worldk encyclopedia--- "at first, scientists thought thAT NEANDERTHAL MAN WAS A SWQaT, BRUTISH, somewhat apelike creature. later research shows that the bodies of neanderthal manand womenwere completelyhuman, fully erect, and very mucsular, thier brins were as large as those of modern man.
and, evolutionist Le Gros Clark: "tere is a danger of relying on too fe measurments...an example of this difficulty is provided by the famous case of Hesperopithecus. This genetic name was given to a fossil tooth found in nebraska in 1922, on the assumption that it represented an extinct type of anthropod ape... as well known, the tooth later proved to be from a pig.
then there is the Science news letter, which states.., One of the most famous fakes that has been exposed by scientific proof was PILTDOWN MAN,thought to be 500,000years old. After much conterversy, it turned out to be not a priimitave at all but a composite skull of modern man and the jawbone of an ape. The jawbone had been doctored with bicromate of potash and iron to make it look mineralised.

lol....Mr. Cutthroat, you are being fooled....

Bashajones evolution rocks...\m/.

piltdowm man, nenderthal, lucy, ect ect ect.. all have been long since proved to be fakes.. for example, the quote i used about piltdown man was from 1964. yet they believe, they ingore the scientific evidence, and if anyone questions them, they are of course simple, ignorant types with a blind faith in God. hmmm who is really the fool here?

Ms.Jones u r being misled ...

Misled by God? Sir, I highly doubt that?....

Dont bring god in between he has got nothing to do with evolution..

Do you believe in God at ALL? Just curious....

if i say yes.. u will win.. very clever

I win either way, Mr. Cutthroat. I always win...

not this time.. i demand a trial by combat...

http://blogs.longwood.edu/buzz/files/2014/05/tyriondemand.gif

Okay, but I'm warning you....This...Is...SPARTA!!!

You can't do arithmetic without learning math.

I've known of several studies on the odds of evolution happening, and none of them functions as evidence against evolution actually happening on this planet.

Imagine that you and two friends fly on a plane, it crashes and one of you dies in the plane crash.

You are lying in the desert among the burning wreckage of the plane, and your deceased friend is lying there. You were talking to him moments before it went down, and his body has obviously been destroyed by the crash.

Your friend wants to argue about the cause of death. He doesn't believe it was the plane crash that did it. He thinks that your friend was murdered by a sexy flight attendant moments before the crash. Rather than produce evidence, he instead says his whole line of thought is based on the fact that "The odds of anyone dying in a plane crash is 1 in 11,000,000, so its VERY unlikely that he died from the plane crash."

This statistic is irrelevant in this context. When something has actually happened, when you are living it, and when you are faced with the evidence that it has actually happened, the odds that it *would* have happened can't change the fact that it *did* happen.

Did your God tell you, directly, that evolution definitely did not happen?

Or did some people tell you that? Or maybe some people produced a book, and they told you that God authored this book (while hiding the historical fact that humans voted on the contents of the book) ?

Its one thing to have faith in God, its another to have faith in the humans that claim to speak for God.

the bible's version of the origion of life and the theory of evolution are completly incompatible. read both and compare. Use your own logic. Do your own homework.

I've read genesis many, many times.


Did God tell you that the bible is the word of God?

I mean, directly?


Or did humans tell you that the bible is word of God?

Another poster seemed adamant that we should trust God over the word of men... but it seems to me that 'the belief that the bible is the word of God', that belief comes to us from other people, so ultimately we really are trusting people (not God) when we decide that the bible must be the word of God.

Unless God tells us this directly, Himself.

Interesting how Genesis chapter 1 and Genesis chapter 2 contract each other, it just gets gets easier to believe from there. Unless, of course, you do a serious mental contortion to try and say they agree with each other, which in the end only demonstrates their unbelievability