100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: RP addressed the "newsletter scandal" 4 years ago (Wolf Blit | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKBlk1Vpeuw&feature=player_embedded#!
Time for the MSM to quit rehashing it. Thanks to a friend of mine for sharing the link. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Too funny! ... People expect this man to lead a country when he can't even control his own newsletter...Paul says he has no idea who wrote the racist remarks peppered throughout 20 years worth of newsletters...Newsletters with his name plastered all over them, listing him as the editor....Paul defends it by saying it is old news and doesn't need to be explained or discussed..... Those responsible for the racist remarks don't need to be identified....So much for transparency....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Tue 12/20/11 11:32 AM
|
|
Too funny! ... People expect this man to lead a country when he can't even control his own newsletter...Paul says he has no idea who wrote the racist remarks peppered throughout 20 years worth of newsletters...Newsletters with his name plastered all over them, listing him as the editor....Paul defends it by saying it is old news and doesn't need to be explained or discussed..... Those responsible for the racist remarks don't need to be identified....So much for transparency.... So Rupert Murdoch and his son ARE guilty as people believe and they should be imprisioned for their sub-ordinates actions at news of the World? After all, their defense is "We had no knowledge"... and they are the owner and CEO. Let me also get this straight.... you won't believe heresay about JFK or 9/11, but you will convict Ron Paul without evidence..... interesting indeed! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also, Ron Paul's POLITICAL newsletter which ran for what 20 years and consistently spouted anti-gay slurs, racist slurs, and anti-Israel slurs, and listed him as editor each and every time, was run as a corporation and said corporation cut Mr. Paul a nice fat PAYCHECK each payday...Checks that Paul endorsed, cashed, and spent....Now, according to Paul, none of this counts because it happened 15 years ago!!!!!
Well, if Dr. Paul want to be president, it counts...Somebody should fill him in, it counts big time...... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also, Ron Paul's POLITICAL newsletter which ran for what 20 years and consistently spouted anti-gay slurs, racist slurs, and anti-Israel slurs, and listed him as editor each and every time, was run as a corporation and said corporation cut Mr. Paul a nice fat PAYCHECK each payday...Checks that Paul endorsed, cashed, and spent....Now, according to Paul, none of this counts because it happened 15 years ago!!!!! Well, if Dr. Paul want to be president, it counts...Somebody should fill him in, it counts big time...... Got this edit in to late.... Let me also get this straight.... you won't believe heresay about JFK or 9/11, but you will convict Ron Paul without evidence..... interesting indeed!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Tue 12/20/11 11:39 AM
|
|
Not at all! you made it a point of topic by previous opinions you have shared. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So Rupert Murdoch and his son ARE guilty as people believe and they should be imprisioned for their sub-ordinates actions at news of the World? After all, their defense is "We had no knowledge"... and they are the owner and CEO. Let me also get this straight.... you won't believe heresay about JFK or 9/11, but you will convict Ron Paul without evidence..... interesting indeed! Very Good. Whats good enough for Rupie the Toad and son............ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not at all! you made it a point of topic by previous opions you have shared. The POLITICAL newsletters and their content with Paul listed as Editor are enough evidence for me or anyone to know that even if he did not write the garbage he either endorsed it by not outing those who did or he was not aware of what was happening in a corporation in which he was an officer...Both of these examples would prevent me from voting for the man.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not at all! you made it a point of topic by previous opinions you have shared. Previous opinions I shared on other threads...This thread is about Ron Paul's racist, anti-gay, anti-Israel POLITICAL newsletters that he got handsomely paid to publish, not conspiracy theories.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous opinions I shared on other threads...This thread is about Ron Paul's racist, anti-gay, anti-Israel POLITICAL newsletters that he got handsomely paid to publish, not conspiracy theories.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not at all! you made it a point of topic by previous opinions you have shared. Previous opinions I shared on other threads...This thread is about Ron Paul's racist, anti-gay, anti-Israel POLITICAL newsletters that he got handsomely paid to publish, not conspiracy theories.... So, the shoe only fits when you wear it.... good information. Disregard Factual documents from 9/11 causing doubt, accept a mystery bullet that breaks laws of physics... these are possible. but a newsletter with someones name on it, sponsored by an external source, and that is proof...... ok My apologies to the OP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
heavenlyboy34
on
Tue 12/20/11 12:13 PM
|
|
Not at all! you made it a point of topic by previous opinions you have shared. Previous opinions I shared on other threads...This thread is about Ron Paul's racist, anti-gay, anti-Israel POLITICAL newsletters that he got handsomely paid to publish, not conspiracy theories.... The assertion that "some articles were written in a newsletter edited (not written by) RP that are not attributed to him some 20-30 years ago, therefore RP is a racist" is in fact nothing more a whacko, pseudo-right wing conspiracy theory rooted in desperation to discredit RP. No different than the wildly absurd claims of "anti-semitism" which have been debunked numerous times, including the program "Reality Check". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zGCdHelRvE&feature=player_embedded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous opinions I shared on other threads...This thread is about Ron Paul's racist, anti-gay, anti-Israel POLITICAL newsletters that he got handsomely paid to publish, not conspiracy theories.... Yes, I've read it....An editor edits... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not at all! you made it a point of topic by previous opinions you have shared. Previous opinions I shared on other threads...This thread is about Ron Paul's racist, anti-gay, anti-Israel POLITICAL newsletters that he got handsomely paid to publish, not conspiracy theories.... So, the shoe only fits when you wear it.... good information. Disregard Factual documents from 9/11 causing doubt, accept a mystery bullet that breaks laws of physics... these are possible. but a newsletter with someones name on it, sponsored by an external source, and that is proof...... ok My apologies to the OP Is this thread about 9/11? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not at all! you made it a point of topic by previous opinions you have shared. Previous opinions I shared on other threads...This thread is about Ron Paul's racist, anti-gay, anti-Israel POLITICAL newsletters that he got handsomely paid to publish, not conspiracy theories.... The assertion that "some articles were written in a newsletter edited (not written by) RP that are not attributed to him some 20-30 years ago, therefore RP is a racist" is in fact nothing more a whacko, pseudo-right wing conspiracy theory rooted in desperation to discredit RP. No different than the wildly absurd claims of "anti-semitism" which have been debunked numerous times, including the program "Reality Check". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zGCdHelRvE&feature=player_embedded If your name was THE TITLE of 20 years worth of POLITICAL newsletters for which you were being paid and the contributors wrote and published anti-Israel, anti-gay, and racist slurs and presented the slurs as your view(s), referencing your name repeatedly, would just turn a blind eye to it or would you out those IF what they were printing was false.....OR.... would you just claim you were not aware of the content of the newsletters or the authors? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not at all! you made it a point of topic by previous opinions you have shared. Previous opinions I shared on other threads...This thread is about Ron Paul's racist, anti-gay, anti-Israel POLITICAL newsletters that he got handsomely paid to publish, not conspiracy theories.... The assertion that "some articles were written in a newsletter edited (not written by) RP that are not attributed to him some 20-30 years ago, therefore RP is a racist" is in fact nothing more a whacko, pseudo-right wing conspiracy theory rooted in desperation to discredit RP. No different than the wildly absurd claims of "anti-semitism" which have been debunked numerous times, including the program "Reality Check". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zGCdHelRvE&feature=player_embedded If your name was THE TITLE of 20 years worth of POLITICAL newsletters for which you were being paid and the contributors wrote and published anti-Israel, anti-gay, and racist slurs and presented the slurs as your view(s), referencing your name repeatedly, would just turn a blind eye to it or would you out those IF what they were printing was false.....OR.... would you just claim you were not aware of the content of the newsletters or the authors? It doesn't matter at this point in time. The burden of proof is on the ones making a positive claim. You can say whatever you want, but that won't make it true. Plenty of newsletters named after individuals use other authors and ghostwriters for columns. Many newspapers wouldn't have much content at all if it weren't for anonymous AP writers. If something false or offensive gets printed, it's just an oversight in editing in most cases. Right now, it's just your word against his-and considering his very long track record of honesty and integrity, I trust him before you (unless you can prove your claim beyond reasonable doubt). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
heavenlyboy34
on
Tue 12/20/11 01:48 PM
|
|
Not at all! you made it a point of topic by previous opinions you have shared. Previous opinions I shared on other threads...This thread is about Ron Paul's racist, anti-gay, anti-Israel POLITICAL newsletters that he got handsomely paid to publish, not conspiracy theories.... Can you actually quote these articles or are you just believing whatever you're spoon-fed by MSM propaganda machines? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not at all! you made it a point of topic by previous opinions you have shared. Previous opinions I shared on other threads...This thread is about Ron Paul's racist, anti-gay, anti-Israel POLITICAL newsletters that he got handsomely paid to publish, not conspiracy theories.... The assertion that "some articles were written in a newsletter edited (not written by) RP that are not attributed to him some 20-30 years ago, therefore RP is a racist" is in fact nothing more a whacko, pseudo-right wing conspiracy theory rooted in desperation to discredit RP. No different than the wildly absurd claims of "anti-semitism" which have been debunked numerous times, including the program "Reality Check". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zGCdHelRvE&feature=player_embedded If your name was THE TITLE of 20 years worth of POLITICAL newsletters for which you were being paid and the contributors wrote and published anti-Israel, anti-gay, and racist slurs and presented the slurs as your view(s), referencing your name repeatedly, would just turn a blind eye to it or would you out those IF what they were printing was false.....OR.... would you just claim you were not aware of the content of the newsletters or the authors? It doesn't matter at this point in time. The burden of proof is on the ones making a positive claim. You can say whatever you want, but that won't make it true. Plenty of newsletters named after individuals use other authors and ghostwriters for columns. Many newspapers wouldn't have much content at all if it weren't for anonymous AP writers. If something false or offensive gets printed, it's just an oversight in editing in most cases. Right now, it's just your word against his-and considering his very long track record of honesty and integrity, I trust him before you (unless you can prove your claim beyond reasonable doubt). Thats a stretch...I was hoping you would just answer my question HB..... |
|
|
|
|
