100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Do You Have The Right To Believe - part 3 | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Why's it matter if Jesus referred to Marry as mother or not? That has no baring on anyone's salvation. You do realize not everything we know of Jesus is in the scriptures of the bible right? All the scriptures we posses and or have about Jesus and or his life would not fit into a single book. Cowboy....if you actually knew anything about Jesus you would know that he intentionly did not call Mary "Mother"...some even asked him about the woman that borned him and he instead pointed to his disciples .... but anyway... we know that you do not refer to the man that sired you as "Father" ... do that mean that you never called the woman that borne you "Mother"? to not refer to one's parents as being ones Mother or Father points to abuse or cults .... The culture at the time of Jesus was a patriarchal society, the oldest son would have been required to take care of his mother once the father died. Joseph was already dead at this time, and Jesus being the only son of Mary was giving her over to John's care. The term woman refers to the prophecy in Genesis where the offspring of the woman would crush the serpent's head (Genesis 3:15), which Jesus done with his crucifixion and resurrection. As Children of God we have become brothers and sisters of Christ, when Christ gave Mary to John he was giving her to us all, for if we are true siblings of Christ then his mother is our mother. Notice that Jesus did not give care of Mary over to his "Brothers." If these were in fact true brothers then Jesus would have been required to hand her over to one of them, by not doing so he was breaking the law. The fact that he did not do this tells us a few things. That those who are referred to as Brothers were actually relatives rather then biological brothers. Lets look at James the brother of the Lord (Gal. 1: 18-19) Paul tells us in Galatians that when he visited Cephas he saw none of the other Apostles except James the brother of the Lord. If we look at the list of Apostles in Matthew 10: 2-4 we see two Apostles named James; one is the son of Zebedee and the other the son of Alphaeus. The Bible is clear that nether of the Apostles named James was a son of Mary or Joseph. The Aramaic or Hebrew Lanuage did not have a word for cousin or step brother so the word brother was used. The early Church fathers taught that Jospeh indeed had a brother named Alphaeus which is also rendered as Clopas. If we look at John 19:25 we see that Mary the mother of Jesus is standing there with her sister Mary the wife of Clopas, this would have been her actual sister in law, the woman married to Joseph's brother. Neither Aramaic or Hebrew had a word for sister in law so the word sister is used. These terms today are used by Catholics and Protestants alike, in Catholic circles the word Brother refers to Monks within a given order and the term sister refers to Nuns of a given order. In Protestant circles the term is used for people within a given congregation, sister Martha or Brother Jim the word is used as a way to distinguish a Christian brother or sister. Cowboy...why did you "google cut and paste" all this useless information when it's a fact of the bible that Jesus never called Mary "Mother" this is the same principle that cults operate on to brainwash their followers to get rid of their birth parents this is what happens when believers stray off the path from the government approved religion which provide some sort of protection you've already claim that you are no longer a Christian and given back your Christian ID card, you have denounced Christianity as not being a need for rules as to follow Jesus, you deny that your male birth parent is your Father .......all that's left is for you to do is to deny that your female birth parent is your Mother and that will make you a cultist my advice...do what the other Ex-Christians do...leave all the bible hocus pocus alone and move to Spirituality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why's it matter if Jesus referred to Marry as mother or not? That has no baring on anyone's salvation. You do realize not everything we know of Jesus is in the scriptures of the bible right? All the scriptures we posses and or have about Jesus and or his life would not fit into a single book. Cowboy....if you actually knew anything about Jesus you would know that he intentionly did not call Mary "Mother"...some even asked him about the woman that borned him and he instead pointed to his disciples .... but anyway... we know that you do not refer to the man that sired you as "Father" ... do that mean that you never called the woman that borne you "Mother"? to not refer to one's parents as being ones Mother or Father points to abuse or cults .... The culture at the time of Jesus was a patriarchal society, the oldest son would have been required to take care of his mother once the father died. Joseph was already dead at this time, and Jesus being the only son of Mary was giving her over to John's care. The term woman refers to the prophecy in Genesis where the offspring of the woman would crush the serpent's head (Genesis 3:15), which Jesus done with his crucifixion and resurrection. As Children of God we have become brothers and sisters of Christ, when Christ gave Mary to John he was giving her to us all, for if we are true siblings of Christ then his mother is our mother. Notice that Jesus did not give care of Mary over to his "Brothers." If these were in fact true brothers then Jesus would have been required to hand her over to one of them, by not doing so he was breaking the law. The fact that he did not do this tells us a few things. That those who are referred to as Brothers were actually relatives rather then biological brothers. Lets look at James the brother of the Lord (Gal. 1: 18-19) Paul tells us in Galatians that when he visited Cephas he saw none of the other Apostles except James the brother of the Lord. If we look at the list of Apostles in Matthew 10: 2-4 we see two Apostles named James; one is the son of Zebedee and the other the son of Alphaeus. The Bible is clear that nether of the Apostles named James was a son of Mary or Joseph. The Aramaic or Hebrew Lanuage did not have a word for cousin or step brother so the word brother was used. The early Church fathers taught that Jospeh indeed had a brother named Alphaeus which is also rendered as Clopas. If we look at John 19:25 we see that Mary the mother of Jesus is standing there with her sister Mary the wife of Clopas, this would have been her actual sister in law, the woman married to Joseph's brother. Neither Aramaic or Hebrew had a word for sister in law so the word sister is used. These terms today are used by Catholics and Protestants alike, in Catholic circles the word Brother refers to Monks within a given order and the term sister refers to Nuns of a given order. In Protestant circles the term is used for people within a given congregation, sister Martha or Brother Jim the word is used as a way to distinguish a Christian brother or sister. Cowboy...why did you "google cut and paste" all this useless information when it's a fact of the bible that Jesus never called Mary "Mother" this is the same principle that cults operate on to brainwash their followers to get rid of their birth parents this is what happens when believers stray off the path from the government approved religion which provide some sort of protection you've already claim that you are no longer a Christian and given back your Christian ID card, you have denounced Christianity as not being a need for rules as to follow Jesus, you deny that your male birth parent is your Father .......all that's left is for you to do is to deny that your female birth parent is your Mother and that will make you a cultist my advice...do what the other Ex-Christians do...leave all the bible hocus pocus alone and move to Spirituality Nobody is getting rid of anybody. What in the world are you talking about? You're really stretching today. I pasted that information to give some light on the culture at that time to give light on the meanings of their words. Again, this has to be done to understand exactly what is being said. For again the words used in the original scriptures don't have the same exact meaning(s) as the words we use now. But to translate something into another language when there is a word that doesn't translate exact, they must use the closest word to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why's it matter if Jesus referred to Marry as mother or not? That has no baring on anyone's salvation. You do realize not everything we know of Jesus is in the scriptures of the bible right? All the scriptures we posses and or have about Jesus and or his life would not fit into a single book. Cowboy....if you actually knew anything about Jesus you would know that he intentionly did not call Mary "Mother"...some even asked him about the woman that borned him and he instead pointed to his disciples .... but anyway... we know that you do not refer to the man that sired you as "Father" ... do that mean that you never called the woman that borne you "Mother"? to not refer to one's parents as being ones Mother or Father points to abuse or cults .... The culture at the time of Jesus was a patriarchal society, the oldest son would have been required to take care of his mother once the father died. Joseph was already dead at this time, and Jesus being the only son of Mary was giving her over to John's care. The term woman refers to the prophecy in Genesis where the offspring of the woman would crush the serpent's head (Genesis 3:15), which Jesus done with his crucifixion and resurrection. As Children of God we have become brothers and sisters of Christ, when Christ gave Mary to John he was giving her to us all, for if we are true siblings of Christ then his mother is our mother. Notice that Jesus did not give care of Mary over to his "Brothers." If these were in fact true brothers then Jesus would have been required to hand her over to one of them, by not doing so he was breaking the law. The fact that he did not do this tells us a few things. That those who are referred to as Brothers were actually relatives rather then biological brothers. Lets look at James the brother of the Lord (Gal. 1: 18-19) Paul tells us in Galatians that when he visited Cephas he saw none of the other Apostles except James the brother of the Lord. If we look at the list of Apostles in Matthew 10: 2-4 we see two Apostles named James; one is the son of Zebedee and the other the son of Alphaeus. The Bible is clear that nether of the Apostles named James was a son of Mary or Joseph. The Aramaic or Hebrew Lanuage did not have a word for cousin or step brother so the word brother was used. The early Church fathers taught that Jospeh indeed had a brother named Alphaeus which is also rendered as Clopas. If we look at John 19:25 we see that Mary the mother of Jesus is standing there with her sister Mary the wife of Clopas, this would have been her actual sister in law, the woman married to Joseph's brother. Neither Aramaic or Hebrew had a word for sister in law so the word sister is used. These terms today are used by Catholics and Protestants alike, in Catholic circles the word Brother refers to Monks within a given order and the term sister refers to Nuns of a given order. In Protestant circles the term is used for people within a given congregation, sister Martha or Brother Jim the word is used as a way to distinguish a Christian brother or sister. Cowboy...why did you "google cut and paste" all this useless information when it's a fact of the bible that Jesus never called Mary "Mother" this is the same principle that cults operate on to brainwash their followers to get rid of their birth parents this is what happens when believers stray off the path from the government approved religion which provide some sort of protection you've already claim that you are no longer a Christian and given back your Christian ID card, you have denounced Christianity as not being a need for rules as to follow Jesus, you deny that your male birth parent is your Father .......all that's left is for you to do is to deny that your female birth parent is your Mother and that will make you a cultist my advice...do what the other Ex-Christians do...leave all the bible hocus pocus alone and move to Spirituality Nobody is getting rid of anybody. What in the world are you talking about? You're really stretching today. I pasted that information to give some light on the culture at that time to give light on the meanings of their words. Again, this has to be done to understand exactly what is being said. For again the words used in the original scriptures don't have the same exact meaning(s) as the words we use now. But to translate something into another language when there is a word that doesn't translate exact, they must use the closest word to it. Cowboy...it has nothing to do with the culture or mis-translation of hebrew words....Jesus intentionally not call Mary "Mother" ......he sure didn't have a problem calling the one that supposedly impregnated his Mother as "Father" if you insist that all of the life of Jesus is not chronicle in the bible....then perhaps what is also not chronicle in the bible is that Mary also abused Jesus as a child and that is why he never called her "Mother" to not acknowledge your parents to be your Mother and/or Father....no matter how you look at it...points to hate and that is why for you to allow a religion to deny your male birth parent as being "Father" ...is just an excuse to mask some other deep rooted unaddressed paternal issues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why's it matter if Jesus referred to Marry as mother or not? That has no baring on anyone's salvation. You do realize not everything we know of Jesus is in the scriptures of the bible right? All the scriptures we posses and or have about Jesus and or his life would not fit into a single book. Cowboy....if you actually knew anything about Jesus you would know that he intentionly did not call Mary "Mother"...some even asked him about the woman that borned him and he instead pointed to his disciples .... but anyway... we know that you do not refer to the man that sired you as "Father" ... do that mean that you never called the woman that borne you "Mother"? to not refer to one's parents as being ones Mother or Father points to abuse or cults .... The culture at the time of Jesus was a patriarchal society, the oldest son would have been required to take care of his mother once the father died. Joseph was already dead at this time, and Jesus being the only son of Mary was giving her over to John's care. The term woman refers to the prophecy in Genesis where the offspring of the woman would crush the serpent's head (Genesis 3:15), which Jesus done with his crucifixion and resurrection. As Children of God we have become brothers and sisters of Christ, when Christ gave Mary to John he was giving her to us all, for if we are true siblings of Christ then his mother is our mother. Notice that Jesus did not give care of Mary over to his "Brothers." If these were in fact true brothers then Jesus would have been required to hand her over to one of them, by not doing so he was breaking the law. The fact that he did not do this tells us a few things. That those who are referred to as Brothers were actually relatives rather then biological brothers. Lets look at James the brother of the Lord (Gal. 1: 18-19) Paul tells us in Galatians that when he visited Cephas he saw none of the other Apostles except James the brother of the Lord. If we look at the list of Apostles in Matthew 10: 2-4 we see two Apostles named James; one is the son of Zebedee and the other the son of Alphaeus. The Bible is clear that nether of the Apostles named James was a son of Mary or Joseph. The Aramaic or Hebrew Lanuage did not have a word for cousin or step brother so the word brother was used. The early Church fathers taught that Jospeh indeed had a brother named Alphaeus which is also rendered as Clopas. If we look at John 19:25 we see that Mary the mother of Jesus is standing there with her sister Mary the wife of Clopas, this would have been her actual sister in law, the woman married to Joseph's brother. Neither Aramaic or Hebrew had a word for sister in law so the word sister is used. These terms today are used by Catholics and Protestants alike, in Catholic circles the word Brother refers to Monks within a given order and the term sister refers to Nuns of a given order. In Protestant circles the term is used for people within a given congregation, sister Martha or Brother Jim the word is used as a way to distinguish a Christian brother or sister. Cowboy...why did you "google cut and paste" all this useless information when it's a fact of the bible that Jesus never called Mary "Mother" this is the same principle that cults operate on to brainwash their followers to get rid of their birth parents this is what happens when believers stray off the path from the government approved religion which provide some sort of protection you've already claim that you are no longer a Christian and given back your Christian ID card, you have denounced Christianity as not being a need for rules as to follow Jesus, you deny that your male birth parent is your Father .......all that's left is for you to do is to deny that your female birth parent is your Mother and that will make you a cultist my advice...do what the other Ex-Christians do...leave all the bible hocus pocus alone and move to Spirituality Nobody is getting rid of anybody. What in the world are you talking about? You're really stretching today. I pasted that information to give some light on the culture at that time to give light on the meanings of their words. Again, this has to be done to understand exactly what is being said. For again the words used in the original scriptures don't have the same exact meaning(s) as the words we use now. But to translate something into another language when there is a word that doesn't translate exact, they must use the closest word to it. Cowboy...it has nothing to do with the culture or mis-translation of hebrew words....Jesus intentionally not call Mary "Mother" ......he sure didn't have a problem calling the one that supposedly impregnated his Mother as "Father" if you insist that all of the life of Jesus is not chronicle in the bible....then perhaps what is also not chronicle in the bible is that Mary also abused Jesus as a child and that is why he never called her "Mother" to not acknowledge your parents to be your Mother and/or Father....no matter how you look at it...points to hate and that is why for you to allow a religion to deny your male birth parent as being "Father" ...is just an excuse to mask some other deep rooted unaddressed paternal issues How does that show hate? You have hate deep in your mind I guess. Everything you say in here has something to with viewing something hateful. And what's my mother have to do with anything? I've never said I don't call my mother just that, mother. And marry would have no time to abuse Jesus as a child, Jesus was spreading the word at a very young age. I'm guessing you were beat as a child? To even think of that, you have a very very very strange way at looking at things. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How does that show hate? You have hate deep in your mind I guess. Everything you say in here has something to with viewing something hateful. And what's my mother have to do with anything? I've never said I don't call my mother just that, mother. And marry would have no time to abuse Jesus as a child, Jesus was spreading the word at a very young age. I'm guessing you were beat as a child? To even think of that, you have a very very very strange way at looking at things. Jesus couldn't even change his own diapers which mean he was not in a position for Mary not to abuse him as a child which could be the reason why he refused to called her "Mother" I unlike you do not allow books to ditcate to me not to refer to my birth Father as my Father .....even Christianity does not allow this since priests as refer to as Father ...but since you claim that you are no longer a member of Christianity it has to be some other reason why you refuse to call your birth parent Father ...and the reason can't be good |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How does that show hate? You have hate deep in your mind I guess. Everything you say in here has something to with viewing something hateful. And what's my mother have to do with anything? I've never said I don't call my mother just that, mother. And marry would have no time to abuse Jesus as a child, Jesus was spreading the word at a very young age. I'm guessing you were beat as a child? To even think of that, you have a very very very strange way at looking at things. Jesus couldn't even change his own diapers which mean he was not in a position for Mary not to abuse him as a child which could be the reason why he refused to called her "Mother" I unlike you do not allow books to ditcate to me not to refer to my birth Father as my Father .....even Christianity does not allow this since priests as refer to as Father ...but since you claim that you are no longer a member of Christianity it has to be some other reason why you refuse to call your birth parent Father ...and the reason can't be good I call no one but God "father". I don't call a priest father, I do not call my dad father. The only one that is anyone's father is Jesus Christ. He is the one that created us all, he is the one that formed us in the womb. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I call no one but God "father". I don't call a priest father, I do not call my dad father. The only one that is anyone's father is Jesus Christ. He is the one that created us all, he is the one that formed us in the womb. well if you choose to claim that you have a Father that you never met or have any proof beyond faith that they exist,... then speak for yourself and not include everyone else in your nonsense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I call no one but God "father". I don't call a priest father, I do not call my dad father. The only one that is anyone's father is Jesus Christ. He is the one that created us all, he is the one that formed us in the womb. well if you choose to claim that you have a Father that you never met or have any proof beyond faith that they exist,... then speak for yourself and not include everyone else in your nonsense I include no one else in my believe in the manner they must believe as I. I include them in my belief, for my belief itself in general doesn't only consist of me, but the whole world. I am nothing special and or out of the ordinary. But nevertheless it is MY belief, if you do not believe as such that is absolutely fine. This is a forum for sharing our inner beliefs, if you don't believe as the same as what you read. The best advice I could give, would be to just move on and ignore the comment if it doesn't apply to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I call no one but God "father". I don't call a priest father, I do not call my dad father. The only one that is anyone's father is Jesus Christ. He is the one that created us all, he is the one that formed us in the womb. well if you choose to claim that you have a Father that you never met or have any proof beyond faith that they exist,... then speak for yourself and not include everyone else in your nonsense I include no one else in my believe in the manner they must believe as I. I include them in my belief, for my belief itself in general doesn't only consist of me, but the whole world. I am nothing special and or out of the ordinary. But nevertheless it is MY belief, if you do not believe as such that is absolutely fine. This is a forum for sharing our inner beliefs, if you don't believe as the same as what you read. The best advice I could give, would be to just move on and ignore the comment if it doesn't apply to you. it appears you are the only one that been brainwashed into believing that your birth parent isn't your Father...which is pretty sad...which is why you should only speak for yourself....or at least do a survey first SURVEY QUESTION: how many religious people believe their male birth parent is not their Father? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I call no one but God "father". I don't call a priest father, I do not call my dad father. The only one that is anyone's father is Jesus Christ. He is the one that created us all, he is the one that formed us in the womb. well if you choose to claim that you have a Father that you never met or have any proof beyond faith that they exist,... then speak for yourself and not include everyone else in your nonsense I include no one else in my believe in the manner they must believe as I. I include them in my belief, for my belief itself in general doesn't only consist of me, but the whole world. I am nothing special and or out of the ordinary. But nevertheless it is MY belief, if you do not believe as such that is absolutely fine. This is a forum for sharing our inner beliefs, if you don't believe as the same as what you read. The best advice I could give, would be to just move on and ignore the comment if it doesn't apply to you. it appears you are the only one that been brainwashed into believing that your birth parent isn't your Father...which is pretty sad...which is why you should only speak for yourself....or at least do a survey first SURVEY QUESTION: how many religious people believe their male birth parent is not their Father? Why so much criticizing of other people's beliefs? This forum is for SHARING our different beliefs. I did, so why do you come up and criticize that belief? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I call no one but God "father". I don't call a priest father, I do not call my dad father. The only one that is anyone's father is Jesus Christ. He is the one that created us all, he is the one that formed us in the womb. well if you choose to claim that you have a Father that you never met or have any proof beyond faith that they exist,... then speak for yourself and not include everyone else in your nonsense I include no one else in my believe in the manner they must believe as I. I include them in my belief, for my belief itself in general doesn't only consist of me, but the whole world. I am nothing special and or out of the ordinary. But nevertheless it is MY belief, if you do not believe as such that is absolutely fine. This is a forum for sharing our inner beliefs, if you don't believe as the same as what you read. The best advice I could give, would be to just move on and ignore the comment if it doesn't apply to you. it appears you are the only one that been brainwashed into believing that your birth parent isn't your Father...which is pretty sad...which is why you should only speak for yourself....or at least do a survey first SURVEY QUESTION: how many religious people believe their male birth parent is not their Father? Why so much criticizing of other people's beliefs? This forum is for SHARING our different beliefs. I did, so why do you come up and criticize that belief? SURVEY QUESTION: how many religious people believe their male birth parent is not their Father? I care not if any one refers to their biological dad as "father". I shared my belief that I do not do as such for in MY eyes God the father is my only "father". Again, this forum is for sharing one's beliefs, so again I ask why so much criticizing of another's belief? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I call no one but God "father". I don't call a priest father, I do not call my dad father. The only one that is anyone's father is Jesus Christ. He is the one that created us all, he is the one that formed us in the womb. well if you choose to claim that you have a Father that you never met or have any proof beyond faith that they exist,... then speak for yourself and not include everyone else in your nonsense I include no one else in my believe in the manner they must believe as I. I include them in my belief, for my belief itself in general doesn't only consist of me, but the whole world. I am nothing special and or out of the ordinary. But nevertheless it is MY belief, if you do not believe as such that is absolutely fine. This is a forum for sharing our inner beliefs, if you don't believe as the same as what you read. The best advice I could give, would be to just move on and ignore the comment if it doesn't apply to you. it appears you are the only one that been brainwashed into believing that your birth parent isn't your Father...which is pretty sad...which is why you should only speak for yourself....or at least do a survey first SURVEY QUESTION: how many religious people believe their male birth parent is not their Father? Why so much criticizing of other people's beliefs? This forum is for SHARING our different beliefs. I did, so why do you come up and criticize that belief? Cowboy...you making claims that everyone's Father is not their Father... is not sharing...it's preaching ...and it's you making claims that everyone's Mother sleeps around |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I call no one but God "father". I don't call a priest father, I do not call my dad father. The only one that is anyone's father is Jesus Christ. He is the one that created us all, he is the one that formed us in the womb. well if you choose to claim that you have a Father that you never met or have any proof beyond faith that they exist,... then speak for yourself and not include everyone else in your nonsense I include no one else in my believe in the manner they must believe as I. I include them in my belief, for my belief itself in general doesn't only consist of me, but the whole world. I am nothing special and or out of the ordinary. But nevertheless it is MY belief, if you do not believe as such that is absolutely fine. This is a forum for sharing our inner beliefs, if you don't believe as the same as what you read. The best advice I could give, would be to just move on and ignore the comment if it doesn't apply to you. it appears you are the only one that been brainwashed into believing that your birth parent isn't your Father...which is pretty sad...which is why you should only speak for yourself....or at least do a survey first SURVEY QUESTION: how many religious people believe their male birth parent is not their Father? Why so much criticizing of other people's beliefs? This forum is for SHARING our different beliefs. I did, so why do you come up and criticize that belief? Cowboy...you making claims that everyone's Father is not their Father... is not sharing...it's preaching ...and it's you making claims that everyone's Mother sleeps around 1. It is sharing, that is my belief. 2. Has absolutely nothing to do with anyone's mother or even sex in general. Why think so much about sex? Anything sexual was not even mentioned before you brought it up.... why bring it up? Is sex all you think of Funches? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. It is sharing, that is my belief. 2. Has absolutely nothing to do with anyone's mother or even sex in general. Why think so much about sex? Anything sexual was not even mentioned before you brought it up.... why bring it up? Is sex all you think of Funches? you're always whining about not getting persoanl... claiming that people Father's are not their Fathers and therefore suggesting that their Mothers are loose is an example of you getting personal and trying to hide behind religion what you're are doing can be classified as Malevolent which is beyond evil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. It is sharing, that is my belief. 2. Has absolutely nothing to do with anyone's mother or even sex in general. Why think so much about sex? Anything sexual was not even mentioned before you brought it up.... why bring it up? Is sex all you think of Funches? you're always whining about not getting persoanl... claiming that people Father's are not their Fathers and therefore suggesting that their Mothers are loose is an example of you getting personal and trying to hide behind religion what you're are doing can be classified as Malevolent which is beyond evil I NEVER said anyone's mother's were on the loose. I NEVER even mentioned mothers. You are the one that brought up mothers and then make this accusation. Not I. Try not to pass the buck Funches. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I NEVER said anyone's mother's were on the loose. I NEVER even mentioned mothers. You are the one that brought up mothers and then make this accusation. Not I. Try not to pass the buck Funches. Cowboy...if you are in this forum telling everyone that their male parent is not their Father and that their Father is someone else... then you have just referred to their Mothers as being loose and Jezebels ...... it's a fact that those that go around spreading such garbage with no proof that their accusations are true are "Evil", and have suffered abuse from their parents and harbor severe anger issues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the past one could speak and it be lost in the sands of time. In this day one can not. What you do and what you say will echo in time for this tool man has built. The words we place into the City of Knowledge from the Gates man has built will be read by others. Some may see your words and so follow that Temporal Loop into death... (still God will gather them up into heaven in each their measure). They will sit at the feet of Jesus (who is close to God) yet by that following they will not be close to God (for Jesus is between them and God and so makes a shadow). Jesus can not be between someone and God, for again Jesus is God. sir... As you have chosen to post by quoting my post you have indeed attempted to limit my right to beleive... and then forced upon my post you believe that God is other than God is... As you believe so is it for you... State so in your own post and muddy not mine. I muddied no post. I replied to some words, I knew not if they were your words or joe bob's down the road. I responded to the comment, not the person nor did I alter anything of what the person said. This is a community forum for those of Mingle2, if your post was at a specific person in which you only wished for that person to respond, you would have placed their name prior to your message. This was not done, so it was posted to the general community of Mingle2 which I am part of. That is a mistatement... It matters not if you were answere 'joe bob' you quoted a post and responded as though what was in the post was incorrect. (a direct assualt). You are indeed smooth with the tongue. If you wished to post your own version of beliefe why then quote another and make it as though it be small. My post was my belief... I have stopped attempting to bandy the Word with you as you read it differenty than do I(and so I quoted you not). Post your belief (but use not mine as though it be a bit of dirt to walk upon. All the quoting of a post means is showing what the post is in response to. Doesn't mean the quoted post agrees or disagrees with what comes forth in the post of the quoting. It shows what it's in response to and helps keep the discussion organized and clean, rather then looking like a bunch of random comments. None of my posts are random. Each one is as the placing of a rock upon the Sand Garden. Ripples then trace from it so that the whole become a work of art. Indeed in the post I referenced your 'following' post is a direct contradiction of the belief I hold and appears as if a person had stepped with ill intent upon my garden. IT would have been better served as a seperate statement and then would have been a proper counter point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that is soo correct and full of Truth, God The Father, God The Son, and God The Holy Spirit....ONE GOD who is faithful and true...yes in Gen 1:26..."And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth." He is sooo totally Awesome!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that is soo correct and full of Truth, God The Father, God The Son, and God The Holy Spirit....ONE GOD who is faithful and true...yes in Gen 1:26..."And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth." He is sooo totally Awesome!! if you think that was awesome,, wait until you get to part two when they start threatening and mass murdering everyone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that is soo correct and full of Truth, God The Father, God The Son, and God The Holy Spirit....ONE GOD who is faithful and true...yes in Gen 1:26..."And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth." He is sooo totally Awesome!! if you think that was awesome,, wait until you get to part two when they start threatening and mass murdering everyone There is absolutely no threatening or murdering, what are you talking about? |
|
|
|
|
