Topic: Presidential trysts
msharmony's photo
Tue 01/31/12 12:21 AM
http://barclay1720.tripod.com/blunder/history.htm


a pretty long list, I wonder how different we would be if we had avoided electing any unfaithful men into office,,,?


I suspect, not much different,,lol

Seakolony's photo
Tue 01/31/12 04:24 AM
There was a time when faithfulness from men wasn't expected especially amongst the "elite". Men had affairs and women dealt with, it's the way it was and sometimes still is.

RoamingOrator's photo
Tue 01/31/12 06:04 AM
Didn't even mention a couple of them - I think the absence of Washington was a biggie. I cannot imagine what this country would have been like if he wouldn't have been allowed to be President.


Seakolony's photo
Tue 01/31/12 06:46 AM

Didn't even mention a couple of them - I think the absence of Washington was a biggie. I cannot imagine what this country would have been like if he wouldn't have been allowed to be President.



Maybe he was a faithful man.

Bravalady's photo
Tue 01/31/12 11:03 AM
I have a brilliant idea. Why doesn't someone try judging presidents on their ability in office?

It's been done, I believe, long ago in the past. . . .

no photo
Tue 01/31/12 12:26 PM

I have a brilliant idea. Why doesn't someone try judging presidents on their ability in office?


That's how I judge my interns. By their ability. In the office. With the door locked.