I bet I have a longer and much more interesting list of suspects than anyone of you have.

Of that, I have no doubt.

No, I'm joking....

Then I have over estimated you.

Nuts!

You don't have enough information for that. Oh, sorry, you don't need any to formulate an opinion.

I mean I really thought you were learning something.

Like:

A list of suspects is not evidence.

Anyone can collect a list of suspects.

I know you are intelligent enough to realize that.

Correct. It doesn't count.

Public opinion remains convinced that surveillance videos of the boarding process had been shown on TV networks.

In fact, what has been shown around the world was not the boarding process of any of the four aircraft but two video recordings, one of which is said to be from Portland airport and the other from Dulles Airport.

The Portland video purports to show alleged hijackers Atta and lomari before they board onto a connecting flight to Boston. Even if this video is authentic and if it actually shows these individuals, it does not show what they did after they arrived in Boston.

The other security video recording is said to be from the screening checkpoint at Dulles Airport, Washington, D.C., from where flight AA77 allegedly departed.


According to all known sources, Logan Airport, Boston, did not have any surveillance cameras on 9/11, neither at the security checkpoints nor above the boarding gates.

No one is known to dispute this fact. According to the 9/11 Commission’s staff, the Newark International Airport, from which flight UA93 reportedly departed, did not either have such equipment.

But this claim has been contradicted by Michael Taylor, president of American International Security Corporation who claims that security cameras had been installed at that airport.

The video recording that has been shown widely purports to show the alleged hijackers of flight AA77 pass through the security checkpoint at Dulles Airport, Washington, D.C. This recording was not voluntarily released by the US government, but was forced out in 2004 under the Freedom Of Information Act.

This video recording can be found on various sites on the Internet.50 Jay Kolar, who published a critical analysis of this recording, pointed out that it does not show the date and time of recording or the camera number.

Security videos typically record such identifying information automatically. He also pointed out further anomalies, such as the unusually bright lighting (which suggest that the recording was not made in the morning) and the fact that a human operator had manipulated the camera in order to zoom on particular subjects (indicating foreknowledge of those subjects).

His conclusion is that someone deliberately decided to film certain persons passing a security checkpoint at a certain time in order to produce “evidence”. The released recording does not show any passengers pass through the security checkpoint. Aside from the dubious source of this recording, it does not show who boarded the aircraft but only a few individuals who passed some security checkpoint at an unknown time.

There are references to news sources and statement to back up these statement in this document, if you are actually interested in TRUTH.


http://newcrisispapers.com/noevidence.pdf






A list of suspects is not evidence.

They have no evidence that Muslims hijacked planes on 9/11.

That is why Bush did not find or even hunt for Osama Bin Laden.
That is why the FBI could not state that he was wanted for that crime.
That is why Obama, our current Zionist controlled President allowed Osama bin Laden to be assassinated rather than just arrested and taken to trial.

They had no evidence to convict him.

I'm getting bored debating with you. You don't do anything but try to demean and attack the messenger.

You can no longer defend these criminals. It is probably better that you don't even try.

Thanks for the Daily Laugh!
Needed it!
Weather here is abominable!
I won't even bother with the rest of the "NEW" """"Evidence""" on account that I might bust a Gut Laughing!
It's just a Rehash of the same tired Conspiracy-Stories,that can't even make sense to the ones who invented them!

Yep,one behind every Tree!
Gruesome I tells ya,gruesome!

You should have a look at David Icke's forums. They are freaking hilarious!

I pass through some of them now and then,but that **** clogs your Arteries!
Worse than Cholesterol!

I have evidence. I have proof.

A list of criminal Zionist suspects.

Plus, the link I posted has credible references to some of your most credible news agencies to back up the total screw ups of the investigators of 9/11 as they were trying to put together their fake (planted) evidence and their list of Arab/Muslim suspects to blame 9/11 on.

The authorities have never had, and still don't have credible evidence to back up any of the "official" fabricated story about 9/11.

And it is YOU guys who seem to have opinions without ever examining the real facts or needing any evidence.







The public is gullible.

According to esebulldog a list of suspects equals "evidence."

So yes, it is laughable.



I would say that you are learning too, but I would probably be over estimating you too.

for the last time lady, YOU said:

"The U.S. government has had 11, years sufficient time to prove the identities of the persons who allegedly boarded and crashed airplanes on 9/11"

i posted a list of names so that you could read for yourself and see that there are persons who have been identified. if you feel that the list is false, then it is your OPINION. you needing more evidence is your personal problem. you cry about attacks on the messenger, well look in the mirror. i never said a list of suspects equals evidence. when you read a post, COMPREHEND what is said

Finding a list of suspects is not "proof" that they had anything to do with 9/11. There names were not on the passenger lists, (the real passenger lists could not be found, the mysteriously disappeared or do not exist.) and no one remembers seeing them board the planes, and there are no videos of them boarding the planes.

There are other problems with the names, which have been changed from time to time.

My point is not that they don't have a list of names, my point is that they have no proof that any of those names on their list actually did what they claim they did.

No evidence... no proof.