Politics makes for strange bedfellows. Add Code Pink and Republican Rep. Ron Paul to that list.

The vehemently anti-war group is organizing a slew of events this weekend in opposition to the United States' Israel policy, to coincide with the annual conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Ahead of the protests, a Code Pink activist suggested the group -- at least when it comes to Israel -- is actually on the same page as Paul, a libertarian and one of the first candidates to enter the race for the GOP presidential nomination.

"The Ron Paul people are closer and closer to our talking points with each election," Code Pink activist Liz Hourican told FoxNews.com.

Hourican specifically was referring to Paul's and Code Pink's respective positions on U.S. aid to Israel -- both have called for eliminating it. Code Pink, known for staging noisy disruptions at hearings and speeches where their topics of interest are being discussed, shares other common ground with Paul, like opposition to the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. But the Israel issue added a new layer.

Paul spokeswoman Rachel Mills, asked about the Code Pink comment, suggested Code Pink might be gravitating toward the congressman's view, rather than the other way around.

"He certainly doesn't take any talking points from Code Pink," she said. "If they're getting closer to his view that's one thing, but he's certainly not looking to them for policy information."

Asked whether Paul would consider linking up with the anti-war group in the future, she said Paul is "in favor of coalition building," noting that his views occasionally put him in the same camp as Democrats like anti-war Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio. But she said any cooperation would have to be "issue-specific."

Paul has been out in front on the Israel aid issue. Earlier this year, he offered an amendment to cut off $6 billion in U.S. aid to Israel and three other countries, including Pakistan. The amendment died, though Mills said the congressman would consider reintroducing it if there's an opportunity. Paul's son, Kentucky GOP Sen. Rand Paul, also tried pushing a plan to cut U.S. foreign aid, including the $3 billion slated for military assistance to Israel.

The elder Paul reiterated his concerns about U.S. support for Israel during the first 2012 Republican primary debate, hosted by Fox News and the South Carolina Republican Party. During the debate, Paul said Israel has "become too dependent on us."

He added: "But I don't want any of this foreign aid -- Pakistan or anybody else -- because the principle is wrong and because it doesn't achieve anything. ... It's not like 100 percent of the people in Israel or every Jew in this country believes that we should have the foreign policy that we have."

The view on Israel aid is not widely held in the Republican Party. U.S. administrations of both parties have long backed U.S. support for Israel, and the military aid levels were most recently pledged in an agreement between the two countries several years ago.

Shortly before Paul officially announced his candidacy last week, the Republican Jewish Coalition put out a statement saying it was "deeply concerned" about Paul's Israel positions.

"While Rep. Paul plans to run as a Republican, his views and past record place him far outside of the Republican mainstream," RJC Executive Director Matthew Brooks said. "Throughout his public service, Paul has espoused a dangerous isolationist vision for the U.S. and our role in the world. He has been a virulent and harsh critic of Israel during his tenure in Congress."

But Paul's position will certainly get an airing this weekend, as Code Pink and dozens of other groups plan demonstrations and summits in Washington, protesting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit and the AIPAC conference, where President Obama is expected to speak.

Hourican said Obama has failed at trying to salvage a Mideast peace process.

"This foreign policy of the U.S., and I love this country, is just not working," she said.

She called for stripping aid to Israel, saying: "We need our money here."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/18/rep-paul-codepink-camp-israel-aid-opposition/

I see he is off his medication again. It's comical watching him blow himself up like this.

Time to fucus on REAL candidates not loons.

What a shock that a racist like Lonney Ron Paul would not want to support Israel. I am sure he would have supported Hitler though.

Adolf was the ultimate right winger.

Not really, being that Democrats pushed segregation hard during the times of Hitler. Not to mention the Democrat sponsored concentration camps set up here in the US for Japannese and other minorities.

National Socialist Germans Worker Party sounds pretty right wing to me.. WTF

Ron Paul happens to be my congressman. I have followed his career since his early days as a third party candidate. Sadly, his good ideas like "don't spend money you don't have." are mixed with pure nuttiness.

His current candidacy puts a different light on American politics. The "Arab Spring" is a movement where vast groups of middle eastern citizens are tired of one man/one party rule and want a say in how they are governed. The two party system in the US has evolved into a one party system with two choices from the same apple barrel.

It took both parties to get the US into the horrible financial crisis it is in. Neither appears serious about getting us out. Both are too concerned about the votes of illegal aliens to solve the illegal problem. Both are too busy trying to jockey the elderly vote with scare tactics about Medicare and SS to solve the actual problem. Both parties spend too much time collecting too much money from special interest groups to look out for the interests of the US citizens.

Some of the radical ideas of Ron Paul are needed to solve some of our biggest problems. Perhaps we should balance the budget ... today.

I agree. I want to take it a step further and put some blame on the voters that continue to send these idiots back to Congress. I have never supported the idea of term limits because the voters are supposed to be the ones that decide whether or not their representatives should be sent back for additional terms. However, it seems that the issues have become so complicated and the general public so ignorant that something has to be done.

The status quo isn't working unless you are a banker or union boss.

I am so sorry that he is your voice in Congress.