1 2 13 14 15 17 19 20 21 37 38
Topic: 9/11: A Conspiracy Theory
Chazster's photo
Sun 04/15/12 06:31 PM

Chazster,and mightymoe, please read more carefully. The topic is not about me or what you think I may have posted in some past forum. You are breaking forum Rule #1 --You can discuss the message or topic, but not the messenger - NO EXCEPTIONS.

Rule#2 : (..you are not to post about past events gone sour, (in this case deleted).)

And since this thread topic is about the official story of 9-11 it is not about any theory you think I might have posted, and I said that what I think or believe is IRRELEVANT to this thread, then why do you keep making this about ME? It is NOT about me. STICK TO THE TOPIC.

Now watch the O.P. video and see if you can see anything in that video that IS NOT IN the OFFICIAL STORY that our government wants you to believe.

Now tell me if YOU believe it.

And don't make this thread about me.





Oh but you are claiming to be an investigator and thus you are using your character as an investigator to try to make your arguments more credible based on your own "research". You put your character out on the table and thus I am questioning it. If its relevant in a court room its relevant here.

metalwing's photo
Sun 04/15/12 06:35 PM


Chazster,and mightymoe, please read more carefully. The topic is not about me or what you think I may have posted in some past forum. You are breaking forum Rule #1 --You can discuss the message or topic, but not the messenger - NO EXCEPTIONS.

Rule#2 : (..you are not to post about past events gone sour, (in this case deleted).)

And since this thread topic is about the official story of 9-11 it is not about any theory you think I might have posted, and I said that what I think or believe is IRRELEVANT to this thread, then why do you keep making this about ME? It is NOT about me. STICK TO THE TOPIC.

Now watch the O.P. video and see if you can see anything in that video that IS NOT IN the OFFICIAL STORY that our government wants you to believe.

Now tell me if YOU believe it.

And don't make this thread about me.





Oh but you are claiming to be an investigator and thus you are using your character as an investigator to try to make your arguments more credible based on your own "research". You put your character out on the table and thus I am questioning it. If its relevant in a court room its relevant here.


Good point! But her points as an investigator are "responding to the OP"?

no photo
Sun 04/15/12 06:38 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Sun 04/15/12 06:39 PM
I was answering a direct question from Mightymoe, which is more than anyone here has done for me. I have asked the same question over and over and no one has answered it.

Here it is:

What in the video posted in the O.P does NOT agree with the government's OFFICIAL STORY, and do you believe it? (do you believe the governments official story?)

Yes or no.


mightymoe's photo
Sun 04/15/12 06:39 PM

Chazster,and mightymoe, please read more carefully. The topic is not about me or what you think I may have posted in some past forum. You are breaking forum Rule #1 --You can discuss the message or topic, but not the messenger - NO EXCEPTIONS.

Rule#2 : (..you are not to post about past events gone sour, (in this case deleted).)

And since this thread topic is about the official story of 9-11 it is not about any theory you think I might have posted, and I said that what I think or believe is IRRELEVANT to this thread, then why do you keep making this about ME? It is NOT about me. STICK TO THE TOPIC.

Now watch the O.P. video and see if you can see anything in that video that IS NOT IN the OFFICIAL STORY that our government wants you to believe.

Now tell me if YOU believe it.

And don't make this thread about me.





think? i know it for a fact...well, your right in the fact this post is not about you, but in order to have any value in what you say on here, your points of view are on a decline when you post something in one post, then post the opposite in another forum in the same topic... yes, you should be called out on that, because it devalues your input on the matter...

no photo
Sun 04/15/12 06:40 PM
YES OR NO.

mightymoe's photo
Sun 04/15/12 06:44 PM

I was answering a direct question from Mightymoe, which is more than anyone here has done for me. I have asked the same question over and over and no one has answered it.

Here it is:

What in the video posted in the O.P does NOT agree with the government's OFFICIAL STORY, and do you believe it? (do you believe the governments official story?)

Yes or no.




for the most part, yes.. there are some elements that don't add up, but nothing as major as the truthers make it out to be... in any situation such as this, there is going to be elements that the government is going "hide" for whatever reasons they have, but that doesn't mean a grand conspiracy...

no photo
Sun 04/15/12 06:44 PM
And Mightymoe, you can't show me the post where you claim I said that. I have said many times that I don't know what happened there or how that much damage was caused, but it damn sure was not two planes hitting the towers and that the official story is bull crap.

mightymoe's photo
Sun 04/15/12 06:47 PM

And Mightymoe, you can't show me the post where you claim I said that. I have said many times that I don't know what happened there or how that much damage was caused, but it damn sure was not two planes hitting the towers and that the official story is bull crap.


i'm looking for it now, there is 450 forums in there, so it will take a while... be patient, it's in there somewhere... AND NO SEARCH!!!!
flowerforyou

i cannot really believe you don't remember that, but when i find it, i'll refresh your memory...

no photo
Sun 04/15/12 06:48 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Sun 04/15/12 06:51 PM
Saying "the truthers" is way too vague. There are many ridiculous ideas about what happened on 9-11 and to bundle them all up together and tag them with pet name like "truthers" name is just idiotic and dumb. It is propaganda at its finest though. However it is not good investigation.




no photo
Sun 04/15/12 06:50 PM


And Mightymoe, you can't show me the post where you claim I said that. I have said many times that I don't know what happened there or how that much damage was caused, but it damn sure was not two planes hitting the towers and that the official story is bull crap.


i'm looking for it now, there is 450 forums in there, so it will take a while... be patient, it's in there somewhere... AND NO SEARCH!!!!
flowerforyou

i cannot really believe you don't remember that, but when i find it, i'll refresh your memory...


Please do. I certainly remember posting lots of pictures of the damage and information about a theory... but it was certainly not MY theory. It was just posted for people to consider and help to answer some of my questions.

No one had any real answers though. Except the same old bull.

mightymoe's photo
Sun 04/15/12 06:52 PM

Saying "the truthers" is way too vague. There are many ridiculous ideas about what happened on 9-11 and to bundle them all up together and tag them with pet like "truthers" name is just idiotic and dumb. It is propaganda at its finest though. However it is not good investigation.






it is what it is, and your right, there are way to many ridiculous ideas about what happened on 9-11... the biggest thing in my mind is there is a strong possibility they cheney could have known about it, but did nothing to stop it... but to say him and bush manufactured all of this is just stupid, IMO...

no photo
Sun 04/15/12 06:55 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Sun 04/15/12 06:55 PM


Saying "the truthers" is way too vague. There are many ridiculous ideas about what happened on 9-11 and to bundle them all up together and tag them with pet like "truthers" name is just idiotic and dumb. It is propaganda at its finest though. However it is not good investigation.






it is what it is, and your right, there are way to many ridiculous ideas about what happened on 9-11... the biggest thing in my mind is there is a strong possibility they cheney could have known about it, but did nothing to stop it... but to say him and bush manufactured all of this is just stupid, IMO...


Well I don't think Bush or Cheney were smart enough to manufacture it themselves. laugh laugh laugh laugh

But I do think they were cogs in the wheel.


no photo
Sun 04/15/12 07:01 PM
Anyway, I've been here for several years and some of my best threads and posts are long gone or have been deleted. Too bad. I spend some time researching that stuff and ordered books about it from both sides and I read the 9-11 commission report and did research on the director and some people on the commission and the company here in Colorado that he belongs to.

Its all water under the bridge anyway. And I have been drinking too much tap water lately which probably has fluoride in it and I have become apathetic so I just don't give a rat's a**. laugh tongue2


Chazster's photo
Sun 04/15/12 08:07 PM


And Mightymoe, you can't show me the post where you claim I said that. I have said many times that I don't know what happened there or how that much damage was caused, but it damn sure was not two planes hitting the towers and that the official story is bull crap.


i'm looking for it now, there is 450 forums in there, so it will take a while... be patient, it's in there somewhere... AND NO SEARCH!!!!
flowerforyou

i cannot really believe you don't remember that, but when i find it, i'll refresh your memory...


Remember most 9/11 posts were deleted by mods. The whole threads were.

metalwing's photo
Sun 04/15/12 08:25 PM


And Mightymoe, you can't show me the post where you claim I said that. I have said many times that I don't know what happened there or how that much damage was caused, but it damn sure was not two planes hitting the towers and that the official story is bull crap.


i'm looking for it now, there is 450 forums in there, so it will take a while... be patient, it's in there somewhere... AND NO SEARCH!!!!
flowerforyou

i cannot really believe you don't remember that, but when i find it, i'll refresh your memory...


I remember it well. The beams caused steel to rust. There were pictures of rusted cars in the streets.

Chazster's photo
Sun 04/15/12 08:28 PM



And Mightymoe, you can't show me the post where you claim I said that. I have said many times that I don't know what happened there or how that much damage was caused, but it damn sure was not two planes hitting the towers and that the official story is bull crap.


i'm looking for it now, there is 450 forums in there, so it will take a while... be patient, it's in there somewhere... AND NO SEARCH!!!!
flowerforyou

i cannot really believe you don't remember that, but when i find it, i'll refresh your memory...


I remember it well. The beams caused steel to rust. There were pictures of rusted cars in the streets.


Oh I remember that too now.

Bestinshow's photo
Mon 04/16/12 02:01 AM


I could have bought into 911 had those three buildings fallen this way or that way or if the fall started leaning to the localised damaged areas of the plane impacts but straight down? three for three at or near free fall speed? No resistance at all? absurd.




of course it would be "absurd" to someone who can't/won't understand it... and they didn't fall straight down...close, but not straight... what is your theory on how/why they fell? just curious...
All the evidence suggests controled demolition.

InvictusV's photo
Mon 04/16/12 03:45 AM



I could have bought into 911 had those three buildings fallen this way or that way or if the fall started leaning to the localised damaged areas of the plane impacts but straight down? three for three at or near free fall speed? No resistance at all? absurd.




of course it would be "absurd" to someone who can't/won't understand it... and they didn't fall straight down...close, but not straight... what is your theory on how/why they fell? just curious...
All the evidence suggests controled demolition.


No evidence suggests controlled demolition..

Optomistic69's photo
Mon 04/16/12 04:56 AM
Edited by Optomistic69 on Mon 04/16/12 05:02 AM



the biggest thing in my mind is there is a strong possibility that cheney could have known about it, but did nothing to stop it... ...


I agree with you.

That poses a serious Question to the defenders of the official report.

A vice President of America more than likely allowed 3000 Americans citizens to be murdered and there are people on here defending that without question and attack those that question.slaphead




I bet you 2.3 Trillion Dollars that something smells about 911bigsmile


mightymoe's photo
Mon 04/16/12 05:26 AM




I could have bought into 911 had those three buildings fallen this way or that way or if the fall started leaning to the localised damaged areas of the plane impacts but straight down? three for three at or near free fall speed? No resistance at all? absurd.




of course it would be "absurd" to someone who can't/won't understand it... and they didn't fall straight down...close, but not straight... what is your theory on how/why they fell? just curious...
All the evidence suggests controled demolition.


No evidence suggests controlled demolition..


i have to agree, i have not seen any evidence of it... none what so ever...

1 2 13 14 15 17 19 20 21 37 38