I am a cancer survivor, I suggest anyone seeking cures for cancer Google, Dr Lorainne Day. She told me how to cure my cancer and I believe it worked. I was in a hospice with two weeks to live and three weeks later I got up put my clothes on and walked out. That was in 2006, Im still here, still going.

That is awesome.

Actually its not scientific.

http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/day.html

Having a background in science makes watching those videos extremely painful.

Volant, you are spreading quack medicine around which if a person ignores science based medical treatments in favor of these quack "remedies" they are placing themselves in great danger. Untreated cancer is a death sentence and nothing in the videos or anything Dr Lorainne Day has offered up will have any impact on the progression of the disease AT ALL.


People want simple answers, so what these quacks offer seems compelling, and really preys on our desire to have a single simple solution to a life threatening disease. The sad truth is that cancer is not a simple, single disease. They also prey on the distrust of authorities that seems to be growing in the US, and in certain cases rightly so.

I can understand how a person without the scientific background could be compelled to believe these kinds of claims, but they are nonsense.

its all about nutrition

Indeed, these cancer “cures” strike me as being either the world’s most well-kept conspiracies of all time (after all, I’m a cancer surgeon and researcher and I’ve never heard from my colleagues even a hint of such an amazing cure for cancer in general or any specific cancer) or the worst-kept (after all, filmmakers like Steve Kroschel, writer, producer, and director of The Beautiful Truth, seem to have very little difficulty finding out all about it). In actuality, whether the secret of these “natural cures” is well or poorly kept seems to vary with the needs of the advocate telling the story.

Moreover, none of these claims makes much sense on a strictly logical basis. Think about it this way: So many people die of cancer every year that virtually every person in developed countries, doctors and cancer researchers–and, yes, even big pharma executives–included, have known, know, or will know someone with cancer. Many have seen or will see someone they love die of cancer, sometimes in horrific ways. Certainly over the more than four decades of my existence, I have had multiple family members who have died of cancer. In fact, right now my wife and I are dealing with the heartbreak of a close family member recently diagnosed with widely metastatic breast cancer, and I’ve been trying to work every contact I know to get her to the best oncologist in order to provide her with the best possible palliation. Do the makers of this movie think that I or any other cancer researcher (or even big pharma executive) would withhold knowledge of such a “cure” or keep it from others if I knew of it? Indeed, because cancer kills so many people, many of these very same doctors and researchers will end up battling the disease at some point in their lives, and many of them will end up dying of it themselves. I might even end up dying of cancer someday. You might end up dying of cancer someday. Does it make any sort of sense logically that every single one of these doctors, executives, and bureaucrats would dismiss or conspire to suppress (or even blindly ignore the evidence for its existence because of dogma and “business as usual” of) such an amazingly effective cure, if it really existed? No, it does not. Someone would talk, probably a lot of people. I know I would. Again, given how cancer has recently touched our family, I assure you, if such a cure existed, I would make damned sure that family member got it, no matter what it was, and if it truly worked as advertised I would make sure everyone else knew about it too. You can be sure that quite a few of those supposedly nefarious cancer researchers, government bureaucrats, and big pharma executives would too.

So now, not surprisingly, the filmmaker (through Garrett) has a mission:

Garrett’s mission now is to tell the world.

Of course it is. It always is. Because he’s been converted and is now an evangelist.

iamascientist

iamascientist

you believe the media over me

who are you going to believe me or the FDA , WHO or ACS?