2 Next
Topic: Social Engineering in the Military
no photo
Thu 12/08/11 07:58 AM



Peta may speak up on this and rightfully so.


I disagree, we don't need the idiots in PETA involved. If your partner cannot consent, then the act should be illegal. Which means that bestiality should be 100% illegal in the USA and the "legal" age for sex with consenting people should be 18. We won't let someone drink until they turn 21, but in some states you can legally start having sex at 16.


i agree with you..i have a problem with anyone deciding that it's alright to **** an animal at will.

someone has to speak for the animals, which idiots would you prefer to do this?


I would prefer that it was the American people to a band of vegan idiots. Nothing would turn public opinion against a cause faster than PETA comparing bestiality to the Holocaust or whatever stupid comparison they decided to make. How about a Constitutional amendment? I don't like Government interference in lives, but I think it's only right to protect children and defenseless animals.

Ladylid2012's photo
Thu 12/08/11 08:17 AM




Peta may speak up on this and rightfully so.


I disagree, we don't need the idiots in PETA involved. If your partner cannot consent, then the act should be illegal. Which means that bestiality should be 100% illegal in the USA and the "legal" age for sex with consenting people should be 18. We won't let someone drink until they turn 21, but in some states you can legally start having sex at 16.


i agree with you..i have a problem with anyone deciding that it's alright to **** an animal at will.

someone has to speak for the animals, which idiots would you prefer to do this?


I would prefer that it was the American people to a band of vegan idiots. Nothing would turn public opinion against a cause faster than PETA comparing bestiality to the Holocaust or whatever stupid comparison they decided to make. How about a Constitutional amendment? I don't like Government interference in lives, but I think it's only right to protect children and defenseless animals.



Your opinion of peta is not the opinion of everyone.
Peta is big enough to make an impact and i don't really
care how it is changed, it's unacceptable and must be changed!
I think it's disgusting that a group of suits who care for nothing but themselves make a decision like this.

frn12345's photo
Thu 12/08/11 08:45 AM
Seems no one in the Senate actually reads the Bills they vote on.
Just like Pelosi, gotta pass it to find out whats in it (Obamacare).

I think these folks are all bozos.


(CNSNews.com) - Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, told CNSNews.com on Wednesday that he did not know that the 926-page Defense Department authorization bill that came through his committee and was approved by the Senate last week on a 93-to-7 vote included a provision that would repeal the military’s ban on sodomy and bestiality if the bill becomes law.

CNSNews.com asked McCain: “Senator, did you read the Defense authorization bill that was passed last week? Were you aware of the language that repealed the ban on sodomy and bestiality?”

“On what?” McCain replied.

(CNSNews.com) - Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), asked Wednesday if he was aware of a provision in the National Defense Authorization Bill that repeals the ban on sodomy and bestiality in the military, told CNSNews.com:

“No, I can’t say I was,” Graham said. “But I can, I think I know what the military is getting at there, in light of the change in policy. But no, I can’t say that I was, so we’ll look at that.”

msharmony's photo
Thu 12/08/11 05:02 PM




Peta may speak up on this and rightfully so.


I disagree, we don't need the idiots in PETA involved. If your partner cannot consent, then the act should be illegal. Which means that bestiality should be 100% illegal in the USA and the "legal" age for sex with consenting people should be 18. We won't let someone drink until they turn 21, but in some states you can legally start having sex at 16.


i agree with you..i have a problem with anyone deciding that it's alright to **** an animal at will.

someone has to speak for the animals, which idiots would you prefer to do this?



I kind of disagree with this. The act of 'mounting' for most animals would seem a consentual activity , at least for the mounter.

just saying,,,

I would prefer that it was the American people to a band of vegan idiots. Nothing would turn public opinion against a cause faster than PETA comparing bestiality to the Holocaust or whatever stupid comparison they decided to make. How about a Constitutional amendment? I don't like Government interference in lives, but I think it's only right to protect children and defenseless animals.

2 Next