It has morphed into a major money making enterprise in which all the kooks and whackos from the conspiracy circuit have converged to enrich themselves.. Actually I was not asking you about what you believe about a certain 9-11 truth movement or any of those organizations. I was asking you if you believe the official government account of 9-11. I simply don't care what the official government account is. What I believe is based on my own conclusions and that involved spending an inordinate amount of time reading "theories" and "hypotheses" from 9-11 truther sites and independent scientific investigations of the collapses of WTC 1 WTC 2 WTC 7 and the damage to the Pentagon. I concluded based on researching the funding and supporting cast of 9-11 truth that they were nothing more than left wing antagonists with axes to grind over the 2000 election. Nothing more. But you don't know or don't care what really happened, or if the government account is a lie? I would think that would be the most important thing to consider. The only reason I even bother to look at alternative accounts of 9-11 is because I can't believe the official account for lack of evidence. I know a lie when I see it. What happened is crystal clear. Really? I don't think so. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Sun 12/02/12 02:56 PM
|
|
Gloria Jeans remark was: Some people just squirm under the thumb of the truth. Hotrod's reply: And some people just assume and make ch*t up. Well, let's face it, dumbass accusations are all they have as a response. Well developed arguments with supporting evidence appear to be beyond their capabilities. The 'sheeple' or 'shill' attacks only demonstrate the accusor's lack of intelligence. But hey, there has always been, and always will be those who massage their ego with the thought that they have special knowledge. That's the psychology behind the cult mentality. I was not "badgering" you when I posted: squirm under the thumb of the truth. I never said you did. My remark was of a universal nature as opposed to specific. Is that clearer now? It was not directed at anyone in particular. And yet you took it to heart and you proceed to badger me. No, I didn't take it to heart, I merely responded. Please stop making up lies. Furthermore, I did not proceed to badger you, merely respond. My 'badgering' comment referred to your harassment over this sophist nonsense about me being a truther. Is that clearer now? Example: you are off the hook? Being uncommitted and vague is not going to save you This could be considered harrassment. So you need more practice using your free will to ignore me. Why don't you stop trolling? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InvictusV, So are you a true believer in the official story told by the Media whores and the political machine? I believe that the 9-11 truth movement was begun as a political organization with the sole purpose of trying to fabricate a narrative in which implicated Bush. It has little or nothing to do with what actually happened. It has morphed into a major money making enterprise in which all the kooks and whackos from the conspiracy circuit have converged to enrich themselves.. Actually I was not asking you about what you believe about a certain 9-11 truth movement or any of those organizations. I was asking you if you believe the official government account of 9-11. I simply don't care what the official government account is. What I believe is based on my own conclusions and that involved spending an inordinate amount of time reading "theories" and "hypotheses" from 9-11 truther sites and independent scientific investigations of the collapses of WTC 1 WTC 2 WTC 7 and the damage to the Pentagon. I concluded based on researching the funding and supporting cast of 9-11 truth that they were nothing more than left wing antagonists with axes to grind over the 2000 election. Nothing more. But you don't know or don't care what really happened, or if the government account is a lie? I would think that would be the most important thing to consider. The only reason I even bother to look at alternative accounts of 9-11 is because I can't believe the official account for lack of evidence. I know a lie when I see it. What happened is crystal clear. Really? I don't think so. yeah.. it really is.. |
|
|
|
|
