I expect the Chargers to win the Super Bowl every year and I wanted Norv Turner fired after his first game as head coach..

I pretty much want him fired after every game even if they win by 30 points.

I know they will never win the Super Bowl with him as head coach.

Some people might be satisfied with winning 13 games like last season, but losing to the Jets in the first playoff game is unacceptable.

The moral of this story is that people can make correct judgments about people whether it be a single game or a year in office..

I was right so far about Norv Turner and I am very confident that I will be right about Obama.

The difference is that Norv is a football coach and Obama is the president of the united states..

quite a HUGE difference, in my opinion(the dynamic of one coach to dozens of athletes with a short term goal, compared to that of the president to hundreds of fellow politicans with hundreds of short and long term goals)

but to each their own,,,

Not really... When you look beyond the politics and what they say when they want your vote, you can get a good feel for who is going to be successful and who isn't.

?? then why did you vote for obama? the guy is as dumb as bush... almost

HOPING FOR CHANGE

Not my words, but those of one Mortimer Zuckerman..

I laughed when I read this part..

Sounds familiar..



It is apparent that Obama didn't seem to have understood the problems of the average American.

He came across as a young man in a grown-up's game—impressive but not presidential. A politician but not a leader, managing American policy at home and American power abroad with disturbing amateurishness. Indeed, there was a growing perception of the inability to run the machinery of government and to find the right people to manage it. A man who was once seen as a talented and even charismatic rhetorician is now seen as lacking real experience or even the ability to stop America's decline. "Yes we can," he once said, but now America asks, "Can he?"

The last two years have exposed to the public the risk that came with voting an inexperienced politician into office at a time when there was a crisis in America's economy, as the nation contended with a financial freeze, a painful recession, and two wars.

http://politics.usnews.com/opinion/mzuckerman/articles/2010/11/05/mort-zuckerman-americas-love-affair-with-obama-is-over.html

not by any imaginable, honest, standards

dummies dont usually graduate MAGNA CUM LAUDE from IVY LEAGUE SCHOOLS with no family connections to lean on,,,,and they RARELY marry fellow IVY LEAGUE graduates,,,,,,

everyone is entitled to their opinion, history will have its say about OBamas leadership and it already has had a say about how 'seasoned politicians' (wasnt Bush one?) dont fare much better or worse than others,,,


Not my words, but those of Steve Kornacki

with which I STRONGLY agree...

'The Clintons were reviled by conservatives for many of the same reasons Obama now is. In fact, the attacks they endured during Bill Clinton’s presidency are startlingly similar—in source, psychology, and tone—to the ones Obama now faces. Bill Clinton, too, committed the sin of being a Democrat identified with “un-American” elements (Vietnam protesters, draft dodgers and pot smokers in the ’60s, and Hollywood celebrities in the ’90s) and—worse—of knowing how to win elections.

.......

Pat Buchanan, who called Hillary a threat to “God’s country” in 1992, suddenly embraced her as a blue-collar heroine. The National Review’s Rich Lowry, who’d branded Hillary “a practitioner of the odious political style of the enlightened Baby Boomer” in the ’90s, praised her as “a serious person, afflicted, as she put it once, with ‘a responsibility gene.’” Richard Mellon Scaife, who’d bankrolled much of the Clinton takedown effort in the ’90s, forgave Bill Clinton’s philandering, pronounced him a charismatic leader, and his newspaper endorsed Hillary in the Pennsylvania primary.

So maybe Obama should take heart. A decade or two from now, when a new Democrat emerges with a real chance to win the White House, the same people who are now calling him a Kenyan terrorist plant will probably look back on his presidency as the good old days."


how fickle media and their public are,,,,sigh

your examples are what the opposition were saying. Zuckerman is a champion of liberal causes.

Obama has 2 years to sort out his problems.

He needs to start by appointing better economic advisers and rethink the Keynesian style of his economic policy.

otherwise, history will not be kind.

time will tell,,,