100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Actor Snorts Coke In Room Where Obama Was | |
|---|---|
|
|
 yeah,, thats ALL he was doing,,,,
Actually it is. Unlike Clinton, oh wait he didn't inhale and Obama who bragged about illegal narcotic use in his poor excuse for a book.
I dont think he was bragging, anymore than Bush brags about being a former alcoholic,,,, and I actually dont know that Bush was or wasnt, because he hasnt openly admitted his vices the way OBama has but I tend to believe he is the 'type' to have done cocaine and I tend to believe accounts from former classmates and enlistees that he did,,,, and Im not sure if a 'former' alcoholic is better or worse tnan a 'former' cokehead,,, but whatever keeps the sensationalism going,,,,,,,, I got to meet the man and I dont think he is the type at all and frankly it's none of our business if they don't go out and brag about it like Obama. I didnt realizing including life experiences in a BIOGRAPHY Was the same as 'going out and bragging' thanx for enlightening me,, IM sure you read the book and its context,,,,,,,, NOT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yeah,, thats ALL he was doing,,,,
Actually it is. Unlike Clinton, oh wait he didn't inhale and Obama who bragged about illegal narcotic use in his poor excuse for a book.
I dont think he was bragging, anymore than Bush brags about being a former alcoholic,,,, and I actually dont know that Bush was or wasnt, because he hasnt openly admitted his vices the way OBama has but I tend to believe he is the 'type' to have done cocaine and I tend to believe accounts from former classmates and enlistees that he did,,,, and Im not sure if a 'former' alcoholic is better or worse tnan a 'former' cokehead,,, but whatever keeps the sensationalism going,,,,,,,, I got to meet the man and I dont think he is the type at all and frankly it's none of our business if they don't go out and brag about it like Obama. I didnt realizing including life experiences in a BIOGRAPHY Was the same as 'going out and bragging' thanx for enlightening me,, IM sure you read the book and its context,,,,,,,, NOT It is bragging. There is no need to put it in a book because most people don't care that Obama was a tweeker or a crackhead. They know him as being a disasterous Senator and President who has no experience in anything but running his mouth and understanding and being a part of Chicago's gangland style politics. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sat 02/25/12 07:49 PM
|
|
yeah,, thats ALL he was doing,,,,
Actually it is. Unlike Clinton, oh wait he didn't inhale and Obama who bragged about illegal narcotic use in his poor excuse for a book.
I dont think he was bragging, anymore than Bush brags about being a former alcoholic,,,, and I actually dont know that Bush was or wasnt, because he hasnt openly admitted his vices the way OBama has but I tend to believe he is the 'type' to have done cocaine and I tend to believe accounts from former classmates and enlistees that he did,,,, and Im not sure if a 'former' alcoholic is better or worse tnan a 'former' cokehead,,, but whatever keeps the sensationalism going,,,,,,,, I got to meet the man and I dont think he is the type at all and frankly it's none of our business if they don't go out and brag about it like Obama. I didnt realizing including life experiences in a BIOGRAPHY Was the same as 'going out and bragging' thanx for enlightening me,, IM sure you read the book and its context,,,,,,,, NOT It is bragging. There is no need to put it in a book because most people don't care that Obama was a tweeker or a crackhead. They know him as being a disasterous Senator and President who has no experience in anything but running his mouth and understanding and being a part of Chicago's gangland style politics. apparently enough did care,, its spent 270 weeks on new york bestsellers list , selling 4.6 million copies and plenty disagreed, apparently , that he was disastrous, he won 53 percent of the popular vote in the 2008 election in an autobiography, you dont just tell about all the great things you have done, unless you are an egotist,,, which may be the personality some people prefer in the white house,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yeah,, thats ALL he was doing,,,,
Actually it is. Unlike Clinton, oh wait he didn't inhale and Obama who bragged about illegal narcotic use in his poor excuse for a book.
I dont think he was bragging, anymore than Bush brags about being a former alcoholic,,,, and I actually dont know that Bush was or wasnt, because he hasnt openly admitted his vices the way OBama has but I tend to believe he is the 'type' to have done cocaine and I tend to believe accounts from former classmates and enlistees that he did,,,, and Im not sure if a 'former' alcoholic is better or worse tnan a 'former' cokehead,,, but whatever keeps the sensationalism going,,,,,,,, I got to meet the man and I dont think he is the type at all and frankly it's none of our business if they don't go out and brag about it like Obama. I didnt realizing including life experiences in a BIOGRAPHY Was the same as 'going out and bragging' thanx for enlightening me,, IM sure you read the book and its context,,,,,,,, NOT It is bragging. There is no need to put it in a book because most people don't care that Obama was a tweeker or a crackhead. They know him as being a disasterous Senator and President who has no experience in anything but running his mouth and understanding and being a part of Chicago's gangland style politics. apparently enough did care,, its spent 270 weeks on new york bestsellers list , selling 4.6 million copies and plenty disagreed, apparently , that he was disastrous, he won 53 percent of the popular vote in the 2008 election in an autobiography, you dont just tell about all the great things you have done, unless you are an egotist,,, which may be the personality some people prefer in the white house,,, Yea, they ALL bought his book because they cared about his past drug abuse and not because it was HEAVILY promoted by the DNC not to mention friends of Obama and donors who bout hundreds, if not thousands of copies each to make it at the top of the list and to buy a Senator and President. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yeah,, thats ALL he was doing,,,,
Actually it is. Unlike Clinton, oh wait he didn't inhale and Obama who bragged about illegal narcotic use in his poor excuse for a book.
I dont think he was bragging, anymore than Bush brags about being a former alcoholic,,,, and I actually dont know that Bush was or wasnt, because he hasnt openly admitted his vices the way OBama has but I tend to believe he is the 'type' to have done cocaine and I tend to believe accounts from former classmates and enlistees that he did,,,, and Im not sure if a 'former' alcoholic is better or worse tnan a 'former' cokehead,,, but whatever keeps the sensationalism going,,,,,,,, I got to meet the man and I dont think he is the type at all and frankly it's none of our business if they don't go out and brag about it like Obama. I didnt realizing including life experiences in a BIOGRAPHY Was the same as 'going out and bragging' thanx for enlightening me,, IM sure you read the book and its context,,,,,,,, NOT It is bragging. There is no need to put it in a book because most people don't care that Obama was a tweeker or a crackhead. They know him as being a disasterous Senator and President who has no experience in anything but running his mouth and understanding and being a part of Chicago's gangland style politics. apparently enough did care,, its spent 270 weeks on new york bestsellers list , selling 4.6 million copies and plenty disagreed, apparently , that he was disastrous, he won 53 percent of the popular vote in the 2008 election in an autobiography, you dont just tell about all the great things you have done, unless you are an egotist,,, which may be the personality some people prefer in the white house,,, Yea, they ALL bought his book because they cared about his past drug abuse and not because it was HEAVILY promoted by the DNC not to mention friends of Obama and donors who bout hundreds, if not thousands of copies each to make it at the top of the list and to buy a Senator and President. well, I personally buy autobiographies when I want to know about someones life being the book was published before he started any political career,along with noteriety for his MAGNA CUM LAUDE status from HARVARD Im guessing most of the initial sales were for this reason as well |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yeah,, thats ALL he was doing,,,,
Actually it is. Unlike Clinton, oh wait he didn't inhale and Obama who bragged about illegal narcotic use in his poor excuse for a book.
I dont think he was bragging, anymore than Bush brags about being a former alcoholic,,,, and I actually dont know that Bush was or wasnt, because he hasnt openly admitted his vices the way OBama has but I tend to believe he is the 'type' to have done cocaine and I tend to believe accounts from former classmates and enlistees that he did,,,, and Im not sure if a 'former' alcoholic is better or worse tnan a 'former' cokehead,,, but whatever keeps the sensationalism going,,,,,,,, I got to meet the man and I dont think he is the type at all and frankly it's none of our business if they don't go out and brag about it like Obama. I didnt realizing including life experiences in a BIOGRAPHY Was the same as 'going out and bragging' thanx for enlightening me,, IM sure you read the book and its context,,,,,,,, NOT It is bragging. There is no need to put it in a book because most people don't care that Obama was a tweeker or a crackhead. They know him as being a disasterous Senator and President who has no experience in anything but running his mouth and understanding and being a part of Chicago's gangland style politics. apparently enough did care,, its spent 270 weeks on new york bestsellers list , selling 4.6 million copies and plenty disagreed, apparently , that he was disastrous, he won 53 percent of the popular vote in the 2008 election in an autobiography, you dont just tell about all the great things you have done, unless you are an egotist,,, which may be the personality some people prefer in the white house,,, Yea, they ALL bought his book because they cared about his past drug abuse and not because it was HEAVILY promoted by the DNC not to mention friends of Obama and donors who bout hundreds, if not thousands of copies each to make it at the top of the list and to buy a Senator and President. well, I personally buy autobiographies when I want to know about someones life being the book was published before he started any political career,along with noteriety for his MAGNA CUM LAUDE status from HARVARD Im guessing most of the initial sales were for this reason as well The initial sales wern't anything to brag about. It wasn't until he got into politics and they re-released the book that it because a super best seller when the idiot ran for the US Senate. Who cares if he Came Loudly in college. Several top Republicans have the same honors but I don't see you being their cheerleader or admiring them because of that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sat 02/25/12 08:12 PM
|
|
yeah,, thats ALL he was doing,,,,
Actually it is. Unlike Clinton, oh wait he didn't inhale and Obama who bragged about illegal narcotic use in his poor excuse for a book.
I dont think he was bragging, anymore than Bush brags about being a former alcoholic,,,, and I actually dont know that Bush was or wasnt, because he hasnt openly admitted his vices the way OBama has but I tend to believe he is the 'type' to have done cocaine and I tend to believe accounts from former classmates and enlistees that he did,,,, and Im not sure if a 'former' alcoholic is better or worse tnan a 'former' cokehead,,, but whatever keeps the sensationalism going,,,,,,,, I got to meet the man and I dont think he is the type at all and frankly it's none of our business if they don't go out and brag about it like Obama. I didnt realizing including life experiences in a BIOGRAPHY Was the same as 'going out and bragging' thanx for enlightening me,, IM sure you read the book and its context,,,,,,,, NOT It is bragging. There is no need to put it in a book because most people don't care that Obama was a tweeker or a crackhead. They know him as being a disasterous Senator and President who has no experience in anything but running his mouth and understanding and being a part of Chicago's gangland style politics. apparently enough did care,, its spent 270 weeks on new york bestsellers list , selling 4.6 million copies and plenty disagreed, apparently , that he was disastrous, he won 53 percent of the popular vote in the 2008 election in an autobiography, you dont just tell about all the great things you have done, unless you are an egotist,,, which may be the personality some people prefer in the white house,,, Yea, they ALL bought his book because they cared about his past drug abuse and not because it was HEAVILY promoted by the DNC not to mention friends of Obama and donors who bout hundreds, if not thousands of copies each to make it at the top of the list and to buy a Senator and President. well, I personally buy autobiographies when I want to know about someones life being the book was published before he started any political career,along with noteriety for his MAGNA CUM LAUDE status from HARVARD Im guessing most of the initial sales were for this reason as well The initial sales wern't anything to brag about. It wasn't until he got into politics and they re-released the book that it because a super best seller when the idiot ran for the US Senate. Who cares if he Came Loudly in college. Several top Republicans have the same honors but I don't see you being their cheerleader or admiring them because of that. truly? what other presidents graduated magna cum laude from Harvard, I will likewise give them credit where credit is due,,,,, and of course, the more people started to hear about him, the more people (potentially) wanted to hear more about his life,,,,thats kind of the law of averages,,,, my point, if we may get back to it though, was he published the book before he ever had a political career because he received a CONTRACT to do so,,,,and an autobiography usually doesnt just contain the triumphs and great decisions a person makes, because that would scream of inauthenticity to anyone who realizes human beings make mistakes, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't help but notice that black public figures are labelled 'crack-head' far more often than white public figures, without any regard for those person's actual habits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
JERMANICUS
on
Sun 02/26/12 10:52 AM
|
|
There are so many more important things to focus on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't help but notice that black public figures are labelled 'crack-head' far more often than white public figures, without any regard for those person's actual habits. I've noticed that as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are so many more inportant things to focus on. This is true. Feel free to post a thread on something more important to focus on! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't help but notice that black public figures are labelled 'crack-head' far more often than white public figures, without any regard for those person's actual habits. true its considered a harsher and more addictive drug, I guess, and carries harsher sentencing people needing drugs or alcohol to cope are all in the same boat in my opinion, but popular opinion is a bit different,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't help but notice that black public figures are labelled 'crack-head' far more often than white public figures, without any regard for those person's actual habits. Nope, there are plenty of white people I call crackheads too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't help but notice that black public figures are labelled 'crack-head' far more often than white public figures, without any regard for those person's actual habits. Nope, there are plenty of white people I call crackheads too. You aren't disagreeing with me with that statement - as I wasn't singling you out as the person responsible for this discrepancy, and I wasn't saying that anyone reserved the label for blacks only. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't help but notice that black public figures are labelled 'crack-head' far more often than white public figures, without any regard for those person's actual habits. Nope, there are plenty of white people I call crackheads too. You aren't disagreeing with me with that statement - as I wasn't singling you out as the person responsible for this discrepancy, and I wasn't saying that anyone reserved the label for blacks only. You basically did with that comment. |
|
|
|
|
