2 Next
Topic: Do you really think it makes any difference who is President
s1owhand's photo
Mon 01/09/12 06:03 AM
LET'S MARCH ON WASHINGTON AND MAKE THEM STOP COOPERATING SECRETLY!

laugh

THEN THEY WILL REALLY BE SORRY

actionlynx's photo
Mon 01/09/12 06:11 AM
Well, I've said what I wanted to say.

Take it, or leave it.

I'm betting most leave it. It's always easier to do nothing and cast blame.

Have fun. winking

Optomistic69's photo
Mon 01/09/12 06:21 AM
I would frame it as Identifying who is to blame and getting a consensus on that and then we can move forward...

Ruth34611's photo
Mon 01/09/12 06:49 AM

I would frame it as Identifying who is to blame and getting a consensus on that and then we can move forward...


That's the problem. Identifying who is to blame. They have at least a little mud on them.

msharmony's photo
Mon 01/09/12 07:01 AM
Edited by msharmony on Mon 01/09/12 07:06 AM

Is there a difference between a liberal democratic system and a totalitarian communist system?

I would say yes there is.

Who is President was less important years ago, since Congress was an equal branch, but today the executive branch continues to do what it wants and circumvents the authority given to Congress.


You can see a perfect example of this with Obama making recess appointments when the Senate is in Pro forma session and not in recess.

The first President EVER to make such appointments.




lol @ 'pro forma'



thats what they call it after they END the meeting of congress and go home early,,,?


HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA



and we are back to people needing to make up their mind

if all politicians are just a part of the 'system'? why would a president make such appointments ABSENT of congress ,,, a congress which so obviously despises him and contests him at every stage?

why DO they make such a fuss over this president if they are all just a part of the same big deceitful family

why are people rallying behind a movement to use resources and effort to 'try' a moot point of eligibility of presidency claiming they will not trust a government entity's word (unless of course they finally find ONE government source out of half a dozen who supports what they are trying to cliam)

even at the RISK of making america look like huge fools being the first ever country to ELECT someone that they later deem ineligible to be elected?


has there been this big a movement, or any success with a movement in the court to 'try' the previous president for the deaths caused in the unjustified 'war'....where people DIED as opposed to just not having the policies and laws they believe in backed up?


lol

2 Next