1 3 Next
Topic: Dominionism
wux's photo
Sun 08/28/11 12:06 AM
Edited by wux on Sun 08/28/11 12:08 AM

Put simply, Dominionism means that Christians have a God-given right to rule all earthly institutions


This actually makes sense.

For Jews, Zionism means Jews have a God-given right to rule all earthly institutions.

To the followers of Muhhamed it means that all earlthyly institutions must be governed by Islam, as a god-given right.

In Buddhism, Hinduism, Bentoism, Shintoism, Taoism, and DalaLamaism, including all the faiths of the Inkas, Ginkas, Pinkazz, Egyptian Pharaohs, Romans, Norsement, Celts, and Greeks, ditto.

It does not escape even atheists. According to Marxism-Leninism, the Proletariat must rule everything with the peasants. In the French revolution, Reuben thought the bourgoesisaeeaouaise must rule. In Satanism, it is the Satan-given right to Satanists to rule the earth. Hitler thought that the Third Reich was going to last a thousand years. Think also of Ghenghis Khan, Napoleon Bonaparte, and Cortez the Killer.

An astute reader will notice a pattern there.

wux's photo
Sun 08/28/11 12:17 AM
Edited by wux on Sun 08/28/11 12:18 AM

Put simply, Dominionism means that Christians have a God-given right to rule all earthly institutions
(...)
e]This actually makes sense.
(...)
An astute reader will notice a pattern there.


Well, there is a proof why this is so logically possible.

In today's world, most or all relgions are exclusively denialists. This means they only allow one god to exists, their own.

So:

Since only one god exists, and this god which exists is the god of the follower's religion, AND god gives out rights, then it is necessarily true that the given religion's god will give the right to its own followers. Not doing so would be stupid. Gods are NOT stupid, despite all evidence to the contrary, such as the world we live in is supposed to be an "intelligent" design. In my opinion my five-year-old grandson could have come up with a better design, but never mind.

------

A little proof must be included why it must be true that the god of the follower's religion is the god in existence.

Imagine it was not so. Then the god of not the follower's religion would be the one giving out rights.


And the god of a religion of not the follower's is the one with the true religion.

If the beleiver really internalizes this, then obviously he will switch to the religion which in the follower's belief has that one and only god.

This above paragraph is true coz to follow a religion, one must believe in the god of that religion. In other words, one can't be commanded by his god to not believe in his god, but in a god of a competing religion.

KerryO's photo
Sun 08/28/11 02:45 AM


And let's not forget Bill Ayers one of Obama's friends. A man who advocated killing Americans and wished they could have done more. And won't apologize for it.



'friend' is a pretty big stretch

and I dont recall OBAMA expressing those views, nor do I believe people have to be in agreement with each other on all views..even married couples arent,, why should any other 'relationship' imply it?


More like a big lie, such as in propaganda created by the Far Right out of whole cloth. The GOP even went so far as to create a phony website on which Ayers was listed as a Facebook-style friend of Obama's.

Here was Obama's statement on the matter when asked about it by George Stephanopolis:


This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who's a professor of English in Chicago who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He's not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis. And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was eight years old, somehow reflects on me and my values doesn't make much sense, George.



Read the Wikipedia article for yourself.



-Kerry O.



1 3 Next