100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Grow Up, Ron Paul | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Actually, this is just getting boring . . . . In a true discussion, each side listens to the other with civility. When that doesn't happen, I just lose interest. Maybe it's my lack of testosterone. I don't enjoy argument for argument's sake. I like to see progress toward a common understanding. So, count me out of this. Paultards don't believe in civility, they apply their militant talking points and talking over people and flooding the internet and anyone who disagrees with them is insulted, called names, harassed and in some cases even stalked. It's honestly cult like behavior. That's funny  sounds familiar and more like someone else on here flooding the site with hate about Paul.....and hate speech about many things.....
Oh I get it, when I post ACCURATE articles about Paul it is considered hate speech?  Thanks for proving my point.
If you call unfair and biased Faux Noise "accurate articles" we don't have to challenge it
And Flooding threads is something you do VERY well, better than most. We don't have to bring attention to our candidate, you do it for us by posting the Faux Noise articles that everyone knows is NOT news, and usually doesn't contain much truth either. I only post a FEW threads to counter the 10+ threads a day the same couple users flood the forums with about their "Messiah" (I believe that's what cults call their leaders nowdays). So, if 4 or 5 people, post 1 or 2 threads each, about a candidate who is running for POTUS it's flooding a thread, but if 1 guy posts 10 or 12 "anti threads" to combat them it's not?
You should run for congress!
1 or two threads each? Try 10 a day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, this is just getting boring . . . . In a true discussion, each side listens to the other with civility. When that doesn't happen, I just lose interest. Maybe it's my lack of testosterone. I don't enjoy argument for argument's sake. I like to see progress toward a common understanding. So, count me out of this. Paultards don't believe in civility, they apply their militant talking points and talking over people and flooding the internet and anyone who disagrees with them is insulted, called names, harassed and in some cases even stalked. It's honestly cult like behavior. That's funny sounds familiar and more like someone else on here flooding the site with hate about Paul.....and hate speech about many things.....
Oh I get it, when I post ACCURATE articles about Paul it is considered hate speech? Thanks for proving my point.
You sound an awful lot like someone who's favorite sayings were Hate mongering, fear mongering, you wish it was true etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, this is just getting boring . . . . In a true discussion, each side listens to the other with civility. When that doesn't happen, I just lose interest. Maybe it's my lack of testosterone. I don't enjoy argument for argument's sake. I like to see progress toward a common understanding. So, count me out of this. Paultards don't believe in civility, they apply their militant talking points and talking over people and flooding the internet and anyone who disagrees with them is insulted, called names, harassed and in some cases even stalked. It's honestly cult like behavior. That's funny sounds familiar and more like someone else on here flooding the site with hate about Paul.....and hate speech about many things.....
Oh I get it, when I post ACCURATE articles about Paul it is considered hate speech? Thanks for proving my point.
You sound an awful lot like someone who's favorite sayings were Hate mongering, fear mongering, you wish it was true etc. Anyways......... |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Mon 01/16/12 04:00 PM
|
|
Actually, this is just getting boring . . . . In a true discussion, each side listens to the other with civility. When that doesn't happen, I just lose interest. Maybe it's my lack of testosterone. I don't enjoy argument for argument's sake. I like to see progress toward a common understanding. So, count me out of this. Paultards don't believe in civility, they apply their militant talking points and talking over people and flooding the internet and anyone who disagrees with them is insulted, called names, harassed and in some cases even stalked. It's honestly cult like behavior. That's funny sounds familiar and more like someone else on here flooding the site with hate about Paul.....and hate speech about many things.....
Oh I get it, when I post ACCURATE articles about Paul it is considered hate speech? Thanks for proving my point.
If you call unfair and biased Faux Noise "accurate articles" we don't have to challenge it
And Flooding threads is something you do VERY well, better than most. We don't have to bring attention to our candidate, you do it for us by posting the Faux Noise articles that everyone knows is NOT news, and usually doesn't contain much truth either. I only post a FEW threads to counter the 10+ threads a day the same couple users flood the forums with about their "Messiah" (I believe that's what cults call their leaders nowdays). So, if 4 or 5 people, post 1 or 2 threads each, about a candidate who is running for POTUS it's flooding a thread, but if 1 guy posts 10 or 12 "anti threads" to combat them it's not?
You should run for congress!
1 or two threads each? Try 10 a day. Learning is beneficial, learning to count is paramount! There are dates and posts listed within the numbers under each users name, as well as the specific post...... if anyone desires to make a point of truth..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flooding threads is something you do VERY well, better than most. We don't have to bring attention to our candidate, you do it for us by posting the Faux Noise articles that everyone knows is NOT news, and usually doesn't contain much truth either. Lpdon may be helping Ron Paul. I'd seen all the articles you Ron Paul supporters had posted, and I didn't pay much attention because I chalked it up to people just posting for things they believe in. You love RP, of course you will post pro-RP articles that are biased in his favor. To me, RP was mildly interesting because he wanted to curtail our warmaking and because he was a doctor; but I didn't have a good impression because some of the most vocal pro-RP people i know offline are just ********. That's totally irrational of me, to have a feeling about a candidate because of the behavior of some supporters, but I'm human and these things happen subconsciously. Then Lpdon started posting these articles. In some of them, he attacks RP for saying some very sensible things. In others, they say horrible things about RP, but as I research them I discover those are lies, misconstrued, or hugely exaggerated. Lpdon's anti-RP articles have given me an increasingly positive impression of RP. By no means am I a supporter - I'm slow to form opinions. Some of his agenda seems to drastic and dramatic to me. But many of his positions are so obvious, so sensible, and in some cases he is the only candidate to hold them. I'm really amazed at how intense the 'smear RP' efforts are in some online communities, and how... just lame they are. Ineffective. Lacking in facts and substance. The pro-RP people can thank Lpdon for putting so much attention on RP, and motivating some of us to look at RP more closely. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flooding threads is something you do VERY well, better than most. We don't have to bring attention to our candidate, you do it for us by posting the Faux Noise articles that everyone knows is NOT news, and usually doesn't contain much truth either. Lpdon may be helping Ron Paul. I'd seen all the articles you Ron Paul supporters had posted, and I didn't pay much attention because I chalked it up to people just posting for things they believe in. You love RP, of course you will post pro-RP articles that are biased in his favor. To me, RP was mildly interesting because he wanted to curtail our warmaking and because he was a doctor; but I didn't have a good impression because some of the most vocal pro-RP people i know offline are just ********. That's totally irrational of me, to have a feeling about a candidate because of the behavior of some supporters, but I'm human and these things happen subconsciously. Then Lpdon started posting these articles. In some of them, he attacks RP for saying some very sensible things. In others, they say horrible things about RP, but as I research them I discover those are lies, misconstrued, or hugely exaggerated. Lpdon's anti-RP articles have given me an increasingly positive impression of RP. By no means am I a supporter - I'm slow to form opinions. Some of his agenda seems to drastic and dramatic to me. But many of his positions are so obvious, so sensible, and in some cases he is the only candidate to hold them. I'm really amazed at how intense the 'smear RP' efforts are in some online communities, and how... just lame they are. Ineffective. Lacking in facts and substance. The pro-RP people can thank Lpdon for putting so much attention on RP, and motivating some of us to look at RP more closely. That's fine, I am sure that for every 1 person that I have turned on to Ron Paul by my posts I have turned at least 10 off. I base that on emails, private messages and Facebook messages I get on a daily basis from several websites I am on including this one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flooding threads is something you do VERY well, better than most. We don't have to bring attention to our candidate, you do it for us by posting the Faux Noise articles that everyone knows is NOT news, and usually doesn't contain much truth either. Lpdon may be helping Ron Paul. I'd seen all the articles you Ron Paul supporters had posted, and I didn't pay much attention because I chalked it up to people just posting for things they believe in. You love RP, of course you will post pro-RP articles that are biased in his favor. To me, RP was mildly interesting because he wanted to curtail our warmaking and because he was a doctor; but I didn't have a good impression because some of the most vocal pro-RP people i know offline are just ********. That's totally irrational of me, to have a feeling about a candidate because of the behavior of some supporters, but I'm human and these things happen subconsciously. Then Lpdon started posting these articles. In some of them, he attacks RP for saying some very sensible things. In others, they say horrible things about RP, but as I research them I discover those are lies, misconstrued, or hugely exaggerated. Lpdon's anti-RP articles have given me an increasingly positive impression of RP. By no means am I a supporter - I'm slow to form opinions. Some of his agenda seems to drastic and dramatic to me. But many of his positions are so obvious, so sensible, and in some cases he is the only candidate to hold them. I'm really amazed at how intense the 'smear RP' efforts are in some online communities, and how... just lame they are. Ineffective. Lacking in facts and substance. The pro-RP people can thank Lpdon for putting so much attention on RP, and motivating some of us to look at RP more closely. That's fine, I am sure that for every 1 person that I have turned on to Ron Paul by my posts I have turned at least 10 off. I base that on emails, private messages and Facebook messages I get on a daily basis from several websites I am on including this one. People can say the same for Nancy Pelosi! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flooding threads is something you do VERY well, better than most. We don't have to bring attention to our candidate, you do it for us by posting the Faux Noise articles that everyone knows is NOT news, and usually doesn't contain much truth either. Lpdon may be helping Ron Paul. I'd seen all the articles you Ron Paul supporters had posted, and I didn't pay much attention because I chalked it up to people just posting for things they believe in. You love RP, of course you will post pro-RP articles that are biased in his favor. To me, RP was mildly interesting because he wanted to curtail our warmaking and because he was a doctor; but I didn't have a good impression because some of the most vocal pro-RP people i know offline are just ********. That's totally irrational of me, to have a feeling about a candidate because of the behavior of some supporters, but I'm human and these things happen subconsciously. Then Lpdon started posting these articles. In some of them, he attacks RP for saying some very sensible things. In others, they say horrible things about RP, but as I research them I discover those are lies, misconstrued, or hugely exaggerated. Lpdon's anti-RP articles have given me an increasingly positive impression of RP. By no means am I a supporter - I'm slow to form opinions. Some of his agenda seems to drastic and dramatic to me. But many of his positions are so obvious, so sensible, and in some cases he is the only candidate to hold them. I'm really amazed at how intense the 'smear RP' efforts are in some online communities, and how... just lame they are. Ineffective. Lacking in facts and substance. The pro-RP people can thank Lpdon for putting so much attention on RP, and motivating some of us to look at RP more closely. That's fine, I am sure that for every 1 person that I have turned on to Ron Paul by my posts I have turned at least 10 off. I base that on emails, private messages and Facebook messages I get on a daily basis from several websites I am on including this one. Just as in business for every 10 people that feel the way you do there are a 10X as many that say nothing to the company but tell their friends. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Mon 01/16/12 05:33 PM
|
|
Flooding threads is something you do VERY well, better than most. We don't have to bring attention to our candidate, you do it for us by posting the Faux Noise articles that everyone knows is NOT news, and usually doesn't contain much truth either. Lpdon may be helping Ron Paul. I'd seen all the articles you Ron Paul supporters had posted, and I didn't pay much attention because I chalked it up to people just posting for things they believe in. You love RP, of course you will post pro-RP articles that are biased in his favor. To me, RP was mildly interesting because he wanted to curtail our warmaking and because he was a doctor; but I didn't have a good impression because some of the most vocal pro-RP people i know offline are just ********. That's totally irrational of me, to have a feeling about a candidate because of the behavior of some supporters, but I'm human and these things happen subconsciously. Then Lpdon started posting these articles. In some of them, he attacks RP for saying some very sensible things. In others, they say horrible things about RP, but as I research them I discover those are lies, misconstrued, or hugely exaggerated. Lpdon's anti-RP articles have given me an increasingly positive impression of RP. By no means am I a supporter - I'm slow to form opinions. Some of his agenda seems to drastic and dramatic to me. But many of his positions are so obvious, so sensible, and in some cases he is the only candidate to hold them. I'm really amazed at how intense the 'smear RP' efforts are in some online communities, and how... just lame they are. Ineffective. Lacking in facts and substance. The pro-RP people can thank Lpdon for putting so much attention on RP, and motivating some of us to look at RP more closely. That's fine, I am sure that for every 1 person that I have turned on to Ron Paul by my posts I have turned at least 10 off. I base that on emails, private messages and Facebook messages I get on a daily basis from several websites I am on including this one. Now who's dreaming? RP still polls #2, is gaining nationaly, and getting more media coverage these days (while some of it is still hit pieces....like Lp, it draws attention to him) and people will find the truth with a little research. But then even psychotics, serial killers, rapists and perverts have friends who will agree with their views, so anything is possible....... huh, Lp? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flooding threads is something you do VERY well, better than most. We don't have to bring attention to our candidate, you do it for us by posting the Faux Noise articles that everyone knows is NOT news, and usually doesn't contain much truth either. Lpdon may be helping Ron Paul. I'd seen all the articles you Ron Paul supporters had posted, and I didn't pay much attention because I chalked it up to people just posting for things they believe in. You love RP, of course you will post pro-RP articles that are biased in his favor. To me, RP was mildly interesting because he wanted to curtail our warmaking and because he was a doctor; but I didn't have a good impression because some of the most vocal pro-RP people i know offline are just ********. That's totally irrational of me, to have a feeling about a candidate because of the behavior of some supporters, but I'm human and these things happen subconsciously. Then Lpdon started posting these articles. In some of them, he attacks RP for saying some very sensible things. In others, they say horrible things about RP, but as I research them I discover those are lies, misconstrued, or hugely exaggerated. Lpdon's anti-RP articles have given me an increasingly positive impression of RP. By no means am I a supporter - I'm slow to form opinions. Some of his agenda seems to drastic and dramatic to me. But many of his positions are so obvious, so sensible, and in some cases he is the only candidate to hold them. I'm really amazed at how intense the 'smear RP' efforts are in some online communities, and how... just lame they are. Ineffective. Lacking in facts and substance. The pro-RP people can thank Lpdon for putting so much attention on RP, and motivating some of us to look at RP more closely. Good point. Another good thing about people like Lpdon is they give us a lot of material to put in promotional materials, commercials, and so on. Especially in our "See, I Told You So" type of stuff. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flooding threads is something you do VERY well, better than most. We don't have to bring attention to our candidate, you do it for us by posting the Faux Noise articles that everyone knows is NOT news, and usually doesn't contain much truth either. Lpdon may be helping Ron Paul. I'd seen all the articles you Ron Paul supporters had posted, and I didn't pay much attention because I chalked it up to people just posting for things they believe in. You love RP, of course you will post pro-RP articles that are biased in his favor. To me, RP was mildly interesting because he wanted to curtail our warmaking and because he was a doctor; but I didn't have a good impression because some of the most vocal pro-RP people i know offline are just ********. That's totally irrational of me, to have a feeling about a candidate because of the behavior of some supporters, but I'm human and these things happen subconsciously. Then Lpdon started posting these articles. In some of them, he attacks RP for saying some very sensible things. In others, they say horrible things about RP, but as I research them I discover those are lies, misconstrued, or hugely exaggerated. Lpdon's anti-RP articles have given me an increasingly positive impression of RP. By no means am I a supporter - I'm slow to form opinions. Some of his agenda seems to drastic and dramatic to me. But many of his positions are so obvious, so sensible, and in some cases he is the only candidate to hold them. I'm really amazed at how intense the 'smear RP' efforts are in some online communities, and how... just lame they are. Ineffective. Lacking in facts and substance. The pro-RP people can thank Lpdon for putting so much attention on RP, and motivating some of us to look at RP more closely. That's fine, I am sure that for every 1 person that I have turned on to Ron Paul by my posts I have turned at least 10 off. I base that on emails, private messages and Facebook messages I get on a daily basis from several websites I am on including this one. Just as in business for every 10 people that feel the way you do there are a 10X as many that say nothing to the company but tell their friends. Actually that is wrong, it's every 20 tell their friends. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When crazy nuts come out against Ron Paul, and when the Zionist Lobby comes out against Ron Paul, it just makes me want to sit up and listen and find out what it is about Ron Paul that has everyone so riled up.
He is actually sort of like David and Goliath. He is like a knight trying to slay the dragon. You gotta sit up and notice him. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flooding threads is something you do VERY well, better than most. We don't have to bring attention to our candidate, you do it for us by posting the Faux Noise articles that everyone knows is NOT news, and usually doesn't contain much truth either. Lpdon may be helping Ron Paul. I'd seen all the articles you Ron Paul supporters had posted, and I didn't pay much attention because I chalked it up to people just posting for things they believe in. You love RP, of course you will post pro-RP articles that are biased in his favor. To me, RP was mildly interesting because he wanted to curtail our warmaking and because he was a doctor; but I didn't have a good impression because some of the most vocal pro-RP people i know offline are just ********. That's totally irrational of me, to have a feeling about a candidate because of the behavior of some supporters, but I'm human and these things happen subconsciously. Then Lpdon started posting these articles. In some of them, he attacks RP for saying some very sensible things. In others, they say horrible things about RP, but as I research them I discover those are lies, misconstrued, or hugely exaggerated. Lpdon's anti-RP articles have given me an increasingly positive impression of RP. By no means am I a supporter - I'm slow to form opinions. Some of his agenda seems to drastic and dramatic to me. But many of his positions are so obvious, so sensible, and in some cases he is the only candidate to hold them. I'm really amazed at how intense the 'smear RP' efforts are in some online communities, and how... just lame they are. Ineffective. Lacking in facts and substance. The pro-RP people can thank Lpdon for putting so much attention on RP, and motivating some of us to look at RP more closely. That's fine, I am sure that for every 1 person that I have turned on to Ron Paul by my posts I have turned at least 10 off. I base that on emails, private messages and Facebook messages I get on a daily basis from several websites I am on including this one. Now who's dreaming? RP still polls #2, is gaining nationaly, and getting more media coverage these days (while some of it is still hit pieces....like Lp, it draws attention to him) and people will find the truth with a little research. But then even psychotics, serial killers, rapists and perverts have friends who will agree with their views, so anything is possible....... huh, Lp? First of all that depends on the poll. He came in #2 in one of the ost Liberal states in the country(which shoud tell you something). The most current poll puts him in 4th place. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/15/fox-news-poll-romney-hits-record-high-santorum-viewed-as-true-conservative/ Second of all Romney has OVER twice the deligates that Ron Paul has and Ron Paul is practically tied with Santorum as far as deligates go. I wish the Paultards will find the truth if they do a little research but unfortunatly they have fallen victim to cult tactics. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flooding threads is something you do VERY well, better than most. We don't have to bring attention to our candidate, you do it for us by posting the Faux Noise articles that everyone knows is NOT news, and usually doesn't contain much truth either. Lpdon may be helping Ron Paul. I'd seen all the articles you Ron Paul supporters had posted, and I didn't pay much attention because I chalked it up to people just posting for things they believe in. You love RP, of course you will post pro-RP articles that are biased in his favor. To me, RP was mildly interesting because he wanted to curtail our warmaking and because he was a doctor; but I didn't have a good impression because some of the most vocal pro-RP people i know offline are just ********. That's totally irrational of me, to have a feeling about a candidate because of the behavior of some supporters, but I'm human and these things happen subconsciously. Then Lpdon started posting these articles. In some of them, he attacks RP for saying some very sensible things. In others, they say horrible things about RP, but as I research them I discover those are lies, misconstrued, or hugely exaggerated. Lpdon's anti-RP articles have given me an increasingly positive impression of RP. By no means am I a supporter - I'm slow to form opinions. Some of his agenda seems to drastic and dramatic to me. But many of his positions are so obvious, so sensible, and in some cases he is the only candidate to hold them. I'm really amazed at how intense the 'smear RP' efforts are in some online communities, and how... just lame they are. Ineffective. Lacking in facts and substance. The pro-RP people can thank Lpdon for putting so much attention on RP, and motivating some of us to look at RP more closely. That's fine, I am sure that for every 1 person that I have turned on to Ron Paul by my posts I have turned at least 10 off. I base that on emails, private messages and Facebook messages I get on a daily basis from several websites I am on including this one. Just as in business for every 10 people that feel the way you do there are a 10X as many that say nothing to the company but tell their friends. Actually that is wrong, it's every 20 tell their friends. Point proven....Those that don't likewhat you don't notify you and tell 20 others (I knew you would correct it and prove my point haha)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Mon 01/16/12 08:46 PM
|
|
Flooding threads is something you do VERY well, better than most. We don't have to bring attention to our candidate, you do it for us by posting the Faux Noise articles that everyone knows is NOT news, and usually doesn't contain much truth either. Lpdon may be helping Ron Paul. I'd seen all the articles you Ron Paul supporters had posted, and I didn't pay much attention because I chalked it up to people just posting for things they believe in. You love RP, of course you will post pro-RP articles that are biased in his favor. To me, RP was mildly interesting because he wanted to curtail our warmaking and because he was a doctor; but I didn't have a good impression because some of the most vocal pro-RP people i know offline are just ********. That's totally irrational of me, to have a feeling about a candidate because of the behavior of some supporters, but I'm human and these things happen subconsciously. Then Lpdon started posting these articles. In some of them, he attacks RP for saying some very sensible things. In others, they say horrible things about RP, but as I research them I discover those are lies, misconstrued, or hugely exaggerated. Lpdon's anti-RP articles have given me an increasingly positive impression of RP. By no means am I a supporter - I'm slow to form opinions. Some of his agenda seems to drastic and dramatic to me. But many of his positions are so obvious, so sensible, and in some cases he is the only candidate to hold them. I'm really amazed at how intense the 'smear RP' efforts are in some online communities, and how... just lame they are. Ineffective. Lacking in facts and substance. The pro-RP people can thank Lpdon for putting so much attention on RP, and motivating some of us to look at RP more closely. That's fine, I am sure that for every 1 person that I have turned on to Ron Paul by my posts I have turned at least 10 off. I base that on emails, private messages and Facebook messages I get on a daily basis from several websites I am on including this one. Now who's dreaming? RP still polls #2, is gaining nationaly, and getting more media coverage these days (while some of it is still hit pieces....like Lp, it draws attention to him) and people will find the truth with a little research. But then even psychotics, serial killers, rapists and perverts have friends who will agree with their views, so anything is possible....... huh, Lp? First of all that depends on the poll. He came in #2 in one of the ost Liberal states in the country(which shoud tell you something). The most current poll puts him in 4th place. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/15/fox-news-poll-romney-hits-record-high-santorum-viewed-as-true-conservative/ Second of all Romney has OVER twice the deligates that Ron Paul has and Ron Paul is practically tied with Santorum as far as deligates go. I wish the Paultards will find the truth if they do a little research but unfortunatly they have fallen victim to cult tactics. Reducing yourself to name calling others with a belief or dedication (Paultards) is an act of despiration and defeat. We love the references! It means we got their attention!
Seems to me something called christianity and the constitution had the same beginnings!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAULTARDS UNITE 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flooding threads is something you do VERY well, better than most. We don't have to bring attention to our candidate, you do it for us by posting the Faux Noise articles that everyone knows is NOT news, and usually doesn't contain much truth either. Lpdon may be helping Ron Paul. I'd seen all the articles you Ron Paul supporters had posted, and I didn't pay much attention because I chalked it up to people just posting for things they believe in. You love RP, of course you will post pro-RP articles that are biased in his favor. To me, RP was mildly interesting because he wanted to curtail our warmaking and because he was a doctor; but I didn't have a good impression because some of the most vocal pro-RP people i know offline are just ********. That's totally irrational of me, to have a feeling about a candidate because of the behavior of some supporters, but I'm human and these things happen subconsciously. Then Lpdon started posting these articles. In some of them, he attacks RP for saying some very sensible things. In others, they say horrible things about RP, but as I research them I discover those are lies, misconstrued, or hugely exaggerated. Lpdon's anti-RP articles have given me an increasingly positive impression of RP. By no means am I a supporter - I'm slow to form opinions. Some of his agenda seems to drastic and dramatic to me. But many of his positions are so obvious, so sensible, and in some cases he is the only candidate to hold them. I'm really amazed at how intense the 'smear RP' efforts are in some online communities, and how... just lame they are. Ineffective. Lacking in facts and substance. The pro-RP people can thank Lpdon for putting so much attention on RP, and motivating some of us to look at RP more closely. That's fine, I am sure that for every 1 person that I have turned on to Ron Paul by my posts I have turned at least 10 off. I base that on emails, private messages and Facebook messages I get on a daily basis from several websites I am on including this one. Now who's dreaming? RP still polls #2, is gaining nationaly, and getting more media coverage these days (while some of it is still hit pieces....like Lp, it draws attention to him) and people will find the truth with a little research. But then even psychotics, serial killers, rapists and perverts have friends who will agree with their views, so anything is possible....... huh, Lp? First of all that depends on the poll. He came in #2 in one of the ost Liberal states in the country(which shoud tell you something). The most current poll puts him in 4th place. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/15/fox-news-poll-romney-hits-record-high-santorum-viewed-as-true-conservative/ Second of all Romney has OVER twice the deligates that Ron Paul has and Ron Paul is practically tied with Santorum as far as deligates go. I wish the Paultards will find the truth if they do a little research but unfortunatly they have fallen victim to cult tactics. Reducing yourself to name calling others with a belief or dedication (Paultards) is an act of despiration and defeat. We love the references! It means we got their attention!
Seems to me something called christianity and the constitution had the same beginnings!
Defeat? The guy stands no chance at winning. That's why this is so entertaining.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Find your Own!
http://www.realchange.org/ The Skeleton Closet All the Scandals on All the Candidates for President --Since 1995-- Because character DOES matter. You've come to the right place for dirt, attitude and opinionated character reviews of all the presidential candidates. 
|
|
|
|
|
