Previous 1
Topic: Just curious?
kvturner's photo
Fri 11/09/12 05:03 AM
My last topic disappeared. Alright... So, what do you guys think of my profile? Too much, too little, just right? Eh?

Gossipmpm's photo
Fri 11/09/12 06:37 AM
welcome


tammy:heart:

Muaness's photo
Fri 11/09/12 06:38 AM
Truth is no profile is just right because we all are here for different purpose.
I would say its ok

Movie07's photo
Fri 11/09/12 07:13 AM
drinker :smile: Hello n welcome to the site

kvturner's photo
Fri 11/09/12 08:23 AM
Thanks all! And I'm not looking for perfect, I'm just looking for opinions, suggestions.

no photo
Fri 11/09/12 08:35 AM
Opinions? I have them more than onions in any grocery any day. Harr harr.
If you cant find what you are looking for in the specific environment you so love, how do you expect to find that here online? (more of a question than opnion! But -ion is all that matters. Yawn) (most of the people who come here hardly have a social life outside family. And as woman who loves limelight n identity, i donno where you belong in this crowd n why .... But welcome)

Muaness's photo
Fri 11/09/12 12:51 PM

Thanks all! And I'm not looking for perfect, I'm just looking for opinions, suggestions.


I think the flower attached to your hair is a bit big w.r.t the size of your image. Its a suggestion though.

kvturner's photo
Fri 11/09/12 12:57 PM


Thanks all! And I'm not looking for perfect, I'm just looking for opinions, suggestions.


I think the flower attached to your hair is a bit big w.r.t the size of your image. Its a suggestion though.


I'll change the main pic in a second then. Lemme know what you think.

HeadnHeart's photo
Fri 11/09/12 01:04 PM
I think either pic is fine, The flower pic is kinda cool, like the whispy hair. The other shows your eyes though. You have enough pics that are very good. I think whats written is pretty decent as well.

Good luck...

Muaness's photo
Fri 11/09/12 01:06 PM
Edited by Muaness on Fri 11/09/12 01:07 PM



Thanks all! And I'm not looking for perfect, I'm just looking for opinions, suggestions.


I think the flower attached to your hair is a bit big w.r.t the size of your image. Its a suggestion though.


I'll change the main pic in a second then. Lemme know what you think.


I think this one is better and prettier too.'I give it a 9.9/10 rating

kvturner's photo
Fri 11/09/12 01:14 PM
What picture do you guys think would represent me best?

wux's photo
Fri 11/09/12 03:30 PM
All pictures look good, I don't like the avant-guarde one(s), but that's just me, you leave it in if you want to, not a big deal.

The upshot is that you look good, period, why change something that ain't broke. (I am not talking 'bout your finances.)

I don't know what else to say. You sound to me like you're toying with the idea of having a sugar daddy, but if one presented, you would run off the map in embarrassment and fear and shame. I was the same way at your age. Prostituting one's own self takes much more than a simple need of money. You'd have to be addicted to crack or heroine if you truly want to be supported by men's monies for love.

I would not recommend to you even the toying with it.

If the economy goes worse, I think that's more the reason to go into theatre. ALL people will lose money, which means that we will ALL have the same percentage of our future measly incomes for all kinds of expenses like food, clothing, shelter, entertainment, education, etc. Which means that goods made of things (cars, trains, etc.) will be prohibitively expensive, and person-serviced services (haircuts, shoe-shines, live theatre) will be much cheaper than today, in comparison to the relative prices of others things.

So if you are good in theatre arts, such as singing, dancing, acting, etc., you will have a VERY good chance of finding gainful employment in a very poor economy.

You won't do Shakespeare, but you can make a good living and not via prostitution at all if you sing in restaurants, or are a dollar-a-dance girl. These things are always in vogue in poor times, when people are hungry for entertainment, since they can't afford books or stereos, and the mass media will be largely shut down due to financial difficulties. Those things cost an enormous amount in operating costs, and set-up costs. They just won't pay for themselves if the US economy goes worse and worse.

And I find you a smart and insightful girl, for realizing that the time of the USA as an international leader in politics, democratics, economics, entertainment, and domestic violence is over. On the upswing all this may lead to an improvement in education and fostering individual achievement, MAVERICK individual achievement; and on another upswing, it may lead to a civil war, since almost every family is well equipped with fire power.

But I digressed.

kvturner's photo
Fri 11/09/12 06:41 PM

All pictures look good, I don't like the avant-guarde one(s), but that's just me, you leave it in if you want to, not a big deal.

The upshot is that you look good, period, why change something that ain't broke. (I am not talking 'bout your finances.)

I don't know what else to say. You sound to me like you're toying with the idea of having a sugar daddy, but if one presented, you would run off the map in embarrassment and fear and shame. I was the same way at your age. Prostituting one's own self takes much more than a simple need of money. You'd have to be addicted to crack or heroine if you truly want to be supported by men's monies for love.

I would not recommend to you even the toying with it.

If the economy goes worse, I think that's more the reason to go into theatre. ALL people will lose money, which means that we will ALL have the same percentage of our future measly incomes for all kinds of expenses like food, clothing, shelter, entertainment, education, etc. Which means that goods made of things (cars, trains, etc.) will be prohibitively expensive, and person-serviced services (haircuts, shoe-shines, live theatre) will be much cheaper than today, in comparison to the relative prices of others things.

So if you are good in theatre arts, such as singing, dancing, acting, etc., you will have a VERY good chance of finding gainful employment in a very poor economy.

You won't do Shakespeare, but you can make a good living and not via prostitution at all if you sing in restaurants, or are a dollar-a-dance girl. These things are always in vogue in poor times, when people are hungry for entertainment, since they can't afford books or stereos, and the mass media will be largely shut down due to financial difficulties. Those things cost an enormous amount in operating costs, and set-up costs. They just won't pay for themselves if the US economy goes worse and worse.

And I find you a smart and insightful girl, for realizing that the time of the USA as an international leader in politics, democratics, economics, entertainment, and domestic violence is over. On the upswing all this may lead to an improvement in education and fostering individual achievement, MAVERICK individual achievement; and on another upswing, it may lead to a civil war, since almost every family is well equipped with fire power.

But I digressed.


I'm not prostituting myself in any manner, and don't wish to have a 'sugar daddy' in any sense. I won't even let a man pay for my meal until I've been in a committed relationship with them for a while, and they tell me to shut up and let them take the check for once. I cover my own finances, and focus mainly on technial theatre. I excel in the field, and have connections set up. None of this is about needing money, or needing anyone to rely on. Quite the contrary.

I digress, any 'avant-guarde' pictures are not me trying to look 'sexy' or whatever. I'm an artist. I make art. People interpret my work in different ways. My photography is one of my outlets, so that is what you see in many of my self photos.

no photo
Fri 11/09/12 07:15 PM

All pictures look good, I don't like the avant-guarde one(s), but that's just me, you leave it in if you want to, not a big deal.

The upshot is that you look good, period, why change something that ain't broke. (I am not talking 'bout your finances.)

I don't know what else to say. You sound to me like you're toying with the idea of having a sugar daddy, but if one presented, you would run off the map in embarrassment and fear and shame. I was the same way at your age. Prostituting one's own self takes much more than a simple need of money. You'd have to be addicted to crack or heroine if you truly want to be supported by men's monies for love.

I would not recommend to you even the toying with it.

If the economy goes worse, I think that's more the reason to go into theatre. ALL people will lose money, which means that we will ALL have the same percentage of our future measly incomes for all kinds of expenses like food, clothing, shelter, entertainment, education, etc. Which means that goods made of things (cars, trains, etc.) will be prohibitively expensive, and person-serviced services (haircuts, shoe-shines, live theatre) will be much cheaper than today, in comparison to the relative prices of others things.

So if you are good in theatre arts, such as singing, dancing, acting, etc., you will have a VERY good chance of finding gainful employment in a very poor economy.

You won't do Shakespeare, but you can make a good living and not via prostitution at all if you sing in restaurants, or are a dollar-a-dance girl. These things are always in vogue in poor times, when people are hungry for entertainment, since they can't afford books or stereos, and the mass media will be largely shut down due to financial difficulties. Those things cost an enormous amount in operating costs, and set-up costs. They just won't pay for themselves if the US economy goes worse and worse.

And I find you a smart and insightful girl, for realizing that the time of the USA as an international leader in politics, democratics, economics, entertainment, and domestic violence is over. On the upswing all this may lead to an improvement in education and fostering individual achievement, MAVERICK individual achievement; and on another upswing, it may lead to a civil war, since almost every family is well equipped with fire power.

But I digressed.


awesome. Opinionated n judgemental but who cares! Wux, You always rock. I am babling. Ha ha

the girl looks soo chewit! Whats wrong with the guys there? I thought only brokes n freaks visited here! Huh!

Muaness's photo
Fri 11/09/12 10:58 PM

All pictures look good, I don't like the avant-guarde one(s), but that's just me, you leave it in if you want to, not a big deal.

The upshot is that you look good, period, why change something that ain't broke. (I am not talking 'bout your finances.)

I don't know what else to say. You sound to me like you're toying with the idea of having a sugar daddy, but if one presented, you would run off the map in embarrassment and fear and shame. I was the same way at your age. Prostituting one's own self takes much more than a simple need of money. You'd have to be addicted to crack or heroine if you truly want to be supported by men's monies for love.

I would not recommend to you even the toying with it.

If the economy goes worse, I think that's more the reason to go into theatre. ALL people will lose money, which means that we will ALL have the same percentage of our future measly incomes for all kinds of expenses like food, clothing, shelter, entertainment, education, etc. Which means that goods made of things (cars, trains, etc.) will be prohibitively expensive, and person-serviced services (haircuts, shoe-shines, live theatre) will be much cheaper than today, in comparison to the relative prices of others things.

So if you are good in theatre arts, such as singing, dancing, acting, etc., you will have a VERY good chance of finding gainful employment in a very poor economy.

You won't do Shakespeare, but you can make a good living and not via prostitution at all if you sing in restaurants, or are a dollar-a-dance girl. These things are always in vogue in poor times, when people are hungry for entertainment, since they can't afford books or stereos, and the mass media will be largely shut down due to financial difficulties. Those things cost an enormous amount in operating costs, and set-up costs. They just won't pay for themselves if the US economy goes worse and worse.

And I find you a smart and insightful girl, for realizing that the time of the USA as an international leader in politics, democratics, economics, entertainment, and domestic violence is over. On the upswing all this may lead to an improvement in education and fostering individual achievement, MAVERICK individual achievement; and on another upswing, it may lead to a civil war, since almost every family is well equipped with fire power.

But I digressed.


All this story just to rate a profile? Truth is I cant even place the connection of most part of what our dear papa wux wrote to the ladies request of helping rate her profile.

America, economy , world power, civil war etc.
Oh! I get it, my knowledge of English is shallow. someone please help me make sense of what wux wrote.

Muaness's photo
Fri 11/09/12 11:06 PM

What picture do you guys think would represent me best?


All ya pictures are ok. However, the one you had a kind of red hair represents you less. So I think though.

Scott18882's photo
Sat 11/10/12 05:44 AM
Very hot girl !

wux's photo
Sat 11/10/12 06:20 AM


All pictures look good, I don't like the avant-guarde one(s), but that's just me, you leave it in if you want to, not a big deal.

The upshot is that you look good, period, why change something that ain't broke. (I am not talking 'bout your finances.)

I don't know what else to say. You sound to me like you're toying with the idea of having a sugar daddy, but if one presented, you would run off the map in embarrassment and fear and shame. I was the same way at your age. Prostituting one's own self takes much more than a simple need of money. You'd have to be addicted to crack or heroine if you truly want to be supported by men's monies for love.

I would not recommend to you even the toying with it.

If the economy goes worse, I think that's more the reason to go into theatre. ALL people will lose money, which means that we will ALL have the same percentage of our future measly incomes for all kinds of expenses like food, clothing, shelter, entertainment, education, etc. Which means that goods made of things (cars, trains, etc.) will be prohibitively expensive, and person-serviced services (haircuts, shoe-shines, live theatre) will be much cheaper than today, in comparison to the relative prices of others things.

So if you are good in theatre arts, such as singing, dancing, acting, etc., you will have a VERY good chance of finding gainful employment in a very poor economy.

You won't do Shakespeare, but you can make a good living and not via prostitution at all if you sing in restaurants, or are a dollar-a-dance girl. These things are always in vogue in poor times, when people are hungry for entertainment, since they can't afford books or stereos, and the mass media will be largely shut down due to financial difficulties. Those things cost an enormous amount in operating costs, and set-up costs. They just won't pay for themselves if the US economy goes worse and worse.

And I find you a smart and insightful girl, for realizing that the time of the USA as an international leader in politics, democratics, economics, entertainment, and domestic violence is over. On the upswing all this may lead to an improvement in education and fostering individual achievement, MAVERICK individual achievement; and on another upswing, it may lead to a civil war, since almost every family is well equipped with fire power.

But I digressed.


I'm not prostituting myself in any manner, and don't wish to have a 'sugar daddy' in any sense. I won't even let a man pay for my meal until I've been in a committed relationship with them for a while, and they tell me to shut up and let them take the check for once. I cover my own finances, and focus mainly on technial theatre. I excel in the field, and have connections set up. None of this is about needing money, or needing anyone to rely on. Quite the contrary.

I digress, any 'avant-guarde' pictures are not me trying to look 'sexy' or whatever. I'm an artist. I make art. People interpret my work in different ways. My photography is one of my outlets, so that is what you see in many of my self photos.


I understand you are saying the truth, but I resent in your putting words in my mouth.

I did not say you are prostituting yourself. I said it appears you are toying with that idea and I advised you agaisnt it. This is what I said, not at all that you are prostituting yourself.

I also did not say that the avant guarde picutres are there to make you look sexy or whatever. I simply said, they are not my taste, and I hastily added, this is just my opinion, dictated by my personal taste. I did qualify my opinion as that. I did not insinuate that you put them there to make yourself look sexy.

I resent it when people attack me on grounds of attributing things to me as though I said those things, whereas I did not say them at all.

That's all. I take all your other criticisms of my criticism, fine, you are right in those, but please don't thing badly of me because you think I said "you are prostituting yourself", because I did not say that at all; and please don't think badly of me because you think that you put in the avant-guarde-looking pictures to make yourself sexy, because I did not say that.

I really don't know why I am getting into trouble with people. I say what I think, and they think what I say, but the two are completely different.


Why me? What's wrong with giving an honest opinion, and getting flack for it? I did not say ANYTHING bad about you in my opinion of your profile text or pictures. Why do you get so defensive that half your audience hates me now? Show me please one point of grievance.

I think you misread my critique, you got upset and leashed out on me.

How do you think that makes me feel? Why do you think I should lie down and take the accusations from you that you based on things I did not say at all, but you assert I said? and most importantly:

Why did you distort my words, and put them in my mouth?

This last question was a totally honest question, I dont know the answer, but I would like to. It is not a rhetorical question. What was it that made you misread my words, and believe that your reading is what's there, black on white?

This I am really curious to know. And I promise I won't be defensive about it, as long as you are honest in your answer. I am really baffled why things like that happen to me. I haven't a clue. What is happening here? Why is reality ignored? So vehemently, so fiercely, and so much against my favour?

I am not demanding an answer from you, at all. But I would be really grateful if you could please fulfil this request.

It is for the purpose to make me acquire new insight about human nature, that's the only reason I request an answer. I have removed the persona from the general problem already, my curiousity is why a general person would do such a thing, and since you did it, you are a good person to ask. I am not singling you out, I ask you only because I think you know the answer. And you must know the answer, because you did just exactly that.

no photo
Sat 11/10/12 07:13 AM
Ha ha ha. Oh ho ho. Now save your ***! I have never ever seen anyone write longer than this on issues imag... Ahem haw haw.

This is high decibel canon ! Beware !!

wux's photo
Sat 11/10/12 07:23 AM
Edited by wux on Sat 11/10/12 07:27 AM

Ha ha ha. Oh ho ho. Now save your ***! I have never ever seen anyone write longer than this on issues imag... Ahem haw haw.

This is high decibel canon ! Beware !!

Quite, little Grasshopper. And a little more quietly, too, please, as well.

A good little young Tibetan monk trainee is not supposed to jump up and down in excitement when he sees the Cow of Milk turn the Corner of Street to come home from Pasture.

:- )

Previous 1