2 Next
Topic: Age is a Stereotype
Wulfenstraat's photo
Tue 09/06/11 11:20 AM


I didn't write it and wasn't defensive about it. I just assumed the site had forgotten what I'd done here and started me fresh with post #1. When she claimed exception, it made me wonder the importance of whether it was post 131 or 132. And, I "never" wrote "post #1. That was their program that included it. I didn't see it until after I posted the message. Until then, it had either been underneath the screen or was added at the moment I posted the thread. That's what happened.

You should attribute your post at the very
beginning, if it is written by someone else.

We are used to people with their own thoughts.
Interest wanes for regurgitated stuff.


What the H is wrong with this site. The whole beginning is about a post number. Now, it's whether this thread was "regurgitated" in plagiarism. What the F is wrong with you people.

no photo
Tue 09/06/11 11:21 AM
whoa surprised

no photo
Tue 09/06/11 11:23 AM



I didn't write it and wasn't defensive about it. I just assumed the site had forgotten what I'd done here and started me fresh with post #1. When she claimed exception, it made me wonder the importance of whether it was post 131 or 132. And, I "never" wrote "post #1. That was their program that included it. I didn't see it until after I posted the message. Until then, it had either been underneath the screen or was added at the moment I posted the thread. That's what happened.

You should attribute your post at the very
beginning, if it is written by someone else.

We are used to people with their own thoughts.
Interest wanes for regurgitated stuff.


What the H is wrong with this site. The whole beginning is about a post number. Now, it's whether this thread was "regurgitated" in plagiarism. What the F is wrong with you people.
ohwell noway WELL,,,I NEVER!!!!!!noway laugh laugh

I THINK,,,this may be your ego over producing an image that your heart can't stand...huh surprised :angel:

adj4u's photo
Tue 09/06/11 12:07 PM

There are an awful lot of threads about age lately.



thats because the discussion of age is ageless

(hhhmmmm isnt cher like 65 or something close to that just a thought)

soufiehere's photo
Tue 09/06/11 12:34 PM



I didn't write it and wasn't defensive about it. I just assumed the site had forgotten what I'd done here and started me fresh with post #1. When she claimed exception, it made me wonder the importance of whether it was post 131 or 132. And, I "never" wrote "post #1. That was their program that included it. I didn't see it until after I posted the message. Until then, it had either been underneath the screen or was added at the moment I posted the thread. That's what happened.

You should attribute your post at the very
beginning, if it is written by someone else.

We are used to people with their own thoughts.
Interest wanes for regurgitated stuff.


What the H is wrong with this site. The whole beginning is about a post number. Now, it's whether this thread was "regurgitated" in plagiarism. What the F is wrong with you people.

Geez, hold onto your pants.
When you said you didn't 'write it', gee,
it looked like you didn't write it.
The whole thing.
If this isn't so, you were unclear.
I am still not sure.
And people are free to comment however they
wish about the stuff you post.
If that is all they find interesting in it,
well, that is not their fault.

no photo
Tue 09/06/11 12:35 PM



I didn't write it and wasn't defensive about it. I just assumed the site had forgotten what I'd done here and started me fresh with post #1. When she claimed exception, it made me wonder the importance of whether it was post 131 or 132. And, I "never" wrote "post #1. That was their program that included it. I didn't see it until after I posted the message. Until then, it had either been underneath the screen or was added at the moment I posted the thread. That's what happened.

You should attribute your post at the very
beginning, if it is written by someone else.

We are used to people with their own thoughts.
Interest wanes for regurgitated stuff.


What the H is wrong with this site. The whole beginning is about a post number. Now, it's whether this thread was "regurgitated" in plagiarism. What the F is wrong with you people.


Such a friendly guy!

no photo
Tue 09/06/11 12:58 PM

Cougar Hunters,

MILF divers,

Horney Dogs,

Whatever...

Who's leg do I got to hump to get a date?

noway Andy, I thought you did that to everyones leg? ohwell

AndyBgood's photo
Tue 09/06/11 02:40 PM


Cougar Hunters,

MILF divers,

Horney Dogs,

Whatever...

Who's leg do I got to hump to get a date?

noway Andy, I thought you did that to everyones leg? ohwell



pitchfork

AndyBgood's photo
Tue 09/06/11 02:41 PM


There are an awful lot of threads about age lately.



thats because the discussion of age is ageless

(hhhmmmm isnt cher like 65 or something close to that just a thought)


Cher is the Cougar's Cougar!

adj4u's photo
Tue 09/06/11 02:54 PM



There are an awful lot of threads about age lately.



thats because the discussion of age is ageless

(hhhmmmm isnt cher like 65 or something close to that just a thought)


Cher is the Cougar's Cougar!



hhmmmmm is that what happened to chaz

my bad sorry chaz n cher

live long and prosper

ladyliz1417's photo
Tue 09/06/11 03:05 PM
Age only makes a difference if you let it.....

no photo
Tue 09/06/11 04:15 PM
What I don't get is why some people get offended that some aren't into those who are much older/younger.

machug's photo
Tue 09/06/11 05:59 PM
I am who I want to be, a number won't change me. I'll think younger til my last. If my age turns someone off, then that is their loss.
I am fun, silly, interesting ...even if my bones creak.LOL:laughing:
And if I want to be naughty, oh yeah I will.devil

wxmann's photo
Tue 09/06/11 06:11 PM
It's hard to tell the age of a woman. I seen some women whom claim they are in their 40 or 50's and don't look much older than early to mid 20's.

2 Next