100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Of random statements and opinions,,,,, | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
106,Wow I didn't know Obama was overseas and shot Osama. When did that happen? lol, exactly good for the goose and all I didnt know a president could pass bills alone, but we have no issue pointing the finger when one passes we dont approve of through CONGRESS I didnt know he could travel to millions of hr offices firing or hiring people, but we have no issue pointing the finger at a president when people are unemployed IM sure everyone involved in these 'debates' and smash sessions understands a President doesnt have to PHYSICALLY have done something themself to be held responsible for what happened....... seems like alot of obama fans use this statement , but when bush was in office, it didn't apply then... why is that? I actually wasnt here when Bush was in and I personally never made claims that he was ruining the country , or a facsist, traitor,,etc,,, when he was in I thought he was embarassing as a representative to the world of the USA, when most leaders are well educated and poised I thought he wasnt actually running things and that his behavior was often too REACTIONARY for my taste, reminded me more like a spoiled child than a diplomatic leader but that was the extent of my criticism for him, never did I believe or imply that he WANTED to destroy america or any such nonsense or that he was UNIQUELY awful in any particular flaw or uniquely responsible for any of the national issues we dealt with,,, thats how some think of barry... he is an ineffective leader, same as bush.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,Wow I didn't know Obama was overseas and shot Osama. When did that happen? lol, exactly good for the goose and all I didnt know a president could pass bills alone, but we have no issue pointing the finger when one passes we dont approve of through CONGRESS I didnt know he could travel to millions of hr offices firing or hiring people, but we have no issue pointing the finger at a president when people are unemployed IM sure everyone involved in these 'debates' and smash sessions understands a President doesnt have to PHYSICALLY have done something themself to be held responsible for what happened....... seems like alot of obama fans use this statement , but when bush was in office, it didn't apply then... why is that? I actually wasnt here when Bush was in and I personally never made claims that he was ruining the country , or a facsist, traitor,,etc,,, when he was in I thought he was embarassing as a representative to the world of the USA, when most leaders are well educated and poised I thought he wasnt actually running things and that his behavior was often too REACTIONARY for my taste, reminded me more like a spoiled child than a diplomatic leader but that was the extent of my criticism for him, never did I believe or imply that he WANTED to destroy america or any such nonsense or that he was UNIQUELY awful in any particular flaw or uniquely responsible for any of the national issues we dealt with,,, thats how some think of barry... he is an ineffective leader, same as bush.. yes, those people are easier to have discussions with other people think of him with hatred as having some PERSONAL intention to destroy and take down the country and solely responsible (again, intentionally as well) for anything that has not gone right since 2009 in this country those people are more frustrating to try and discuss things with,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,Wow I didn't know Obama was overseas and shot Osama. When did that happen? lol, exactly good for the goose and all I didnt know a president could pass bills alone, but we have no issue pointing the finger when one passes we dont approve of through CONGRESS I didnt know he could travel to millions of hr offices firing or hiring people, but we have no issue pointing the finger at a president when people are unemployed IM sure everyone involved in these 'debates' and smash sessions understands a President doesnt have to PHYSICALLY have done something themself to be held responsible for what happened....... seems like alot of obama fans use this statement , but when bush was in office, it didn't apply then... why is that? I actually wasnt here when Bush was in and I personally never made claims that he was ruining the country , or a facsist, traitor,,etc,,, when he was in I thought he was embarassing as a representative to the world of the USA, when most leaders are well educated and poised I thought he wasnt actually running things and that his behavior was often too REACTIONARY for my taste, reminded me more like a spoiled child than a diplomatic leader but that was the extent of my criticism for him, never did I believe or imply that he WANTED to destroy america or any such nonsense or that he was UNIQUELY awful in any particular flaw or uniquely responsible for any of the national issues we dealt with,,, thats how some think of barry... he is an ineffective leader, same as bush.. yes, those people are easier to have discussions with other people think of him with hatred as having some PERSONAL intention to destroy and take down the country and solely responsible (again, intentionally as well) for anything that has not gone right since 2009 in this country those people are more frustrating to try and discuss things with,,, what if your wrong and he does have a PERSONAL intention to destroy and take down the country? i personally do not trust the man, and i have no idea what he is up to. but it doesn't seem very good to me, whatever it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Thu 07/05/12 12:35 PM
|
|
106,Wow I didn't know Obama was overseas and shot Osama. When did that happen? lol, exactly good for the goose and all I didnt know a president could pass bills alone, but we have no issue pointing the finger when one passes we dont approve of through CONGRESS I didnt know he could travel to millions of hr offices firing or hiring people, but we have no issue pointing the finger at a president when people are unemployed IM sure everyone involved in these 'debates' and smash sessions understands a President doesnt have to PHYSICALLY have done something themself to be held responsible for what happened....... seems like alot of obama fans use this statement , but when bush was in office, it didn't apply then... why is that? I actually wasnt here when Bush was in and I personally never made claims that he was ruining the country , or a facsist, traitor,,etc,,, when he was in I thought he was embarassing as a representative to the world of the USA, when most leaders are well educated and poised I thought he wasnt actually running things and that his behavior was often too REACTIONARY for my taste, reminded me more like a spoiled child than a diplomatic leader but that was the extent of my criticism for him, never did I believe or imply that he WANTED to destroy america or any such nonsense or that he was UNIQUELY awful in any particular flaw or uniquely responsible for any of the national issues we dealt with,,, thats how some think of barry... he is an ineffective leader, same as bush.. yes, those people are easier to have discussions with other people think of him with hatred as having some PERSONAL intention to destroy and take down the country and solely responsible (again, intentionally as well) for anything that has not gone right since 2009 in this country those people are more frustrating to try and discuss things with,,, what if your wrong and he does have a PERSONAL intention to destroy and take down the country? i personally do not trust the man, and i have no idea what he is up to. but it doesn't seem very good to me, whatever it is. its as likely as any other president before him having 'planned' to take down america it seems like he is up to alot of good to me,, it just boils down to personal perceptions of what constitutes 'good' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,Wow I didn't know Obama was overseas and shot Osama. When did that happen? lol, exactly good for the goose and all I didnt know a president could pass bills alone, but we have no issue pointing the finger when one passes we dont approve of through CONGRESS I didnt know he could travel to millions of hr offices firing or hiring people, but we have no issue pointing the finger at a president when people are unemployed IM sure everyone involved in these 'debates' and smash sessions understands a President doesnt have to PHYSICALLY have done something themself to be held responsible for what happened....... seems like alot of obama fans use this statement , but when bush was in office, it didn't apply then... why is that? I actually wasnt here when Bush was in and I personally never made claims that he was ruining the country , or a facsist, traitor,,etc,,, when he was in I thought he was embarassing as a representative to the world of the USA, when most leaders are well educated and poised I thought he wasnt actually running things and that his behavior was often too REACTIONARY for my taste, reminded me more like a spoiled child than a diplomatic leader but that was the extent of my criticism for him, never did I believe or imply that he WANTED to destroy america or any such nonsense or that he was UNIQUELY awful in any particular flaw or uniquely responsible for any of the national issues we dealt with,,, thats how some think of barry... he is an ineffective leader, same as bush.. yes, those people are easier to have discussions with other people think of him with hatred as having some PERSONAL intention to destroy and take down the country and solely responsible (again, intentionally as well) for anything that has not gone right since 2009 in this country those people are more frustrating to try and discuss things with,,, what if your wrong and he does have a PERSONAL intention to destroy and take down the country? i personally do not trust the man, and i have no idea what he is up to. but it doesn't seem very good to me, whatever it is. its as likely as any other president before him having 'planned' to take down america it seems like he is up to alot of good to me,, it just boils down to personal perceptions of what constitutes 'good' i guess i'm just paranoid... all this "good" he has done, and i didn't even notice it... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,Wow I didn't know Obama was overseas and shot Osama. When did that happen? lol, exactly good for the goose and all I didnt know a president could pass bills alone, but we have no issue pointing the finger when one passes we dont approve of through CONGRESS I didnt know he could travel to millions of hr offices firing or hiring people, but we have no issue pointing the finger at a president when people are unemployed IM sure everyone involved in these 'debates' and smash sessions understands a President doesnt have to PHYSICALLY have done something themself to be held responsible for what happened....... seems like alot of obama fans use this statement , but when bush was in office, it didn't apply then... why is that? I actually wasnt here when Bush was in and I personally never made claims that he was ruining the country , or a facsist, traitor,,etc,,, when he was in I thought he was embarassing as a representative to the world of the USA, when most leaders are well educated and poised I thought he wasnt actually running things and that his behavior was often too REACTIONARY for my taste, reminded me more like a spoiled child than a diplomatic leader but that was the extent of my criticism for him, never did I believe or imply that he WANTED to destroy america or any such nonsense or that he was UNIQUELY awful in any particular flaw or uniquely responsible for any of the national issues we dealt with,,, thats how some think of barry... he is an ineffective leader, same as bush.. yes, those people are easier to have discussions with other people think of him with hatred as having some PERSONAL intention to destroy and take down the country and solely responsible (again, intentionally as well) for anything that has not gone right since 2009 in this country those people are more frustrating to try and discuss things with,,, what if your wrong and he does have a PERSONAL intention to destroy and take down the country? i personally do not trust the man, and i have no idea what he is up to. but it doesn't seem very good to me, whatever it is. its as likely as any other president before him having 'planned' to take down america it seems like he is up to alot of good to me,, it just boils down to personal perceptions of what constitutes 'good' i guess i'm just paranoid... all this "good" he has done, and i didn't even notice it... those who constantly see and assume the worst are often called paranoid those who constantly see and assume the best are called naive I am sure, in my four decades of experience, that the truth lies somewhere in the middle no,, its not all good, but it sure aint all bad either,,, just my 2 cents 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, that was kind of my point,, how useless long random allegations or statements of 'fact' are,,,,,
  those who constantly see and assume the worst are often called paranoid
those who constantly see and assume the best are called naive I am sure, in my four decades of experience, that the truth lies somewhere in the middle no,, its not all good, but it sure aint all bad either,,, just my 2 cents
Good job, msharmony. 
|
|
|
|
|
