Topic: Illegals may suffer if Unemployment Bennis are cut | |
---|---|
Their jobs could be taken.
This is speaking about the chronic, long-term unemployed. " (CNN) -- Congress is about to decide whether to renew unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless. Unless it acts by December 31, millions who have been unemployed for more than six months will begin losing benefits. With unemployment at nearly 9% and likely to remain high for the next few years, cutting off benefits for the long-term unemployed would have severe consequences for them and our economy. ![]() ![]() Several members of Congress, and a few policy analysts and pundits, argue otherwise, saying that eliminating benefits for the long-term unemployed will force millions of Americans back to work and reduce unemployment. http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/02/opinion/van-horn-unemployment-extension/index.html?hpt=hp_bn9 |
|
|
|
Their jobs could be taken. This is speaking about the chronic, long-term unemployed. " (CNN) -- Congress is about to decide whether to renew unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless. Unless it acts by December 31, millions who have been unemployed for more than six months will begin losing benefits. With unemployment at nearly 9% and likely to remain high for the next few years, cutting off benefits for the long-term unemployed would have severe consequences for them and our economy. ![]() ![]() Several members of Congress, and a few policy analysts and pundits, argue otherwise, saying that eliminating benefits for the long-term unemployed will force millions of Americans back to work and reduce unemployment. http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/02/opinion/van-horn-unemployment-extension/index.html?hpt=hp_bn9 |
|
|
|
Their jobs could be taken. This is speaking about the chronic, long-term unemployed. " (CNN) -- Congress is about to decide whether to renew unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless. Unless it acts by December 31, millions who have been unemployed for more than six months will begin losing benefits. With unemployment at nearly 9% and likely to remain high for the next few years, cutting off benefits for the long-term unemployed would have severe consequences for them and our economy. ![]() ![]() Several members of Congress, and a few policy analysts and pundits, argue otherwise, saying that eliminating benefits for the long-term unemployed will force millions of Americans back to work and reduce unemployment. http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/02/opinion/van-horn-unemployment-extension/index.html?hpt=hp_bn9 Gov. pumps or deflates the numbers to benefit the agenda. I'd say, with confidence, we are at around 25% unemployed. Barry's create and save program is about as fruitful for Americans as his clunker/cash did. Japan made the most money off the C/C debacle and most all metal salvaged was sold to overseas industry. Vote Ron Paul! |
|
|
|
the US wasnt isolated in its economic downturn, so I somehow dont think the downturn can be attributed to america or the american president,,,
time will tell what long term impact the current 'administration' has had,, one term will not be long enough to truly see long term impact,,, |
|
|