100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Republicans Are Anti-American | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Almost as bad as Democratic Congress spending out of control. So if we spending so much on the military and dem's areagaibst that then Why has spending increased 5-10 times since they took control of the budget? Still cant believe the republicans would filibuster a bill that cuts the tax break to companies that outsource jobs its totally insane. Who controls the budget? It's the Senate. The budget is submitted the year before so 2013s budget would be submitted (if it was even done) in 2012 for example. http://www.davemanuel.com/history-of-deficits-and-surpluses-in-the-united-states.php here is a link with deficits by year. Dems took over the Senate in January 07 thus they for control of the budget from 08 until now. Numbers don't lie. Anyhow if the republicans wanted to cute spending a win win would be to end tax breaks to companies that export american jobs. It sure will make them look anti american worker on election day. Its a democratic dream to have them do this as it exposes them for the frauds they are. I will quote a person from another site who says it best. "MONEY, MONEY, MONEY! T H A T is the mission of the republican party. All this talk about freedom, or the flag, or Jesus, or terra is just the flavor du jour, " http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/dave-johnson/44432/republicans-filibuster-bill-ending-tax-breaks-for-shipping-jobs-out-of-country Check your math again. 2007 180 billion. 2009 1.5 trillion 8.3 times which is between 5-10 From yahoo answers. Why did Bush place the cost for the war on Iraq "off budget"? Why would congress allow Bush to place the expenditures for the cost of a war off budget?? And why would Obama put it back on? The best answer? Best Answer - Chosen by Asker Because he was deceitful and duplicitous for his entire eight-year-long Regime. It's much easier getting away with murder if you don't actually admit you're committing murder. "Why did Congress allow him to get away with it?" Really? Because it was a Republican Congress who rubberstamped every single piece of crappy legislation for his entire Regime. They did not question ANYTHING he did. Why do you think we're in the mess we're in??? He wasn't honest about ANYTHING he did. Obama put it in the budget because the American people have a right to know how much money their government is spending. http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100606144719AAq1ZmX They don't call me Bestinshow for nothing  
I am off to a local winery you can have the last word. Total 10 year cost of the war isn't even up to spending in 2009. It's still not even close. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Republicans Filibuster Bill Ending Tax Breaks For Shipping Jobs Out Of Country! enate Republicans today FILIBUSTERED to block a bill ending the tax breaks companies get when they send our jobs out of the country -- and giving a few breaks to companies that hire here. The question now: will this get reported to the public? Will they be told this was a Republican filibuster, or just that "The Senate" "blocked" the bill? And will we ever know which companies -- and countries -- paid Republicans to kill this bill. The Bill According to GovTrack.us, the Bring Jobs Home Act: Amends the Internal Revenue Code to: (1) grant business taxpayers a tax credit for up to 20% of insourcing expenses incurred for eliminating a business located outside the United States and relocating it within the United States, and (2) deny a tax deduction for outsourcing expenses incurred in relocating a U.S. business outside the United States. Requires an increase in the taxpayer's employment of full-time employees in the United States in order to claim the tax credit for insourcing expenses. Yes, you can see why Republicans would filibuster that. http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/dave-johnson/44432/republicans-filibuster-bill-ending-tax-breaks-for-shipping-jobs-out-of-country Yet another vapid OP 
Some facts.... GOP blocked Deb Stabenew's bill because Harry Reid blocked GOP amendments, specifically their proposal to repeal the health-care reform act... Dems scheduled the vote to coordinate with Obama/Romney campaign accusations about outsourcing...Stabenew's bill is a good one and should be passed but party divisiveness and dissension on the hill is, as usual, at full court press thanks to Obama's dictating style... This is nothing more than a campaign tactic by the Obama camp and a test of wills by the GOP... The numbers are what matter....GDP is at 15.5 trillion.....Tax revenue is at 2.5 trillion...Eliminating the tax deduction to corps moving overseas would raise revenue 168 million over ten years and cost (in tax breaks) 255 million creating very little effect on budget...... Remember this is just party campaign tactics and strong arming...no biggie... |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Fri 07/20/12 02:28 PM
|
|
we added nearly 10 percent population from 2000 till now
the social programs are not nearly as much the issue as the stagnating income and dropping income levels if more people EARNED ENOUGH to pay in, the system would level off again but more and more people are making less and less and more and more are also needy, so the burden is becoming larger Id love to see the ideas to promote the educational preperation and employer incentives for increasing the income levels, as opposed to just blindly cutting the programs so many are finding a need for due to systemic changes in income opportunities,,,, I do think its just as logical to 'attack' the employer end by not rewarding those employers who take jobs from americans as it is to 'attack' the employee end by mandating potential employees out of work just go without and have no safety net,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best you gotta lay off that kool-aid man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best you gotta lay off that kool-aid man.
Wonder what flavor he's "using" today..... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best you gotta lay off that kool-aid man.
Wonder what flavor he's "using" today.....
Purple haze? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree.
IMO, 99.9% of Republican and Democratic Politicians are ant-American interests. Most all of them are paid for and owned by at least one special interest. IMO, Hussein has already proven his Anti-American status and hopefully, they will also flush the Muslim influence out of DC, as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best you gotta lay off that kool-aid man.
Wonder what flavor he's "using" today.....
Purple haze?
That be grape.... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we added nearly 10 percent population from 2000 till now the social programs are not nearly as much the issue as the stagnating income and dropping income levels if more people EARNED ENOUGH to pay in, the system would level off again but more and more people are making less and less and more and more are also needy, so the burden is becoming larger Id love to see the ideas to promote the educational preperation and employer incentives for increasing the income levels, as opposed to just blindly cutting the programs so many are finding a need for due to systemic changes in income opportunities,,,, I do think its just as logical to 'attack' the employer end by not rewarding those employers who take jobs from americans as it is to 'attack' the employee end by mandating potential employees out of work just go without and have no safety net,,, The median income stayed pretty stable but the unemployment rate nearly doubled. Doesn't that suggest people are making more on average? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best you gotta lay off that kool-aid man.
Wonder what flavor he's "using" today.....
Purple haze?
That be grape....
Orange Sunshine. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Peccy
on
Fri 07/20/12 05:32 PM
|
|
Until the bi-partisan name calling and finger pointing stop, we will never get anywhere. Best, I thought you were above this type of 5th grade blame game.
There are bad dems and repubs. I don't think one is any better than the other. Democrats want to hug trees and republicans want to blow stuff up. I think that somewhere in the middle is about right. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Until the bi-partisan name calling and finger pointing stop, we will never get anywhere. Best, I thought you were above this type of 5th grade blame game. There are bad dems and repubs. I don't think one is any better than the other. Democrats want to hug trees and republicans want to blow stuff up. I think that somewhere in the middle is about right. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Until the bi-partisan name calling and finger pointing stop, we will never get anywhere. Best, I thought you were above this type of 5th grade blame game. There are bad dems and repubs. I don't think one is any better than the other. Democrats want to hug trees and republicans want to blow stuff up. I think that somewhere in the middle is about right. It's them who are killing everything! Thieves,the LOT! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we added nearly 10 percent population from 2000 till now the social programs are not nearly as much the issue as the stagnating income and dropping income levels if more people EARNED ENOUGH to pay in, the system would level off again but more and more people are making less and less and more and more are also needy, so the burden is becoming larger Id love to see the ideas to promote the educational preperation and employer incentives for increasing the income levels, as opposed to just blindly cutting the programs so many are finding a need for due to systemic changes in income opportunities,,,, I do think its just as logical to 'attack' the employer end by not rewarding those employers who take jobs from americans as it is to 'attack' the employee end by mandating potential employees out of work just go without and have no safety net,,, The median income stayed pretty stable but the unemployment rate nearly doubled. Doesn't that suggest people are making more on average? what matters is people are not working and those trying to work are finding LOWER wages available,, if you drop people out of the 'earned income' tabulation who arent top earners, you are going to see a number reflecting a higher 'average' if we have 21 people and 10 make 20 dollars 1 makes 21 and 10 make 40 the MEDIAN income is 21 and the AVERAGE income is 29.57 but if we have 15 of those same people making money and 7 make 5 dollars and 7 make 50 dollars and one makes 6 dollars the MEDIAN income is 6 dollars and the AVERAGE income is 26 dollars that means 6 people have no earned income, and 8 have taken huge decrease while 7 have witnessed insane increase thats 14 out of the original twenty one who have seen a pretty steep decrease in INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we added nearly 10 percent population from 2000 till now the social programs are not nearly as much the issue as the stagnating income and dropping income levels if more people EARNED ENOUGH to pay in, the system would level off again but more and more people are making less and less and more and more are also needy, so the burden is becoming larger Id love to see the ideas to promote the educational preperation and employer incentives for increasing the income levels, as opposed to just blindly cutting the programs so many are finding a need for due to systemic changes in income opportunities,,,, I do think its just as logical to 'attack' the employer end by not rewarding those employers who take jobs from americans as it is to 'attack' the employee end by mandating potential employees out of work just go without and have no safety net,,, The median income stayed pretty stable but the unemployment rate nearly doubled. Doesn't that suggest people are making more on average? what matters is people are not working and those trying to work are finding LOWER wages available,, if you drop people out of the 'earned income' tabulation who arent top earners, you are going to see a number reflecting a higher 'average' if we have 21 people and 10 make 20 dollars 1 makes 21 and 10 make 40 the MEDIAN income is 21 and the AVERAGE income is 29.57 but if we have 15 of those same people making money and 7 make 5 dollars and 7 make 50 dollars and one makes 6 dollars the MEDIAN income is 6 dollars and the AVERAGE income is 26 dollars that means 6 people have no earned income, and 8 have taken huge decrease while 7 have witnessed insane increase thats 14 out of the original twenty one who have seen a pretty steep decrease in INCOME Yes comrade harmony, that's why we need Obama's Proletariat to re-distribute the wealth. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
right wing
left wing same bird the turkey both parties are controlled by satanists |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
right wing left wing same bird the turkey both parties are controlled by satanists 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just wish republicans would do what is "responsible" and keep american jobs in america and stop giving tax breaks to companies who ship jobs overseas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just wish republicans would do what is "responsible" and keep american jobs in america and stop giving tax breaks to companies who ship jobs overseas Oh no, that won't happen. Republicans are evil and they want them Americans jobs to go overseas. So they can have all the money for their greedy selves. And they want to kill grandma and grandpa and never have to pay any taxes. And they want to take food away from poor children so they will starve and live on the street. Best, you sure have them evil republicans figured out, Good work. 
|
|
|
|
|
