Topic: Another Lesson In 'The Government is Here to Help' | |
---|---|
Ori Feibush © Steven M. Falk/Daily News A business developer in the Philadelphia neighborhood of Point Breeze is facing legal action after voluntarily cleaning up more than 40 tons of trash from a vacant lot neighboring his local business. As the old adage goes, no good deed goes unpunished. Ori Feibush says he visited the local offices of the Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority four times, sent in seven written requests and made 24 phone calls to the agency asking them to take care of a major eyesore: an empty lot next to his coffee shop was home to more than 40 tons of debris. Not only did the agency fail to act but it also denied Feibush's offer to clean up the mess himself. But the Daily News reports that Feibush went ahead with his plans anyway, reportedly spending more than $20,000 of his own money not only to remove the trash but also to level the soil; add cherry trees, fencing and park benches; and repave the sidewalk. "This was a lot of garbage," local resident Elaine McGrath told the paper. "Now it's gorgeous. I'm excited." However, the city agency was less excited, demanding that Feibush return the vacant lot to its previous condition and saying it is considering legal action against him. ![]() Cleaned Up Lot © Steven M. Falk/Daily News This lot was recently home to 40 tons of trash until a local businessman cleaned it up. "Like any property owner, [the authority] does not permit unauthorized access to or alteration of its property," Paul D. Chrystie, director of communications at the Office of Housing and Community Development told the paper. "This is both on principle (no property owner knowingly allows trespassing) and to limit taxpayer liability." And the situation is not without irony. Feibush says he received a citation in August 2011 from the city for litter on the same lot that the city now points out is not his property. Nonetheless, the city's request puts Feibush in an unusual position. In theory, he committed a good deed, investing his own time and money to improve the condition of his neighborhood when city authorities refused to step up to the plate. But he also knowingly did so after the city refused his request to intervene. The situation is almost like a reverse case of eminent domain, in which a private owner is attempting to revitalize a piece of public property. For his part, Feibush thinks the city agency is jealous. "For a private developer to create a garden, it's a question of who gets credit. To do it without their blessing, you're basically insulting them," he said. "I'm not looking for a thank-you, but I'm not looking for a big F.U." |
|
|
|
Government/Politicians=Dumb and Dumberer!
So they want him to restore it to it's previous state? Guess they will the charge him with illegally dumping Trash,creating a Health-Hazard and Pollution! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Government/Politicians=Dumb and Dumberer! So they want him to restore it to it's previous state? Guess they will the charge him with illegally dumping Trash,creating a Health-Hazard and Pollution! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() make extra money that way...but it is better to have a park with benches right next to his deli... |
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Fri 09/21/12 11:23 AM
|
|
I just sent him the jackass award.
![]() You can also. Share it with all your friends. Paul.Chrystie@phila.gov |
|
|
|
Most frightening occurrence in a Citizen's Life!
A knock on the Door,outside stands a Fellow and introduces himself thus:"I am from the Government,I am here to help"! ![]() |
|
|
|
Nonetheless, the city's request puts Feibush in an unusual position. In theory, he committed a good deed, investing his own time and money to improve the condition of his neighborhood when city authorities refused to step up to the plate. But he also knowingly did so after the city refused his request to intervene.
The situation is almost like a reverse case of eminent domain, in which a private owner is attempting to revitalize a piece of public property. repeated for relevanc |
|
|
|
Edited by
mightymoe
on
Sat 09/22/12 08:55 PM
|
|
Nonetheless, the city's request puts Feibush in an unusual position. In theory, he committed a good deed, investing his own time and money to improve the condition of his neighborhood when city authorities refused to step up to the plate. But he also knowingly did so after the city refused his request to intervene. The situation is almost like a reverse case of eminent domain, in which a private owner is attempting to revitalize a piece of public property. repeated for relevanc it wasn't an entirely unselfish act, he did a good deed, but he is profiting from it... now he has more seats for his customers. i can kind of see why the city is a little pissed, like he just confiscated the property and made changes without the owners approval, but he did clean it up and made it better for everyone around. Trash and debris bring pests around, like rats, snakes and other assorted wildlife that is unneeded there... the city should call it a wash, and make him take everything down before anyone builds on the property. |
|
|