1 2 5 6 7 8 9 11 13
Topic: NY Senate Votes For Marriage Equality
mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/27/11 11:48 AM










Ya know, I read this thread and others of similar subject.
As much as I really, really try to put myself in others
shoes before making any kind of judgment...
for the life of me I can not wrap my mind around WHY any
of you give a flying **** who, what, where another chooses to marry.

There is NO threat to your decision to not be gay, there is NO
threat to your marriage..or potential marriage. There is no
threat to YOU at all...why do you care?
Seems to just keep coming back as..it's just not right, the
definition of marriage has to be protected...
get off your judgmental high horses.

A same sex marriage has NOTHING to do with you or your beliefs...
get over yourselves and let people live as they wish.


so why are you worried about it? does anything i think or do affect you in any way, shape or form? you should get off your high horse and quit thinking that i should have to think like you and explain myself when i dont


I care about the issue because I know gay people...many of them. Including a sister who is gay. They have the right to be happy...life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for ALL..not just hetro's.
My high horse? The horse I ride that believes that ALL people have a right to live as they choose as long as it's not hurting you...is that the horse your referring to?


It's really sad to me that religious dogma comes first to the happiness of human beings, it truly is.



as someone else put it, happiness and marriage are two different issues

we should all have the right to be happy and do whatever we want with whomever we want in our personal life

we shouldnt have the government giving support to everything we want to do with whomever we want in our personal life though

there is a difference, IF we were saying to outlaw homosexual lifestyles, I could understand the argument that everyone deserves to be happy

but protesting homosexual marriage has nothing to do with stopping people from being able to live 'happy'


It takes away something from them though that others can do, and denies them the benefits others get when marrying legally. So in that sense in particular, it very much does impact their ability to live happily if they are denied benefits others get.



guess what? benefits are just that 'benefits' . not 'entitlements'

I dont get the same benefits that come to others with having a masters degree

I dont get the same benefits that come to those in a different income bracket

I dont get the same benefits as a business owner

these types of benefits are not 'rights' and have little to do though with my ability to live 'happy'


My kids dont have the same 'benefits' as me


there ia a perception of a difference of RESPONSIBILITY that leads to a difference in PRIVILEGE ,, thats life.



it's the same thing over and over, gays want more than everyone else and use the discrimination issue to try to get it... they have every right you or me have, but that is not enough for them, they want more and better rights, to make them feel better about themselves...they say it's about happiness, but i guess the only way they are happy is if they get better benefits...


No they DON'T have the same rights. If they can't marry like you can, they DON'T.
GeeZ...How bout giving them the right to marry. When they can have kids and pay child-support if need be?


i don't really care if they get married or not, but if it was put to a vote, i would vote no

Kleisto's photo
Mon 06/27/11 11:52 AM











Ya know, I read this thread and others of similar subject.
As much as I really, really try to put myself in others
shoes before making any kind of judgment...
for the life of me I can not wrap my mind around WHY any
of you give a flying **** who, what, where another chooses to marry.

There is NO threat to your decision to not be gay, there is NO
threat to your marriage..or potential marriage. There is no
threat to YOU at all...why do you care?
Seems to just keep coming back as..it's just not right, the
definition of marriage has to be protected...
get off your judgmental high horses.

A same sex marriage has NOTHING to do with you or your beliefs...
get over yourselves and let people live as they wish.


so why are you worried about it? does anything i think or do affect you in any way, shape or form? you should get off your high horse and quit thinking that i should have to think like you and explain myself when i dont


I care about the issue because I know gay people...many of them. Including a sister who is gay. They have the right to be happy...life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for ALL..not just hetro's.
My high horse? The horse I ride that believes that ALL people have a right to live as they choose as long as it's not hurting you...is that the horse your referring to?


It's really sad to me that religious dogma comes first to the happiness of human beings, it truly is.



as someone else put it, happiness and marriage are two different issues

we should all have the right to be happy and do whatever we want with whomever we want in our personal life

we shouldnt have the government giving support to everything we want to do with whomever we want in our personal life though

there is a difference, IF we were saying to outlaw homosexual lifestyles, I could understand the argument that everyone deserves to be happy

but protesting homosexual marriage has nothing to do with stopping people from being able to live 'happy'


It takes away something from them though that others can do, and denies them the benefits others get when marrying legally. So in that sense in particular, it very much does impact their ability to live happily if they are denied benefits others get.



guess what? benefits are just that 'benefits' . not 'entitlements'

I dont get the same benefits that come to others with having a masters degree

I dont get the same benefits that come to those in a different income bracket

I dont get the same benefits as a business owner

these types of benefits are not 'rights' and have little to do though with my ability to live 'happy'


My kids dont have the same 'benefits' as me


there ia a perception of a difference of RESPONSIBILITY that leads to a difference in PRIVILEGE ,, thats life.



it's the same thing over and over, gays want more than everyone else and use the discrimination issue to try to get it... they have every right you or me have, but that is not enough for them, they want more and better rights, to make them feel better about themselves...they say it's about happiness, but i guess the only way they are happy is if they get better benefits...


No they DON'T have the same rights. If they can't marry like you can, they DON'T.
GeeZ...How bout giving them the right to marry. When they can have kids and pay child-support if need be?


i don't really care if they get married or not, but if it was put to a vote, i would vote no


If you don't care, why make an issue of it even in a vote? That doesn't make sense.

mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/27/11 11:56 AM












Ya know, I read this thread and others of similar subject.
As much as I really, really try to put myself in others
shoes before making any kind of judgment...
for the life of me I can not wrap my mind around WHY any
of you give a flying **** who, what, where another chooses to marry.

There is NO threat to your decision to not be gay, there is NO
threat to your marriage..or potential marriage. There is no
threat to YOU at all...why do you care?
Seems to just keep coming back as..it's just not right, the
definition of marriage has to be protected...
get off your judgmental high horses.

A same sex marriage has NOTHING to do with you or your beliefs...
get over yourselves and let people live as they wish.


so why are you worried about it? does anything i think or do affect you in any way, shape or form? you should get off your high horse and quit thinking that i should have to think like you and explain myself when i dont


I care about the issue because I know gay people...many of them. Including a sister who is gay. They have the right to be happy...life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for ALL..not just hetro's.
My high horse? The horse I ride that believes that ALL people have a right to live as they choose as long as it's not hurting you...is that the horse your referring to?


It's really sad to me that religious dogma comes first to the happiness of human beings, it truly is.



as someone else put it, happiness and marriage are two different issues

we should all have the right to be happy and do whatever we want with whomever we want in our personal life

we shouldnt have the government giving support to everything we want to do with whomever we want in our personal life though

there is a difference, IF we were saying to outlaw homosexual lifestyles, I could understand the argument that everyone deserves to be happy

but protesting homosexual marriage has nothing to do with stopping people from being able to live 'happy'


It takes away something from them though that others can do, and denies them the benefits others get when marrying legally. So in that sense in particular, it very much does impact their ability to live happily if they are denied benefits others get.



guess what? benefits are just that 'benefits' . not 'entitlements'

I dont get the same benefits that come to others with having a masters degree

I dont get the same benefits that come to those in a different income bracket

I dont get the same benefits as a business owner

these types of benefits are not 'rights' and have little to do though with my ability to live 'happy'


My kids dont have the same 'benefits' as me


there ia a perception of a difference of RESPONSIBILITY that leads to a difference in PRIVILEGE ,, thats life.



it's the same thing over and over, gays want more than everyone else and use the discrimination issue to try to get it... they have every right you or me have, but that is not enough for them, they want more and better rights, to make them feel better about themselves...they say it's about happiness, but i guess the only way they are happy is if they get better benefits...


No they DON'T have the same rights. If they can't marry like you can, they DON'T.
GeeZ...How bout giving them the right to marry. When they can have kids and pay child-support if need be?


i don't really care if they get married or not, but if it was put to a vote, i would vote no


If you don't care, why make an issue of it even in a vote? That doesn't make sense.


and why does that need to make sense to you?

Kleisto's photo
Mon 06/27/11 11:58 AM













Ya know, I read this thread and others of similar subject.
As much as I really, really try to put myself in others
shoes before making any kind of judgment...
for the life of me I can not wrap my mind around WHY any
of you give a flying **** who, what, where another chooses to marry.

There is NO threat to your decision to not be gay, there is NO
threat to your marriage..or potential marriage. There is no
threat to YOU at all...why do you care?
Seems to just keep coming back as..it's just not right, the
definition of marriage has to be protected...
get off your judgmental high horses.

A same sex marriage has NOTHING to do with you or your beliefs...
get over yourselves and let people live as they wish.


so why are you worried about it? does anything i think or do affect you in any way, shape or form? you should get off your high horse and quit thinking that i should have to think like you and explain myself when i dont


I care about the issue because I know gay people...many of them. Including a sister who is gay. They have the right to be happy...life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for ALL..not just hetro's.
My high horse? The horse I ride that believes that ALL people have a right to live as they choose as long as it's not hurting you...is that the horse your referring to?


It's really sad to me that religious dogma comes first to the happiness of human beings, it truly is.



as someone else put it, happiness and marriage are two different issues

we should all have the right to be happy and do whatever we want with whomever we want in our personal life

we shouldnt have the government giving support to everything we want to do with whomever we want in our personal life though

there is a difference, IF we were saying to outlaw homosexual lifestyles, I could understand the argument that everyone deserves to be happy

but protesting homosexual marriage has nothing to do with stopping people from being able to live 'happy'


It takes away something from them though that others can do, and denies them the benefits others get when marrying legally. So in that sense in particular, it very much does impact their ability to live happily if they are denied benefits others get.



guess what? benefits are just that 'benefits' . not 'entitlements'

I dont get the same benefits that come to others with having a masters degree

I dont get the same benefits that come to those in a different income bracket

I dont get the same benefits as a business owner

these types of benefits are not 'rights' and have little to do though with my ability to live 'happy'


My kids dont have the same 'benefits' as me


there ia a perception of a difference of RESPONSIBILITY that leads to a difference in PRIVILEGE ,, thats life.



it's the same thing over and over, gays want more than everyone else and use the discrimination issue to try to get it... they have every right you or me have, but that is not enough for them, they want more and better rights, to make them feel better about themselves...they say it's about happiness, but i guess the only way they are happy is if they get better benefits...


No they DON'T have the same rights. If they can't marry like you can, they DON'T.
GeeZ...How bout giving them the right to marry. When they can have kids and pay child-support if need be?


i don't really care if they get married or not, but if it was put to a vote, i would vote no


If you don't care, why make an issue of it even in a vote? That doesn't make sense.


and why does that need to make sense to you?


Because you say you don't care, but then say you'd vote no given the chance, so obviously it means you must care to some degree.

mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/27/11 12:00 PM














Ya know, I read this thread and others of similar subject.
As much as I really, really try to put myself in others
shoes before making any kind of judgment...
for the life of me I can not wrap my mind around WHY any
of you give a flying **** who, what, where another chooses to marry.

There is NO threat to your decision to not be gay, there is NO
threat to your marriage..or potential marriage. There is no
threat to YOU at all...why do you care?
Seems to just keep coming back as..it's just not right, the
definition of marriage has to be protected...
get off your judgmental high horses.

A same sex marriage has NOTHING to do with you or your beliefs...
get over yourselves and let people live as they wish.


so why are you worried about it? does anything i think or do affect you in any way, shape or form? you should get off your high horse and quit thinking that i should have to think like you and explain myself when i dont


I care about the issue because I know gay people...many of them. Including a sister who is gay. They have the right to be happy...life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for ALL..not just hetro's.
My high horse? The horse I ride that believes that ALL people have a right to live as they choose as long as it's not hurting you...is that the horse your referring to?


It's really sad to me that religious dogma comes first to the happiness of human beings, it truly is.



as someone else put it, happiness and marriage are two different issues

we should all have the right to be happy and do whatever we want with whomever we want in our personal life

we shouldnt have the government giving support to everything we want to do with whomever we want in our personal life though

there is a difference, IF we were saying to outlaw homosexual lifestyles, I could understand the argument that everyone deserves to be happy

but protesting homosexual marriage has nothing to do with stopping people from being able to live 'happy'


It takes away something from them though that others can do, and denies them the benefits others get when marrying legally. So in that sense in particular, it very much does impact their ability to live happily if they are denied benefits others get.



guess what? benefits are just that 'benefits' . not 'entitlements'

I dont get the same benefits that come to others with having a masters degree

I dont get the same benefits that come to those in a different income bracket

I dont get the same benefits as a business owner

these types of benefits are not 'rights' and have little to do though with my ability to live 'happy'


My kids dont have the same 'benefits' as me


there ia a perception of a difference of RESPONSIBILITY that leads to a difference in PRIVILEGE ,, thats life.



it's the same thing over and over, gays want more than everyone else and use the discrimination issue to try to get it... they have every right you or me have, but that is not enough for them, they want more and better rights, to make them feel better about themselves...they say it's about happiness, but i guess the only way they are happy is if they get better benefits...


No they DON'T have the same rights. If they can't marry like you can, they DON'T.
GeeZ...How bout giving them the right to marry. When they can have kids and pay child-support if need be?


i don't really care if they get married or not, but if it was put to a vote, i would vote no


If you don't care, why make an issue of it even in a vote? That doesn't make sense.


and why does that need to make sense to you?


Because you say you don't care, but then say you'd vote no given the chance, so obviously it means you must care to some degree.


i guess it does then

Kleisto's photo
Mon 06/27/11 12:03 PM
Thank you for admitting that much.

mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/27/11 12:08 PM

Thank you for admitting that much.


your welcome... no matter what i post, with the exception of "i'm all for it", your going to argue, so i will just agree with you from now on

Kleisto's photo
Mon 06/27/11 12:57 PM


Thank you for admitting that much.


your welcome... no matter what i post, with the exception of "i'm all for it", your going to argue, so i will just agree with you from now on


Hey I'm not the one that made the claim that I didn't care only to say that I'd vote no if given the chance. The two statements are mutually opposed from each other. If you're gonna say something, your statements need to back it up, otherwise be prepared to be called on it.

mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/27/11 01:02 PM



Thank you for admitting that much.


your welcome... no matter what i post, with the exception of "i'm all for it", your going to argue, so i will just agree with you from now on


Hey I'm not the one that made the claim that I didn't care only to say that I'd vote no if given the chance. The two statements are mutually opposed from each other. If you're gonna say something, your statements need to back it up, otherwise be prepared to be called on it.


see, your still arguing...all i can say is "ok"

Kleisto's photo
Mon 06/27/11 01:04 PM




Thank you for admitting that much.


your welcome... no matter what i post, with the exception of "i'm all for it", your going to argue, so i will just agree with you from now on


Hey I'm not the one that made the claim that I didn't care only to say that I'd vote no if given the chance. The two statements are mutually opposed from each other. If you're gonna say something, your statements need to back it up, otherwise be prepared to be called on it.


see, your still arguing...all i can say is "ok"


I just said that, cause you didn't seem to like when I called you on something. But if you had backed what you said to start with, I wouldn't have had to.

mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/27/11 01:15 PM





Thank you for admitting that much.


your welcome... no matter what i post, with the exception of "i'm all for it", your going to argue, so i will just agree with you from now on


Hey I'm not the one that made the claim that I didn't care only to say that I'd vote no if given the chance. The two statements are mutually opposed from each other. If you're gonna say something, your statements need to back it up, otherwise be prepared to be called on it.


see, your still arguing...all i can say is "ok"


I just said that, cause you didn't seem to like when I called you on something. But if you had backed what you said to start with, I wouldn't have had to.


it doesn't matter what i say, your just going to argue... that's why i won't answer any questions to you anymore... you seem to think that i have to think like you, or explain myself if i don't... i do not have to explain myself to anyone on why i think the way i do, or why i would vote one way or another, or anything else to anyone. it's the pushiness from liberals like you that make me think the way i do. your not going to change my mind, if anything, your just strengthening my reasons on why i would vote against it, just because of the pushiness...

Kleisto's photo
Mon 06/27/11 01:28 PM






Thank you for admitting that much.


your welcome... no matter what i post, with the exception of "i'm all for it", your going to argue, so i will just agree with you from now on


Hey I'm not the one that made the claim that I didn't care only to say that I'd vote no if given the chance. The two statements are mutually opposed from each other. If you're gonna say something, your statements need to back it up, otherwise be prepared to be called on it.


see, your still arguing...all i can say is "ok"


I just said that, cause you didn't seem to like when I called you on something. But if you had backed what you said to start with, I wouldn't have had to.


it doesn't matter what i say, your just going to argue... that's why i won't answer any questions to you anymore... you seem to think that i have to think like you, or explain myself if i don't... i do not have to explain myself to anyone on why i think the way i do, or why i would vote one way or another, or anything else to anyone. it's the pushiness from liberals like you that make me think the way i do. your not going to change my mind, if anything, your just strengthening my reasons on why i would vote against it, just because of the pushiness...


I could say the same for you too, your types are just as pushy against people like this as you claim us to be.

And I don't appreciate being called a liberal, I don't associate with any label or group like that.

mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/27/11 01:31 PM







Thank you for admitting that much.


your welcome... no matter what i post, with the exception of "i'm all for it", your going to argue, so i will just agree with you from now on


Hey I'm not the one that made the claim that I didn't care only to say that I'd vote no if given the chance. The two statements are mutually opposed from each other. If you're gonna say something, your statements need to back it up, otherwise be prepared to be called on it.


see, your still arguing...all i can say is "ok"


I just said that, cause you didn't seem to like when I called you on something. But if you had backed what you said to start with, I wouldn't have had to.


it doesn't matter what i say, your just going to argue... that's why i won't answer any questions to you anymore... you seem to think that i have to think like you, or explain myself if i don't... i do not have to explain myself to anyone on why i think the way i do, or why i would vote one way or another, or anything else to anyone. it's the pushiness from liberals like you that make me think the way i do. your not going to change my mind, if anything, your just strengthening my reasons on why i would vote against it, just because of the pushiness...


I could say the same for you too, your types are just as pushy against people like this as you claim us to be.

And I don't appreciate being called a liberal, I don't associate with any label or group like that.


ok, sure... whatever you say

Ladylid2012's photo
Mon 06/27/11 01:37 PM




Na, the only time the state of Utah ever went after a polygamist was when the olympics came to Salt lake City...1991 I believe (doh, I was there ) the world was watching and they took that poor guy Warren Jeffs and made an example out of him. Haven't heard a peep about it all since.
Just saving face is all...hypocrites!

Why in thee hell would any man want more than one wife?!?!
We already kill ya off quicker as it is, wanna die faster... ; )


variety...and also to split up the chores



variety is the spice of life.....
na, the wives don't do the chores,
that's what ya have 4 kids with each
wifeie for.

I can't believe you all are STILL going round and round and round over this issue. I'm sooooo done.

no photo
Mon 06/27/11 02:56 PM













Ya know, I read this thread and others of similar subject.
As much as I really, really try to put myself in others
shoes before making any kind of judgment...
for the life of me I can not wrap my mind around WHY any
of you give a flying **** who, what, where another chooses to marry.

There is NO threat to your decision to not be gay, there is NO
threat to your marriage..or potential marriage. There is no
threat to YOU at all...why do you care?
Seems to just keep coming back as..it's just not right, the
definition of marriage has to be protected...
get off your judgmental high horses.

A same sex marriage has NOTHING to do with you or your beliefs...
get over yourselves and let people live as they wish.


so why are you worried about it? does anything i think or do affect you in any way, shape or form? you should get off your high horse and quit thinking that i should have to think like you and explain myself when i dont


I care about the issue because I know gay people...many of them. Including a sister who is gay. They have the right to be happy...life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for ALL..not just hetro's.
My high horse? The horse I ride that believes that ALL people have a right to live as they choose as long as it's not hurting you...is that the horse your referring to?


It's really sad to me that religious dogma comes first to the happiness of human beings, it truly is.



as someone else put it, happiness and marriage are two different issues

we should all have the right to be happy and do whatever we want with whomever we want in our personal life

we shouldnt have the government giving support to everything we want to do with whomever we want in our personal life though

there is a difference, IF we were saying to outlaw homosexual lifestyles, I could understand the argument that everyone deserves to be happy

but protesting homosexual marriage has nothing to do with stopping people from being able to live 'happy'


It takes away something from them though that others can do, and denies them the benefits others get when marrying legally. So in that sense in particular, it very much does impact their ability to live happily if they are denied benefits others get.



guess what? benefits are just that 'benefits' . not 'entitlements'

I dont get the same benefits that come to others with having a masters degree

I dont get the same benefits that come to those in a different income bracket

I dont get the same benefits as a business owner

these types of benefits are not 'rights' and have little to do though with my ability to live 'happy'


My kids dont have the same 'benefits' as me


there ia a perception of a difference of RESPONSIBILITY that leads to a difference in PRIVILEGE ,, thats life.



it's the same thing over and over, gays want more than everyone else and use the discrimination issue to try to get it... they have every right you or me have, but that is not enough for them, they want more and better rights, to make them feel better about themselves...they say it's about happiness, but i guess the only way they are happy is if they get better benefits...


No they DON'T have the same rights. If they can't marry like you can, they DON'T.
GeeZ...How bout giving them the right to marry. When they can have kids and pay child-support if need be?


i don't really care if they get married or not, but if it was put to a vote, i would vote no


If you don't care, why make an issue of it even in a vote? That doesn't make sense.


and why does that need to make sense to you?


Again, you're talking about it here on a public message board. Why give your opinion if you're not willing to discuss it?

mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/27/11 03:04 PM



Again, you're talking about it here on a public message board. Why give your opinion if you're not willing to discuss it?


because i did try to discuss it, and all i got was that i am wrong, that i can't think the way i do, and i vote wrong...not to mention the underlying tone of discriminationist...any other questions? i'm sure you can read the responses for yourself and see what you and others wrote....

Kleisto's photo
Mon 06/27/11 03:05 PM
Edited by Kleisto on Mon 06/27/11 03:05 PM




Again, you're talking about it here on a public message board. Why give your opinion if you're not willing to discuss it?


because i did try to discuss it, and all i got was that i am wrong, that i can't think the way i do, and i vote wrong...not to mention the underlying tone of discriminationist...any other questions? i'm sure you can read the responses for yourself and see what you and others wrote....


No one is saying you can't, but if you think we're gonna back down and just say it's ok to discriminate against someone else, think again. That isn't gonna happen. Can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen then.

mightymoe's photo
Mon 06/27/11 03:12 PM





Again, you're talking about it here on a public message board. Why give your opinion if you're not willing to discuss it?


because i did try to discuss it, and all i got was that i am wrong, that i can't think the way i do, and i vote wrong...not to mention the underlying tone of discriminationist...any other questions? i'm sure you can read the responses for yourself and see what you and others wrote....


No one is saying you can't, but if you think we're gonna back down and just say it's ok to discriminate against someone else, think again. That isn't gonna happen. Can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen then.


ok, sure....

no photo
Mon 06/27/11 03:14 PM




Again, you're talking about it here on a public message board. Why give your opinion if you're not willing to discuss it?


because i did try to discuss it, and all i got was that i am wrong, that i can't think the way i do, and i vote wrong...not to mention the underlying tone of discriminationist...any other questions? i'm sure you can read the responses for yourself and see what you and others wrote....


You tell other people they're wrong all the time. I believe I saw someone ask you about your beliefs and you assumed they were trying to change yours or tell you that you couldn't think the way you do. However, I didn't see anyone tell you that you were not allowed to think the way you do. You just assumed. And when I explained why I ask people about their beliefs, you said it was bs. So, it seems that you were the one who was just trying to argue.

Kleisto's photo
Mon 06/27/11 03:14 PM
I find it really funny, how one posts something publically and then gets upset at being challenged on it. If you didn't want it to be challenged, maybe you shouldn't have said anything at all. To expect others to stay quiet on something they don't agree with you on and not question your side, is silly.

1 2 5 6 7 8 9 11 13