Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Previous 1 2 … 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 … 37 38 Next

Topic: 9/11: A Conspiracy Theory
Optomistic69 Joined Mon 10/10/11 Posts: 5173	Sun 04/15/12 03:21 PM Edited by Optomistic69 on Sun 04/15/12 03:22 PM
I think you are upsetting These Macho Guys Jeanniebean because you are a woman with a brain and a mind that exercises free thinking.

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Sun 04/15/12 03:48 PM
I think you are upsetting These Macho Guys Jeanniebean because you are a woman with a brain and a mind that exercises free thinking. Ahhh. I see the problem here. You don't understand that the "Truther" storyline is the opposite of free thinking. It is swallowing garbage because you can't understand the real story. Explosives, ray guns, CIA guided missiles all make much more sense than gravity, physics, math, and experts in those areas. I see you learned much from the ASCE Structural website.

andrewzooms Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 2842	Sun 04/15/12 03:53 PM Edited by andrewzooms on Sun 04/15/12 03:53 PM
It is obvious this building would collapse at free fall speed. I mean the damage to building 7 was tremendous.

Optomistic69 Joined Mon 10/10/11 Posts: 5173	Sun 04/15/12 03:55 PM
I think you are upsetting These Macho Guys Jeanniebean because you are a woman with a brain and a mind that exercises free thinking. Ahhh. I see the problem here. You don't understand that the "Truther" storyline is the opposite of free thinking. It is swallowing garbage because you can't understand the real story. Explosives, ray guns, CIA guided missiles all make much more sense than gravity, physics, math, and experts in those areas. I see you learned much from the ASCE Structural website. The Real Story....not in your childrens lifetime

Optomistic69 Joined Mon 10/10/11 Posts: 5173	Sun 04/15/12 03:57 PM
It is obvious this building would collapse at free fall speed. I mean the damage to building 7 was tremendous. I am very surprised that it took so long to fall....look at the raging fires

andrewzooms Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 2842	Sun 04/15/12 04:02 PM
One of my favorites. American 77 so called plane that hit The Pentagon. No penetration of the builidng. Yet at The WTC they where able to knock out all the core columns.

andrewzooms Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 2842	Sun 04/15/12 04:13 PM
Where is Flight 93? Where is the Jet Fuel? Oh wait this cloth Bandanna worn by a terrorist survived. But the titanium engines and metal and steel evaporated.

Chazster Joined Tue 08/28/07 Posts: 6206	Sun 04/15/12 04:15 PM
Also dont forget Jeanne is the one that thinks the towers were not blown up but shot with some invisible secret government laser weapon. What I think is irrelevant. I just don't believe the official story is true and that people want THE TRUTH. There are thousands of unanswered questions. Anyone who asks them are ridiculed, silenced, mocked, etc. P.S. Alex Jones is a disinformation agent paid by Zionists. People have the truth. Just because some of you decide not to believe it doesn't make it any less true. More like there are 1000s of answered questions that people just ignore the answers because they can't understand or refuse to listen to them. Look she even admits she thinks it was a giant invisible laser weapon. I know what investigator I am not hiring. That's a lie. I admitted NO SUCH THING. I said "What I think is irrelevant." And why are you making this about me? Stick to the topic. It's not about me. Its about the ridiculous official story the government concocted around 9-11. They even changed it completely after getting hold of the NORAD tapes. If those tapes are the truth, then their most high ranking officials LIED TO THEM. They were not questioned or prosecuted for lying or for giving false information either. Its not made up. You argued about this in the last 9/11 thread. I remember and possibly metalwing remembers too.

Chazster Joined Tue 08/28/07 Posts: 6206	Sun 04/15/12 04:17 PM
One of my favorites. American 77 so called plane that hit The Pentagon. No penetration of the builidng. Yet at The WTC they where able to knock out all the core columns. I like how you are saying there is no plane when the landing gear is right there in the photo.

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Sun 04/15/12 04:18 PM
It is obvious this building would collapse at free fall speed. I mean the damage to building 7 was tremendous. I am very surprised that it took so long to fall....look at the raging fires Why would you post about a topic of which you know nothing?

andrewzooms Joined Fri 10/26/07 Posts: 2842	Sun 04/15/12 04:20 PM
Those are Cable Reels for Construction. No Aircraft parts shown.

Optomistic69 Joined Mon 10/10/11 Posts: 5173	Sun 04/15/12 04:27 PM
Those are Cable Reels for Construction. No Aircraft parts shown. They look like cable reels to me

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Sun 04/15/12 04:37 PM
Also dont forget Jeanne is the one that thinks the towers were not blown up but shot with some invisible secret government laser weapon. What I think is irrelevant. I just don't believe the official story is true and that people want THE TRUTH. There are thousands of unanswered questions. Anyone who asks them are ridiculed, silenced, mocked, etc. P.S. Alex Jones is a disinformation agent paid by Zionists. you want the truth? how would you know the truth from the untruth? your not going to believe anything that doesn't correspond to what you already know as the truth, no matter who says what. in your mind, along with the other truthers, that yall are right, and no matter what, you won't settle for anything less than what you already know, no how illogical it is... maybe you should stick to your paintings rather than dabble in things that you don't understand... I can spot untruth easily. What I know is that government is corrupt from the grass roots all the way to the top and I have NO REASON whatsoever to believe anything they say. I can also spot ridiculous propaganda when I here it. There goes you, another person presuming to know what I do or do not understand. It is YOU that do not understand. So stick to the topic of this thread and stop making it about me. If you don't like the you tube video clip in the O.P. then tell me what is in that clip that is NOT the actual OFFICIAL STORY. Then tell me you believe it all. If even Part of the official story is a lie, then none of it can be taken seriously. i'm not presuming anything... it is very obvious... i wasn't there, so i don't know how or why... but i do know a little about physics, and some/most of the things that the truthers come up with is just fantasy...

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Sun 04/15/12 04:41 PM
Also dont forget Jeanne is the one that thinks the towers were not blown up but shot with some invisible secret government laser weapon. What I think is irrelevant. I just don't believe the official story is true and that people want THE TRUTH. There are thousands of unanswered questions. Anyone who asks them are ridiculed, silenced, mocked, etc. P.S. Alex Jones is a disinformation agent paid by Zionists. People have the truth. Just because some of you decide not to believe it doesn't make it any less true. More like there are 1000s of answered questions that people just ignore the answers because they can't understand or refuse to listen to them. Look she even admits she thinks it was a giant invisible laser weapon. I know what investigator I am not hiring. That's a lie. I admitted NO SUCH THING. I said "What I think is irrelevant." And why are you making this about me? Stick to the topic. It's not about me. Its about the ridiculous official story the government concocted around 9-11. They even changed it completely after getting hold of the NORAD tapes. If those tapes are the truth, then their most high ranking officials LIED TO THEM. They were not questioned or prosecuted for lying or for giving false information either. Its not made up. You argued about this in the last 9/11 thread. I remember and possibly metalwing remembers too. yea, she was posting pictures of burned out cars saying it was the super secret government ray gun, that she knew all about...i guess it was the PI work from the super secret websites we cannot access...

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Sun 04/15/12 04:51 PM
Also dont forget Jeanne is the one that thinks the towers were not blown up but shot with some invisible secret government laser weapon. What I think is irrelevant. I just don't believe the official story is true and that people want THE TRUTH. There are thousands of unanswered questions. Anyone who asks them are ridiculed, silenced, mocked, etc. P.S. Alex Jones is a disinformation agent paid by Zionists. People have the truth. Just because some of you decide not to believe it doesn't make it any less true. More like there are 1000s of answered questions that people just ignore the answers because they can't understand or refuse to listen to them. Look she even admits she thinks it was a giant invisible laser weapon. I know what investigator I am not hiring. That's a lie. I admitted NO SUCH THING. I said "What I think is irrelevant." And why are you making this about me? Stick to the topic. It's not about me. Its about the ridiculous official story the government concocted around 9-11. They even changed it completely after getting hold of the NORAD tapes. If those tapes are the truth, then their most high ranking officials LIED TO THEM. They were not questioned or prosecuted for lying or for giving false information either. Its not made up. You argued about this in the last 9/11 thread. I remember and possibly metalwing remembers too. yea, she was posting pictures of burned out cars saying it was the super secret government ray gun, that she knew all about...i guess it was the PI work from the super secret websites we cannot access... That's why this goofy thread keeps getting restarted over and over. All the "FACTS" that got shot down can be resurrected in a different way... or forgotten ... (or as in this case) denied.

Bestinshow Joined Mon 06/01/09 Posts: 5540	Sun 04/15/12 05:33 PM
I could have bought into 911 had those three buildings fallen this way or that way or if the fall started leaning to the localised damaged areas of the plane impacts but straight down? three for three at or near free fall speed? No resistance at all? absurd.

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Sun 04/15/12 05:46 PM
I could have bought into 911 had those three buildings fallen this way or that way or if the fall started leaning to the localised damaged areas of the plane impacts but straight down? three for three at or near free fall speed? No resistance at all? absurd. of course it would be "absurd" to someone who can't/won't understand it... and they didn't fall straight down...close, but not straight... what is your theory on how/why they fell? just curious...

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Sun 04/15/12 06:17 PM Edited by Jeanniebean on Sun 04/15/12 06:19 PM
Chazster,and mightymoe, please read more carefully. The topic is not about me or what you think I may have posted in some past forum. You are breaking forum Rule #1 --You can discuss the message or topic, but not the messenger - NO EXCEPTIONS. Rule#2 : (..you are not to post about past events gone sour, (in this case deleted).) And since this thread topic is about the official story of 9-11 it is not about any theory you think I might have posted, and I said that what I think or believe is IRRELEVANT to this thread, then why do you keep making this about ME? It is NOT about me. STICK TO THE TOPIC. Now watch the O.P. video and see if you can see anything in that video that IS NOT IN the OFFICIAL STORY that our government wants you to believe. Now tell me if YOU believe it. And don't make this thread about me.

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Sun 04/15/12 06:25 PM
Chazster,and mightymoe, please read more carefully. The topic is not about me or what you think I may have posted in some past forum. You are breaking forum Rule #1 --You can discuss the message or topic, but not the messenger - NO EXCEPTIONS. Rule#2 : (..you are not to post about past events gone sour, (in this case deleted).) And since this thread topic is about the official story of 9-11 it is not about any theory you think I might have posted, and I said that what I think or believe is IRRELEVANT to this thread, then why do you keep making this about ME? It is NOT about me. STICK TO THE TOPIC. Now watch the O.P. video and see if you can see anything in that video that IS NOT IN the OFFICIAL STORY that our government wants you to believe. Now tell me if YOU believe it. And don't make this thread about me. But it is OK for YOU to address them directly? NO EXCEPTIONS except for you? Nobody does more thread hijacking than you.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Sun 04/15/12 06:27 PM Edited by Jeanniebean on Sun 04/15/12 06:31 PM
Chazster,and mightymoe, please read more carefully. The topic is not about me or what you think I may have posted in some past forum. You are breaking forum Rule #1 --You can discuss the message or topic, but not the messenger - NO EXCEPTIONS. Rule#2 : (..you are not to post about past events gone sour, (in this case deleted).) And since this thread topic is about the official story of 9-11 it is not about any theory you think I might have posted, and I said that what I think or believe is IRRELEVANT to this thread, then why do you keep making this about ME? It is NOT about me. STICK TO THE TOPIC. Now watch the O.P. video and see if you can see anything in that video that IS NOT IN the OFFICIAL STORY that our government wants you to believe. Now tell me if YOU believe it. And don't make this thread about me. But it is OK for YOU to address them directly? NO EXCEPTIONS except for you? Nobody does more thread hijacking than you. Addressing someone you are talking to is not the same thing as hijacking the topic and making it about the messenger. But if you prefer, I will just report you the next time and say not a word. You called it. So be it. I'm out of this thread. Have fun.