100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
| Topic: Thought you knew Newter? Nobody can! | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Why? Got a buck? He'll see things your way! http://ronpaulflix.com/2012/01/newt-gingrich-a-crime-against-conservatism/ |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Fri 02/03/12 02:46 PM
|
|
he is interesting, as is romney...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Fri 02/03/12 02:53 PM
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQwrB1vu74c
and as a DISCLAIMER,, this type of edited snippet of statements over time and possibly out of context,, can be made about ANY of the candidates ;;;none of them particularly stand out to me HINT: just put in a candidate name into youtube with the words flip flop,, and have at it,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
He is a typical politician..
Telling whatever crowd he is addressing what they want to hear.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
people change with experience
seven years ago, If you had asked me about cyber romance, Id say why not if you ask me today, ID say its a huge waste of time fifteen years ago, if you had asked me about senior aged men, Id say yuck five years ago,, Id say why not ,,,standing still in views and opinions was once known as being STUBBORN and not considered such an absolute asset as it seems to have become in politics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
people change with experience seven years ago, If you had asked me about cyber romance, Id say why not if you ask me today, ID say its a huge waste of time fifteen years ago, if you had asked me about senior aged men, Id say yuck five years ago,, Id say why not ,,,standing still in views and opinions was once known as being STUBBORN and not considered such an absolute asset as it seems to have become in politics As usual....msH putting lipstick on a pig 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
people change with experience seven years ago, If you had asked me about cyber romance, Id say why not if you ask me today, ID say its a huge waste of time fifteen years ago, if you had asked me about senior aged men, Id say yuck five years ago,, Id say why not ,,,standing still in views and opinions was once known as being STUBBORN and not considered such an absolute asset as it seems to have become in politics I agree with your comments, but Gingrich is basing his entire campaign on being the this consistent conservative and that just ain't so.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
people change with experience seven years ago, If you had asked me about cyber romance, Id say why not if you ask me today, ID say its a huge waste of time fifteen years ago, if you had asked me about senior aged men, Id say yuck five years ago,, Id say why not ,,,standing still in views and opinions was once known as being STUBBORN and not considered such an absolute asset as it seems to have become in politics I agree with your comments, but Gingrich is basing his entire campaign on being the this consistent conservative and that just ain't so.. I understand,, if someone is praising themself for stubbornness,, its possibly relevant to find instances where they have not been stubborn,,, (im not saying this cynically, but understanding the 'simple' relevance of challenging ones claims about themself) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
people change with experience seven years ago, If you had asked me about cyber romance, Id say why not if you ask me today, ID say its a huge waste of time fifteen years ago, if you had asked me about senior aged men, Id say yuck five years ago,, Id say why not ,,,standing still in views and opinions was once known as being STUBBORN and not considered such an absolute asset as it seems to have become in politics I agree with your comments, but Gingrich is basing his entire campaign on being the this consistent conservative and that just ain't so.. I understand,, if someone is praising themself for stubbornness,, its possibly relevant to find instances where they have not been stubborn,,, (im not saying this cynically, but understanding the 'simple' relevance of challenging ones claims about themself) There is a difference between being stubborn and having the guts to defend what you believe because it's what you believe. Is believing in God being stubborn or is it a core belief that you will defend regardless of which way the prevailing winds are blowing? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Fri 02/03/12 04:21 PM
|
|
people change with experience seven years ago, If you had asked me about cyber romance, Id say why not if you ask me today, ID say its a huge waste of time fifteen years ago, if you had asked me about senior aged men, Id say yuck five years ago,, Id say why not ,,,standing still in views and opinions was once known as being STUBBORN and not considered such an absolute asset as it seems to have become in politics I agree with your comments, but Gingrich is basing his entire campaign on being the this consistent conservative and that just ain't so.. I understand,, if someone is praising themself for stubbornness,, its possibly relevant to find instances where they have not been stubborn,,, (im not saying this cynically, but understanding the 'simple' relevance of challenging ones claims about themself) There is a difference between being stubborn and having the guts to defend what you believe because it's what you believe. Is believing in God being stubborn or is it a core belief that you will defend regardless of which way the prevailing winds are blowing? thats something that usually only the believer can attest to I will believe in God because it makes sense to me and continues to make sense through 42 years of life and that belief has little chance of changing until I was 28, senior aged men didnt seem like a reasonable choice for anyone but senior aged women, but once I got in my thirties that belief changed as I realized how immature some people can be at any age and how mature they can be at any age and how much more significance maturity was to me than age,,, who am I to say whether someone else is being true to their belief at any given time in their life,,,? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newt can't keep his Cheney in his pants cause he loves Bush.
|
|
|
|
|
