But with convincing enough Documents,did they see a necessity to delve any deeper?
MI5 never got their 5th Man,and they tried hard!
It is absolutely possible to get good enough Papers,and Coverstory to pass by the vetting of even an Intelligence-Service!
Nothing to do with Incompetence!
Especially if the "right" People intervene in the "right" Places.

This is such a crock. Just a little bit of research concerning citizenship laws would show this. That's why I took the time to do it myself.

People get paid to be professional witnesses. Intelligent people are capable of being biased and prejudiced. And people with several pages of qualifications can simply be tenured incompetents.

In politics, some of these people are ruthless. The Paula Jones case highlights this. It was the lawyers who refused to give up even as the world around Paula Jones came tumbling down. When she finally won a settlement, the lawyers took all the money, leaving Jones with nothing. Her savings gone. Her husband gone. Her name smeared and tarnished. She was no saint. She isn't even that bright. Something may have really happened with her and Clinton. BUT she wanted to give up the case because of the toll it was taking. She wanted to cut her losses. It was the politicians and lawyers that refused to take "no" for an answer.

So this whole BC deal is a politically motivated farce. The people who do this stuff are unprincipled. They will use and discard anyone they can just to get done the job they are being paid to do by other political entities. Since it mostly comes from the Republicans these days, it's almost like they still have an axe to grind over Watergate. It's really sad. Politics haven't been the same since that scandal. All 3 Democrat Presidents have been smeared in office since then. Yet then we see the Republicans buddy up with them after they leave office.

The ends justify the means....Just win, baby, win.

Obama has LOST His First Court Case on Eligibility -- Tell Every OTHER Secretary of State to REMOVE Obama NOW:
https://secure.conservativedonations.com/rm_eligibility/?a=7292

ALERT: Barack Hussein Obama has just LOST his FIRST EVER Constitutional eligibility hearing!

YOU READ THAT RIGHT -- Barack Obama FAILED to appear before by a State Judge in Georgia to defend against charges that he is NOT ELIGIBLE to be on the Presidential Primary ballot in March. Now the judge is preparing to order Obama to be KICKED OFF THE BALLOT there -- because it's been proven he's NOT a natural-born citizen!

THIS IS IT -- THE BEGINNING OF THE END FOR THE GREAT PRETENDER SITTING IN THE OVAL OFFICE!

The judge is set to make his final ruling by February 4th... BUT IT MUST NOT END HERE! WE MUST GET OBAMA KICKED OFF EVERY BALLOT IN EVERY STATE IN THE NATION!

lol, from 'secureconservativedonations'




I love this line

"Now the judge is preparing to order Obama to be KICKED OFF THE BALLOT there -- because it's been proven he's NOT a natural-born citizen!
"


is this a direct qutoe from the Judge? a leak from someone viewing his yet undisclosed finding? or just wishful thinking?....lol.

Bottom line is he was ordered to appear before a Judge and he didn't. Just because he is the president does not excuse him from court orders. Now that this has happened its time to sit back and see what comes next.

this is true, so perhaps they will issue a warrant for the president of the USA for not appearing to hear the same case against him that has been shot down everyplace else its been presented

been a while since the clinton scandal where some of the worst adulterers stood up to belittle a fellow adulterer, I Guess we do need to give the world another good laugh at our hypocrisy when our officials try to berate the right of the already PRESIDING president to run for the presidency because his father was not born here ,,,,,,,


as the mother of a child whose father is a british citizen but has done barely an iota for her since she was two, ID be interested in seeing if we give the world more bigotry to look down on us about too by defining her as less 'american' than any other child of an american citizen in america

Just a reminder of the way our country is being lead. Is this how you want YOUR President to lead?

nope, I dont want our presidents to 'lead' from a steak fry,,,,lol

How about showing proper respect for the pledge of allegiance and national anthem for the country he leads?

i guess its all perception

it looks respectful to me,, hand over heart is symbolic, but not the only way to show 'respect'

It is the proper way from generation to generation to place your hand over your heart or a salute during the pledge of allegiance. What kind of example does that set for our nation?

what is 'proper' is debatable,,,,

US flag code
During rendition of the national anthem when the flag is displayed, all present except those in uniform should stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. Men not in uniform should remove their headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart. Persons in uniform should render the military salute at the first note of the anthem and retain this position until the last note. When the flag is not displayed, those present should face toward the music and act in the same manner they would if the flag were displayed there.


NOONE There was facing the flag behind them,,,was there a flag displayed elsewhere? the picture doesnt show

Wouldn't the "Commander in Chief" be considered military, and as the "President" since he is always on duty should present properly?

it doesnt say anything about 'military'

it states 'all present except those in uniform should stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart'

Men not in uniform should remove their headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart

.,..but in any case,,, much like in the bible, the traditions are not the priority so much as the common sense and outcomes are,,,,

so long as no DISRESPECT is shown (giving the bird, cursing, scratching behind, talking,,etc,,) than a respectful stance doesnt offend me at all,,,

By the way it was the Pledge of Allegiance and not the National Anthem.

no, it was the national anthem,,,

So by your own research it states you should place your right hand over your heart. Then not doing that would be a sign of disrespect would it not?

WHEN THE FLAG IS DISPLAYED


'facing the flag'


the displayed flag is BEHIND all involved, including those with hand on heart,,,,so its not disrespect, especially if there is no flag displayed for them to face and particularly because of the inclusion of the word 'should' instead of 'must'

Then if there is no flag in the direction they are facing having your back turned to the flag itsn't disrespect?

Oh come on Ms, you would defend Obama if he was wiping his azz with the American flag......lol And yes I think as the leader of this nation, he should set an example. That's not silly like I think you're about to type, that's what is called good PR. And national anthem or pledge, you're not simply respecting a piece of cloth...it's a symbol of the USA, and the people who gave their life for that "piece of cloth" and those that put their lives on the line for it daily.