Topic: 911 WTC1 - New video shows explosions. This was a planned de | |
---|---|
I'll try this again. This thread is not for you. I see, another predictable diversion. So, as I suspected, you cannot tell the difference. |
|
|
|
You can discuss the message or topic, but not the messenger - NO EXCEPTIONS.
Kim |
|
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhGcBxONSvc
So, this is 'absolute evidence' that the WTC was brought down with bombs? Hardly, it is merely evidence the firefighters heard explosions in the building. Big deal! There can be explosions in house fires. Moreover, did anyone notice the editing during the opening 30 seconds? Clipped and cropped to support the narration, but lacking in confirmation of the narration. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Mon 07/23/12 01:19 AM
|
|
Here's a terrific NY Times article as found in the IHT. The writer does a great job of debunking controlled demolition: "The demolition theory has managed to endure what would seem to be enormous obstacles to its practicality. Controlled demolition is done from the bottom of buildings, not the top, to take advantage of gravity, and there is little dispute that the collapse of the two towers began high in the towers, in the areas where the airplanes struck. Moreover, a demolition project would have required the walls of the towers to be opened on dozens of floors, followed by the insertion of thousands of pounds of explosives, fuses and ignition mechanisms, all sneaked past the security stations, inside hundreds of feet of walls on all four faces of both buildings. Then the walls presumably would have been closed up. All this would have had to take place without attracting the notice of any of the thousands of tenants and workers in either building; no witness has ever reported such activity. Then on the morning of Sept. 11, the demolition explosives would have had to withstand the impacts of the airplanes, since the collapse did not begin for 57 minutes in one tower, and 102 minutes in the other." Reposted from JREF The demolition was by no means a typical "controlled demolition." It was a terrorists attack. And it was NOT done by Muslims. (or Osama Bin Laden.) It was the Banking Cabal Criminals who were behind it. This was not your typical demolition explosives, but some kind of new bombs. You don't use Bombs for Demolition! |
|
|
|
Here's a terrific NY Times article as found in the IHT. The writer does a great job of debunking controlled demolition: "The demolition theory has managed to endure what would seem to be enormous obstacles to its practicality. Controlled demolition is done from the bottom of buildings, not the top, to take advantage of gravity, and there is little dispute that the collapse of the two towers began high in the towers, in the areas where the airplanes struck. Moreover, a demolition project would have required the walls of the towers to be opened on dozens of floors, followed by the insertion of thousands of pounds of explosives, fuses and ignition mechanisms, all sneaked past the security stations, inside hundreds of feet of walls on all four faces of both buildings. Then the walls presumably would have been closed up. All this would have had to take place without attracting the notice of any of the thousands of tenants and workers in either building; no witness has ever reported such activity. Then on the morning of Sept. 11, the demolition explosives would have had to withstand the impacts of the airplanes, since the collapse did not begin for 57 minutes in one tower, and 102 minutes in the other." Reposted from JREF The demolition was by no means a typical "controlled demolition." It was a terrorists attack. And it was NOT done by Muslims. (or Osama Bin Laden.) It was the Banking Cabal Criminals who were behind it. This was not your typical demolition explosives, but some kind of new bombs. You don't use Bombs for Demolition! The building fell from the top (where the planes hit) down. There is no evidence of any kind that explosives were used anywhere. There would be seismic evidence and photo evidence of the second tower, but there is none. The video is just cut and paste. |
|
|
|
Here's a terrific NY Times article as found in the IHT. The writer does a great job of debunking controlled demolition: "The demolition theory has managed to endure what would seem to be enormous obstacles to its practicality. Controlled demolition is done from the bottom of buildings, not the top, to take advantage of gravity, and there is little dispute that the collapse of the two towers began high in the towers, in the areas where the airplanes struck. Moreover, a demolition project would have required the walls of the towers to be opened on dozens of floors, followed by the insertion of thousands of pounds of explosives, fuses and ignition mechanisms, all sneaked past the security stations, inside hundreds of feet of walls on all four faces of both buildings. Then the walls presumably would have been closed up. All this would have had to take place without attracting the notice of any of the thousands of tenants and workers in either building; no witness has ever reported such activity. Then on the morning of Sept. 11, the demolition explosives would have had to withstand the impacts of the airplanes, since the collapse did not begin for 57 minutes in one tower, and 102 minutes in the other." Reposted from JREF The demolition was by no means a typical "controlled demolition." It was a terrorists attack. And it was NOT done by Muslims. (or Osama Bin Laden.) It was the Banking Cabal Criminals who were behind it. This was not your typical demolition explosives, but some kind of new bombs. You don't use Bombs for Demolition! The building fell from the top (where the planes hit) down. There is no evidence of any kind that explosives were used anywhere. There would be seismic evidence and photo evidence of the second tower, but there is none. The video is just cut and paste. Another BasementStudio Production! Bushels of them on YT! |
|
|
|
|
|
No one even finds it odd that not one black box was ever recovered?
If I am not mistaken its like the first time ever. No way the official version of 911 is the true version. I am 100% certain of that. |
|
|
|
No one even finds it odd that not one black box was ever recovered? If I am not mistaken its like the first time ever. No way the official version of 911 is the true version. I am 100% certain of that. So you think a Black Box is Indestructible! Something from the Planet Krypton? |
|
|
|
No one even finds it odd that not one black box was ever recovered? If I am not mistaken its like the first time ever. No way the official version of 911 is the true version. I am 100% certain of that. So you think a Black Box is Indestructible! Something from the Planet Krypton? They are pretty much indestructible. At least more so than a terrorist's passport. |
|
|
|
In the real world were I live its hard to find anyone who believes the official version of 911.
The real question is how much longer can they perpetuate this fraud on the american people. |
|
|
|
In the real world were I live its hard to find anyone who believes the official version of 911. The real question is how much longer can they perpetuate this fraud on the american people. Not long at all. People are waking up. I am even seeing hints of this on some major networks. |
|
|
|
In the real world were I live its hard to find anyone who believes the official version of 911. The real question is how much longer can they perpetuate this fraud on the american people. Not long at all. People are waking up. I am even seeing hints of this on some major networks. oh yea, people are waking up... ... keep thinking that... |
|
|
|
In the real world were I live its hard to find anyone who believes the official version of 911. The real question is how much longer can they perpetuate this fraud on the american people. Not long at all. People are waking up. I am even seeing hints of this on some major networks. oh yea, people are waking up... ... keep thinking that... Its true for some but apparently not for all people. |
|
|
|
When the topic comes up among adults its almost certain that most people find 911 to be absurd.
I will replay Saturday evening. we were all up late at my GF house I worked Saturday morning and took a nap she worked at her brothers Marina as a second job for the summer she was home late her son and GF also were home late. Her oldest son is home from collage on a football scholarship no left leaning hippie that's for sure, he likes to fish when he isn't working or playing or preparing for football. His GF is working on her teaching degree. So we were all sitting around watching this you tube of some girl who found a dead squirrel and I asked if they had seen "MY Pet Goat" we watched it and it started a conversation about 911. The football player told me about a kid who wrote a paper on 911 and how it had to have been an inside job, gave facts and details etc etc, the entire class was convinced it was an inside job. The professor praised the kid and said in fifteen years she hasn't heard such a good report, these were verbal in front of the whole class. Normally I do not discuss the fraud of 911 because people have enough worries and sometimes its just good to have fun but it was a good affirmation that young people are also waking up and understanding how their futures have been hijacked tax monies stolen and people killed for a pack of horrific lies. Does anyone remember when the BBC said building seven collapsed a half hour before it happened? You can watch it here at t his link. building seven BBC reported it collapsed half hour early /www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s |
|
|
|
When the topic comes up among adults its almost certain that most people find 911 to be absurd. I will replay Saturday evening. we were all up late at my GF house I worked Saturday morning and took a nap she worked at her brothers Marina as a second job for the summer she was home late her son and GF also were home late. Her oldest son is home from collage on a football scholarship no left leaning hippie that's for sure, he likes to fish when he isn't working or playing or preparing for football. His GF is working on her teaching degree. So we were all sitting around watching this you tube of some girl who found a dead squirrel and I asked if they had seen "MY Pet Goat" we watched it and it started a conversation about 911. The football player told me about a kid who wrote a paper on 911 and how it had to have been an inside job, gave facts and details etc etc, the entire class was convinced it was an inside job. The professor praised the kid and said in fifteen years she hasn't heard such a good report, these were verbal in front of the whole class. Normally I do not discuss the fraud of 911 because people have enough worries and sometimes its just good to have fun but it was a good affirmation that young people are also waking up and understanding how their futures have been hijacked tax monies stolen and people killed for a pack of horrific lies. Does anyone remember when the BBC said building seven collapsed a half hour before it happened? You can watch it here at t his link. building seven BBC reported it collapsed half hour early /www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s 11years later, and you people are still dreaming up things... |
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Mon 07/23/12 08:21 PM
|
|
er... no, 11 years later and "we people" are still finding out things.
We don't intend to forget. We don't intend to forgive. EVER. |
|
|
|
After watching several videos where the WTC was just burning and people jumping out, which seemed to last quite a while before the buildings actually fell, here is a quick video with a good view of the explosion that took the tower down. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnuFACYc-Q4&feature=related |
|
|
|
We should have at least the right to have a new investigation. The 911 commission report was pure garbage. There is to much evidence that is contrary to the official story. It took 9 years to get my mind wrapped around the idea that this was a false flag attack. I still have a hard time believing that our government is capable of these actions, but the more I study it the more convinced I become that it is probable that it is exactly what happened. I've lost a faith in my country that makes me want to puke in my mouth. I want it back. I want the truth. And if I'm right, I want Justice. And if I'm wrong, I will smack my self on the forehead and shut the hell up. |
|
|
|
Two people using the word "pull" to refer to demolishing a building at WTC.
9-11 The Most Important Video Ever What Happened to WTC Building 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWZELJA_fSU&feature=related |
|
|