Recently obtained evidence from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society now definitively establishes that Obama was a member of the New Party. He also signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.

Minutes of the meeting on January 11, 1996, of the New Party’s Chicago chapter read as follows:
Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party “Candidate Contract” and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.

http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=2234&mn=445405&pt=msg&mid=11803666

and he still is...

Who would have ever thought?

The New Party was a third political party in the United States that tried to re-introduce the practice of electoral fusion as a political strategy for labor unions and community organizing groups. In electoral fusion, the same candidate receives nomination from more than one political party and occupies more than one ballot line. Fusion was once common in the United States but is now commonly practiced only in New York State, although it is allowed by law in seven other states.


OH THE HORROR


a 'third party' idea,,,(kind of like libertarians huh?)

STILL PRACRICED in New York and permitted in seven other states,,,,,

Oh, then why does he deny belonging when evidence clearly shows that he did?

exactly? why would he need to deny something so trivial?

Ill believe he denied it when I see the 'proof'
and Ill believe he signed a contract when I See proof too

if state documents arent enough to prove his citizenship to some, an editorial of allegations with no supporting evidence isnt enough to prove any the allegations are true,,,

Now, through careful archival research, Kurtz has proven his case--and proven once again that there are many people on the left who have been willing to misrepresent and obscure facts about Barack Obama, as well as many in the mainstream media who have acted as Obama's accomplices rather than searching for the truth.

Kurtz writes:

Minutes of the meeting on January 11, 1996, of the New Party’s Chicago chapter read as follows:

Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party “Candidate Contract” and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.

Consistent with this, a roster of the Chicago chapter of the New Party from early 1997 lists Obama as a member, with January 11, 1996, indicated as the date he joined...

The revelation in 2008 that Obama had joined an ACORN-controlled, leftist third party could have been damaging indeed, and coming clean about his broader work with ACORN might easily have exposed these New Party ties. Because the work of ACORN and the New Party often intersected with Obama’s other alliances, honesty about his ties to either could have laid bare the entire network of his leftist political partnerships.

Hmm...

thats not proof,, thats someone making a CLAIM About something,,,,

looks like proof to me.

Minutes taken at a January 1996 meeting of the Chicago chapter of the New Party read, in part:

Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party “Candidate Contract” and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.
looks like proof to me.

A note on Danny Davis center in the picture.




In February, 2012, Davis was interviewed about his involvement and award from the Communist Party USA.
Democratic Socialists of America and Chicago Communist Party USA.



If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, what must it be?

Guess obozos "cleaners" missed that one huh?

And Mitt Romney wore a Michigan State Trooper's uniform when he wasn't a state trooper. What's your point?

You missed it?

What was there to miss?

looks like proof he took pictures with two members of a group that 'supported' his run

looked at a list of 'supporters' of other candidates?

thats lame proof, one article , one segment from a new article even

do you know how often news articles make incorrect references,,?

What's lame is your denial of truth when you see it. Sorry that you can't.

whats lame is that so many can take THIS, an article in a newspaper written by God knows who, as proof


but question state documents and officials

IM also sorry that people put so much energy looking for controversy where there isnt any,,,

That's how the truth is revealed.
The New Party was a front to help get leftist(marxist)elected under the guise of being democrats. It is political deception and lies.
Quack, Quack.

that was a previous
New Party

seperate from the one in Chicago or New York


kind of like comparing the old panthers to the new ones,,,different ideologies and different approach,,,