The CONCEPT of explosives being used is so absurd as to be hilarious to the tens of thousands of engineers and scientists who actually understand the subject.

The misuse of the word "fact" in your statement and the connection using the word "proving" is really sad.

Please show your source of information on the new noiseless and lightless type of explosive. Also please explain the physics of the bristance calculations allowing such new explosive to cut steel while remaining noiseless and lightless.

The "facts" are:

No such explosive exists.

Evidence would be recorded on many of the recording devices used at the time.

The physics and material science prove no such explosive was necessary.

Your statement is a stupid lie that you cannot defend.