100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
| Topic: Obama never mentions one word -- 'terror' | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
That was a perfectly fine speech Barack Obama gave at the United Nations yesterday. Perfectly fine, except that he has been president for the last four years.
Perfectly fine, except that terrorists murdered our ambassador in Libya on the 11th anniversary of 9/11. And perfectly fine, except that the head of Al Qaeda released a videotape urging that murder and others during what he called a time of “American weakness.” Mr. President: The video didn’t do it. Terrorists did. Say it, for God’s sake! Facts, bloody facts, take all the shine off Obama’s speech. His teleprompted rhetoric no longer inspires because reality keeps interrupting the swoon. Even if you try, you can’t drift off into a dreamy vision of utopia while the corpses pile up and the hate burns red hot. Unless you’re one of the bad guys , “Death to America” doesn’t make you want to get up and dance. Give the president some credit. He tried, to a certain degree. He brought his best scolding, patronizing tone for the day, as though the Turtle Bay club dominated by thugs, theocrats and cowards would be moved by his earnest pleas and frowns. It was an appeal better directed at third-graders than the Third World. His boldest declaration, that “the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” was met with silence. Then again, he has said similar things before, and nobody believes him, so there’s no sense either cheering or hissing. It’s just words. See, they’ve already evaporated. Much of those words were aimed at Ohio and Florida. A president who has put campaigning above governing for nearly two years should never be accused of neglecting his real goal for even a moment this close to the election. Yet, as events of the last two weeks prove, the disconnect between Obama’s words and the effect of his policies can no longer be ignored. Even as he praises our slain ambassador, Chris Stevens, Obama demeans his memory by refusing to call the attack in Libya what it was -- an act of terrorism against the United States. Nor was it a coincidence of timing that it was carried out on the anniversary of that historic infamy. It was purposeful, Al Qaeda boss Ayman al-Zawahiri said on tape, a reminder that our enemies are still determined to “purify” Muslim lands. His assertion of “American weakness” indicts Obama, the architect of that weakness. The president pleaded guilty by sidestepping the 9/11 connection, as he has for 15 days. By doing so, Obama reveals a worldview that is incompatible with American leadership and national security. His failure to talk straight about what happened that day is a form of appeasement that will embolden radical Islamists. They don’t see his reticence as a noble peace offering. They see it as an invitation to hit again. They don’t want a seat at the table. They want to blow up the table. His middle name and apologies have not charmed them. Nor will his commitment to retreating from the battlefield. His statement that “we have begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014” put an exclamation point on a very strange day. Only under Obama do wars have schedules. Not victory, just a timetable. With the presidential campaign almost exclusively about the domestic economy and jobs, many conservatives are pushing Mitt Romney to add foreign policy to the mix. No doubt he should and will, but he would be remiss if he didn’t tie the themes together. The Obama presidency is failing on all fronts, and for the same reason. The man at the center embodies the deadly combination of hubris and incompetence. Other than that, he gives a perfectly fine speech. Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/26/at-un-obama-never-mentions-one-word-terror/#ixzz27egUjIhC 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That was a perfectly fine speech Barack Obama gave at the United Nations yesterday. Perfectly fine, except that he has been president for the last four years. Perfectly fine, except that terrorists murdered our ambassador in Libya on the 11th anniversary of 9/11. And perfectly fine, except that the head of Al Qaeda released a videotape urging that murder and others during what he called a time of “American weakness.” Mr. President: The video didn’t do it. Terrorists did. Say it, for God’s sake! Facts, bloody facts, take all the shine off Obama’s speech. His teleprompted rhetoric no longer inspires because reality keeps interrupting the swoon. Even if you try, you can’t drift off into a dreamy vision of utopia while the corpses pile up and the hate burns red hot. Unless you’re one of the bad guys , “Death to America” doesn’t make you want to get up and dance. Give the president some credit. He tried, to a certain degree. He brought his best scolding, patronizing tone for the day, as though the Turtle Bay club dominated by thugs, theocrats and cowards would be moved by his earnest pleas and frowns. It was an appeal better directed at third-graders than the Third World. His boldest declaration, that “the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” was met with silence. Then again, he has said similar things before, and nobody believes him, so there’s no sense either cheering or hissing. It’s just words. See, they’ve already evaporated. Much of those words were aimed at Ohio and Florida. A president who has put campaigning above governing for nearly two years should never be accused of neglecting his real goal for even a moment this close to the election. Yet, as events of the last two weeks prove, the disconnect between Obama’s words and the effect of his policies can no longer be ignored. Even as he praises our slain ambassador, Chris Stevens, Obama demeans his memory by refusing to call the attack in Libya what it was -- an act of terrorism against the United States. Nor was it a coincidence of timing that it was carried out on the anniversary of that historic infamy. It was purposeful, Al Qaeda boss Ayman al-Zawahiri said on tape, a reminder that our enemies are still determined to “purify” Muslim lands. His assertion of “American weakness” indicts Obama, the architect of that weakness. The president pleaded guilty by sidestepping the 9/11 connection, as he has for 15 days. By doing so, Obama reveals a worldview that is incompatible with American leadership and national security. His failure to talk straight about what happened that day is a form of appeasement that will embolden radical Islamists. They don’t see his reticence as a noble peace offering. They see it as an invitation to hit again. They don’t want a seat at the table. They want to blow up the table. His middle name and apologies have not charmed them. Nor will his commitment to retreating from the battlefield. His statement that “we have begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014” put an exclamation point on a very strange day. Only under Obama do wars have schedules. Not victory, just a timetable. With the presidential campaign almost exclusively about the domestic economy and jobs, many conservatives are pushing Mitt Romney to add foreign policy to the mix. No doubt he should and will, but he would be remiss if he didn’t tie the themes together. The Obama presidency is failing on all fronts, and for the same reason. The man at the center embodies the deadly combination of hubris and incompetence. Other than that, he gives a perfectly fine speech. Read more:http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/26/at-un-obama-never-mentions-one-word-terror/#ixzz27egUjIhC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's dare to take it one step farther.
They were Muslim terrorist. We have a large extremist Muslim group here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That was a perfectly fine speech Barack Obama gave at the United Nations yesterday. Perfectly fine, except that he has been president for the last four years. Perfectly fine, except that terrorists murdered our ambassador in Libya on the 11th anniversary of 9/11. And perfectly fine, except that the head of Al Qaeda released a videotape urging that murder and others during what he called a time of “American weakness.” Mr. President: The video didn’t do it. Terrorists did. Say it, for God’s sake! Facts, bloody facts, take all the shine off Obama’s speech. His teleprompted rhetoric no longer inspires because reality keeps interrupting the swoon. Even if you try, you can’t drift off into a dreamy vision of utopia while the corpses pile up and the hate burns red hot. Unless you’re one of the bad guys , “Death to America” doesn’t make you want to get up and dance. Give the president some credit. He tried, to a certain degree. He brought his best scolding, patronizing tone for the day, as though the Turtle Bay club dominated by thugs, theocrats and cowards would be moved by his earnest pleas and frowns. It was an appeal better directed at third-graders than the Third World. His boldest declaration, that “the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” was met with silence. Then again, he has said similar things before, and nobody believes him, so there’s no sense either cheering or hissing. It’s just words. See, they’ve already evaporated. Much of those words were aimed at Ohio and Florida. A president who has put campaigning above governing for nearly two years should never be accused of neglecting his real goal for even a moment this close to the election. Yet, as events of the last two weeks prove, the disconnect between Obama’s words and the effect of his policies can no longer be ignored. Even as he praises our slain ambassador, Chris Stevens, Obama demeans his memory by refusing to call the attack in Libya what it was -- an act of terrorism against the United States. Nor was it a coincidence of timing that it was carried out on the anniversary of that historic infamy. It was purposeful, Al Qaeda boss Ayman al-Zawahiri said on tape, a reminder that our enemies are still determined to “purify” Muslim lands. His assertion of “American weakness” indicts Obama, the architect of that weakness. The president pleaded guilty by sidestepping the 9/11 connection, as he has for 15 days. By doing so, Obama reveals a worldview that is incompatible with American leadership and national security. His failure to talk straight about what happened that day is a form of appeasement that will embolden radical Islamists. They don’t see his reticence as a noble peace offering. They see it as an invitation to hit again. They don’t want a seat at the table. They want to blow up the table. His middle name and apologies have not charmed them. Nor will his commitment to retreating from the battlefield. His statement that “we have begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014” put an exclamation point on a very strange day. Only under Obama do wars have schedules. Not victory, just a timetable. With the presidential campaign almost exclusively about the domestic economy and jobs, many conservatives are pushing Mitt Romney to add foreign policy to the mix. No doubt he should and will, but he would be remiss if he didn’t tie the themes together. The Obama presidency is failing on all fronts, and for the same reason. The man at the center embodies the deadly combination of hubris and incompetence. Other than that, he gives a perfectly fine speech. Read more:http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/26/at-un-obama-never-mentions-one-word-terror/#ixzz27egUjIhC
interesting, mentioning 'terrorism' would be more effective than: •September 2011 – Younis al Mauritani captured (senior al Qaeda leader in Pakistan) •September 2011 – Abu Hafs al-Shahri killed (al Qaeda’s chief of Pakistan operations) •August 2011 – Atiyah Abd al-Rahman killed (Al Qaeda No. 2 in Pakistan) •May 2011 – Osama bin Laden killed (Number 1 Al Qaeda, and worlds most wanted) •June 2011 – Fazul Abdullah Mohammed killed (top al-Qaeda operative in Somalia) •June 2011 – Ilyas Kashmiri killed (top al- Qaeda commander in Pakistan) •June 2010 – Hawza al Jawfi killed along with 6 other terrorist (leader in Pakistan) •May 2010 – Mustafa Ahmed Muhammad Uthman Abu al-Yazid killed [aliases Shaikh Sa’id al-Masri and Mustafa Abu al-Yazid] (al Qaeda’s No. 3) •April 2010 – Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Umar al-Baghdadi (Top two Al Qaeda operatives in Iraq) •March 2010 – Qari Mohammad Zafar killed (terrorist leader in Pakistan) •February 2010 – Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar captured (The Taliban’s top military commander) •February 2010 – Sirajuddin Haqqani killed (militant commander in Pakistan) •January 2010 – Qassem al-Rimi, Ayed al-Shabwani, Ammar al-Waili, Saleh al-Tais, Ibrahim and Mohammed Saleh al-Banna killed (Al-Qaeda military boss and senior Al-Qaeda figures in the Arabian Peninsula) •December 2009 – Saleh Al-Somali killed (senior al Qaeda operative in Pakistan) •September 2009 – Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan killed (ringleader of an al Qaeda cell in Kenya yeah, I can see where the words he uses to isolate and stereotype are MUCH more significant in the fight on 'terror'.... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That was a perfectly fine speech Barack Obama gave at the United Nations yesterday. Perfectly fine, except that he has been president for the last four years. Perfectly fine, except that terrorists murdered our ambassador in Libya on the 11th anniversary of 9/11. And perfectly fine, except that the head of Al Qaeda released a videotape urging that murder and others during what he called a time of “American weakness.” Mr. President: The video didn’t do it. Terrorists did. Say it, for God’s sake! Facts, bloody facts, take all the shine off Obama’s speech. His teleprompted rhetoric no longer inspires because reality keeps interrupting the swoon. Even if you try, you can’t drift off into a dreamy vision of utopia while the corpses pile up and the hate burns red hot. Unless you’re one of the bad guys , “Death to America” doesn’t make you want to get up and dance. Give the president some credit. He tried, to a certain degree. He brought his best scolding, patronizing tone for the day, as though the Turtle Bay club dominated by thugs, theocrats and cowards would be moved by his earnest pleas and frowns. It was an appeal better directed at third-graders than the Third World. His boldest declaration, that “the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” was met with silence. Then again, he has said similar things before, and nobody believes him, so there’s no sense either cheering or hissing. It’s just words. See, they’ve already evaporated. Much of those words were aimed at Ohio and Florida. A president who has put campaigning above governing for nearly two years should never be accused of neglecting his real goal for even a moment this close to the election. Yet, as events of the last two weeks prove, the disconnect between Obama’s words and the effect of his policies can no longer be ignored. Even as he praises our slain ambassador, Chris Stevens, Obama demeans his memory by refusing to call the attack in Libya what it was -- an act of terrorism against the United States. Nor was it a coincidence of timing that it was carried out on the anniversary of that historic infamy. It was purposeful, Al Qaeda boss Ayman al-Zawahiri said on tape, a reminder that our enemies are still determined to “purify” Muslim lands. His assertion of “American weakness” indicts Obama, the architect of that weakness. The president pleaded guilty by sidestepping the 9/11 connection, as he has for 15 days. By doing so, Obama reveals a worldview that is incompatible with American leadership and national security. His failure to talk straight about what happened that day is a form of appeasement that will embolden radical Islamists. They don’t see his reticence as a noble peace offering. They see it as an invitation to hit again. They don’t want a seat at the table. They want to blow up the table. His middle name and apologies have not charmed them. Nor will his commitment to retreating from the battlefield. His statement that “we have begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014” put an exclamation point on a very strange day. Only under Obama do wars have schedules. Not victory, just a timetable. With the presidential campaign almost exclusively about the domestic economy and jobs, many conservatives are pushing Mitt Romney to add foreign policy to the mix. No doubt he should and will, but he would be remiss if he didn’t tie the themes together. The Obama presidency is failing on all fronts, and for the same reason. The man at the center embodies the deadly combination of hubris and incompetence. Other than that, he gives a perfectly fine speech. Read more:http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/26/at-un-obama-never-mentions-one-word-terror/#ixzz27egUjIhC
If that's the case then how come as of yesterday the Agency investigating the crime (The F.B.I.) isn't on the ground in Libya or haven't been to the scene yet? Show's you Obama's priorties. Anyother time a US interest has been attacked like this the US has had Federal Agents on scene in less then an hour. NCIS agents were the first U.S. law enforcement personnel on the scene at the USS Cole bombing, the Limburg bombing and the terrorist attack in Mombasa, Kenya. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That was a perfectly fine speech Barack Obama gave at the United Nations yesterday. Perfectly fine, except that he has been president for the last four years. Perfectly fine, except that terrorists murdered our ambassador in Libya on the 11th anniversary of 9/11. And perfectly fine, except that the head of Al Qaeda released a videotape urging that murder and others during what he called a time of “American weakness.” Mr. President: The video didn’t do it. Terrorists did. Say it, for God’s sake! Facts, bloody facts, take all the shine off Obama’s speech. His teleprompted rhetoric no longer inspires because reality keeps interrupting the swoon. Even if you try, you can’t drift off into a dreamy vision of utopia while the corpses pile up and the hate burns red hot. Unless you’re one of the bad guys , “Death to America” doesn’t make you want to get up and dance. Give the president some credit. He tried, to a certain degree. He brought his best scolding, patronizing tone for the day, as though the Turtle Bay club dominated by thugs, theocrats and cowards would be moved by his earnest pleas and frowns. It was an appeal better directed at third-graders than the Third World. His boldest declaration, that “the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” was met with silence. Then again, he has said similar things before, and nobody believes him, so there’s no sense either cheering or hissing. It’s just words. See, they’ve already evaporated. Much of those words were aimed at Ohio and Florida. A president who has put campaigning above governing for nearly two years should never be accused of neglecting his real goal for even a moment this close to the election. Yet, as events of the last two weeks prove, the disconnect between Obama’s words and the effect of his policies can no longer be ignored. Even as he praises our slain ambassador, Chris Stevens, Obama demeans his memory by refusing to call the attack in Libya what it was -- an act of terrorism against the United States. Nor was it a coincidence of timing that it was carried out on the anniversary of that historic infamy. It was purposeful, Al Qaeda boss Ayman al-Zawahiri said on tape, a reminder that our enemies are still determined to “purify” Muslim lands. His assertion of “American weakness” indicts Obama, the architect of that weakness. The president pleaded guilty by sidestepping the 9/11 connection, as he has for 15 days. By doing so, Obama reveals a worldview that is incompatible with American leadership and national security. His failure to talk straight about what happened that day is a form of appeasement that will embolden radical Islamists. They don’t see his reticence as a noble peace offering. They see it as an invitation to hit again. They don’t want a seat at the table. They want to blow up the table. His middle name and apologies have not charmed them. Nor will his commitment to retreating from the battlefield. His statement that “we have begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014” put an exclamation point on a very strange day. Only under Obama do wars have schedules. Not victory, just a timetable. With the presidential campaign almost exclusively about the domestic economy and jobs, many conservatives are pushing Mitt Romney to add foreign policy to the mix. No doubt he should and will, but he would be remiss if he didn’t tie the themes together. The Obama presidency is failing on all fronts, and for the same reason. The man at the center embodies the deadly combination of hubris and incompetence. Other than that, he gives a perfectly fine speech. Read more:http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/26/at-un-obama-never-mentions-one-word-terror/#ixzz27egUjIhC
interesting, mentioning 'terrorism' would be more effective than: •September 2011 – Younis al Mauritani captured (senior al Qaeda leader in Pakistan) •September 2011 – Abu Hafs al-Shahri killed (al Qaeda’s chief of Pakistan operations) •August 2011 – Atiyah Abd al-Rahman killed (Al Qaeda No. 2 in Pakistan) •May 2011 – Osama bin Laden killed (Number 1 Al Qaeda, and worlds most wanted) •June 2011 – Fazul Abdullah Mohammed killed (top al-Qaeda operative in Somalia) •June 2011 – Ilyas Kashmiri killed (top al- Qaeda commander in Pakistan) •June 2010 – Hawza al Jawfi killed along with 6 other terrorist (leader in Pakistan) •May 2010 – Mustafa Ahmed Muhammad Uthman Abu al-Yazid killed [aliases Shaikh Sa’id al-Masri and Mustafa Abu al-Yazid] (al Qaeda’s No. 3) •April 2010 – Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Umar al-Baghdadi (Top two Al Qaeda operatives in Iraq) •March 2010 – Qari Mohammad Zafar killed (terrorist leader in Pakistan) •February 2010 – Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar captured (The Taliban’s top military commander) •February 2010 – Sirajuddin Haqqani killed (militant commander in Pakistan) •January 2010 – Qassem al-Rimi, Ayed al-Shabwani, Ammar al-Waili, Saleh al-Tais, Ibrahim and Mohammed Saleh al-Banna killed (Al-Qaeda military boss and senior Al-Qaeda figures in the Arabian Peninsula) •December 2009 – Saleh Al-Somali killed (senior al Qaeda operative in Pakistan) •September 2009 – Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan killed (ringleader of an al Qaeda cell in Kenya yeah, I can see where the words he uses to isolate and stereotype are MUCH more significant in the fight on 'terror'....
He has captured a small fraction of terrorists compared to the amount that was captured or killed under President Bush's watch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sat 09/29/12 09:09 AM
|
|
That was a perfectly fine speech Barack Obama gave at the United Nations yesterday. Perfectly fine, except that he has been president for the last four years. Perfectly fine, except that terrorists murdered our ambassador in Libya on the 11th anniversary of 9/11. And perfectly fine, except that the head of Al Qaeda released a videotape urging that murder and others during what he called a time of “American weakness.” Mr. President: The video didn’t do it. Terrorists did. Say it, for God’s sake! Facts, bloody facts, take all the shine off Obama’s speech. His teleprompted rhetoric no longer inspires because reality keeps interrupting the swoon. Even if you try, you can’t drift off into a dreamy vision of utopia while the corpses pile up and the hate burns red hot. Unless you’re one of the bad guys , “Death to America” doesn’t make you want to get up and dance. Give the president some credit. He tried, to a certain degree. He brought his best scolding, patronizing tone for the day, as though the Turtle Bay club dominated by thugs, theocrats and cowards would be moved by his earnest pleas and frowns. It was an appeal better directed at third-graders than the Third World. His boldest declaration, that “the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” was met with silence. Then again, he has said similar things before, and nobody believes him, so there’s no sense either cheering or hissing. It’s just words. See, they’ve already evaporated. Much of those words were aimed at Ohio and Florida. A president who has put campaigning above governing for nearly two years should never be accused of neglecting his real goal for even a moment this close to the election. Yet, as events of the last two weeks prove, the disconnect between Obama’s words and the effect of his policies can no longer be ignored. Even as he praises our slain ambassador, Chris Stevens, Obama demeans his memory by refusing to call the attack in Libya what it was -- an act of terrorism against the United States. Nor was it a coincidence of timing that it was carried out on the anniversary of that historic infamy. It was purposeful, Al Qaeda boss Ayman al-Zawahiri said on tape, a reminder that our enemies are still determined to “purify” Muslim lands. His assertion of “American weakness” indicts Obama, the architect of that weakness. The president pleaded guilty by sidestepping the 9/11 connection, as he has for 15 days. By doing so, Obama reveals a worldview that is incompatible with American leadership and national security. His failure to talk straight about what happened that day is a form of appeasement that will embolden radical Islamists. They don’t see his reticence as a noble peace offering. They see it as an invitation to hit again. They don’t want a seat at the table. They want to blow up the table. His middle name and apologies have not charmed them. Nor will his commitment to retreating from the battlefield. His statement that “we have begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014” put an exclamation point on a very strange day. Only under Obama do wars have schedules. Not victory, just a timetable. With the presidential campaign almost exclusively about the domestic economy and jobs, many conservatives are pushing Mitt Romney to add foreign policy to the mix. No doubt he should and will, but he would be remiss if he didn’t tie the themes together. The Obama presidency is failing on all fronts, and for the same reason. The man at the center embodies the deadly combination of hubris and incompetence. Other than that, he gives a perfectly fine speech. Read more:http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/26/at-un-obama-never-mentions-one-word-terror/#ixzz27egUjIhC
interesting, mentioning 'terrorism' would be more effective than: •September 2011 – Younis al Mauritani captured (senior al Qaeda leader in Pakistan) •September 2011 – Abu Hafs al-Shahri killed (al Qaeda’s chief of Pakistan operations) •August 2011 – Atiyah Abd al-Rahman killed (Al Qaeda No. 2 in Pakistan) •May 2011 – Osama bin Laden killed (Number 1 Al Qaeda, and worlds most wanted) •June 2011 – Fazul Abdullah Mohammed killed (top al-Qaeda operative in Somalia) •June 2011 – Ilyas Kashmiri killed (top al- Qaeda commander in Pakistan) •June 2010 – Hawza al Jawfi killed along with 6 other terrorist (leader in Pakistan) •May 2010 – Mustafa Ahmed Muhammad Uthman Abu al-Yazid killed [aliases Shaikh Sa’id al-Masri and Mustafa Abu al-Yazid] (al Qaeda’s No. 3) •April 2010 – Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Umar al-Baghdadi (Top two Al Qaeda operatives in Iraq) •March 2010 – Qari Mohammad Zafar killed (terrorist leader in Pakistan) •February 2010 – Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar captured (The Taliban’s top military commander) •February 2010 – Sirajuddin Haqqani killed (militant commander in Pakistan) •January 2010 – Qassem al-Rimi, Ayed al-Shabwani, Ammar al-Waili, Saleh al-Tais, Ibrahim and Mohammed Saleh al-Banna killed (Al-Qaeda military boss and senior Al-Qaeda figures in the Arabian Peninsula) •December 2009 – Saleh Al-Somali killed (senior al Qaeda operative in Pakistan) •September 2009 – Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan killed (ringleader of an al Qaeda cell in Kenya yeah, I can see where the words he uses to isolate and stereotype are MUCH more significant in the fight on 'terror'....
He has captured a small fraction of terrorists compared to the amount that was captured or killed under President Bush's watch. and that has to do with using the word 'terror',,,,,,how? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That was a perfectly fine speech Barack Obama gave at the United Nations yesterday. Perfectly fine, except that he has been president for the last four years. Perfectly fine, except that terrorists murdered our ambassador in Libya on the 11th anniversary of 9/11. And perfectly fine, except that the head of Al Qaeda released a videotape urging that murder and others during what he called a time of “American weakness.” Mr. President: The video didn’t do it. Terrorists did. Say it, for God’s sake! Facts, bloody facts, take all the shine off Obama’s speech. His teleprompted rhetoric no longer inspires because reality keeps interrupting the swoon. Even if you try, you can’t drift off into a dreamy vision of utopia while the corpses pile up and the hate burns red hot. Unless you’re one of the bad guys , “Death to America” doesn’t make you want to get up and dance. Give the president some credit. He tried, to a certain degree. He brought his best scolding, patronizing tone for the day, as though the Turtle Bay club dominated by thugs, theocrats and cowards would be moved by his earnest pleas and frowns. It was an appeal better directed at third-graders than the Third World. His boldest declaration, that “the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” was met with silence. Then again, he has said similar things before, and nobody believes him, so there’s no sense either cheering or hissing. It’s just words. See, they’ve already evaporated. Much of those words were aimed at Ohio and Florida. A president who has put campaigning above governing for nearly two years should never be accused of neglecting his real goal for even a moment this close to the election. Yet, as events of the last two weeks prove, the disconnect between Obama’s words and the effect of his policies can no longer be ignored. Even as he praises our slain ambassador, Chris Stevens, Obama demeans his memory by refusing to call the attack in Libya what it was -- an act of terrorism against the United States. Nor was it a coincidence of timing that it was carried out on the anniversary of that historic infamy. It was purposeful, Al Qaeda boss Ayman al-Zawahiri said on tape, a reminder that our enemies are still determined to “purify” Muslim lands. His assertion of “American weakness” indicts Obama, the architect of that weakness. The president pleaded guilty by sidestepping the 9/11 connection, as he has for 15 days. By doing so, Obama reveals a worldview that is incompatible with American leadership and national security. His failure to talk straight about what happened that day is a form of appeasement that will embolden radical Islamists. They don’t see his reticence as a noble peace offering. They see it as an invitation to hit again. They don’t want a seat at the table. They want to blow up the table. His middle name and apologies have not charmed them. Nor will his commitment to retreating from the battlefield. His statement that “we have begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014” put an exclamation point on a very strange day. Only under Obama do wars have schedules. Not victory, just a timetable. With the presidential campaign almost exclusively about the domestic economy and jobs, many conservatives are pushing Mitt Romney to add foreign policy to the mix. No doubt he should and will, but he would be remiss if he didn’t tie the themes together. The Obama presidency is failing on all fronts, and for the same reason. The man at the center embodies the deadly combination of hubris and incompetence. Other than that, he gives a perfectly fine speech. Read more:http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/26/at-un-obama-never-mentions-one-word-terror/#ixzz27egUjIhC
interesting, mentioning 'terrorism' would be more effective than: •September 2011 – Younis al Mauritani captured (senior al Qaeda leader in Pakistan) •September 2011 – Abu Hafs al-Shahri killed (al Qaeda’s chief of Pakistan operations) •August 2011 – Atiyah Abd al-Rahman killed (Al Qaeda No. 2 in Pakistan) •May 2011 – Osama bin Laden killed (Number 1 Al Qaeda, and worlds most wanted) •June 2011 – Fazul Abdullah Mohammed killed (top al-Qaeda operative in Somalia) •June 2011 – Ilyas Kashmiri killed (top al- Qaeda commander in Pakistan) •June 2010 – Hawza al Jawfi killed along with 6 other terrorist (leader in Pakistan) •May 2010 – Mustafa Ahmed Muhammad Uthman Abu al-Yazid killed [aliases Shaikh Sa’id al-Masri and Mustafa Abu al-Yazid] (al Qaeda’s No. 3) •April 2010 – Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Umar al-Baghdadi (Top two Al Qaeda operatives in Iraq) •March 2010 – Qari Mohammad Zafar killed (terrorist leader in Pakistan) •February 2010 – Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar captured (The Taliban’s top military commander) •February 2010 – Sirajuddin Haqqani killed (militant commander in Pakistan) •January 2010 – Qassem al-Rimi, Ayed al-Shabwani, Ammar al-Waili, Saleh al-Tais, Ibrahim and Mohammed Saleh al-Banna killed (Al-Qaeda military boss and senior Al-Qaeda figures in the Arabian Peninsula) •December 2009 – Saleh Al-Somali killed (senior al Qaeda operative in Pakistan) •September 2009 – Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan killed (ringleader of an al Qaeda cell in Kenya yeah, I can see where the words he uses to isolate and stereotype are MUCH more significant in the fight on 'terror'....
He has captured a small fraction of terrorists compared to the amount that was captured or killed under President Bush's watch. and that has to do with using the word 'terror',,,,,,how? Because he is a professional victim who is a coward and is scared to open up that can of worms. He want's to kiss their a$$ and make nice with them, and we saw what happened when Clinton did that, they bombed our Embassies, military ships and flew planes right up our a$$. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That was a perfectly fine speech Barack Obama gave at the United Nations yesterday. Perfectly fine, except that he has been president for the last four years. Perfectly fine, except that terrorists murdered our ambassador in Libya on the 11th anniversary of 9/11. And perfectly fine, except that the head of Al Qaeda released a videotape urging that murder and others during what he called a time of “American weakness.” Mr. President: The video didn’t do it. Terrorists did. Say it, for God’s sake! Facts, bloody facts, take all the shine off Obama’s speech. His teleprompted rhetoric no longer inspires because reality keeps interrupting the swoon. Even if you try, you can’t drift off into a dreamy vision of utopia while the corpses pile up and the hate burns red hot. Unless you’re one of the bad guys , “Death to America” doesn’t make you want to get up and dance. Give the president some credit. He tried, to a certain degree. He brought his best scolding, patronizing tone for the day, as though the Turtle Bay club dominated by thugs, theocrats and cowards would be moved by his earnest pleas and frowns. It was an appeal better directed at third-graders than the Third World. His boldest declaration, that “the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” was met with silence. Then again, he has said similar things before, and nobody believes him, so there’s no sense either cheering or hissing. It’s just words. See, they’ve already evaporated. Much of those words were aimed at Ohio and Florida. A president who has put campaigning above governing for nearly two years should never be accused of neglecting his real goal for even a moment this close to the election. Yet, as events of the last two weeks prove, the disconnect between Obama’s words and the effect of his policies can no longer be ignored. Even as he praises our slain ambassador, Chris Stevens, Obama demeans his memory by refusing to call the attack in Libya what it was -- an act of terrorism against the United States. Nor was it a coincidence of timing that it was carried out on the anniversary of that historic infamy. It was purposeful, Al Qaeda boss Ayman al-Zawahiri said on tape, a reminder that our enemies are still determined to “purify” Muslim lands. His assertion of “American weakness” indicts Obama, the architect of that weakness. The president pleaded guilty by sidestepping the 9/11 connection, as he has for 15 days. By doing so, Obama reveals a worldview that is incompatible with American leadership and national security. His failure to talk straight about what happened that day is a form of appeasement that will embolden radical Islamists. They don’t see his reticence as a noble peace offering. They see it as an invitation to hit again. They don’t want a seat at the table. They want to blow up the table. His middle name and apologies have not charmed them. Nor will his commitment to retreating from the battlefield. His statement that “we have begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014” put an exclamation point on a very strange day. Only under Obama do wars have schedules. Not victory, just a timetable. With the presidential campaign almost exclusively about the domestic economy and jobs, many conservatives are pushing Mitt Romney to add foreign policy to the mix. No doubt he should and will, but he would be remiss if he didn’t tie the themes together. The Obama presidency is failing on all fronts, and for the same reason. The man at the center embodies the deadly combination of hubris and incompetence. Other than that, he gives a perfectly fine speech. Read more:http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/26/at-un-obama-never-mentions-one-word-terror/#ixzz27egUjIhC
interesting, mentioning 'terrorism' would be more effective than: •September 2011 – Younis al Mauritani captured (senior al Qaeda leader in Pakistan) •September 2011 – Abu Hafs al-Shahri killed (al Qaeda’s chief of Pakistan operations) •August 2011 – Atiyah Abd al-Rahman killed (Al Qaeda No. 2 in Pakistan) •May 2011 – Osama bin Laden killed (Number 1 Al Qaeda, and worlds most wanted) •June 2011 – Fazul Abdullah Mohammed killed (top al-Qaeda operative in Somalia) •June 2011 – Ilyas Kashmiri killed (top al- Qaeda commander in Pakistan) •June 2010 – Hawza al Jawfi killed along with 6 other terrorist (leader in Pakistan) •May 2010 – Mustafa Ahmed Muhammad Uthman Abu al-Yazid killed [aliases Shaikh Sa’id al-Masri and Mustafa Abu al-Yazid] (al Qaeda’s No. 3) •April 2010 – Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Umar al-Baghdadi (Top two Al Qaeda operatives in Iraq) •March 2010 – Qari Mohammad Zafar killed (terrorist leader in Pakistan) •February 2010 – Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar captured (The Taliban’s top military commander) •February 2010 – Sirajuddin Haqqani killed (militant commander in Pakistan) •January 2010 – Qassem al-Rimi, Ayed al-Shabwani, Ammar al-Waili, Saleh al-Tais, Ibrahim and Mohammed Saleh al-Banna killed (Al-Qaeda military boss and senior Al-Qaeda figures in the Arabian Peninsula) •December 2009 – Saleh Al-Somali killed (senior al Qaeda operative in Pakistan) •September 2009 – Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan killed (ringleader of an al Qaeda cell in Kenya yeah, I can see where the words he uses to isolate and stereotype are MUCH more significant in the fight on 'terror'....
He has captured a small fraction of terrorists compared to the amount that was captured or killed under President Bush's watch. and that has to do with using the word 'terror',,,,,,how? Because he is a professional victim who is a coward and is scared to open up that can of worms. He want's to kiss their a$$ and make nice with them, and we saw what happened when Clinton did that, they bombed our Embassies, military ships and flew planes right up our a$$. I still fail to see how using one word makes the difference,,,,,,actions are louder than words and soundbytes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That was a perfectly fine speech Barack Obama gave at the United Nations yesterday. Perfectly fine, except that he has been president for the last four years. Perfectly fine, except that terrorists murdered our ambassador in Libya on the 11th anniversary of 9/11. And perfectly fine, except that the head of Al Qaeda released a videotape urging that murder and others during what he called a time of “American weakness.” Mr. President: The video didn’t do it. Terrorists did. Say it, for God’s sake! Facts, bloody facts, take all the shine off Obama’s speech. His teleprompted rhetoric no longer inspires because reality keeps interrupting the swoon. Even if you try, you can’t drift off into a dreamy vision of utopia while the corpses pile up and the hate burns red hot. Unless you’re one of the bad guys , “Death to America” doesn’t make you want to get up and dance. Give the president some credit. He tried, to a certain degree. He brought his best scolding, patronizing tone for the day, as though the Turtle Bay club dominated by thugs, theocrats and cowards would be moved by his earnest pleas and frowns. It was an appeal better directed at third-graders than the Third World. His boldest declaration, that “the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” was met with silence. Then again, he has said similar things before, and nobody believes him, so there’s no sense either cheering or hissing. It’s just words. See, they’ve already evaporated. Much of those words were aimed at Ohio and Florida. A president who has put campaigning above governing for nearly two years should never be accused of neglecting his real goal for even a moment this close to the election. Yet, as events of the last two weeks prove, the disconnect between Obama’s words and the effect of his policies can no longer be ignored. Even as he praises our slain ambassador, Chris Stevens, Obama demeans his memory by refusing to call the attack in Libya what it was -- an act of terrorism against the United States. Nor was it a coincidence of timing that it was carried out on the anniversary of that historic infamy. It was purposeful, Al Qaeda boss Ayman al-Zawahiri said on tape, a reminder that our enemies are still determined to “purify” Muslim lands. His assertion of “American weakness” indicts Obama, the architect of that weakness. The president pleaded guilty by sidestepping the 9/11 connection, as he has for 15 days. By doing so, Obama reveals a worldview that is incompatible with American leadership and national security. His failure to talk straight about what happened that day is a form of appeasement that will embolden radical Islamists. They don’t see his reticence as a noble peace offering. They see it as an invitation to hit again. They don’t want a seat at the table. They want to blow up the table. His middle name and apologies have not charmed them. Nor will his commitment to retreating from the battlefield. His statement that “we have begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014” put an exclamation point on a very strange day. Only under Obama do wars have schedules. Not victory, just a timetable. With the presidential campaign almost exclusively about the domestic economy and jobs, many conservatives are pushing Mitt Romney to add foreign policy to the mix. No doubt he should and will, but he would be remiss if he didn’t tie the themes together. The Obama presidency is failing on all fronts, and for the same reason. The man at the center embodies the deadly combination of hubris and incompetence. Other than that, he gives a perfectly fine speech. Read more:http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/26/at-un-obama-never-mentions-one-word-terror/#ixzz27egUjIhC
interesting, mentioning 'terrorism' would be more effective than: •September 2011 – Younis al Mauritani captured (senior al Qaeda leader in Pakistan) •September 2011 – Abu Hafs al-Shahri killed (al Qaeda’s chief of Pakistan operations) •August 2011 – Atiyah Abd al-Rahman killed (Al Qaeda No. 2 in Pakistan) •May 2011 – Osama bin Laden killed (Number 1 Al Qaeda, and worlds most wanted) •June 2011 – Fazul Abdullah Mohammed killed (top al-Qaeda operative in Somalia) •June 2011 – Ilyas Kashmiri killed (top al- Qaeda commander in Pakistan) •June 2010 – Hawza al Jawfi killed along with 6 other terrorist (leader in Pakistan) •May 2010 – Mustafa Ahmed Muhammad Uthman Abu al-Yazid killed [aliases Shaikh Sa’id al-Masri and Mustafa Abu al-Yazid] (al Qaeda’s No. 3) •April 2010 – Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Umar al-Baghdadi (Top two Al Qaeda operatives in Iraq) •March 2010 – Qari Mohammad Zafar killed (terrorist leader in Pakistan) •February 2010 – Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar captured (The Taliban’s top military commander) •February 2010 – Sirajuddin Haqqani killed (militant commander in Pakistan) •January 2010 – Qassem al-Rimi, Ayed al-Shabwani, Ammar al-Waili, Saleh al-Tais, Ibrahim and Mohammed Saleh al-Banna killed (Al-Qaeda military boss and senior Al-Qaeda figures in the Arabian Peninsula) •December 2009 – Saleh Al-Somali killed (senior al Qaeda operative in Pakistan) •September 2009 – Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan killed (ringleader of an al Qaeda cell in Kenya yeah, I can see where the words he uses to isolate and stereotype are MUCH more significant in the fight on 'terror'....
He has captured a small fraction of terrorists compared to the amount that was captured or killed under President Bush's watch. and that has to do with using the word 'terror',,,,,,how? Because he is a professional victim who is a coward and is scared to open up that can of worms. He want's to kiss their a$$ and make nice with them, and we saw what happened when Clinton did that, they bombed our Embassies, military ships and flew planes right up our a$$. I still fail to see how using one word makes the difference,,,,,,actions are louder than words and soundbytes His actions arn't any better. Failing to protect the Embassy and the Ambassador when there is known threats on an extremists symbolic day like 9/11, took over 24 hours to get the military there after the first shots were fired (the FBI still isn't on the scene or on the ground there yet), rarely met with his national security council (which he should have done weekly of not daily on the 9/11 anniversary, staying on the campaign trail and attending high dollar fundraisers in the aftermath following this terrorist attack. It's funny how Senator's and Congressmen on the Intelligence commitee's and Military commitiee's knew it was a terrorist attack and were able to announce it that day (and they were getting the same intelligence that the White House was getting. Obama is an inexperienced rookie who has no business visiting the White House as a tourist let alone as POTUS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That was a perfectly fine speech Barack Obama gave at the United Nations yesterday. Perfectly fine, except that he has been president for the last four years. Perfectly fine, except that terrorists murdered our ambassador in Libya on the 11th anniversary of 9/11. And perfectly fine, except that the head of Al Qaeda released a videotape urging that murder and others during what he called a time of “American weakness.” Mr. President: The video didn’t do it. Terrorists did. Say it, for God’s sake! Facts, bloody facts, take all the shine off Obama’s speech. His teleprompted rhetoric no longer inspires because reality keeps interrupting the swoon. Even if you try, you can’t drift off into a dreamy vision of utopia while the corpses pile up and the hate burns red hot. Unless you’re one of the bad guys , “Death to America” doesn’t make you want to get up and dance. Give the president some credit. He tried, to a certain degree. He brought his best scolding, patronizing tone for the day, as though the Turtle Bay club dominated by thugs, theocrats and cowards would be moved by his earnest pleas and frowns. It was an appeal better directed at third-graders than the Third World. His boldest declaration, that “the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” was met with silence. Then again, he has said similar things before, and nobody believes him, so there’s no sense either cheering or hissing. It’s just words. See, they’ve already evaporated. Much of those words were aimed at Ohio and Florida. A president who has put campaigning above governing for nearly two years should never be accused of neglecting his real goal for even a moment this close to the election. Yet, as events of the last two weeks prove, the disconnect between Obama’s words and the effect of his policies can no longer be ignored. Even as he praises our slain ambassador, Chris Stevens, Obama demeans his memory by refusing to call the attack in Libya what it was -- an act of terrorism against the United States. Nor was it a coincidence of timing that it was carried out on the anniversary of that historic infamy. It was purposeful, Al Qaeda boss Ayman al-Zawahiri said on tape, a reminder that our enemies are still determined to “purify” Muslim lands. His assertion of “American weakness” indicts Obama, the architect of that weakness. The president pleaded guilty by sidestepping the 9/11 connection, as he has for 15 days. By doing so, Obama reveals a worldview that is incompatible with American leadership and national security. His failure to talk straight about what happened that day is a form of appeasement that will embolden radical Islamists. They don’t see his reticence as a noble peace offering. They see it as an invitation to hit again. They don’t want a seat at the table. They want to blow up the table. His middle name and apologies have not charmed them. Nor will his commitment to retreating from the battlefield. His statement that “we have begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014” put an exclamation point on a very strange day. Only under Obama do wars have schedules. Not victory, just a timetable. With the presidential campaign almost exclusively about the domestic economy and jobs, many conservatives are pushing Mitt Romney to add foreign policy to the mix. No doubt he should and will, but he would be remiss if he didn’t tie the themes together. The Obama presidency is failing on all fronts, and for the same reason. The man at the center embodies the deadly combination of hubris and incompetence. Other than that, he gives a perfectly fine speech. Read more:http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/26/at-un-obama-never-mentions-one-word-terror/#ixzz27egUjIhC
interesting, mentioning 'terrorism' would be more effective than: •September 2011 – Younis al Mauritani captured (senior al Qaeda leader in Pakistan) •September 2011 – Abu Hafs al-Shahri killed (al Qaeda’s chief of Pakistan operations) •August 2011 – Atiyah Abd al-Rahman killed (Al Qaeda No. 2 in Pakistan) •May 2011 – Osama bin Laden killed (Number 1 Al Qaeda, and worlds most wanted) •June 2011 – Fazul Abdullah Mohammed killed (top al-Qaeda operative in Somalia) •June 2011 – Ilyas Kashmiri killed (top al- Qaeda commander in Pakistan) •June 2010 – Hawza al Jawfi killed along with 6 other terrorist (leader in Pakistan) •May 2010 – Mustafa Ahmed Muhammad Uthman Abu al-Yazid killed [aliases Shaikh Sa’id al-Masri and Mustafa Abu al-Yazid] (al Qaeda’s No. 3) •April 2010 – Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Umar al-Baghdadi (Top two Al Qaeda operatives in Iraq) •March 2010 – Qari Mohammad Zafar killed (terrorist leader in Pakistan) •February 2010 – Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar captured (The Taliban’s top military commander) •February 2010 – Sirajuddin Haqqani killed (militant commander in Pakistan) •January 2010 – Qassem al-Rimi, Ayed al-Shabwani, Ammar al-Waili, Saleh al-Tais, Ibrahim and Mohammed Saleh al-Banna killed (Al-Qaeda military boss and senior Al-Qaeda figures in the Arabian Peninsula) •December 2009 – Saleh Al-Somali killed (senior al Qaeda operative in Pakistan) •September 2009 – Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan killed (ringleader of an al Qaeda cell in Kenya yeah, I can see where the words he uses to isolate and stereotype are MUCH more significant in the fight on 'terror'....
He has captured a small fraction of terrorists compared to the amount that was captured or killed under President Bush's watch. and that has to do with using the word 'terror',,,,,,how? Because he is a professional victim who is a coward and is scared to open up that can of worms. He want's to kiss their a$$ and make nice with them, and we saw what happened when Clinton did that, they bombed our Embassies, military ships and flew planes right up our a$$. I still fail to see how using one word makes the difference,,,,,,actions are louder than words and soundbytes His actions arn't any better. Failing to protect the Embassy and the Ambassador when there is known threats on an extremists symbolic day like 9/11, took over 24 hours to get the military there after the first shots were fired (the FBI still isn't on the scene or on the ground there yet), rarely met with his national security council (which he should have done weekly of not daily on the 9/11 anniversary, staying on the campaign trail and attending high dollar fundraisers in the aftermath following this terrorist attack. It's funny how Senator's and Congressmen on the Intelligence commitee's and Military commitiee's knew it was a terrorist attack and were able to announce it that day (and they were getting the same intelligence that the White House was getting. Obama is an inexperienced rookie who has no business visiting the White House as a tourist let alone as POTUS. Im curious if you think Bush, upon whose watch THOUSANDS died ON AMERICAN SOIL,,,,was an inexperienced rookie too, based upon his similar slowless to know or react? |
|
|
|
|
