Topic: Iraq war leaks: US didn't probe abuse allegations | |
---|---|
funny the reason the japanese emperor hirohito wasn't charged with war crimes is because america could have been charged to with war crimes the atom bomb use which killed 250,000 innocent civilians in japan.remember the treaty of versailles? One. Shame on Reagan. Cubans, like Mexicans can change their own country if they aren't satisfied. Two. Now this topic is going deeper into history. No sir, you're completely off topic and I do not appreciate it. Not off topic when you brought Japan the Nazi's and WW2 into the picture....he just exponded upon it......off topic only when it doesn't suit your agenda? BS BS BS, It's all about war crimes and the lack of oversight by the DIPPIC administration in conducting these wars and not investigating war crimes.... Bur pathetic defenses here...I'd say more about how immoral some people are but that's just feeding their only way to win: GET A THREAD LOCKED. KMWHA. His response did discuss war crimes....... |
|
|
|
I'm outa' here.
Tired of the abuse and degrading remarks of the op. |
|
|
|
I still dont understand how invading a sovereign country that had absolutely nothing to do with the attack on USA soil is still being referred to as a "war"..??
it was an invasion and everyone (politician to soldier) who participated in that aggression should be held accountable for those crimes against humanity. |
|
|
|
I still dont understand how invading a sovereign country that had absolutely nothing to do with the attack on USA soil is still being referred to as a "war"..?? it was an invasion and everyone (politician to soldier) who participated in that aggression should be held accountable for those crimes against humanity. Okay...that's never going to happen......and its invasion war samething....who's going to hold them accountable pray tell? |
|
|
|
Edited by
mightymoe
on
Sat 10/23/10 07:19 PM
|
|
I still dont understand how invading a sovereign country that had absolutely nothing to do with the attack on USA soil is still being referred to as a "war"..?? it was an invasion and everyone (politician to soldier) who participated in that aggression should be held accountable for those crimes against humanity. yea, so? your always griping about it.... what are you going to do about it? i guess you wanted sadam to have control of all the mideast oil.... i guess it was ok that he gas bombed his own people... all the torture and imprisonment of his countrymen... his personal death squad, his trying to take over all the mid east muslim countries... is all that ok with you? and the OTHER 60 nations that helped should be brought up on charges too? wake up, try reading something before you make comments like this... |
|
|
|
I still dont understand how invading a sovereign country that had absolutely nothing to do with the attack on USA soil is still being referred to as a "war"..?? it was an invasion and everyone (politician to soldier) who participated in that aggression should be held accountable for those crimes against humanity. yea, so? your always griping about it.... what are you going to do about it? i guess you wanted sadam to have control of all the mideast oil.... i guess it was ok that he gas bombed his own people... all the torture and imprisonment of his countrymen... his personal death squad, his trying to take over all the mid east muslim countries... is all that ok with you? and the OTHER 60 nations that helped should be brought up on charges too? wake up, try reading something before you make comments like this... |
|
|
|
I still dont understand how invading a sovereign country that had absolutely nothing to do with the attack on USA soil is still being referred to as a "war"..?? it was an invasion and everyone (politician to soldier) who participated in that aggression should be held accountable for those crimes against humanity. yea, so? your always griping about it.... what are you going to do about it? i guess you wanted sadam to have control of all the mideast oil.... i guess it was ok that he gas bombed his own people... all the torture and imprisonment of his countrymen... his personal death squad, his trying to take over all the mid east muslim countries... is all that ok with you? and the OTHER 60 nations that helped should be brought up on charges too? wake up, try reading something before you make comments like this... i understand what your saying, but 60 other countries were wrong too? the nerve gas they used to kill their own countrymen was not a WMD? 60 countries can not be wrong, they all have intelligence agencies of their own, and would not just invade for the fun of it like you guys seem to think... WMD's or not, Sadam needed to be outstead. Our country has invaded other countries for less than those reasons before. sorry we don't agree, but all in all, i think we did the right thing. |
|
|
|
I still dont understand how invading a sovereign country that had absolutely nothing to do with the attack on USA soil is still being referred to as a "war"..?? it was an invasion and everyone (politician to soldier) who participated in that aggression should be held accountable for those crimes against humanity. yea, so? your always griping about it.... what are you going to do about it? i guess you wanted sadam to have control of all the mideast oil.... i guess it was ok that he gas bombed his own people... all the torture and imprisonment of his countrymen... his personal death squad, his trying to take over all the mid east muslim countries... is all that ok with you? and the OTHER 60 nations that helped should be brought up on charges too? wake up, try reading something before you make comments like this... Ahhhh but think about this if they had nothing to hide they would have let NATO in to check for WMD'S to begin with....just bcs they weren't there in the doesn't mean they never were......but yeah the reports and such along with everything else....government acted hastily..... |
|
|
|
I still dont understand how invading a sovereign country that had absolutely nothing to do with the attack on USA soil is still being referred to as a "war"..?? it was an invasion and everyone (politician to soldier) who participated in that aggression should be held accountable for those crimes against humanity. yea, so? your always griping about it.... what are you going to do about it? i guess you wanted sadam to have control of all the mideast oil.... i guess it was ok that he gas bombed his own people... all the torture and imprisonment of his countrymen... his personal death squad, his trying to take over all the mid east muslim countries... is all that ok with you? and the OTHER 60 nations that helped should be brought up on charges too? wake up, try reading something before you make comments like this... Ahhhh but think about this if they had nothing to hide they would have let NATO in to check for WMD'S to begin with....just bcs they weren't there in the doesn't mean they never were......but yeah the reports and such along with everything else....government acted hastily..... |
|
|
|
So sadam didn't kill the kurds with nerve gas?
|
|
|
|
So sadam didn't kill the kurds with nerve gas? |
|
|
|
Trials
On December 23, 2005, a Dutch court sentenced Frans van Anraat, a businessman who bought chemicals on the world market and sold them to Saddam's regime, to 15 years in prison. The Dutch court ruled that Saddam committed genocide against the people of Halabja;[16] this was the first time a court described the Halabja attack as an act of genocide. On 12 March 2008, the government of Iraq announced plans to take further legal action against the suppliers of chemicals used in the poison gas attack.[17] Neither Saddam Hussein nor his cousin Ali Hassan al-Majid (who commanded Iraqi forces in northern Iraq in that period, which earned him a nickname of "Chemical Ali") were charged by the Iraqi Special Tribunal for crimes against humanity relating to the events at Halabja. However, the Iraqi prosecutors had "500 documented baskets of crimes during the Hussein regime" and Hussein was condemned to death based on just one case (the 1982 Dujail Massacre).[18] Among several documents revealed during the trial of Saddam Hussein, one was a 1987 memorandum from Iraq's military intelligence seeking permission from the president's office to use mustard gas and the nerve agent sarin against Kurds. A second document said in reply that Saddam had ordered military intelligence to study the possibility of a "sudden strike" using such weapons against Iranian and Kurdish forces. An internal memo written by military intelligence confirmed it had received approval from the president's office for a strike using "special ammunition" and emphasized that no strike would be launched without first informing the president.[19] On 18 December 2006, Saddam Hussein told the court: In relation to Iran, if any military or civil official claims that Saddam gave orders to use either conventional or special ammunition, which as explained is chemical, I will take responsibility with honor. But I will discuss any act committed against our people and any Iraqi citizen, whether Arab or Kurdish. I don't accept any insult to my principles or to me personally.[20] Ali Hassan al-Majid ("Chemical Ali") was condemned to death by hanging by an Iraqi court in January 2010, after being found guilty of orchestrating the Halabja massacre. Majid was first sentenced to hang in 2007 for his role in a 1988 military campaign against ethnic Kurds, codenamed Operation Anfal; in 2008 he also twice received a death sentence for his crimes against the Iraqi Shia Muslims, in particular for his role in crushing the 1991 uprisings in southern Iraq and his involvement in the 1999 killings in the Sadr City (then Saddam City) district of Baghdad. He was executed on January 25, 2010.[21] |
|
|
|
we knew about the genocide in kosovo but didn't invade yugoslavia
|
|
|
|
we knew about the genocide in kosovo but didn't invade yugoslavia i think we did... what was clinton doing there? http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1316/is_5_35/ai_101861609/ |
|
|
|
it's all about the black gold,f**ckin war pigs
|
|
|
|
I still dont understand how invading a sovereign country that had absolutely nothing to do with the attack on USA soil is still being referred to as a "war"..?? it was an invasion and everyone (politician to soldier) who participated in that aggression should be held accountable for those crimes against humanity. yea, so? your always griping about it.... what are you going to do about it? i guess you wanted sadam to have control of all the mideast oil.... i guess it was ok that he gas bombed his own people... all the torture and imprisonment of his countrymen... his personal death squad, his trying to take over all the mid east muslim countries... is all that ok with you? and the OTHER 60 nations that helped should be brought up on charges too? wake up, try reading something before you make comments like this... Ahhhh but think about this if they had nothing to hide they would have let NATO in to check for WMD'S to begin with....just bcs they weren't there in the doesn't mean they never were......but yeah the reports and such along with everything else....government acted hastily..... And they couldn't have moved them b4 the inspection....they have plenty of help hiding things btwn countries u know.....just sayin'...... |
|
|
|
we knew about the genocide in kosovo but didn't invade yugoslavia i think we did... what was clinton doing there? http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1316/is_5_35/ai_101861609/ |
|
|
|
I still dont understand how invading a sovereign country that had absolutely nothing to do with the attack on USA soil is still being referred to as a "war"..?? it was an invasion and everyone (politician to soldier) who participated in that aggression should be held accountable for those crimes against humanity. yea, so? your always griping about it.... what are you going to do about it? i guess you wanted sadam to have control of all the mideast oil.... i guess it was ok that he gas bombed his own people... all the torture and imprisonment of his countrymen... his personal death squad, his trying to take over all the mid east muslim countries... is all that ok with you? and the OTHER 60 nations that helped should be brought up on charges too? wake up, try reading something before you make comments like this... Ahhhh but think about this if they had nothing to hide they would have let NATO in to check for WMD'S to begin with....just bcs they weren't there in the doesn't mean they never were......but yeah the reports and such along with everything else....government acted hastily..... And they couldn't have moved them b4 the inspection....they have plenty of help hiding things btwn countries u know.....just sayin'...... |
|
|
|
I still dont understand how invading a sovereign country that had absolutely nothing to do with the attack on USA soil is still being referred to as a "war"..?? it was an invasion and everyone (politician to soldier) who participated in that aggression should be held accountable for those crimes against humanity. yea, so? your always griping about it.... what are you going to do about it? i guess you wanted sadam to have control of all the mideast oil.... i guess it was ok that he gas bombed his own people... all the torture and imprisonment of his countrymen... his personal death squad, his trying to take over all the mid east muslim countries... is all that ok with you? and the OTHER 60 nations that helped should be brought up on charges too? wake up, try reading something before you make comments like this... Ahhhh but think about this if they had nothing to hide they would have let NATO in to check for WMD'S to begin with....just bcs they weren't there in the doesn't mean they never were......but yeah the reports and such along with everything else....government acted hastily..... And they couldn't have moved them b4 the inspection....they have plenty of help hiding things btwn countries u know.....just sayin'...... |
|
|
|
I still dont understand how invading a sovereign country that had absolutely nothing to do with the attack on USA soil is still being referred to as a "war"..?? it was an invasion and everyone (politician to soldier) who participated in that aggression should be held accountable for those crimes against humanity. yea, so? your always griping about it.... what are you going to do about it? i guess you wanted sadam to have control of all the mideast oil.... i guess it was ok that he gas bombed his own people... all the torture and imprisonment of his countrymen... his personal death squad, his trying to take over all the mid east muslim countries... is all that ok with you? and the OTHER 60 nations that helped should be brought up on charges too? wake up, try reading something before you make comments like this... Ahhhh but think about this if they had nothing to hide they would have let NATO in to check for WMD'S to begin with....just bcs they weren't there in the doesn't mean they never were......but yeah the reports and such along with everything else....government acted hastily..... And they couldn't have moved them b4 the inspection....they have plenty of help hiding things btwn countries u know.....just sayin'...... |
|
|